| Literature DB >> 35883408 |
James Patrick Crilly1, Peter Plate2.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess iron deficiency anaemia in new-born lambs and goat kids and was carried out in two parts: (1) Twenty blood samples were taken from one-month-old lambs and kids under different systems and were tested for haemoglobin. Three groups of lambs were compared: indoor reared on maternal milk, indoor reared on milk replacer, and outdoor reared on maternal milk. Indoor-reared kids were compared: those fed on maternal milk and fed on milk replacer. Indoor-reared kids and lambs on maternal milk showed significantly lower haemoglobin levels than those on milk replacer or reared outdoors. (2) On farms with indoor-reared lambs or goat kids on maternal milk, an intervention trial was carried out: animals were randomly assigned at 1-8 days of age to either receive 300 mg (lambs) or 150 mg iron (goat kids) as intramuscular iron dextran, and growth rates were compared after one and two months. Haemoglobin levels at one month were also compared in randomly selected animals from both groups. Treated lambs and kids showed higher haemoglobin levels at one month of age and a numerically increased growth rate that was statistically significant for twin lambs. Iron dextran improves haemoglobin levels in these animals and may lead to higher growth rates, especially in twin lambs.Entities:
Keywords: anaemia; goat kids; growth rates; haemoglobin; iron; lambs
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883408 PMCID: PMC9311502 DOI: 10.3390/ani12141863
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Sample size calculation, based on a p-value of 0.05 and a power of 0.8; calculator used: https://www.sealedenvelope.com/power/continuous-superiority/ (accessed on 18 November 2021).
| Kids | Lambs | |
|---|---|---|
| Assumed average DLWG treated (g/d) | 160 | 220 |
| Assumed average DLWG untreated (g/d) | 145 | 200 |
| Assumed standard deviation (g/d) | 28 | 50 |
| Sample size per group required | 55 | 99 |
| Total sample size required | 110 | 198 |
Mean haemoglobin concentrations of the tested groups of lambs and kids from the preliminary study. The 95% confidence interval is also shown, as is the percentage of animals in each group with a haemoglobin concentration below the reference range of 8–14 g/dL.
| Group | Species | Environment | Diet | Mean [Hb] (g/dL) | 95% CI | % [Hb] < Ref. Range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Goat | Indoors | Milk replacer | 9.65 | 9.07–10.23 | 5% |
| 2 | Goat | Indoors | Suckling | 7.73 | 7.21–8.24 | 45% |
| 3 | Sheep | Indoors | Milk replacer | 10.13 | 9.37–10.89 | 5% |
| 4 | Sheep | Indoors | Suckling | 6.8 | 6.14–7.46 | 80% |
| 5 | Sheep | Outdoors | Suckling | 9.08 | 8.49–9.66 | 20% |
Results of the comparison of the concentration of haemoglobin by Student’s t-test, and the comparison of the percentage of animals with haemoglobin concentration below the reference range by Fisher’s exact test between the different groups. Cross-species comparisons were not performed.
| Species | Comparison | Variable | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Goats | Indoor: suckled vs. milk replacer | [Hb] | 0.000 |
| Sheep | Indoor: suckled vs. milk replacer | [Hb] | 0.000 |
| Sheep | Suckled: indoor vs. outdoor | [Hb] | 0.000 |
| Sheep | Outdoor suckled vs. indoor milk replacer | [Hb] | 0.037 |
| Goats | Indoor: suckled vs. milk replacer | % [Hb] < ref.range | 0.008 |
| Sheep | Indoor: suckled vs. milk replacer | % [Hb] < ref.range | 0.000 |
| Sheep | Suckled: indoor vs. outdoor | % [Hb] < ref.range | 0.000 |
| Sheep | Outdoor suckled vs. indoor milk replacer | % [Hb] < ref.range | 0.342 |
Overall DLWG in lambs between 0–1 month.
| Farm | 0–1 Month DLWG (g/day) | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | INJ (SD) | CON (SD) | |||
| 1 | 125 | 311 (54) | 288 (78) | 23 | 0.058 |
| 2 | 31 | 352 (65) | 325 (51) | 27 | 0.208 |
| 3 | 61 | 327 (118) | 319 (78) | 8 | 0.743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall DLWG in lambs, 0–1 month, singles only.
| Farm | 0–1 Month DLWG (g/Day) | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | INJ (SD) | CON (SD) | |||
| 1 | 49 | 328 (50) | 324 (89 | 4 | 0.868 |
| 2 | 7 | 315 (48) | 361 (53) | −46 | 0.287 |
| 3 | 27 | 393 (121) | 346 (94) | 47 | 0.265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mean 0–1-month DLWG in twins and triplets on the three farms.
| Farm | 0–1 Month DLWG (g/Day) | Difference | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | INJ (SD) | CON (SD) | |||
| 1 | 76 | 301 (55) | 261 (56) | 40 | 0.002 |
| 2 | 24 | 366 (67) | 317 (50) | 49 | 0.05 |
| 3 | 34 | 277 (90) | 296 (55) | −20 | 0.444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1Mean overall DLWG on the farms with error bars (kg/day).
Figure 2Mean 0–1-month DLWG in twins and triplets (kg/day).
Overall DLWG in kids between 0 and 1 month.
| Farm | n | 0–1 Month DLWG (g/Day) | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| INJ (SD) | CON (SD) | ||||
| 1 | 22 | 200 (33) | 191 (32) | 9 | 0.508 |
| 2 | 34 | 129 (28) | 129 (33) | 0 | 0.956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|