| Literature DB >> 35890444 |
Shuangnan Hao1, Panfeng Liu1, Jie Qin1, Lifang Song1, Wude Yang1, Meichen Feng1, Meijun Zhang1, Chao Wang1, Xiaoyan Song1.
Abstract
(1) Background: With the increase in people's consumption of processed oat products, the production of selenium (Se)-enriched oat has become a possibility to supplement the human body with Se. Therefore, the effects of various factors on the Se-enriched ability and yield of different oat varieties were comprehensively studied. (2)Entities:
Keywords: oat; selenium content; sodium selenite; yield
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890444 PMCID: PMC9324387 DOI: 10.3390/plants11141810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plants (Basel) ISSN: 2223-7747
Effects of various factors on the yield of oat in the JZ ecological region.
| Test Number | Se Dose (g hm−2) A | Variety B | Stage of Se | Method of Se | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 (Pinyan 5) | 1 (Stem-elongation stage) | 1 (Soil application) | 1003.59 |
| 2 | 0 | 2 (Bayou 18) | 2 (Heading stage) | 2 (Foliar spraying) | 1650.00 |
| 3 | 5.48 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1181.60 |
| 4 | 5.48 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1739.06 |
| 5 | 10.96 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1321.00 |
| 6 | 10.96 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1837.35 |
| 7 | 21.92 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1201.70 |
| 8 | 21.92 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1747.50 |
| 9 | 43.84 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1511.10 |
| 10 | 43.84 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2272.39 |
| 11 | 65.76 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1576.87 |
| 12 | 65.76 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2330.55 |
| 13 | 98.64 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1499.50 |
| 14 | 98.64 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1775.70 |
| 15 | 147.96 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1241.10 |
| 16 | 147.96 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1697.00 |
| K1 | 2653.59 | 10,536.45 | 12,783.52 | 12,330.70 | |
| K2 | 2920.66 | 15,049.55 | 12,802.48 | 13,255.30 | |
| K3 | 3158.35 | ||||
| K4 | 2949.20 | ||||
| K5 | 3783.49 | ||||
| K6 | 3907.42 | ||||
| K7 | 3275.20 | ||||
| K8 | 2938.10 | ||||
| k1 | 1326.79 | 1317.06 | 1597.94 | 1541.34 | |
| k2 | 1460.33 | 1881.19 | 1600.31 | 1656.91 | |
| k3 | 1579.18 | ||||
| k4 | 1474.60 | ||||
| k5 | 1891.74 | ||||
| k6 | 1953.71 | ||||
| k7 | 1637.60 | ||||
| k8 | 1469.05 | ||||
| Range(R) | 484.66 | 564.14 | 2.37 | 115.57 | |
| Adjust(R’) | 285.41 | 693.73 | 2.91 | 142.12 | |
| Factor priority order | B > A > D > C | ||||
| Optimal | A6 | B2 | C2 | D2 | |
| ANVOA | |||||
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.971 | 0.083 | ||
Note: K, the sum of the experimental indicators corresponding to the factors and levels. k, average of K. For example, KA1 = test number 1 and 2 (yield values corresponding), k, average of K. Range (R), represents the difference between the maximum value and the minimum value. Adjust (R’), Converted according to the number of factor levels. p value, represents a significant difference at the 0.05 level. The same as below.
Significance test of regression model of oat yield.
| Region | F Value | |
|---|---|---|
| JZ | 7.406 | 0.007 |
| JXB | 9.230 | 0.003 |
Effects of various factors on the yield of oat in the JXB ecological region.
| Test Number | Se Dose (g hm−2) A | Variety B | Stage of Se | Method of Se | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 (Bayou 1) | 1 (Heading stage) | 1 (Soil application) | 2740.05 |
| 2 | 0 | 2 (Jinyan 18) | 2 (Flowering stage) | 2 (Foliar spraying) | 3412.80 |
| 3 | 5.48 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3200.40 |
| 4 | 5.48 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3509.90 |
| 5 | 10.96 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3347.27 |
| 6 | 10.96 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3663.73 |
| 7 | 21.92 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3475.70 |
| 8 | 21.92 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3870.20 |
| 9 | 43.84 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3922.35 |
| 10 | 43.84 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 4151.90 |
| 11 | 65.76 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3175.60 |
| 12 | 65.76 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3734.00 |
| 13 | 98.64 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3004.63 |
| 14 | 98.64 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3382.83 |
| 15 | 147.96 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2875.20 |
| 16 | 147.96 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3325.50 |
| K1 | 6152.85 | 25,741.20 | 27,522.60 | 27,280.67 | |
| K2 | 6710.30 | 29,050.87 | 27,269.47 | 27,511.40 | |
| K3 | 7011.00 | ||||
| K4 | 7345.90 | ||||
| K5 | 8074.25 | ||||
| K6 | 6909.60 | ||||
| K7 | 6387.47 | ||||
| K8 | 6200.70 | ||||
| k1 | 3076.43 | 3217.65 | 3440.33 | 3410.08 | |
| k2 | 3355.15 | 3631.36 | 3408.68 | 3438.93 | |
| k3 | 3505.50 | ||||
| k4 | 3672.95 | ||||
| k5 | 4037.13 | ||||
| k6 | 3454.80 | ||||
| k7 | 3193.73 | ||||
| k8 | 3100.35 | ||||
| Range(R) | 960.70 | 413.71 | 31.64 | 28.84 | |
| Adjust(R’) | 565.74 | 508.75 | 38.91 | 35.47 | |
| Factor priority order | A > B > C > D | ||||
| Optimal | A5 | B2 | C1 | D2 | |
| ANVOA | |||||
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.925 | 0.777 | ||
Effects of various factors on Se content in oat grain in the JZ ecological region.
| Test Number | Se Dose | Variety B | Stage of Se | Method of Se | Se Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 (Pinyan 5) | 1 (stem-elongation stage) | 1 (Soil application) | 0.13 |
| 2 | 0 | 2 (Bayou 18) | 2 (Heading stage) | 2 (Foliar spraying) | 0.17 |
| 3 | 5.48 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.15 |
| 4 | 5.48 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.20 |
| 5 | 10.96 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.20 |
| 6 | 10.96 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.24 |
| 7 | 21.92 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.25 |
| 8 | 21.92 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.27 |
| 9 | 43.84 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.34 |
| 10 | 43.84 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.36 |
| 11 | 65.76 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.44 |
| 12 | 65.76 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.47 |
| 13 | 98.64 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.46 |
| 14 | 98.64 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.55 |
| 15 | 147.96 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.61 |
| 16 | 147.96 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.56 |
| K1 | 0.30 | 2.58 | 2.67 | 2.68 | |
| K2 | 0.35 | 2.82 | 2.72 | 2.72 | |
| K3 | 0.44 | ||||
| K4 | 0.52 | ||||
| K5 | 0.70 | ||||
| K6 | 0.90 | ||||
| K7 | 1.01 | ||||
| K8 | 1.17 | ||||
| k1 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.33 | 0.33 | |
| k2 | 0.17 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.34 | |
| k3 | 0.22 | ||||
| k4 | 0.26 | ||||
| k5 | 0.35 | ||||
| k6 | 0.45 | ||||
| k7 | 0.50 | ||||
| k8 | 0.58 | ||||
| Range(R) | 0.43 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | |
| Adjust(R’) | 0.25 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Factor priority | A > B > D > C | ||||
| Optimal | A8 | B2 | C2 | D2 | |
| ANVOA | |||||
| 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.517 | 0.627 | ||
Significance test of regression model of Se content in oat grain.
| Region | F Value | |
|---|---|---|
| JZ | 90.073 | 0.000 |
| JXB | 161.466 | 0.000 |
Effects of various factors on Se content in oat grain in the JXB ecological region.
| Test Number | Se Dose | Variety B | Stage of Se | Method of Se | Se Content |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 1 (Bayou 1) | 1 (stem-elongation stage) | 1 (Soil application) | 0.10 |
| 2 | 0 | 2 (Jinyan 18) | 2 (Heading stage) | 2 (Foliar spraying) | 0.05 |
| 3 | 5.48 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.16 |
| 4 | 5.48 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0.07 |
| 5 | 10.96 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.23 |
| 6 | 10.96 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.12 |
| 7 | 21.92 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0.26 |
| 8 | 21.92 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0.16 |
| 9 | 43.84 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.29 |
| 10 | 43.84 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.21 |
| 11 | 65.76 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0.34 |
| 12 | 65.76 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0.29 |
| 13 | 98.64 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.42 |
| 14 | 98.64 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.38 |
| 15 | 147.96 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0.57 |
| 16 | 147.96 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0.46 |
| K1 | 0.15 | 2.37 | 2.09 | 2.01 | |
| K2 | 0.23 | 1.74 | 2.02 | 2.10 | |
| K3 | 0.35 | ||||
| K4 | 0.42 | ||||
| K5 | 0.50 | ||||
| K6 | 0.63 | ||||
| K7 | 0.80 | ||||
| K8 | 1.03 | ||||
| k1 | 0.08 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 0.25 | |
| k2 | 0.12 | 0.22 | 0.25 | 0.26 | |
| k3 | 0.18 | ||||
| k4 | 0.21 | ||||
| k5 | 0.25 | ||||
| k6 | 0.32 | ||||
| k7 | 0.40 | ||||
| k8 | 0.52 | ||||
| Range (R) | 0.44 | 0.08 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Adjust (R’) | 0.26 | 0.10 | 0.01 | 0.01 | |
| Factor priority order | A > B > C > D | ||||
| Optimal | A8 | B1 | C1 | D2 | |
| ANVOA | |||||
| 0.000V | 0.000 | 0.897 | 0.738 | ||
L16 (8 × 23) orthogonal test scheme.
| Test Number | Se Dose (g·hm−2) A | Variety B | Stage of Se | Method of Se |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1(0) | 1 (J Z-Pinyan 5) | 1 (J Z-stem-elongation stage) | 1 (Soil application) |
| 1 (JXB-Bayou 1) | 1 (JXB-Heading stage) | |||
| 2 | 1 | 2 (J Z-Bayou 18) | 2 (J Z-Heading stage) | 2 (Foliar spraying) |
| 2 (JXB-Jinyan 18) | 2 (JXB-Flowering stage) | |||
| 3 | 2(5.48) | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| 5 | 3(10.96) | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 6 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | 4(21.92) | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 9 | 5(43.84) | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 10 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 11 | 6(65.76) | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 12 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 13 | 7(98.64) | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 14 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| 15 | 8(147.96) | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 16 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
Note: L, represents an orthogonal table. In the table, 16, the number “16” in the lower right corner of L indicates that there are 16 rows, and this orthogonal table is used to arrange the experiment to contain 16 treatments. The number 8 means that there is a column with a level number of 8, which means that there are 8 different Se doses of sodium selenite. The 23 means that there are 3 columns with a level number of 2, that is, there are two varieties, two periods of applying sodium selenite and two ways of applying sodium selenite.