| Literature DB >> 35885683 |
Jin Yan1, Lijun Li2, Jie Li2, Sha Wang1, Xiaoqi Wu2, Panpan Xiao2, Zhuqing Zhong1, Siqing Ding1, Jianfei Xie1, Andy S K Cheng3.
Abstract
Young nurses' safety behavior and interrupted coping behavior affect patient safety. A stepped, interactive and situated training program should be evaluated to assist young nurses in improving themselves. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of the stepwise interactive situated training program on safety behavior and practice ability with respect to nursing interruptions for young nurses and its influencing factors. This was a quasi-experimental, one-group, self-control and pretest-post-test design study. Six hundred young nurses in two provinces were included. The participants underwent a stepwise interactive situated training program from March to August 2019. The program was delivered by designated head nurses and consisted of five themes: mobilization, theoretical training, operational training, specialized training and self-improvement. Five hundred and sixty-two young nurses completed this study. The safety behavior and the practice of nursing interruption were significantly higher after intervention than before. Professional titles, age and occupational time were the influence factors. The stepwise interactive situated training program was effective at improving young nurses' safety behavior and interrupted coping behavior. Nurses with higher professional titles performed better with regard to the safety behavior and the practice of nursing interruption.Entities:
Keywords: interrupted coping behavior; safety behavior; stepwise interactive situated training; young nurses
Year: 2022 PMID: 35885683 PMCID: PMC9320381 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10071157
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Healthcare (Basel) ISSN: 2227-9032
Figure 1The flowchart of the study.
Figure 2The step interactive situated training program. Abbreviations: MDT, multidisciplinary team.
The demographic characteristics of participants and the scores of measurements (N = 562).
| Characteristics | N (%)/Mean ± SD | SBS | Practice Subscale of KAP | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Test | Post-Test | Pro-Test | Post-Test | ||||
| Gender | <0.001/0.455 | 0.274/0.130 | |||||
| Male | 43 (7.7) | 3.30 ± 0.47 | 3.68 ± 0.66 | 2.40 ± 0.39 | 2.58 ± 0.46 | ||
| Female | 519 (92.3) | 3.54 ± 0.52 | 3.73 ± 0.63 | 5.56 ± 0.57 | 2.72 ± 0.55 | ||
| Highest Education | 0.453/0.611 | 0.226/0.907 | |||||
| Junior college or below | 55 (9.8) | 3.58 ± 0.63 | 3.77 ± 0.70 | 2.63 ± 0.59 | 2.72 ± 0.56 | ||
| Bachelor | 480 (85.4) | 3.51 ± 0.51 | 3.72 ± 0.62 | 2.54 ± 0.55 | 2.71 ± 0.53 | ||
| Master or above | 27 (4.8) | 3.64 ± 0.40 | 3.83 ± 0.59 | 2.50 ± 0.62 | 2.80 ± 0.68 | ||
| Professional title | <0.001/<0.001 | <0.001/0.023 | |||||
| Nurse | 74 (13.2) | 3.23 ± 0.64 | 3.41 ± 0.67 | 2.41 ± 0.50 | 2.62 ± 0.54 | ||
| Senior nurse | 360 (64.1) | 3.51 ± 0.48 | 3.73 ± 0.62 | 2.50 ± 0.50 | 2.69 ± 0.51 | ||
| Supervisor nurse | 128 (22.8) | 3.74 ± 0.46 | 3.91 ± 0.55 | 2.75 ± 0.68 | 2.83 ± 0.63 | ||
| Age, y | 27.22 ± 2.668 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| Occupational age, y | 5.37 ± 2.990 | / | / | / | / | / | / |
Abbreviations: SBS, Safety Behavior Scale; KAP, Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire of Nursing Interruptions.
The correlation between age or occupational age and safety behavior or interrupt coping behavior (N = 562).
| Characteristics | SBS/r |
| P-KAP/r |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pro-Test | Post-Test | Pro-Test | Post-Test | |||
| Age, y | 0.25 | 0.27 | <0.001 | 0.22 | 0.25 | <0.001 |
| Occupational age, y | 0.28 | 0.30 | <0.001 | 0.24 | 0.25 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: SBS, Safety Behavior Scale; P-KAP, Practice dimension of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire of Nursing Interruptions.
Figure 3The correlation between age, occupation and SBS or P-KAP. Abbreviations: SBS, Safety Behavior Scale; P-KAP, Practice dimension of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire of Nursing Interruptions.
The correlation between professional title, age and occupational time (N = 562).
| Professional Title | Age, y | Occupational Age, y | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Professional title | -- | 0.74 a | 0.72 a |
| Age, y | -- | 0.89 a | |
| Occupational age, y | -- |
ap < 0.05.
Comparison of SBS and P-KAP scores between pre- and post-intervention (N = 562).
| Scales | Mean ± SD | Z |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-Test | Post-Test | |||
| SBS | 3.53 ± 0.52 | 3.72 ± 0.63 | −11.87 | <0.001 |
| Item 1—I will try to make patients feel safest during work. | 3.64 ± 0.73 | 3.79 ± 0.72 | −6.85 | <0.001 |
| Item 2—I will prioritize patient safety when making difficult judgments. | 3.72 ± 0.58 | 3.88 ± 0.66 | −7.18 | <0.001 |
| Item 3—I will try to adjust the mental and physical strength to the most suitable state at work. | 3.83 ± 0.61 | 3.96 ± 0.67 | −7.25 | <0.001 |
| Item 4—I will read the standard workflow established by the unit before taking care of patients. | 3.05 ± 0.51 | 3.26 ± 0.71 | −8.23 | <0.001 |
| Item 5—I will carefully follow the unit’s operating instructions on the standard safety workflow. | 3.04 ± 0.48 | 3.23 ± 0.69 | −7.22 | <0.001 |
| Item 6—I will cause no accidents. | 3.66 ± 0.74 | 3.84 ± 0.77 | −7.63 | <0.001 |
| Item 7—I will ask my boss or supervisor when in doubt. | 3.81 ± 0.65 | 3.95 ± 0.68 | −7.52 | <0.001 |
| Item 8—I will clean my hands before touching the patients. | 3.45 ± 0.70 | 3.81 ± 0.76 | −11.67 | <0.001 |
| Item 9—I always take the initiative to confirm the patient’s identity when it involves any treatment and patient care. | 3.51 ± 0.71 | 3.84 ± 0.76 | −10.66 | <0.001 |
| Practice subscale of KAP | 2.54 ± 0.56 | 2.71 ± 0.54 | −11.56 | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: SBS, Safety Behavior Scale; P-KAP, Practice dimension of Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Questionnaire of Nursing Interruptions.