| Literature DB >> 30157884 |
Ane Odden1, Synnøve Vatn2, Antonio Ruiz3, Lucy Jane Robertson4, Heidi Larsen Enemark5, Silje Katrine Nes6, Vibeke Tømmerberg2, Snorre Stuen6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Iron is an essential nutrient, and iron supplementation has been shown to reduce the incidence of abomasal bloat in lambs. Additionally, iron deficiency is linked to pica, which may increase uptake of Eimeria oocysts. Coccidiosis in sheep, caused by Eimeria spp., is an important infection, leading to reduced welfare and economic losses. The aims of our study were to investigate: (1) the use of iron supplementation in Norwegian sheep flocks using a questionnaire survey, and (2) whether iron supplementation reduced excretion of Eimeria oocysts and increased the growth rates of young lambs.Entities:
Keywords: Coccidiosis; Eimeria spp.; Iron supplementation; Norway; Sheep
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30157884 PMCID: PMC6114706 DOI: 10.1186/s13028-018-0404-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Vet Scand ISSN: 0044-605X Impact factor: 1.695
Fig. 1Sample protocol. Twin lambs (n = 20) in five flocks, injected with iron or saline 0–3 days after birth, were sampled according to the given protocol. Days are given as days after turnout
Questionnaire data from Norwegian sheep farmers supplementing with iron
| % | n | |
|---|---|---|
| Administration route | ||
| Oral | 56.7 | 85 |
| Injection | 43.3 | 65 |
| Total | 150 | |
| Purpose | ||
| Abomasal bloat | 38.4 | 58 |
| Abomasal bloat and coccidiosis | 27.8 | 42 |
| Coccidiosis | 9.3 | 14 |
| Other/uncertaina | 24.5 | 37 |
| Total | 151 | |
| Intend to supplement next year | ||
| Yes | 93.4 | 142 |
| No | 6.6 | 10 |
| Total | 152 | |
aOther purpose/uncertain includes recommendations by veterinarian, experience of pica in lambs, and focus on increasing growth rates. n = number of farms
Twin lambs from five flocks (A–E) located in Rogaland County, Norway, included in an iron injection field trial
| Flock | Number of lambs | Treated | Control | Age at iron injection (days) | Age at turnout (days) | Breeda | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rams | Ewes | Rams | Ewes | |||||
| A | 22 | 3 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 1–3 | 16–18 | NWS |
| B | 20 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 0–2 | 20–23 | NWS |
| C | 20 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 1–3 | 29–31 | NWS and NST |
| D | 20 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 0–3 | 16–21 | NWS |
| E | 20 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2–3 | 16–17 | NWS and NST |
Lambs were either supplemented with 600 mg gleptoferron (treated) or physiological saline (controls) subcutaneously
aNWS Norwegian White Sheep, NST Norwegian Short Tail
Mean growth rates (g/day, mean ± SEM) of iron supplemented lambs and controls in the five flocks (A–E)
| Iron injectiona—21 days after turnout | 21 days after turnout—autumnb | Iron injection—autumnb | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treated | Control | Treated | Control | Treated | Control | |
| A | 392 ± 19 | 357 ± 19 | 177 ± 12 | 203 ± 14 | 224 ± 12 | 238 ± 14 |
| B | 394 ± 14 | 371 ± 12 | 294 ± 17 | 324 ± 37 | 324 ± 14 | 334 ± 22 |
| C | 374 ± 11 | 332 ± 25 | 248 ± 28 | 251 ± 25 | 287 ± 19 | 276 ± 16 |
| D | 410 ± 13 | 423 ± 22 | 252 ± 12 | 249 ± 10 | 293 ± 12 | 295 ± 13 |
| E | 367 ± 17* | 311 ± 15 | 345 ± 27 | 367 ± 26 | 351 ± 21 | 351 ± 20 |
| All flocks | 388 ± 7* | 359 ± 10 | 262 ± 12 | 274 ± 13 | 295 ± 9 | 296 ± 9 |
Treated lambs were subcutaneously supplemented with iron within 3 days of birth. Turnout was considered day 0
* P < 0.05
aIron injection: days − 31 to − 16
bAutumn: days 79 to 150
Fig. 2Mean oocyst excretion in 102 twin lambs supplemented subcutaneously with iron (red) or saline (blue). Lambs from five Norwegian sheep flocks (A–E) with known coccidiosis problems were sampled at day 0, 7, 14 and 21 after turnout. *P< 0.05
Fig. 3Mean blood levels of red blood cells, iron, haemoglobin and haematocrit with 95% confidence intervals for twin lambs in the five included flocks (A–E) at day 0 and 14 after turnout. Half of the lambs were supplemented with iron 16–31 days before turnout. Red: iron supplemented lambs, blue: control lambs, green line: lower reference limit (internal references). *Significant difference in the treated group between samplings (P< 0.05)