| Literature DB >> 35890486 |
Fatima Ezzahra El Oumari1, Naima Mammate1, Hamada Imtara2, Anissa Lahrichi3, Radouane Elhabbani1, Ghita El Mouhri3, Ali S Alqahtani4, Omar M Noman4, Mansour N Ibrahim5, Andriy Grafov6, Dalila Bousta7, Tarik Sqalli Houssaini1,8.
Abstract
A wide range of biological properties and a potent therapeutic and prophylactic effect on chronic diseases are all present in Argania spinosa L. press cake. The aim of this research is to valorize the anticrystallization properties against calcium oxalate crystals of Argania spinosa L. press cake fractions and identify its bioactive components. Chemical species identification was performed using GC-MS analysis. The turbidimetric model was used to investigate crystallization inhibition in vitro. Infrared spectroscopy technique was used to characterize the synthesized crystals. Furthermore, both DPPH and FRAP methods were used to assess antioxidant activity. The results show that the fractions are equally important in crystallization inhibition percentages of calcium oxalate crystals. For saponin and polyphenol fractions, the inhibition percentages are in the orders of 83.49% and 82.83%, respectively. The results of the antioxidant activity by DPPH method show that the two fractions are equally important in the elimination of free radicals; the inhibition percentages were 77.87 ± 4.21 and 89.92 ± 1.39 for both polyphenols and saponins, respectively. FRAP method showed that the absorbance increases proportionally with concentration, and the absorbance are almost similar for both fractions and reach maximum values in the orders of 0.52 ± 0.07 and 0.42 ± 0.03, respectively, for saponins and polyphenols. These findings demonstrate that both fractions are rich in bioactive chemicals and have an anticrystallization capacity, allowing them to be employed for the curative and prophylactic effects against urolithiasis.Entities:
Keywords: Argania spinosa L. press cake; GC–MS analysis; anticrystallization; calcium oxalate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890486 PMCID: PMC9317695 DOI: 10.3390/plants11141852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Figure 1Chromatographic profile of polyphenol and saponin fractions extracted from Argania spinosa L. press cake.
Chemical compounds identified in polyphenol fraction.
| No. | Retention Time (Min) | Compounds | Chemical Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.43 | Isocyanic acid/carbimide hydrogen isocyanate | HNCO |
| 2 | 2.75 | Propanoic acid,2-methyl-[cas] (isobutyric acid) | C4H8O2 |
| 3 | 3.03 | p-Hydroxybenzoic acid | C7H6O3 |
| 4 | 3.23 | Catechol | C6H6O2 |
| 5 | 3.87 | Ephedrine | C10H15NO |
Chemical compounds identified in saponin fraction.
| No. | Retention Time (Min) | Compounds | Chemical Formula |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.96 | Silanamine, N,1,1,1-tetramethyl-N-(trimethylsilyl) | SiH5N |
| 2 | 7.85 | 3-Methyl-6-phenyl-imidazole [2,1-b] oxazole | C13H10N2O2S |
| 3 | 9.1 | 3,7-Dioxa-2,8disilanonane,2,2,8,8-tetramethyl-5-(trimethylsilyl)oxypropoxy)silane) | C9H24O2Si2 |
| 4 | 9.38 | N-methyl-n-phenyl-n’-(3-methoxyphenyl)-urea | C15H16N2O |
| 5 | 9.7 | Morphinan-6-one, 3-methoxy-17-methyl | C18H21NO3 |
| 6 | 10.43 | Imidazole,1,4-dimethyl-2-phenyl | C23H20N2 |
| 7 | 14.15 | Quinidine | C20H24N2O2 |
| 8 | 15.09 | Oleic acid TMS | C18H34O2 |
| 9 | 15.21 | Tetramethoxyflavone | C19H18O6 |
| 10 | 17.1 | Beta-D-galactofuranose,1,2,3,5,6-pentakis-o-[trimethylsilyl] | C21H52O6Si5 |
| 11 | 17.61 | D-xylofuranose,1,2,3,5 tetrakis-o-[trimethylsilyl] | C17H42O5Si4 |
| 12 | 18.13 | Glucofuranoside, methyl-tetrakis-o-trimethylsilyl | C19H46O6Si4 |
| 13 | 17.78 | D-ribopyranose,1,2,3,5 tetrakis-o-[trimethylsilyl] | C17H42O5Si4 |
Figure 2Percent inhibition of free DPPH by saponin and polyphenol fractions. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.005 vs. ascorbic acid.
Figure 3Ferric reducing power of saponin and polyphenol fractions; **** p < 0.005 vs. ascorbic acid.
Percent inhibition of nucleation in the presence of polyphenol and saponin fractions and potassium citrate.
| Concentration g/L | % Inhibition | R | CV | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P.F | S.F | Cit.P | P.F | S.F | Cit.P | P.F | S.F | Cit.P | |
| 0.25 | 79.76 ± 5.4 | 78.87 ± 4.03 | 75.47 ± 6.76 | 0.96 | 0.97 | 0.99 | 6.77 | 4.46 | 8.96 |
| 0.5 | 82.83 ± 4.32 | 83.49 ± 3.73 | 97.28 ± 0.29 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 5.21 | 5.11 | 0.3 |
Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). p < 0.05; P.F: polyphenol fraction; S.F: saponin fraction; Cit.P: potassium Citrate; R: correlation coefficient; CV: variation coefficient.
Figure 4Temporal variation of the optical density in the presence of polyphenol fraction.
Figure 5Temporal variation of the optical density in the presence of saponin fraction.
Figure 6Temporal variation of the optical density in the presence of potassium citrate. WI: without inhibitor.
Figure 7Infra−red spectrum of Ca−Ox synthesized crystals.