| Literature DB >> 35887486 |
Changyin Li1,2, Chengxiao Hu1, Jiatao Xie1, Guangyu Shi3, Xu Wang4, Xiang Yuan1, Keyi Li1, Siqi Chen1, Xiaohu Zhao1, Guocheng Fan2.
Abstract
Tomato cultivation is seriously affected by infection from Botrytis cinerea. The safe and effective control of tomato gray mold remains elusive. Plant-related microbial communities regulate not only plant metabolism but also plant immune systems. In this study, we observed that Selenium application in soil combined with foliar spraying of methyl jasmonate could reduce Botrytis cinerea infection in tomato fruits and leaves and improve tomato fruit quality. The infection rate of leaves decreased from 42.19% to 25.00%, and the vitamin C content increased by 22.14%. The bacterial community structure of the tomato was studied by using amplicon sequencing technology. The leaf bacterial alpha diversity of tomatoes treated with Se plus methyl jasmonate was significantly higher than that of the control. Then we isolated five strains antagonistic to Botrytis cinerea in vitro from tomato leaves in the treatment of Se plus methyl jasmonate. The antagonistic strains were identified as Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus velezensis. Spraying mixed antagonistic strain suspension significantly inhibited the diameter of Botrytis cinerea with an inhibition rate of 40.99%. This study revealed the key role of plant-beneficial bacteria recruited by Se combined with methyl jasmonate in improving tomato plant disease resistance. These findings may benefit our understanding of the new regulation of microorganisms on Botrytis cinerea.Entities:
Keywords: Methyl jasmonate; Selenium; gray mold; incidence; microbes; tomato
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887486 PMCID: PMC9319442 DOI: 10.3390/jof8070731
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Effect of Se and MeJA on controlling grey mold in tomatoes. (A) Symptoms of grey mold in fruit. (B) Visual score of Botrytis cinerea. Grey mold severity was evaluated using a scale of 0 to 4 based on the diameter of the lesions on the tomato surface. (C) Box plot shows the average diameter of tomato leaf lesions after inoculation with Botrytis cinerea. (D) Infection rate of Botrytis cinerea in tomato leaves. (E) Tomato disease index grading. 0: no spots; 1: 0–3 mm; 2: 3–6 mm; 3: 6–9 mm; 4: >9 mm. Treatments followed by different lowercase letters are statistically different by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05). “*” indicates a significant difference between the two treatments by Sudent’s t test (p < 0.05). Bars = 12 mm.
Figure 2Effects of Se and MeJA on tomato leaf selenium content. (A), fruit selenium content (B), vitamin C content (C), and soluble protein content (D). Treatments followed by different lowercase letters were statistically different by the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Effects of Se and MeJA on bacterial community composition and structure in tomato fruit and leaves. (A) Histograms of bacterial species in Se and MeJA treatment and control at class level. (B) Bubble chart of bacterial species in Se and MeJA treatment and control at order level. The color code for the bubbles depicts the different treatments, and tomato tissue and bubble size indicate relative abundance of order within the tomato microbiota. (C) Evaluation of the microflora richness of tomato by Chao-1 index. (D) Evaluation of the microflora diversity of the tomato by Shannon index. (E) PCoA of bacterial communities with Bray-Curtis distance in fruit and leaf of tomato. “F” means fruit, “L” means leaf.
Figure 4Different species of microbial communities between MSe2.0 and CK of bacteria on the tomato leaves. (A) LEfSe of phyllosphere bacterial community. (B) Cladogram of phyllosphere bacterial community (LDA scores > 4).
Figure 5Isolation of phyllosphere bacteria and their antagonism to (A) Colony characteristic of bacterial isolated from tomato interfoliate. (B) Inhibitory effect of tomato interfoliar bacteria on Botryis cinerea. (C) Annotated results of 4 antagonistic bacteria samples. Bars = 30 mm.
Figure 6Effects of (A) Infection rate of Botrytis cinerea in tomato leaves. (B) Representative incidence of Botrytis cinerea tomato leaves that obtained from four beneficial bacteria treatments. Bars=30 mm (C) Box plot shows the average diameter of tomato leaf lesions after inoculation with Botrytis cinerea. (D) Representative disease lesion diameter of Botrytis cinerea tomato leaves that obtained from four beneficial bacteria treatments. Bars = 15 mm. Treatments followed by different lowercase letters are statistically different by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (p < 0.05). “***” indicates a significant difference between the two treatments by Sudent’s t test (p < 0.001).