| Literature DB >> 35887542 |
Jui-Chien Wang1, Chung-Yi Li2,3,4, Po-Yen Ko5,6, Tung-Tai Wu6,7, Kuo-Chen Wu8, Fong-Chin Su6,9, I-Ming Jou7,9,10,11, Po-Ting Wu5,6,9,12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To evaluate the correlation between carpal tunnel pressure (CTP) and the clinical presentations, and to explore the possible predictors for the postoperative recovery pattern in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).Entities:
Keywords: carpal tunnel pressure; carpal tunnel syndrome; surgery; treatment outcome; ultrasound
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887542 PMCID: PMC9325166 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12071045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pers Med ISSN: 2075-4426
Figure 1The step-by-step procedure of the carpal tunnel pressure (CTP) measurement and carpal tunnel release (CTR) under ultrasonographical guidance. First, the median nerve, transverse carpal ligament, and hamate hook were quickly examined using ultrasound (US). The hamate hook was aimed at the center of the region of interest (ROI) in the sagittal view (a). The transducer was transversely moved towards the radial side until the full view of the median nerve (b), and then moved back a little toward the ulnar side to make ROI next to the median nerve. The needle of the CTP measurement gauge was percutaneously inserted into the carpal tunnel, and the tip of the needle was placed in the center of ROI in the sagittal view to align the hamate hook in the transverse direction (c). The transducer was turned transversely to make sure again that the tip of the CTP measurement gauge was next to the median nerve, within the carpal tunnel, and at the same level as the hamate hook (d). The percutaneous CTR was done under ultrasonographic guidance (e). After the surgical release, the CTP was measured again and recorded (f). H, hamate hook; asterisk, median nerve; arrowhead, the tip of the needle of the CTP measurement gauge.
Clinical outcomes before and after percutaneous ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release.
| Parameters | Preoperative | Postoperative | 1 Month | 3 Month | 12 Month | β-Coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CTP (mmHg) | 40.0 (28.0–58.0) | 13.0 (8.0–20.0) # | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. | N.A. |
| CSA (mm2) | 13.0 (11.0–14.0) | N.A. | 12.0 (12.0–14.0) | 12.0 (10.0–12.0) # | 10.0 (10.0–12.0) # | −0.24 | 0.028 |
| BCTQ-Total | 4.4 (3.6–5.8) | N.A. | 2.8 (2.6–3.5) # | 2.2 (2.0–2.3) # | 2.0 (2.0–2.0) # | −0.87 | <0.001 |
| BCTQ-S | 2.2 (1.8–2.7) | N.A. | 1.5 (1.3–1.8) # | 1.1 (1.0–1.2) # | 1.0 (1.0–1.0) # | −0.42 | <0.001 |
| BCTQ-F | 2.3 (1.8–2.8) | N.A. | 1.5 (1.3–1.8) # | 1.0 (1.0–1.2) # | 1.0 (1.0–1.0) # | −0.45 | <0.001 |
Values are presented as the median (interquartile range); p value, examination of time trend of the study group using linear regression models with the GEE method; β-coefficient, regression coefficient indicating time trend; The significant between-timepoint difference in comparison with the preoperative status using the Wilcoxon Signed-rank test; CSA: Cross-sectional area of median nerve; BCTQ: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire; BCTQ-S: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire-symptom severity scale; BCTQ-F: Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire-functional status scale.
Correlation between the preoperative carpal tunnel pressure (CTP) and the clinical presentations.
| Parameters | Preoperative CTP | |
|---|---|---|
| r | ||
| Duration of symptoms (month) | 0.310 | 0.084 |
| CSA of median nerve (mm2) | 0.444 | 0.011 |
| Nerve conduction study | ||
| SNAP | −0.212 | 0.245 |
| CMAP | −0.077 | 0.677 |
| Severity grade | 0.222 | 0.222 |
| BCTQ-Total | 0.685 | <0.001 |
| BCTQ-S | 0.561 | 0.001 |
| BCTQ-F | 0.738 | <0.001 |
Spearman rank correlation was used to determine the correlation between variables. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between the CSA of the median nerve and the preoperative CTP because data were considered to be normally distributed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. SNAP, sensory nerve action potential; CMAP, compound motor action potential.
Figure 2The trajectories and 95% confidence intervals of the perioperative recovery pattern of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ)-Total scores after percutaneous ultrasound-guided carpal tunnel release.
Comparisons of clinical characteristics of patients between gradual and fast recovery groups.
| Characteristics | Group 1 | Group 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative CTP (mmHg) | 35.0 (25.0–40.0) | 59.0 (55.0–70.0) | <0.001 |
| Postoperative CTP (mmHg) | 11.0 (6.0–16.0) | 24.0 (17.0–40.0) | 0.001 |
| Age (years) | 59.0 (51.0–71.0) | 59.0 (48.0–65.0) | 0.355 |
| Gender (male) | 7 (25.9%) | 1 (10.0%) | 0.404 |
| Affected Side (Right) | 14 (51.9%) | 6 (60.0%) | 0.725 |
| Preoperative CSA of median nerve (mm2) | 12.0 (11.0–14.0) | 14.0 (13.0–16.0) | 0.112 |
| Nerve conduction study | |||
| SNAP | 10.7 (6.8–21.9) | 7.8 (5.2–13.2) | 0.296 |
| CMAP | 5.9 (3.5–8.3) | 5.7 (3.3–7.2) | 0.932 |
| Severity grade | 0.214 | ||
| Mild | 10 (37.0%) | 1 (10.0%) | |
| Moderate | 3 (11.1%) | 3 (30.0%) | |
| Severe | 14 (51.9%) | 6 (60.0%) |
Values are presented as the median (interquartile range) or number (percentage). The between-group differences were analyzed using the Mann–Whitney u test for continuous variables and the Fisher’s exact test for the proportion; CTP, carpal tunnel pressure; CSA, cross-sectional area; SNAP, sensory nerve action potential; CMAP, compound motor action potential.
Odds ratio of fast recovery group assignment in relation to baseline variables.
| Crude Odds Ratio | Adjusted Odds Ratio | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Preoperative CTP | 1.20 (1.05–1.36) | 0.005 | 1.32 (1.05–1.66) | 0.018 |
| Age (years) | 0.96 (0.90–1.02) | 0.166 | 0.91 (0.79–1.04) | 0.167 |
| Gender (male) | 0.32 (0.03–2.98) | 0.315 | 0.02 (<0.01–2.76) | 0.117 |
The association between clinical characteristics (the preoperative CTP, age, and gender) and the postoperative recovery pattern of the BCTQ-Total scores were analyzed using binary logistic regression. The results were presented as crude and adjusted odds ratio, respectively.