| Literature DB >> 33343551 |
Aline Midori Kanashiro1, Daniel Yuri Akiyama1, Katia Cristina Kupper2, Taícia Pacheco Fill1.
Abstract
In the agricultural sector, citrus is one of the most important fruit genus in the world. In this scenario, Brazil is the largest producer of oranges; 34% of the global production, and exporter of concentrated orange juice; 76% of the juice consumed in the planet, summing up US$ 6.5 billion to Brazilian GDP. However, the orange production has been considerable decreasing due to unfavorable weather conditions in recent years and the increasing number of pathogen infections. One of the main citrus post-harvest phytopathogen is Penicillium italicum, responsible for the blue mold disease, which is currently controlled by pesticides, such as Imazalil, Pyrimethanil, Fludioxonil, and Tiabendazole, which are toxic chemicals harmful to the environment and also to human health. In addition, P. italicum has developed considerable resistance to these chemicals as a result of widespread applications. To address this growing problem, the search for new control methods of citrus post-harvest phytopathogens is being extensively explored, resulting in promising new approaches such as biocontrol methods as "killer" yeasts, application of essential oils, and antimicrobial volatile substances. The alternative methodologies to control P. italicum are reviewed here, as well as the fungal virulence factors and infection strategies. Therefore, this review will focus on a general overview of recent research carried out regarding the phytopathological interaction of P. italicum and its citrus host.Entities:
Keywords: Penicillium italicum; blue mold; blue mold disease; natural products; pathogen host interaction; virulence factors
Year: 2020 PMID: 33343551 PMCID: PMC7746842 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.606852
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Global orange production in the last 6 years. Source: (USDA, 2020). Accessed on: Jan. 27, 2020.
Alternative methods based in natural products (NPs) found in microbial or plant extracts and essential oils from plants.
| Kojic Acid (KA) combinated with H2O2 | 12.8 and 1.5 mm (KA and H2O2, respectively) | Kim and Chan, | |
| Sinulolide I, (9Z, 12Z)-N-(2-hydroxyethyl)-octadeca-9,12-dienamide, dodecanoic acid and decanoic acid | 0.031-0.125 mg mL−1 | Yang et al., | |
| Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs): methyl isobutyl ketone, ethanol, 5-methyl-2-heptanone, and S-(-)-2-methylbutylamine | - | Morita et al., | |
| Chinese propolis | Pinocembrin | 400 mg L−1 | Peng et al., |
| Chinese propolis | Pinocembroside | 200 mg L−1 | Chen et al., |
| α-terpineol, terpinen-4-ol, linalool, and limonene | 2.5 μL mL−1 | Trabelsi et al., | |
| Cinnamon bark ( | Cinnamaldehyde and eugenol | 130–398.11 μL mL−1 | Kanan and Al-Najar, |
| Citrus fruits | Citral | 0.5 μL mL−1 | Droby et al., |
| Citrus fruits | Octanal | 1.0 μL mL−1 | Klieber et al., |
| Garlic oil nanoemulsion (GO NE) | Dimethyl trisulfide, diallyl disulfide, diallyl sulfide, diallyl tetrasulfide, 3-vinyl-4H-1,2-dithiin, diallyl trisulfide, 1,4-dimethyl tetrasulfide, methyl allyl disulfide and methyl allyl trisulfide | 0.01265% | Ding et al., |
| Carvacrol and thymol | - | Pérez-Afonso et al., | |
| Harmine, harmaline, and tetrahydroharmine (THH) alkaloids | 263.03–514.81 μL mL−1 | Kanan and Al-Najar, | |
| Pomegranate ( | Phenolic compounds | - | Nicosia et al., |
| Flavonoids of pinocembrin, chrysin, and galangin | - | Yang et al., | |
| Cinnamic acid and cinnamaldehyde | - | Wan et al., | |
| Gallic acid, quercetin and kaempferol | 1.75 mg mL−1 | Luo et al., | |
| Dimethyldisulfide, dimethyltrisulfide and acetophenone | - | Li et al., | |
| Thymol, carvacrol, geraniol, eugenol, octanal, and citral | <500 μL L−1 | Boubaker et al., | |
| Thymol and carvacrol | - | Ameziane et al., | |
| Thymol | 0.13 e 0.50 μL mL−1 (mycelium growth and spore gemination, respectively) | Vitoratos et al., |
Figure 2Type of control methods against P. italicum.
Biocontrol methods against P. italicum.
| Increase phenylalanine ammonia lyase activity and accumulation of the phytoalexins such as umbelliferone, scoparone, and scopoletin, which led to resistance induction. | Droby et al., | |
| “Killer” activity, inhibition of conidial germination, and stimulates production of chitinase. | Cunha et al., | |
| Loss of membrane integrity which led to leakage of cytoplasmic materials and death of the fungal pathogen | Li J. et al., | |
| Competition for space and nutrients | Droby et al., | |
| “Killer” activity | Comitini et al., | |
| Iron depletion, biofilm formation, and adhesion to mycelia. | Liu et al., | |
| Competition for nutrients and influence in superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities, which led to fruit resistance induction. | Parafati et al., | |
| Direct parasitism, which causes fungal cell wall degradation. | Liu et al., | |
| “Killer” activity and competition for space and nutrients | Comitini et al., | |
| Predation, competition for nutrients and other antagonistic interactions | Pimenta et al., | |
| “Killer” activity based on β-glucanase production, competition for nutrients, fruit resistance induction, and antibiosis. | Comitini et al., |
Figure 3Main virulence mechanisms of host-pathogen interaction.
Main virulence factors of P. italicum's infection.
| Accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) | Reduction of antioxidant metabolites and activity of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, CAT, POD, and APX | Chen et al., |
| Damage the integrity of the host's cells | Increase PME, PG, and XTH | Li T. et al., |
| Decreasing pH | Organic acids, especially citric acid | Prusky et al., |
| Demethylation of pectin | Accumulation of D-galacturonic and CAZymes such as PL1, PL3, PL4, GH28, GH78, GH95, GH105, CE8 e CE12 | Hershenhorn et al., |
| Fruit tissue maceration | PG, PL and PNL | Alana et al., |
| Modification of the cell wall | Decreasing ASP and hemicellulose. Increasing PME, PG, XTH, WSP, D-galacturonic acid and expression of the XTH21, XTH29, XTH33, and Expansin-A16 genes | Hershenhorn et al., |
| Neutralization or silencing of defense of host | ck-RNAi and proteases contained in secretomes | Li B. et al., |
| Plasmolysis of cells in the vicinity of the hyphae | Accumulation of D-galacturonic acid | Hershenhorn et al., |
ASP, Acid-soluble pectin; APX, Ascorbate peroxidase; CAT, Catalase; CAZyme, Carbohydrate active enzymes; ck-RNAi, Cross-kingdom RNA interference; PG, Polygalacturonases; PL, Pectate lyase; PNL, Pectin lyase; PME, Pectin methylesterase; POD, Peroxidase; WSP, Water-soluble pectin; XTH, Xyloglucanendotransglucosylases/hydrolases.
Structure of the secondary metabolites produced by P. italicum already identified.
| Deoxybrevianamide E | Scott et al., | ||
| Dehydrodeoxybrevianamide E | Scott et al., | ||
| Xanthocyllin X | Frisvad et al., | ||
| Formylxanthocillin X | Frisvad et al., | ||
| 5,6-dihydroxy-4- methoxy-2H-pyran-2-one | Faid and Tantaoui-Elaraki, | ||
| 4-methoxy-6-n-propenyl-2-pyrone | Arai et al., | ||
| PI-1 | Arai et al., | ||
| PI-2 | Arai et al., | ||
| PI-3 | Arai et al., | ||
| PI-4 | Arai et al., | ||
| Dehydrofulvic acid | Frisvad et al., | ||
| Arabenoic acid | Frisvad et al., | ||
| 5-hydroxymethylfuric acid | Frisvad et al., |