| Literature DB >> 35887969 |
Manuela Violeta Bacanoiu1,2, Mircea Danoiu1.
Abstract
In the context of the manifestation of the phenomenon of normal aging and functional decline at older adults with neurodegenerative pathology, the development of physical activities and healthy lifestyle has become a priority that involves many decisions and responsibilities. Therefore, the study of the quality of life of the elderly in terms of delaying early aging and improving the lifestyle of patients with neurodegenerative diseases is a scientific challenge representing research of great interest and relevance. By promoting physical activity based on telerehabilitation programs or performed according to coordinated training either in the community or at home for both study groups, significant improvements have been obtained. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the intervention suitable patterns, surveys delivered through variables online platforms and tools to reflect the stagnation of early aging and the evolution of patients with PD and dementia. Our study involved selected original studies, intensively processed, which demonstrated through intervention specific tools, such as quantitative, qualitative, socio-economics, physical, and cognitive indicators, that significant improvements can be achieved in the process of early aging, but also significant progress in patients with neurodegenerative diseases. By searching the last five years of papers, our review, presents the importance of intervention by telerehabilitation or by scheduled physical exercises quantified by specific indicators.Entities:
Keywords: health and well-being lifestyle older adults; health nutrition; neurodegenerative pathology aging; physical activity; quality of life; tele-rehabilitation; tools
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887969 PMCID: PMC9322909 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11144207
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1PRISMA 2009 flow diagram.
Well-being and Quality of life Tools/Instruments.
| Quantitative General Tools | Qualitative Specific Tools | Socio-Economics Tools | Physical Tools | Falls Tools | Cognitive Tools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EuroQoL-5D-3L | ICEpop/ICECAP-O | CEA | SPPB | BADL | Jong Loneliness |
Quantitative general tools: EuroQol -5D-3L: including five dimensions: self-care, mobility, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression; HRQoL: Health related with quality of life; AQoL-6D/NeuroQoL: Assessment quality of life, with dimensions: independently life, mental health, happiness, relationships, self-efficacy, pain, difficulty management; SWB: Subjective wellbeing, which measures quality of life related to health conditions; QUALY: Quality adjusted life years; Mini-OQLQ: mini osteoporosis quality of life; SF-36: Physical functioning Scale, measures physical health, pain, vitality, social relationships, mental disorders; FCI: Functional comorbidity index; PSS: Perceived Stress Scale; RPE: rating of perceived exertion; PTSD: Scale-post-traumatic stress disorder; FAP: Functional Abulation profile; GLFS: Geriatric locomotive function scale; WHODAS: WHO disability assessment schedule related dietary intake (protein, fiber, fruits, vitamins); SNAQ: Short nutritional assessment questionnaire; DRV: Dietary reference value; MUFA: mono-unsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: poly-unsaturated fatty acids; RIR: Recommended intake range; RI: Reference intake; FI: Fraitly index; mSOF: Frailty score-modified study of osteoporotic fractures; aHEI: Alternative healthy eating index; MED: Mediterranean diet; DASH: Diet approaches to stop Hypertension; FFQ: Food frequency questionnaire (energy intake kcal/day); PROMIS: Patient reported outcomes measurement information system; HAAS: Harvard Alumni Activity Survey. Qualitative specific tools: ICEpop/ICECAP-O: Capability measure for older: evaluating the quality of life from an economic point of view; SUS: System usability Scale life; LQS: Life quality Scale; LSS: Life satisfaction Scale; SRSE- Self regulatory self-efficacy; MRSE: Mobility regulatory self-efficacy; MSEQ: Marcu’s self-efficacy; RAVLT: Rey auditory verbal learning Test; HHIE: Hearing handicap inventory for the elderly; IOI-AI: International outcomes inventory alternative intervention; BRCS: Brief resilience copy Scale; PEG: Pain, Enjoyment and General Activity; PDQ-8: Parkinson’s Disease Quality of Life questionnaire; PHQ-4: Health Questionnaire for Patients. Socio-economics tools: COSI: Client oriented Scale of improvement; CEA: Cost effectiveness analysis; CCA: Cost consequence analysis; CCWBA: Cost capability wellbeing analysis; ICER: Incremental cost effectiveness; VIF: Variance inflation factors; COPM: Canadian occupational performance measure: socio-economical outcome. Physical tools: SPPB: Short Physical performance battery; TUG: Time Up and Go; Chair sit to stand Test; 6 min. Walk Test; One foot balance Test; Grip strength; Back scratch; BBS: Berg Balance Test; 4, 10, 400 m WT: 4, 10, 400 m Walk test; PASE: Physical activity Scale for Elderly; VAS Fatigue: Visual Analog Scale of fatigue; BOOMER: Balance outcome measure for Elder rehabilitation; TLS: time loaded standing; PFS: Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale; DT-FPT: Dual -task functional power training; ABC: Activity balance confidence scale; SOT: Sensory organization test-evaluating postural ability through visual, somatosensory and vestibular system; FRT: Functional reach Test < 18 s evaluating limitation skills ability for upper limbs; TMT: Trail Making Test; MCST: Modified Card Sorting Test; ROM: Range of motion; IPAQ: International Physical Activity Questionnaire; SIBT: Sensory Integration Balance Training; MDC: Minimal detectable Change; DGI: Dynamic Gait Index; BARSE: Barriers Self-Efficacy Scale; SEW-D: Self-Efficacy of Walking Duration; MDRT: Multidirectional Reach Test; MSL: Maxim Step Length; UPDRS: UPDRS: Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; H&Y: Hoehn & Yahr; ALS-FRS-R: Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating, revised; COP: Centre of pressure. Falls tools: BADL: Barthel Index correlated with falls; IADL: Lawton Index correlated with falls; FRAT: Fall risk score; Short FES: Falls Efficacy scale; FES-I: Short form falls efficacy Scale- fear of falling; PROFANE: monitoring falls; FaB: Falls behavioral risk scale; FRM: Fall risk measure; FSST: Four square Test evaluating risk of falls at 15 s; Mini- BEST 28: Mini balance evaluation system test 5 × SST -five times sit to stand test of falls (>15 s); SEE: Self -efficacy for exercise Scale. Cognitive tools: MMSE: Mini mental State Examination; GDS: Geriatric Depressive Scale; DSMV: Diagnostic and statistical of mental disorders; PHQ-9: Scale for evaluation depression; PPA: Physiological profile assessment; MoCA—Montreal Cognitive Assessment; FCSRT: Free and Cued Selective Reminding Test; CES-D: Centre of Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale; CRIq: Cognitive Reserve Index Questionnaire; PDSS-2: Parkinson’s Disease Sleep Scale; D-QoL: Dementia Quality Life Instrument.
Figure 2Multimodal approach of Quality of Life in older adults.
Positive effects of measured outcomes in physical activity with assistive devices in healthy older adults.
| References | Design | Physical Activity | Primary Outcomes | Secondary Outcomes | Assistive Devices | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deida M., et al. (2018) | SITLESS study | 30 min/daily | ERS-exercise referral scheme, | EQ-5D-5L | Actigraphy, | Developing health |
| Duckham R.L., et al. (2018) [ | PACE-IT | 26 weeks exercise | Falls rate | Changes in lower limb motricity, | Hand grip dynamometer, | Improving balance, gait pattern, |
| Gibbs J.C., et al. (2019) | Osteoporosis | Physical exercises training from to moderate and high intensity | SPPB | EQ-5D-3L | Dumbbells | Developing the new strategies for performing physical activities which improve strength, joint mobility and the possibility of delaying the onset of osteoporosis in postmenopausal, |
| Giné-Garriga, M., et al. (2017) [ | SITLESS study | 16 weeks walking | ERS—exercise referral scheme, | SPPB | Hip work | Promoting strategies to combat sedentary behavior for the elderly population by implementing exercise schemes and supporting exciting learning programs capable rehabilitating physical and cognitive functions, |
| Jones C.A., et al. (2019) [ | Hearing loss | 10 weeks—SHE | Functional outcomes: | Psycho-social outcomes: | Hearing aids | WTL (walk, talk, listen) |
| Klein D., et al. (2017) [ | CHANGE | Physical aerobic | Change to fitness | COPM | Treadmill | Improving capacity and mobility of motion, |
| Li F., et al. (2017) [ | TJQMBB | 24 weeks twice | Number of falls | EQ-5D-5L | Weights | Streamlining mobility through TJQMBB |
| Mora Pinzon M., et al. (2019) [ | PISANDO FUERTE | Physical exercises for balance and strength | FaB ( | Fidelity performing in learning program | Assistive devices- | Decreasing tendency to falls 6 months training, |
| Oliveira A., et al. (2019) | HCS-home care services (Portugal) | ADL | BADL | IADL | Questionnaires: | Increasing quality of life |
| Pebole M.M., et al. (2019) | Warrior wellness | 12 weeks | Weight loss rate | PHQ 9 | Bike | Improving physical health, mental health, |
| Shahar S., et al. (2019) [ | SES-socio-economic | ADL | BMI | MMSE | RAVLT | The need to promote program to improving of health and nutrition for |
| Vilpunaho T., et al. (2019) [ | Osteoporosis | 6 months training | Falls rate | EQ-5D-5L | Stack weight device | Reducing falls and fair of falls through Taiji |
| Yamada K., et al. (2018) [ | Locomotive | Exercises walking | Two step score | GLFS | Weights | Early identification of ways to delay the decrease of mobility the lower |
Telerehabilitation through assistive devices for normal aging.
| References | Design | Physical Exercises | Primary Outcomes | Secondary Outcomes | Assistive Devices | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Borges P.R.T., et al. (2021) [ | Public health care | Physical therapy for resistance and | TUG | SF-36 | Smartphone | Effectiveness and |
| 115-participants telerehabilitation group | ||||||
| >60 years | ||||||
| Delbaere K., et al. (2021) [ | Standing Tall | ADL | Rate of falls at 12 months | At 24 months | Tablet with health | Preventing falls in older adults through E-health program |
| Djuric Z., et al. (2017) [ | Physicians’ Health | ADL | Frailty index (FI) | mSOF | Well-coaches | Evaluating diet factors and |
| Pre-frail group | ||||||
| Falvey J.R., et al. (2019) [ | PACE program | ADL | SPPB | Gait speed (m/s) | Stopwatch | Preventing the decrease of physical abilities in elderly adults |
| Hill A.M., et al. (2017) [ | “Back to My Best” | ADL | Rate of falls | Percent of participants with falls | Phone | Decreasing rate of falls |
| Naseri C., et al. (2017) [ | Semi-structured | ADL | Rate of falls | Falls prevention after 6 months | Phone | Changing of physical behavior |
| Rantz M., et al. (2017) [ | Senior housing | ADL | SF-12 | Walking speed in 10 s. | Gait Rite Digital | Delaying the functional |
| Rønnow, Schacht, S., et al. (2019) [ | CALM | Exercises training | DRV | AR | VITAKOST dietary | Improving the balance in the consumption of foods that bring adequate energy intake such as protein intake, vitamin D and thiamine intake and the |
| Stanmore E.K., et al. (2019) [ | Sheltered housing | 12 weeks | BBS | PASE | Kinect sensor | Improving balance, strength, |
| van Schooten K.S., et al. (2021) [ | Standing Tall | 52 weeks | Rate of falls | EQ-5D-5L | Tablets with | Improving quality of life |
| Ward R.E., et al. (2020) [ | Self-care weekly | 8–12 weeks | Neuro QoL | Confidence to | Smart phone | Improving mobility and |
| 39 participants |
Telerehabilitation with assistive devices at neurodegenerative pathology for older adults.
| References | Design | Physical Exercises | Primary Outcomes | Secondary Outcomes | Assistive Devices | Conclusions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fabbri L., et al. (2019) [ | Randomized controlled | 8 weeks | Cognitive domain: | Physical and social | GENEA actigraph | Decreasing |
| Gandolfi M., et al. (2017) [ | Randomized (PD) | 50 min/session | BBS | ABC | Tele Wii Nintendo protocol | Improving balance, |
| Harris D. M., et al. (2018) [ | Randomized controlled | 2 sessions/week | Limits of stability | UPDRS | Jintronix Software with a-t DCS (anodal-transcranial | Stimulating neuroplasticity, |
| Lei H., et al. (2016) [ | Randomized | 30 min/session | Gait speed | Spatio-temporal | LEG Sys | Performing gait |
| Rawson K.S., et al. (2020) [ | Randomized | 30–60 min/ | Mean number | 6MKT | mHealth software | Increasing walking ability. |
| Realdon O., et al. (2016) [ | Randomized | Physical exercises | SUS | MMSE | Tablet ACG | Improving motor |
| Siegert S., et al. (2019) [ | Quasi-randomized prospective | 9 months | PDQ-8 | IMET | Tablet performed training | Improving motor skills, |
| Yuan R.Y., et al. (2020) [ | Cross-over trial (PD) | 12 weeks | BBS | FES-M | XaviX | Reducing incidence |
| Piccinini G., et al. (2018) [ | Idiopathic PD | 32 sessions for | BBS | CR level | CRIq: cognitive | Improving gait, |
| Burke K., et al. (2018) [ | Educational | Stretching | ROM | Five-point | RedCap software app | Improving motion, |