| Literature DB >> 35881683 |
Shenling Liao1, Kang An2, Zhi Liu1, He He1, Zhenmei An3, Qiaoli Su2, Shuangqing Li2.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to confirm the association between some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) in western China.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990GATAD2Azzm321990; zzm321990GCKRzzm321990; zzm321990MBOAT7zzm321990; zzm321990PNPLA3zzm321990; zzm321990TM6SF2zzm321990; metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35881683 PMCID: PMC9459258 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 3.124
Basic information of SNPs, including the frequencies of SNP genotypes, the p value of the Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium equation, and bioinformatics function annotations
| SNP | Genotypes | Control group ( |
| Case group ( |
| HaploReg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| CC | 105 | 0.912 | 91 | 0.732 | Enhancer histone marks, Motifs changed, NHGRI/EBI GWAS hits, selected eQTL hits |
| CG | 114 | 137 | ||||
| GG | 30 | 56 | ||||
|
| CC | 221 | 0.401 | 239 | 0.194 | Enhancer histone marks, Motifs changed, selected eQTL hits |
| CT | 25 | 35 | ||||
| TT | 0 | 3 | ||||
|
| CC | 136 | 0.468 | 148 | 0.826 | Promoter histone marks, enhancer histone marks, DNAse, proteins bound, Motifs changed, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits |
| CT | 93 | 113 | ||||
| TT | 20 | 23 | ||||
|
| CC | 55 | 0.717 | 63 | 0.957 | Enhancer histone marks, DNAse, proteins bound, Motifs changed, HGRI/EBI GWAS hits, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits |
| CT | 121 | 142 | ||||
| TT | 73 | 79 | ||||
|
| CC | 54 | 0.520 | 59 | 0.954 | Enhancer histone marks, Motifs changed, HGRI/EBI GWAS hits, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits |
| CT | 118 | 139 | ||||
| TT | 76 | 83 | ||||
|
| GG | 153 | 0.852 | 171 | 0.051 | Promoter histone marks, enhancer histone marks, DNAse, Motifs changed, GRASP QTL hits, selected eQTL hits |
| GA | 85 | 91 | ||||
| AA | 11 | 22 |
Characteristics of the study populations. Data are presented as the median and interquartile range or mean and standard deviation, and the Mann–Whitney U test or Student's t test was performed for quantitative variables
| Variables | Control | MAFLD |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex (male%) | 73.2% | 75.0% | 0.637 |
| Age | 49.00 (17.00) | 51.00 (18.00) | 0.075 |
| BMI | 23.95 (3.57) | 27.12 (4.67) | <0.001 |
| Total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 13.70 (8.62) | 15.84 (7.71) | <0.001 |
| Direct bilirubin (μmol/L) | 4.40 (3.07) | 4.86 (2.27) | <0.001 |
| Indirect bilirubin (μmol/L) | 9.32 (6.20) | 10.90 (5.34) | 0.002 |
| Albumin (g/L) | 47.40 (7.50) | 49.05 (4.23) | <0.001 |
| Globulin (g/L) | 27.57 (3.26) | 27.45 (4.87) | 0.739 |
| ALT (IU/L) | 20.00 (14.00) | 29.00 (29.00) | <0.001 |
| AST (IU/L) | 18.00 (6.00) | 21.00 (14.00) | <0.001 |
| Glucose (mmol/L) | 5.47 (0.88) | 6.13 (3.16) | <0.001 |
| Urea (mmol/L) | 4.91 (2.13) | 4.86 (1.60) | 0.830 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 77.56 (17.35) | 75.77 (15.06) | 0.211 |
| Serum uric acid (μmol/L) | 316.00 (110.00) | 350.50 (117.25) | <0.001 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.29 (1.00) | 2.03 (1.43) | <0.001 |
| CHOL (mmol/L) | 4.74 (1.05) | 4.77 (1.16) | 0.781 |
| HDL‐C (mmol/L) | 1.35 (0.50) | 1.08 (0.44) | <0.001 |
| LDL‐C (mmol/L) | 2.97 (0.84) | 3.06 (0.93) | 0.218 |
| ALP (IU/L) | 75.00 (27.00) | 75.00 (29.00) | 0.564 |
| GGT (IU/L) | 26.00 (22.50) | 36.00 (36.00) | <0.001 |
Abbreviations: ALP, alkaline phosphatase; ALT, alanine transaminase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; CHOL, cholesterol; GGT, gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase; HDL‐C, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL‐C, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglycerides.
Normal data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation, and Student's t test was used to compare continuous variables.
Association between the genetic model for each SNP and MAFLD. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association between gene variants and MAFLD after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dominant model | CC vs. CG + GG | CC vs. CT + TT | CC vs. CT + TT | CC vs. CT + TT | CC vs. CT + TT | GG vs. GA + AA |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.397 (0.933, 2.093) | 1.375 (0.926, 2.043) | 1.088 (0.577, 2.501) | 0.929 (0.582, 1.484) | 1.015 (0.630, 1.636) | 0.980 (0.655, 1.465) |
|
| 0.104 | 0.114 | 0.795 | 0.758 | 0.951 | 0.92 |
| adjust | 0.388 | 0.388 | 0.951 | 0.951 | 0.951 | 0.951 |
| Recessive model | CC + CG vs. GG | CT + CC vs. TT | CT + CC vs. TT | CT + CC vs. TT | CT + CC vs. TT | GA + GG vs. AA |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.791 (1.032, 3.108) | 1.156 (0.567, 2.354) | — | 0.894 (0.578, 1.382) | 0.942 (0.613, 1.445) | 2.066 (0.880, 4.847) |
|
| 0.038 | 0.69 | — | 0.614 | 0.783 | 0.095 |
| adjust | 0.323 | 0.951 | — | 0.951 | 0.951 | 0.388 |
| Additive model | CC vs. CG vs. GG | CC vs. CT vs. TT | CC vs. CT vs. TT | CC vs. CT vs. TT | CC vs. CT vs. TT | GG vs. GA vs. AA |
| OR (95% CI) | 1.377 (1.037, 1.828) | 1.244 (0.916, 1.690) | 1.162 (0.636, 2.126) | 0.932 (0.707, 1.228) | 0.980 (0.744, 1292) | 1.100 (0.796, 1.520) |
|
| 0.027 | 0.163 | 0.625 | 0.616 | 0.887 | 0.564 |
| adjust | 0.323 | 0.462 | 0.951 | 0.951 | 0.951 | 0.951 |
The adjusted p value was adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg.
The association between quantitative traits in the MAFLD group and genetic models after adjustment for age, sex, and BMI
| Traits | SNP | B (95% CI) |
| Adjust |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG |
| 0.649 (0.125, 1.173) | 0.015 | 0.022 |
| TG |
| 0.706 (0.178, 1.234) | 0.009 | 0.022 |
| GLU |
| −1.217 (−2.004, −0.390) | 0.004 | 0.022 |
| GLU |
| −0.618 (−1.096, −0.140) | 0.011 | 0.022 |
| GLU |
| −0.892 (−1.699, −0.084) | 0.031 | 0.031 |
| AST |
| 13.774 (2.404, 25.145) | 0.018 | 0.022 |
The adjusted p value was adjusted by Benjamini–Hochberg.
Summary of SNP–SNP interaction models detected by MDR
| Model | Training balance accuracy | Testing balance accuracy | Cross‐validation consistency |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rs738409 | 0.5512 | 0.5337 | 10/10 | 0.0146 |
| rs58542926, rs738409 | 0.5660 | 0.5008 | 5/10 | 0.0007 |
| rs1260326, rs4808199, rs738409 | 0.5960 | 0.4916 | 5/10 | <0.0001 |
| rs1260326, rs4808199, rs641738, rs738409 | 0.6428 | 0.5188 | 9/10 | <0.0001 |
| rs58542926, rs1260326, rs4808199, rs641738, rs738409 | 0.6677 | 0.5165 | 8/10 | <0.0001 |
| rs58542926, rs780094, rs1260326, rs4808199, rs641738, rs738409 | 0.6795 | 0.5105 | 10/10 | <0.0001 |
FIGURE 1The entropy of SNP–SNP interactions in the dendrogram (A) and circle graph (B). (A) Short lines represented stronger interactions, and long lines represented weaker interactions. (B) Entropy values of the SNPs were presented in the cells, showing the main independent effects. The connecting lines indicated pairwise interactive effects. Red and blue represented synergism, and redundancy, respectively. Negative percent entropy indicates redundancy, while positive percent entropy indicates synergism