| Literature DB >> 35887424 |
Guoqi Li1, Shaoting Liu2, Lijuan Wu1, Xiao Wang1, Rongrong Cuan1, Yongliang Zheng3, Deli Liu1, Yongze Yuan1.
Abstract
Calcium (Ca2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaMKs) act as a class of crucial elements in Ca2+-signal transduction pathways that regulate fungal growth, sporulation, virulence, and environmental stress tolerance. However, little is known about the function of such protein kinase in phytopathogenic Penicillium species. In the present study, a new CaMK gene from the citrus pathogenic fungus P. italicum, designated PiCaMK1, was cloned and functionally characterized by gene knockout and transcriptome analysis. The open reading frame of PiCaMK1 is 1209 bp in full length, which encodes 402 amino acid residues (putative molecular weight ~45.2 KD) with the highest homologous (~96.3%) to the P. expansum CaMK. The knockout mutant ΔPiCaMK1 showed a significant reduction in vegetative growth, conidiation, and virulence (i.e., to induce blue mold decay on citrus fruit). ΔPiCaMK1 was less sensitive to NaCl- or KCl-induced salinity stress and less resistant to mannitol-induced osmotic stress, indicating the functional involvement of PiCaMK1 in such environmental stress tolerance. In contrast, the PiCaMK1-complemented strain ΔPiCaMK1COM can restore all the defective phenotypes. Transcriptome analysis revealed that knockout of PiCaMK1 down-regulated expression of the genes involved in DNA replication and repair, cell cycle, meiosis, pyrimidine and purine metabolisms, and MAPK signaling pathway. Our results suggested the critical role of PiCaMK1 in regulating multiple physical and cellular processes of citrus postharvest pathogen P. italicum, including growth, conidiation, virulence, and environmental stress tolerance.Entities:
Keywords: P. italicum; calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (CaMK); conidiation; stress tolerance; transcriptome; virulence
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887424 PMCID: PMC9323541 DOI: 10.3390/jof8070667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Multiple sequence alignments of fungal calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinases (CaMKs). Amino acid sequence of CaMKs from the selected fungi (Table S2) were compared using the software ClustalX 2.1 and GeneDoc. Conserved amino acid residues are indicated in black (100%), dark gray (>80%), and light gray (>60%). I–XI represents conserved CaMK domains. The asterisk (*) indicates the middle position between two neighboring numbers above the selected sequences.
Figure 2Phylogenetic analysis of PiCaMK1 among fungal CaMKs. Phylogenetic analysis of the CaMKs from the selected fungi (Table S3) was performed using the minimum evolution method with 500 bootstrap replications in the phylogeny test by MEGA7.0 software. CaMKs are described by Genbank accession number, organism, and phylum. Bars indicate the scale of genetic distances. The red star indicates the position of PiCaMK1 in this study.
Figure 3Construction and verification of PiCaMK1-knockout and -complementation mutants. (A) Schematic diagram to construct the PiCaMK1-knockout and -complementation mutants. (B) Image of DNA fragments amplified from genomic DNA of the control and the PiCaMK1-knockout mutants (ΔPiCaMK1). M: DNA marker DS5000; lanes 1, 5, and 9: PCR fragments with primers PiCaMK1-Ko-F/R; lanes 2, 6, and 10: PCR fragments with primers Hyg-F/R; lanes 3, 7, and 11: PCR fragments with primers PiCaMK1-Diag-F/R; lanes 4, 8, and 12: PCR fragments with primers PiCaMK1-L-F and PiCaMK1-R-R. (C) Image of DNA fragments amplified from genomic DNA of the control and the ΔPiCaMK1COM strains. M: DNA marker DS5000; lanes 1, 2, and 3: PCR fragments with primers PiCaMK1-COM-F/R. (D) Southern blot hybridization of fungal genomic DNA after digestion with Xba I. The digested DNA fragments were electrophoresed in an agarose gel, then blotted to a nylon membrane, and finally hybridized to a PiCaMK1-specific probe (310 bp in size). M: DIG-labeled DNA marker; lanes 1, 2, and 3: the control, ΔPiCaMK1, and ΔPiCaMK1COM.
Figure 4PiCaMK1 is required for the P. italicum vegetative growth and conidiation. (A) Images of the control, ΔPiCaMK1, and ΔPiCaMK1COM strains grown on potato dextrose agar (PDA) for 7 days. (B) Vegetative growth rates of the control, ΔPiCaMK1, and ΔPiCaMK1COM strains grown on PDA. (C) Conidia yield quantification of the different P. italicum strains grown on PDA for 6 days. The data presented are the mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments with at least three replicates (** p < 0.01).
Figure 5PiCaMK1 is required for the P. italicum full virulence. (A) Images of virulence assays on the postharvest citrus fruits infected by the control, ΔPiCaMK1, and ΔPiCaMK1COM strains. The postharvest citrus fruits were inoculated with 10 µL of conidial suspension (1 × 107 conidia·mL−1) from the different P. italicum strains, and the lesion size was determined at 6 days post-inoculation (dpi). (B) Quantification of the lesion size on the citrus fruits. The data presented are the mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments with at least three replicates (** p < 0.01).
Figure 6PiCaMK1 is not required for the P. italicum resistance to the DMI fungicides. (A) Images of the P. italicum growth on the PDA plates with the increasing DMI-fungicide concentrations. DMI fungicides prochloraz and imazalil were used in the experiments. Mycelial plugs from the control, ΔPiCaMK1, and ΔPiCaMK1COM colonies were cultivated individually on a PDA medium with the indicated concentrations of DMI fungicides, i.e., prochloraz and imazalil, respectively, and the fungal colony diameters were recorded at 6 dpi at 28 °C. (B) Prochloraz EC50 assays. (C) Imazalil EC50 assays. The data presented are the mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments with at least three replicates.
Figure 7Effects of PiCaMK1 on stress tolerance of the P. italicum to KCl, NaCl, D-mannitol, and H2O2. (A) Images of the P. italicum growth on the PDA plates with the increasing concentrations of NaCl, KCl, D-mannitol, and H2O2, respectively. The mycelial plug operation and cultivation process were as described in Figure 6 legend. (B) The effects of NaCl on the relative growth of the different P. italicum strains, i.e., the control, ΔPiCaMK1, and ΔPiCaMK1COM strains. (C) The effects of KCl on the relative growth of the different P. italicum strains. (D) The effects of D-mannitol on the relative growth of the different P. italicum strains. (E) The effects of H2O2 on the relative growth of the different P. italicum strains. The data presented are the mean and standard deviation of three independent experiments with at least three replicates.
Figure 8Transcriptome analysis of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the control and ΔPiCaMK1 strains. (A) Clustering (heatmap) analysis of the DEGs. (B) Volcano plot analysis of the DEGs. (C) MA plot analysis of the DEGs.
Figure 9KEGG enrichment of the DEGs between the control and ΔPiCaMK1 strains. (A) Up-regulated DEGs. (B) Down-regulated DEGs. Each scatter plot in panel (A) or (B) shows the top 20 KEGG pathways enriched, and the red color indicates the most significant enrichment.
KEGG-enriched DEGs down-regulated in the PiCaMK1-knockout mutant.
| KEGG Pathway (ID) | Gene ID | Gene Function | Log2 * FC | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA replication (ko03030) | EKV13547 | DNA primase (large subunit) | −7.57 | 1.06 × 10−5 |
| EKV11776 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm6 | −2.13 | 3.01 × 10−7 | |
| EKV18089 | DNA polymerase δ (catalytic subunit) | −1.53 | 5.95 × 10−5 | |
| EKV08814 | DNA polymerase ε (catalytic subunit) | −1.49 | 2.40 × 10−4 | |
| EKV11198 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm3 | −1.19 | 3.90 × 10−5 | |
| EKV17606 | Replication factor-a protein | −1.14 | 2.22 × 10−3 | |
| EKV16128 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm2 | −1.08 | 2.62 × 10−5 | |
| Cell cycle (ko04111) | EKV11033 | Condensin complex subunit (HEAT-like repeat) | −4.11 | 1.19 × 10−3 |
| EKV11776 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm6 | −2.13 | 3.01 × 10−7 | |
| EKV17483 | Cell-cycle checkpoint protein kinase (DNA damage response protein kinase) | −2.12 | 1.27 × 10−10 | |
| EKV19093 | Nuclear condensin complex Smc2 (structural maintenance of chromosome) | −1.51 | 7.96 × 10−8 | |
| EKV04214 | Replication checkpoint protein (MRC1-like domain) | −1.38 | 1.92 × 10−3 | |
| EKV16186 | Mitotic spindle checkpoint protein (Mad2) | −1.27 | 3.21 × 10−3 | |
| EKV11198 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm3 | −1.19 | 3.90 × 10−5 | |
| EKV16749 | Condensin complex subunit 1 | −1.10 | 3.82 × 10−4 | |
| EKV16128 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm2 | −1.08 | 2.62 × 10−5 | |
| Purine metabolism (ko00230) | EKV04683 | Xanthine dehydrogenase HxA | −7.57 | 1.06 × 10−5 |
| EKV13547 | DNA primase (large subunit) | −7.57 | 1.06 × 10−5 | |
| EKV18089 | DNA polymerase δ (catalytic subunit) | −1.53 | 5.95 × 10−5 | |
| EKV19574 | Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase | −1.53 | 2.12 × 10−5 | |
| EKV08814 | DNA polymerase ε (catalytic subunit) | −1.49 | 2.40 × 10−4 | |
| EKV15599 | Ribonucleotide reductase RnrA | −1.13 | 1.08 × 10−5 | |
| EKV16890 | DNA-directed RNA polymerase III | −1.12 | 1.81 × 10−4 | |
| EKV07940 | Adenylate cyclase | −1.01 | 2.19 × 10−4 | |
| Pyrimidine metabolism (ko00240) | EKV07761 | Uracil phosphoribosyltransferase | −10.48 | 1.79 × 10−32 |
| EKV13547 | DNA primase (large subunit) | −7.57 | 1.06 × 10−5 | |
| EKV18089 | DNA polymerase δ (catalytic subunit) | −1.53 | 5.95 × 10−5 | |
| EKV19574 | Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase | −1.53 | 2.12 × 10−5 | |
| EKV08814 | DNA polymerase ε (catalytic subunit) | −1.49 | 2.40 × 10−4 | |
| EKV15599 | Ribonucleotide reductase RnrA | −1.13 | 1.08 × 10−5 | |
| EKV16890 | DNA-directed RNA polymerase III | −1.12 | 1.81 × 10−4 | |
| Base excision repair (ko03410) | EKV18089 | DNA polymerase δ (catalytic subunit) | −1.53 | 5.95 × 10−5 |
| EKV08814 | DNA polymerase ε (catalytic subunit) | −1.49 | 2.40 × 10−4 | |
| EKV07371 | Formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase | −1.33 | 5.95 × 10−5 | |
| Nucleotide excision repair (ko03420) | EKV18089 | DNA polymerase δ (catalytic subunit) | −1.53 | 5.95 × 10−5 |
| EKV08814 | DNA polymerase ε (catalytic subunit) | −1.49 | 2.40 × 10−4 | |
| EKV15299 | DNA repair protein RAD1 | −1.39 | 6.80 × 10−7 | |
| EKV17606 | Replication factor-a protein | −1.14 | 1.22 × 10−3 | |
| Mismatch repair (ko03430) | EKV18089 | DNA polymerase δ (catalytic subunit) | −1.53 | 5.95 × 10−5 |
| EKV17606 | Replication factor-a protein | −1.14 | 1.22 × 10−3 | |
| Meiosis (ko04113) | EKV11776 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm6 | −2.13 | 3.01 × 10−7 |
| EKV16186 | Mitotic spindle checkpoint protein (Mad2) | −1.27 | 3.21 × 10−3 | |
| EKV11198 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm3 | −1.19 | 3.90 × 10−5 | |
| EKV16128 | DNA replication licensing factor Mcm2 | −1.08 | 2.62 × 10−5 | |
| EKV07940 | Adenylate cyclase | −1.01 | 2.19 × 10−4 | |
| MAPK signaling pathway (ko04011) | EKV17484 | Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase | −1.62 | 3.94 × 10−6 |
| Oxidative phosphorylation (ko00190) | EKV05405 | Cytochrome c oxidase assembly protein | −7.43 | 3.13 × 10−5 |
| EKV18906 | Mitochondrial F1/F0-ATP synthase | −4.60 | 3.19 × 10−21 | |
| Carotenoid biosynthesis (ko00906) | EKV07272 | Aldehyde dehydrogenase (β-apo-4′-carotenal oxygenase) | −7.28 | 9.59 × 10−5 |
| Glutathione metabolism (ko00480) | EKV19574 | Ribonucleoside-diphosphate reductase | −1.53 | 2.12 × 10−5 |
| EKV15599 | Ribonucleotide reductase RnrA | −1.13 | 1.08 × 10−5 | |
| Cysteine and methionine metabolism (ko00270) | EKV06483 | Cysteine synthase A | −9.77 | 2.13 × 10−22 |
| Sulfur metabolism (ko00920) | EKV06483 | Cysteine synthase A | −9.77 | 2.13 × 10−22 |
| EKV18475 | Assimilatory sulfite reductase | −1.73 | 5.56 × 10−3 | |
| Starch and sucrose metabolism (ko00500) | EKV04855 | Oligo-1,6-glucosidase (α-amylase or maltase) | −3.09 | 3.67 × 10−6 |
| Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism (ko00520) | EKV05685 | Glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase | −12.86 | 1.32 × 10−83 |
| EKV11299 | NADH-cytochrome b5 reductase | −1.59 | 1.52 × 10−8 | |
| EKV15950 | Chitin synthase A/B | −1.19 | 5.23 × 10−4 | |
| Biosynthesis of amino acids (ko01230) | EKV06483 | Cysteine synthase A | −9.77 | 2.13 × 10−22 |
| EKV17406 | Catabolic 3-dehydroquinase | −1.26 | 9.29 × 10−5 | |
| Protein processing in endoplasmic reticulum (ko04141) | EKV13467 | DnaJ-related protein SCJ1 | −8.53 | 1.19 × 10−10 |
| EKV14522 | Polyubiquitin binding protein (Doa1/Ufd3) | −1.68 | 1.34 × 10−9 | |
| EKV14057 | Heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) | −1.33 | 8.03 × 10−7 | |
| EKV13033 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein (HSP70) | −1.09 | 2.44 × 10−6 | |
| EKV13686 | Nuclear protein localization protein (NPL4 family) | −1.04 | 6.08 × 10−4 | |
| Endocytosis (ko04144) | EKV18650 | Phospholipase D | −9.35 | 1.16 × 10−17 |
| PHI26_NewGene_31 | Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein (VHS domain) | −1.57 | 4.21 × 10−8 | |
| PHI26_NewGene_32 | Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein (FYVE-like protein) | −1.10 | 5.12 × 10−3 | |
| EKV13033 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein (HSP70) | −1.09 | 2.44 × 10−6 |
* FC = Fold Change; FDR, False Discovery Rate (i.e., the corrected p-value also named q-value).
Figure 10RT-qPCR validation of DEGs identified in the present transcriptome analysis. The experiments were performed in triplicate with three technical repeats, and the results were expressed as relative transcript abundance with mean ± SD. One-way ANOVA and the least significant difference (LSD) test were applied to statistics analysis (** p < 0.01).