Andreas Stahl1, Emine A Sukgen2, Wei-Chi Wu3, Domenico Lepore4, Hidehiko Nakanishi5, Jan Mazela6, Darius M Moshfeghi7, Robert Vitti8, Aditya Athanikar8, Karen Chu8, Pablo Iveli9, Fei Zhao10, Thomas Schmelter11, Sergio Leal12, Evra Köfüncü11, Noriyuki Azuma13. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Adana City Training and Research Hospital, Adana, Turkey. 3. Department of Ophthalmology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan. 4. Department of Geriatrics and Neuroscience, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, A. Gemelli Foundation IRCSS, Rome, Italy. 5. Research and Development Center for New Medical Frontiers, Department of Advanced Medicine, Division of Neonatal Intensive Care Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan. 6. Department of Neonatology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland. 7. Byers Eye Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 8. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Tarrytown, New York. 9. Bayer AG, Wuppertal, Germany. 10. Bayer Inc, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 11. Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany. 12. Bayer Consumer Care AG, Basel, Switzerland. 13. Department of Ophthalmology, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
Importance: Laser photocoagulation, which is the standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), can have adverse events. Studies of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections have suggested efficacy in the treatment of ROP, but few studies have directly compared them with laser treatments. Objective: To compare intravitreal aflibercept vs laser photocoagulation in infants with ROP requiring treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority, phase 3, 24-week, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 27 countries (64 hospital sites) throughout Asia, Europe, and South America. Overall, 118 infants (gestational age ≤32 weeks at birth or birth weight ≤1500 g) with ROP severity (zone I stage 1+ [stage 1 plus increased disease activity], zone I stage 2+, zone I stage 3, zone I stage 3+, zone II stage 2+, or zone II stage 3+) requiring treatment or with aggressive posterior ROP in at least 1 eye were enrolled between September 25, 2019, and August 28, 2020 (the last visit occurred on February 12, 2021). Interventions: Infants were randomized 2:1 to receive a 0.4-mg dose of intravitreal aflibercept (n = 75) or laser photocoagulation (n = 43) at baseline. Additional treatment was allowed as prespecified. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of infants without active ROP and unfavorable structural outcomes 24 weeks after starting treatment (assessed by investigators). The requirement for rescue treatment was considered treatment failure. Intravitreal aflibercept was deemed noninferior if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% bayesian credible interval for the treatment difference was greater than -5%. Results: Among 118 infants randomized, 113 were treated (mean gestational age, 26.3 [SD, 1.9] weeks; 53 [46.9%] were female; 16.8% had aggressive posterior ROP, 19.5% had zone I ROP, and 63.7% had zone II ROP) and 104 completed the study. Treatment (intravitreal aflibercept: n = 75; laser photocoagulation: n = 38) was mostly bilateral (92.9%), and 82.2% of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group received 1 injection per eye. Treatment success was 85.5% with intravitreal aflibercept vs 82.1% with laser photocoagulation (between-group difference, 3.4% [1-sided 95% credible interval, -8.0% to ∞]). Rescue treatment was required in 4.8% (95% CI, 1.9% to 9.6%) of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group vs 11.1% (95% CI, 4.9% to 20.7%) of eyes in the laser photocoagulation group. The serious adverse event rates were 13.3% (ocular) and 24.0% (systemic) in the intravitreal aflibercept group compared with 7.9% and 36.8%, respectively, in the laser photocoagulation group. Three deaths, which occurred 4 to 9 weeks after intravitreal aflibercept treatment, were considered unrelated to aflibercept by the investigators. Conclusions and Relevance: Among infants with ROP, intravitreal aflibercept compared with laser photocoagulation did not meet criteria for noninferiority with respect to the primary outcome of the proportion of infants achieving treatment success at week 24. Further data would be required for more definitive conclusions regarding the comparative effects of intravitreal aflibercept and laser photocoagulation in this population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004208.
Importance: Laser photocoagulation, which is the standard treatment for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), can have adverse events. Studies of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor injections have suggested efficacy in the treatment of ROP, but few studies have directly compared them with laser treatments. Objective: To compare intravitreal aflibercept vs laser photocoagulation in infants with ROP requiring treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This noninferiority, phase 3, 24-week, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 27 countries (64 hospital sites) throughout Asia, Europe, and South America. Overall, 118 infants (gestational age ≤32 weeks at birth or birth weight ≤1500 g) with ROP severity (zone I stage 1+ [stage 1 plus increased disease activity], zone I stage 2+, zone I stage 3, zone I stage 3+, zone II stage 2+, or zone II stage 3+) requiring treatment or with aggressive posterior ROP in at least 1 eye were enrolled between September 25, 2019, and August 28, 2020 (the last visit occurred on February 12, 2021). Interventions: Infants were randomized 2:1 to receive a 0.4-mg dose of intravitreal aflibercept (n = 75) or laser photocoagulation (n = 43) at baseline. Additional treatment was allowed as prespecified. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of infants without active ROP and unfavorable structural outcomes 24 weeks after starting treatment (assessed by investigators). The requirement for rescue treatment was considered treatment failure. Intravitreal aflibercept was deemed noninferior if the lower limit of the 1-sided 95% bayesian credible interval for the treatment difference was greater than -5%. Results: Among 118 infants randomized, 113 were treated (mean gestational age, 26.3 [SD, 1.9] weeks; 53 [46.9%] were female; 16.8% had aggressive posterior ROP, 19.5% had zone I ROP, and 63.7% had zone II ROP) and 104 completed the study. Treatment (intravitreal aflibercept: n = 75; laser photocoagulation: n = 38) was mostly bilateral (92.9%), and 82.2% of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group received 1 injection per eye. Treatment success was 85.5% with intravitreal aflibercept vs 82.1% with laser photocoagulation (between-group difference, 3.4% [1-sided 95% credible interval, -8.0% to ∞]). Rescue treatment was required in 4.8% (95% CI, 1.9% to 9.6%) of eyes in the intravitreal aflibercept group vs 11.1% (95% CI, 4.9% to 20.7%) of eyes in the laser photocoagulation group. The serious adverse event rates were 13.3% (ocular) and 24.0% (systemic) in the intravitreal aflibercept group compared with 7.9% and 36.8%, respectively, in the laser photocoagulation group. Three deaths, which occurred 4 to 9 weeks after intravitreal aflibercept treatment, were considered unrelated to aflibercept by the investigators. Conclusions and Relevance: Among infants with ROP, intravitreal aflibercept compared with laser photocoagulation did not meet criteria for noninferiority with respect to the primary outcome of the proportion of infants achieving treatment success at week 24. Further data would be required for more definitive conclusions regarding the comparative effects of intravitreal aflibercept and laser photocoagulation in this population. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04004208.
Authors: Laura L Snyder; Jose Maria Garcia-Gonzalez; Michael J Shapiro; Michael P Blair Journal: Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina Date: 2016-03 Impact factor: 1.300
Authors: Lois E H Smith; Ann Hellström; Andreas Stahl; Alistair Fielder; Wiley Chambers; Jane Moseley; Cynthia Toth; David Wallace; Brian A Darlow; Jacob V Aranda; Boubou Hallberg; Jonathan M Davis Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2019-03-01 Impact factor: 7.389
Authors: Michael F Chiang; Graham E Quinn; Alistair R Fielder; Susan R Ostmo; R V Paul Chan; Audina Berrocal; Gil Binenbaum; Michael Blair; J Peter Campbell; Antonio Capone; Yi Chen; Shuan Dai; Anna Ells; Brian W Fleck; William V Good; M Elizabeth Hartnett; Gerd Holmstrom; Shunji Kusaka; Andrés Kychenthal; Domenico Lepore; Birgit Lorenz; Maria Ana Martinez-Castellanos; Şengül Özdek; Dupe Ademola-Popoola; James D Reynolds; Parag K Shah; Michael Shapiro; Andreas Stahl; Cynthia Toth; Anand Vinekar; Linda Visser; David K Wallace; Wei-Chi Wu; Peiquan Zhao; Andrea Zin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2021-07-08 Impact factor: 12.079