| Literature DB >> 35887461 |
Shuhe Wang1,2, Chaofan Gao1, Qiuyu Sun2, Qi Liu2,3, Cuicui Wang2,4, Fangfang Guo2, Zhanhong Ma2.
Abstract
Stripe rust, caused by Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici (Pst), is one of the most important fungal diseases affecting wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) worldwide. In this study, the genetic diversity and population structure of Pst isolates were analyzed using 15 microsatellite markers. Isolates were collected from five wheat cultivars with different levels of resistance from Yanting county and Fucheng district, Mianyang city, Sichuan province, China. The aim of this study was to investigate whether Pst populations are differentiated by wheat genotype or geographic origin. Seventy-six multilocus genotypes (MLGs) were identified from all 289 single uredinial isolates. In general, the genotypic diversity of Pst populations from five wheat cultivars in Fucheng was higher than that in Yanting. In addition, the genetic diversity was highest in the Pst populations from Mianmai 367, a cultivar considered to be highly resistant. The unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) phylogenetic tree, Bayesian clustering analysis, and minimum spanning network for the MLGs revealed two major genetic clusters based on geographical location. Greater differentiation was observed between the populations from the two sampling locations than between the populations from different hosts in the same location. The results suggest that geographic and environmental differences could partially explain the genetic differentiation of Pst more than wheat genotype. This study provides novel insight into the interactions between Pst populations and their hosts. The results could be helpful in designing more effective management strategies for stripe rust in wheat production.Entities:
Keywords: host resistance; population genetics; simple sequence repeats; stripe rust; wheat
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887461 PMCID: PMC9319641 DOI: 10.3390/jof8070705
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Locations of experimental plots from which isolates of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici were collected from five wheat cultivars in Yanting and Fucheng, Sichuan province, China. Map shapefile and DEM data were downloaded from https://www.resdc.cn (accessed on 19 May 2022).
The infection type and disease index for five wheat cultivars in the field.
| No. | Cultivars | Infection Types (ITs) | Disease Index ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanting | Fucheng | |||
| 1 | Mingxian 169 | 4 | 23.30 ± 2.17 a | 22.74 ± 5.58 a |
| 2 | Mianmai 367 | 1–3 | 1.35 ± 0.19 c | 5.08 ± 0.94 c |
| 3 | Xikemai 4 | 1–3 | 1.61 ± 0.34 c | 1.59 ± 0.47 d |
| 4 | Xiaoyan 22 | 2–4 | 5.65 ± 0.80 b | 15.41 ± 2.70 b |
| 5 | Zhengmai 9023 | 2–3 | 4.38 ± 0.60 bc | 5.34 ± 0.41 c |
Note: Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference at p = 0.05.
Genetic diversity and multilocus linkage disequilibrium of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici populations collected from five wheat cultivars in Yanting and Fucheng.
| Location | Host | Population |
|
|
| MLG |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yanting | Mingxian 169 | YtMX | 28 | 2.07 ± 0.12 | 1.44 ± 0.08 | 8 | 7.48 ± 0.63 | 1.67 | 0.58 | 0.28 | 0.65 * |
| Mianmai 367 | YtMM | 37 | 2.20 ± 0.11 | 1.48 ± 0.08 | 14 | 9.22 ± 1.35 | 1.94 | 0.47 | 0.31 | 0.47 * | |
| Xikemai 4 | YtXK | 31 | 2.20 ± 0.11 | 1.32 ± 0.05 | 14 | 9.62 ± 1.31 | 1.84 | 0.41 | 0.23 | 0.48 * | |
| Xiaoyan 22 | YtXY | 33 | 2.00 ± 0.10 | 1.32 ± 0.04 | 11 | 7.79 ± 1.22 | 1.69 | 0.52 | 0.24 | 0.76 * | |
| Zhengmai 9023 | YtZM | 27 | 1.80 ± 0.15 | 1.10 ± 0.03 | 9 | 7.52 ± 0.93 | 1.50 | 0.48 | 0.08 | 0.32 * | |
| Yanting | 156 | 2.05 ± 0.05 | 1.33 ± 0.03 | 45 | 9.64 ± 0.93 | 2.39 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.52 * | ||
| Fucheng | Mingxian 169 | FcMX | 34 | 2.20 ± 0.11 | 1.51 ± 0.11 | 10 | 8.82 ± 0.87 | 2.04 | 0.70 | 0.30 | 0.46 * |
| Mianmai 367 | FcMM | 36 | 2.13 ± 0.10 | 1.50 ± 0.10 | 17 | 10.40 ± 1.46 | 2.06 | 0.40 | 0.31 | 0.70 * | |
| Xikemai 4 | FcXK | 22 | 2.20 ± 0.15 | 1.44 ± 0.11 | 11 | 10.35 ± 0.64 | 2.00 | 0.60 | 0.26 | 0.30 * | |
| Xiaoyan 22 | FcXY | 20 | 2.20 ± 0.11 | 1.45 ± 0.14 | 9 | 9.00 ± 0.00 | 1.94 | 0.74 | 0.26 | 0.32 * | |
| Zhengmai 9023 | FcZM | 21 | 1.73 ± 0.15 | 1.43 ± 0.13 | 5 | 5.00 ± 0.00 | 1.48 | 0.82 | 0.24 | 0.25 * | |
| Fucheng | 133 | 2.09 ± 0.06 | 1.47 ± 0.05 | 40 | 11.95 ± 1.86 | 2.94 | 0.46 | 0.30 | 0.32 * | ||
| Total | 289 | 2.07 ± 0.04 | 1.40 ± 0.03 | 76 | 12.11± 1.97 | 3.20 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 0.31 * |
Note: n, number of individuals; Na, number of alleles; Ne, effective number of alleles; MLG, number of multilocus genotypes (MLGs) observed; eMLG, the number of expected MLGs at the smallest sample size based on rarefaction with standard error (SE); H, Shannon–Wiener index of MLG diversity; E, evenness; H, Nei’s unbiased gene diversity; rbarD, the standardized index of association; *, estimates significant at p = 0.001.
Figure 2Number of isolates with different multilocus SSR genotypes detected in Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici populations from five wheat cultivars in Yanting and Fucheng.
Figure 3Relationships among Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici populations from five wheat cultivars in Yanting and Fucheng. The dendrogram was constructed using the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean based on Nei’s genetic distance. Numbers at branch points indicate the percent occurrence of the cluster to the right of the branch in 1000 bootstrapped dendrograms (node values greater than 50% are shown).
Figure 4Population genetic structure of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici analyzed in STRUCTURE v 2.3.4. (A) Comparison of ΔK values for acquisition of the optimal K-value from STRUCTURE harvester. (B) Population structure of 289 Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici isolates collected from five wheat cultivars in Yanting and Fucheng inferred using a Bayesian clustering algorithm implemented in STRUCTURE v 2.3.4. Each individual isolate is represented by a vertical line partitioned into shaded segments corresponding to the isolate’s estimated mean membership coefficient in K = 2 genetic clusters. Membership coefficients were estimated from 10 replicate runs for each K. Vertical black lines separate isolates sampled from different hosts and each host is labeled below.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) for Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici populations collected from five wheat cultivars in Yanting and Fucheng.
| Source | d.f. | SS | PV (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among geographical locations | 1 | 206.77 | 25.24% | 0.001 |
| Among host populations | 8 | 73.17 | 4.48% | 0.001 |
| Among individuals | 279 | 603.69 | 9.20% | 0.001 |
| Within individuals | 289 | 480.50 | 61.08% | 0.001 |
Note: d.f., degrees of freedom; SS, sum of squared observations; PV (%), percentage of total variance. p values are based on 999 permutations.
Pairwise F differentiation between collections of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici from different wheat cultivars in Yanting and Fucheng.
| Yanting | Fucheng | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YtMX | YtMM | YtXY | YtXK | YtZM | FcMX | FcMM | FcXY | FcXK | FcZM | |
| YtMX | ||||||||||
| YtMM | 0.009 | |||||||||
| YtXY | 0.001 | 0.018 | ||||||||
| YtXK | 0.007 | 0.005 | 0.000 | |||||||
| YtZM | 0.114 * | 0.091 | 0.066 | 0.044 | ||||||
| FcMX | 0.220 * | 0.180 * | 0.278 * | 0.232 * | 0.402 * | |||||
| FcMM | 0.328 * | 0.245 * | 0.372 * | 0.345 * | 0.478 * | 0.169 * | ||||
| FcXY | 0.313 * | 0.222 * | 0.366 * | 0.320 * | 0.504 * | 0.086 * | 0.032 | |||
| FcXK | 0.246 * | 0.176 * | 0.302 * | 0.244 * | 0.429 * | 0.017 | 0.134 * | 0.033 | ||
| FcZM | 0.233 * | 0.152 * | 0.283 * | 0.221 * | 0.400 * | 0.052 | 0.134 * | 0.036 | 0.000 | |
Note: F, value below diagonal; *, significance level p = 0.001; p values are based on 999 permutations; negative F estimates were converted to zero. The five wheat cultivars were Mingxian 169 (MX), Xiaoyan 22 (XY), Zhengmai 9023 (ZM), Mianmai 367 (MM), and Xikemai 4 (XK).
Figure 5Minimum spanning networks (MSNs) showing the multilocus genotypes (MLGs) of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici from five wheat cultivars in Yanting (A) and Fucheng (B), respectively, as well as all MLGs from both Yanting and Fucheng (C). Each multilocus genotype is represented by one node sized in proportion to its frequency in the populations. The black-to-grey scale bar shows Bruvo’s genetic distance between MLGs; the further the genetic distances, the lighter the color and thinner the line.