Literature DB >> 29396311

Electrodiagnostic Grade and Carpal Tunnel Release Outcomes: A Prospective Analysis.

Michael Rivlin1, Amir R Kachooei2, Mark L Wang3, Asif M Ilyas3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The value of electrodiagnostic (EDX) study grades as a prognostic indicator of clinical results after carpal tunnel release (CTR) remains controversial. In this study, we tested the primary null hypothesis that symptom relief after CTR would not differ based on EDX grade. Secondarily, we evaluated the degree of symptomatic and functional postoperative improvement relative to preoperative EDX grade.
METHODS: We prospectively evaluated 199 consecutive patients with 256 hands after CTR confirmed with EDX. Data were collected before surgery and patients were observed at 2 weeks and 3 months after surgery. There were 20 hands with mild, 126 with moderate, and 110 with severe involvement in the preoperative EDX. Demographic, EDX grade (mild, moderate, or severe); surgical parameters; Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire; symptom severity scale, functional status scale, pain catastrophizing scale, and visual analog scale data were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: There was significant improvement in Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, symptom severity scale, and functional status scale scores from the preoperative to 2-week and 3-month postoperative visits in all categories of EDX grade. There was no significant difference in the extent of recovery by the 2-week and 3-month visits relative to EDX grade. Catastrophic thinking did not have a significant effect on any of the 3 groups. Pain decreased dramatically at 2 weeks after surgery but there was no additional significant difference in visual analog scale scores between the 2-week and 3-month postoperative visits. Postoperative pain improvement occurred regardless of EDX grade. There were no major complications or reoperations in any group.
CONCLUSIONS: Carpal tunnel release demonstrated consistently significant improvement in outcomes regardless of EDX grade at initial and final follow-up. The extent of postoperative improvement after CTR overall was also not statistically different between groups with differing EDX severity. Older patients with severe CTS achieved more modest gains. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.
Copyright © 2018 American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carpal tunnel release; carpal tunnel syndrome; electrodiagnostic study; endoscopic

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29396311     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hand Surg Am        ISSN: 0363-5023            Impact factor:   2.230


  5 in total

1.  Outcomes of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Unrecordable Preoperative Nerve Conduction Potentials at a Minimum of 5 Years.

Authors:  Dafang Zhang; Peter Ostergaard; Charles Cefalu; Matthew Hall; Brandon E Earp; Philip Blazar
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-06-22

2.  The Association Between Electrodiagnostic Severity and Treatment Recommendations for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Yu-Ting Lu; Amrit K Deol; Erika D Sears
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2020-10-31       Impact factor: 2.230

3.  Ultrasonography Findings of the Carpal Tunnel after Endoscopic Carpal Tunnel Release for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

Authors:  Alex Wing Hung Ng; James Francis Griffith; Carita Tsoi; Raymond Chun Wing Fong; Michael Chu Kay Mak; Wing Lim Tse; Pak Cheong Ho
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  A Comparison of Changes in Median Nerve Cross-sectional Area Between Endoscopic and Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  William R Smith; David C Hirsch; David O Osei-Hwedieh; Robert J Goitz; John Fowler
Journal:  J Hand Surg Glob Online       Date:  2019-10-31

5.  The Correlation of Carpal Tunnel Pressure with Clinical Outcomes following Ultrasonographically-Guided Percutaneous Carpal Tunnel Release.

Authors:  Jui-Chien Wang; Chung-Yi Li; Po-Yen Ko; Tung-Tai Wu; Kuo-Chen Wu; Fong-Chin Su; I-Ming Jou; Po-Ting Wu
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-27
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.