Literature DB >> 28818744

Cytotoxic, genotoxic and antimicrobial activity of caffeic and rosmarinic acids and their lithium, sodium and potassium salts as potential anticancer compounds.

Marzena Matejczyk1, Renata Świsłocka2, Aleksandra Golonko2, Włodzimierz Lewandowski3, Eliza Hawrylik4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine the cytotoxic, genotoxic, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of caffeic and rosmarinic acids and their salts with Li, Na and K with use of Escherichia coli K-12 recA:gfp strain as a model organism.
METHODS: Cytotoxic potency of tested chemicals were calculated on the basis on the dose that confers inhibition percentage such as 20% for each concentrations of analysed chemicals. Genotoxic properties were calculated on the basis of the fold increase (FI) of SFI values normalized with control. Antioxidant potencies were established on the base of DPPH assay. Antimicrobial activity of chemicals were established on the value of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC).
RESULTS: Obtained results indicated that lower concentrations of tested compounds exhibited stronger GFP fluorescence response after rosmarinic acids and their salts treatment. Genotoxic effects seemed to be independent of the salt ions. The caffeic acid salts with Li, Na and K showed reduced genotoxic effect in comparison to the caffeic acid while increased cytotoxic effect than that of caffeic acid. Moreover, caffeinate salts exhibited better antimicrobial activity against E. coli (MIC=250μg/mL) than K caffeinate salt (MIC>500μg/mL). The MIC values of Li, Na and K rosmarinate salts were above 500μg/mL against all tested microorganisms.
CONCLUSION: The results of the experiment show that there is no clear positive correlation between the antioxidant potency of caffeic and rosmarinic acids and their Li, Na and K salts and their cytotoxic effect. Used salts ions Li, Na and K do not significantly affect the antioxidant effect of natural phenolic compounds and they do not have a significant impact on the biological parameters such as cyto- and genotoxicity. Perhaps it is connected with the reaction environment including polarity of the solvent (water).
Copyright © 2017 Medical University of Bialystok. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticancer; Caffeic acid; Rosmarinic acid; gfp biosensor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28818744     DOI: 10.1016/j.advms.2017.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Med Sci        ISSN: 1896-1126            Impact factor:   3.287


  16 in total

1.  Egyptian chia seeds (Salvia hispanica L.) during germination: Upgrading of phenolic profile, antioxidant, antibacterial properties and relevant enzymes activities.

Authors:  Azza M Abdel-Aty; Alshaimaa M Elsayed; Hala A Salah; Roqaya I Bassuiny; Saleh A Mohamed
Journal:  Food Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.391

2.  In vivo Antibacterial Activity of Star Anise (Illicium verum Hook.) Extract Using Murine MRSA Skin Infection Model in Relation to Its Metabolite Profile.

Authors:  Mohamed A Salem; Riham A El-Shiekh; Rasha A Hashem; Mariam Hassan
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.003

3.  Phytochemical Characterization and Bioactive Properties of Cinnamon Basil (Ocimum basilicum cv. 'Cinnamon') and Lemon Basil (Ocimum × citriodorum).

Authors:  Chaimae Majdi; Carla Pereira; Maria Inês Dias; Ricardo C Calhelha; Maria José Alves; Boutayna Rhourri-Frih; Zoubida Charrouf; Lillian Barros; Joana S Amaral; Isabel C F R Ferreira
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-29

Review 4.  Voltamperometric Sensors and Biosensors Based on Carbon Nanomaterials Used for Detecting Caffeic Acid-A Review.

Authors:  Alexandra Virginia Bounegru; Constantin Apetrei
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Chemical characterization, cytotoxic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and enzyme inhibitory effects of different extracts from one sage (Salvia ceratophylla L.) from Turkey: open a new window on industrial purposes.

Authors:  Sengul Uysal; Gokhan Zengin; Kouadio Ibrahime Sinan; Gunes Ak; Ramazan Ceylan; Mohamad Fawzi Mahomoodally; Ahmet Uysal; Nabeelah Bibi Sadeer; József Jekő; Zoltán Cziáky; Maria João Rodrigues; Evren Yıldıztugay; Fevzi Elbasan; Luisa Custodio
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.361

6.  Evaluation of the Rosemary Extract Effect on the Properties of Polylactic Acid-Based Materials.

Authors:  Raluca Nicoleta Darie-Niţă; Cornelia Vasile; Elena Stoleru; Daniela Pamfil; Traian Zaharescu; Liliana Tarţău; Niţă Tudorachi; Mihai Adrian Brebu; Gina Mihaela Pricope; Raluca Petronela Dumitriu; Karol Leluk
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-25       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Antibacterial Activity of Some Flavonoids and Organic Acids Widely Distributed in Plants.

Authors:  Artur Adamczak; Marcin Ożarowski; Tomasz M Karpiński
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Monitoring of the Surface Charge Density Changes of Human Glioblastoma Cell Membranes upon Cinnamic and Ferulic Acids Treatment.

Authors:  Monika Naumowicz; Magdalena Kusaczuk; Marcin Zając; Miroslav Gál; Joanna Kotyńska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Phenolic-Rich Plant Extracts With Antimicrobial Activity: An Alternative to Food Preservatives and Biocides?

Authors:  Nadia Oulahal; Pascal Degraeve
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Caffeic Acid/Eu(III) Complexes: Solution Equilibrium Studies, Structure Characterization and Biological Activity.

Authors:  Żaneta Arciszewska; Sofia Gama; Monika Kalinowska; Grzegorz Świderski; Renata Świsłocka; Ewelina Gołębiewska; Monika Naumowicz; Mateusz Worobiczuk; Adam Cudowski; Anna Pietryczuk; Concetta De Stefano; Demetrio Milea; Włodzimierz Lewandowski; Beata Godlewska-Żyłkiewicz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.