Literature DB >> 29369401

Pallidal deep brain stimulation modulates cortical excitability and plasticity.

Zhen Ni1, Sang Jin Kim1, Nicolas Phielipp1, Soumya Ghosh1, Kaviraja Udupa1, Carolyn A Gunraj1, Utpal Saha1, Mojgan Hodaie2, Suneil K Kalia2, Andres M Lozano2, Darrin J Lee2, Elena Moro1,3, Alfonso Fasano1,4, Mark Hallett5, Anthony E Lang1,4, Robert Chen1,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Internal globus pallidus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) relieves symptoms in dystonia patients. However, the physiological effects produced by GPi DBS are not fully understood. In particular, how a single-pulse GPi DBS changes cortical circuits has never been investigated. We studied the modulation of motor cortical excitability and plasticity with single-pulse GPi DBS in dystonia patients with bilateral implantation of GPi DBS.
METHODS: The cortical evoked potentials from DBS were recorded with electroencephalography. Transcranial magnetic stimulation with a conditioning test paired-pulse paradigm was used to investigate the effect of GPi DBS on the primary motor cortex. How GPi DBS might modulate the motor cortical plasticity was tested using a paired associative stimulation paradigm with repetitive pairs of GPi DBS and motor cortical stimulation at specific time intervals.
RESULTS: GPi stimulation produced 2 peaks of cortical evoked potentials with latencies of ∼10 and ∼25 milliseconds in the motor cortical area. Cortical facilitation was observed at ∼10 milliseconds after single-pulse GPi DBS, and cortical inhibition was observed after a ∼25-millisecond interval. Repetitive pairs of GPi stimulation with cortical stimulation at these 2 time intervals produced long-term potentiation-like effects in the motor cortex.
INTERPRETATION: Single-pulse DBS modulates cortical excitability and plasticity at specific time intervals. These effects may be related to the mechanism of action of DBS. Combination of DBS with cortical stimulation with appropriate timing has therapeutic potential and could be explored in the future as a method to enhance the effects of neuromodulation for neurological and psychiatric diseases. Ann Neurol 2018;83:352-362.
© 2018 American Neurological Association.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29369401     DOI: 10.1002/ana.25156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Neurol        ISSN: 0364-5134            Impact factor:   10.422


  18 in total

1.  Case studies in neuroscience: deep brain stimulation changes upper limb cortical motor maps in dystonia.

Authors:  Nicholas D J Strzalkowski; Rachel E Sondergaard; Liu Shi Gan; Zelma H T Kiss
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A pooled meta-analysis of GPi and STN deep brain stimulation outcomes for cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Takashi Tsuboi; Joshua K Wong; Leonardo Almeida; Christopher W Hess; Aparna Wagle Shukla; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Effects of deep brain stimulation on the primary motor cortex: Insights from transcranial magnetic stimulation studies.

Authors:  Zhen Ni; Kaviraja Udupa; Mark Hallett; Robert Chen
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 4.  Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Julius Kricheldorff; Katharina Göke; Maximilian Kiebs; Florian H Kasten; Christoph S Herrmann; Karsten Witt; Rene Hurlemann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-15

5.  Improvement of head and neck range of motion induced by chronic pallidal deep brain stimulation for cervical dystonia.

Authors:  Christian Blahak; Marc E Wolf; Assel Saryyeva; Hansjoerg Baezner; Joachim K Krauss
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.575

6.  Cortical Potentials Evoked by Subthalamic Stimulation Demonstrate a Short Latency Hyperdirect Pathway in Humans.

Authors:  Svjetlana Miocinovic; Coralie de Hemptinne; Witney Chen; Faical Isbaine; Jon T Willie; Jill L Ostrem; Philip A Starr
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-10       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  Neurophysiological insights in dystonia and its response to deep brain stimulation treatment.

Authors:  Stephen Tisch; Patricia Limousin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  High-Frequency Deep Brain Stimulation of the Substantia Nigra Pars Reticulata Facilitates Extinction and Prevents Reinstatement of Methamphetamine-Induced Conditioned Place Preference.

Authors:  Libo Zhang; Shiqiu Meng; Wenjun Chen; Yun Chen; Enze Huang; Guipeng Zhang; Yisen Liang; Zengbo Ding; Yanxue Xue; Yun Chen; Jie Shi; Yu Shi
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.810

9.  Model-based deconstruction of cortical evoked potentials generated by subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Karthik Kumaravelu; Chintan S Oza; Christina E Behrend; Warren M Grill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.974

Review 10.  Safety and recommendations for TMS use in healthy subjects and patient populations, with updates on training, ethical and regulatory issues: Expert Guidelines.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Andrea Antal; Sven Bestmann; Marom Bikson; Carmen Brewer; Jürgen Brockmöller; Linda L Carpenter; Massimo Cincotta; Robert Chen; Jeff D Daskalakis; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Michael D Fox; Mark S George; Donald Gilbert; Vasilios K Kimiskidis; Giacomo Koch; Risto J Ilmoniemi; Jean Pascal Lefaucheur; Letizia Leocani; Sarah H Lisanby; Carlo Miniussi; Frank Padberg; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Walter Paulus; Angel V Peterchev; Angelo Quartarone; Alexander Rotenberg; John Rothwell; Paolo M Rossini; Emiliano Santarnecchi; Mouhsin M Shafi; Hartwig R Siebner; Yoshikatzu Ugawa; Eric M Wassermann; Abraham Zangen; Ulf Ziemann; Mark Hallett
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 4.861

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.