| Literature DB >> 35890343 |
Sonia Gera1, Sunitha Sampathi1,2, Sravya Maddukuri2, Sujatha Dodoala3, Vijayabhaskarreddy Junnuthula4, Sathish Dyawanapelly5.
Abstract
Naringenin (NRG) is a flavonoid and has been reported as an anti-osteoporotic agent. However, poor bioavailability may limit the anti-osteoporotic potential of the drug. The purpose of the study was to compare the anti-osteoporotic activity of naringenin nanosuspension (NRG-NS) with the NRG and standard therapeutic drug, raloxifene hydrochloride (RLX). Here, NRG-NS showed anti-osteoporotic activity in MG-63 cells by upregulating the osteocalcin levels. The in vivo anti-osteoporotic activity of NRG-NS was further investigated in an osteoporotic rat model to mimic the post-menopausal condition. The animals were randomized and separated into six groups. The animals were treated with RLX (p.o., 5.4 mg/kg), NRG (p.o., 20 mg/kg), NRG-NS (p.o., 20 mg/kg), and blank-NS for 60 days after completion of a 30-day post-surgery period and compared with control and ovariectomized (OVX) groups. After the treatment, body and uterine weights, biochemical estimation in serum (calcium, phosphorus, acid phosphatase, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin), bone parameters (length, diameter, dry weight, density, ash weight, bone mineral content) and bone microarchitecture by histopathology were determined. The results showed the protective effects of NRG-NS on osteoblast-like MG-63 cells. The biochemical estimations confirmed the normalization of parameters viz., alkaline phosphatase, calcium concentrations, and bone density with a decrease in levels of acid phosphatase and inorganic phosphorus with NRG-NS as compared to plain NRG. The results indicated that the oral administration of NRG-NS could be a potential therapeutic formulation for the treatment of osteoporosis.Entities:
Keywords: bone; nanomedicine; nanosuspension; naringenin; osteocalcin; osteoporosis; ovariectomized
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890343 PMCID: PMC9323949 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071449
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.525
Figure 1Cell viability assay on MG-63 cell lines. Cytoprotective result on cells (0.15–10 µg/mL) for 48 h. MTT incubation after treating with NRG-plain, NRG-NS and blank-NS. Mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). *** p < 0.001 is considerably diverse from the NRG plain.
Figure 2The concentration of osteocalcin secretion in MG-63 cells after treatment with NRG-plain, NRG-NS and blank-NS (0.5 µg/mL) for 48 h. The values presented are means ± S.E.M (n = 3). **** p < 0.0001 is significant. Note: NC: negative control.
Effect of treatment on body weight and uterine weight.
| S. No. | Parameters | Initial Weight (g) | Final Weight (g) | Weight Variation (g) | Uterine Weight (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sham | 189.12 ± 8.22 | 205.32 ± 12.54 | 16.2 ± 4.32 | 0.56 ± 0.15 |
| 2 | OVX (Control) | 190.45 ± 9.65 | 284.19 ± 23.32 *** | 93.74 ± 3.67 | 0.09 ± 0.02 *** |
| 3 | RLX | 205.12 ± 5.43 | 257.86 ± 18.98 | 52.74 ± 3.55 | 0.16 ± 0.02 ### |
| 4 | NRG | 216.23 ± 2.13 | 240.74 ± 28.90 | 24.51 ± 6.77 | 0.13 ± 0.07 # |
| 5 | NRG-NS | 209.15 ± 1.98 | 225.52 ± 17.87 | 16.37 ± 5.89 | 0.15 ± 0.06 ## |
| 6 | Blank-NS | 192.64 ± 5.87 | 228.81 ± 18.76 | 36.17 ± 2.89 | 0.10 ± 0.03 |
The values presented are mean ± S.E.M (n = 8); *** p < 0.001 vs. sham, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. OVX, SHAM: sham, OVX: ovariectomized (control), RLX: raloxifene, NRG: naringenin, NRG-NS: naringenin nanosuspension.
Effects of different treatments on biochemical estimations (serum and urine).
| S. No. | Treatment | Calcium Estimation in Urine | Serum | Serum | Total Protein | Phosphorus Estimation in Urine | Serum OCN (ng/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sham | 5.02 ± 2.78 | 10.05 ± 1.06 | 25.53 ± 0.52 | 10.05 ± 1.40 | 4.75 ± 1.98 * | 2.20 ± 1.7 |
| 2 | OVX untreated | 4.45 ± 0.38 | 5.90 ± 0.47 ### | 22.31 ± 0.09 | 9.98 ± 0.87 | 2.29 ± 0.95 | 2.53 ± 1.90 ** |
| 3 | RLX | 4.55 ± 0.82 | 9.10 ± 0.25 ** | 27.95 ± 1.42 | 10.13 ± 1.12 | 6.38 ± 2.77 * | 2.19 ± 1.25 * |
| 4 | NRG | 4.91 ± 0.72 | 7.63 ± 1.19 * | 25.89 ± 0.23 | 9.57 ± 1.20 | 3.96 ± 0.81 | 2.47± 1.98 ** |
| 5 | NRG-NS | 3.81 ± 0.99 | 9.83 ± 0.87 ** | 26.31 ± 0.48 | 9.56 ± 2.76 | 4.18 ± 0.70 | 3.89 ± 1.5 ## |
| 6 | Blank-NS | 4.23 ± 0.34 | 6.34 ± 0.04 | 21.76 ± 0.34 | 9.06 ± 1.43 | 2.65 ± 0.23 | 2.32 ± 1.54 |
The values presented are mean ± S.E.M (n = 8); Note: RLX: raloxifene, NRG: naringenin, NRG-NS: naringenin formulation, OVX: ovariectomized * p < 0.05 vs. OVX untreated group, * p < 0.05 vs. sham; ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, RLX, NRG, NRG-NS and Blank-NS vs. OVX untreated.
Figure 3(A) ALP levels in serum of various animal groups. The values presented are mean ± S.E.M (n = 8). ALP *** p < 0.001 vs. sham, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ### p < 0.001 vs. OVX SHAM. (B) ACP levels in serum of various animal groups. ACP ** p < 0.01 vs. sham, # p < 0.05 ## p < 0.01 vs. OVX control. OVX SHAM—sham control, OVX—ovariectomized control, RLX—plain raloxifene hydrochloride (as standard), NRG or NRG-plain, NRG-NS.
Bone parameters in various groups after formulation treatment.
| S. No. | Group | Weight | Ash Weight | Length | Diameter | Bone Density | Bone Inorganic Content (mg%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | P | |||||||
| 1 | SHAM | 0.88 ± 0.18 | 0.07 ± 0.02 | 28.46 ± 1.28 | 2.48 ± 0.32 | 1.79 ± 0.008 | 10.27 ± 0.40 | 4.19 ± 0.08 |
| 2 | OVX Control | 0.58 ± 0.07 # | 0.03 ± 0.01 # | 27.76 ± 0.30 | 2.09 ± 0.05 | 0.54 ± 0.09 ## | 5.25 ± 0.65 ## | 3.76 ± 0.05 # |
| 3 | RLX | 0.80 ± 0.08 | 0.08 ± 0.02 | 28.01 ± 0.49 | 2.17 ± 0.01 | 1.80 ± 0.07 ** | 11.57 ± 2.19 | 4.64 ± 0.01 |
| 4 | NRG | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 26.66 ± 1.24 | 2.54 ± 0.34 | 0.69 ± 0.07 | 11.48 ± 1.45 | 4.20 ± 0.04 |
| 5 | NRG-NS | 0.85 ± 0.12 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 27.86 ± 1.13 | 2.56 ± 0.76 | 1.40 ± 0.29 * | 11.09 ± 0.05 | 4.06 ± 0.03 |
| 6 | Blank-NS | 0.61 ± 0.11 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 26.43 ± 1.43 | 2.23 ± 1.52 | 0.66 ± 0.12 | 6.32 ± 0.32 | 4.12 ± 0.01 |
The values presented are mean ± S.E.M (n = 8); ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 vs. OVX, # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, vs. sham. SHAM: sham (control), OVX: ovariectomized control, RLX: raloxifene hydrochloride, NRG: naringenin, NRG-NS: naringenin nanosuspension.
Figure 4(A–E) Histopathological images of rat bone at the area of the tibial joint (10× magnification). (A) Sham control displaying regular trabecular construction (Indicated by arrows). (B) OVX control displaying the damage of interconnectivity, diminishing trabecular construction and lytic variations (Indicated by arrows). (C) Raloxifene group shows rebuilding of normal trabecular construction of bones (Indicated by arrows). (D) Naringenin plain also causes restoration of trabecular spaces (Indicated by arrows). (E) NRG-NS shows bone renewal (Indicated by arrows).