Laura M Jacobsen1, Brian N Bundy2, Heba M Ismail3, Mark Clements4, Megan Warnock2, Susan Geyer2, Desmond A Schatz1, Jay M Sosenko5. 1. Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. 2. Health Informatics Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. 4. Pediatric Endocrinology, Children's Mercy, Kansas City, MO 64111, USA. 5. Division of Endocrinology, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
Abstract
CONTEXT: HbA1c from ≥ 5.7% to < 6.5% (39-46 mmol/mol) indicates prediabetes according to American Diabetes Association guidelines, yet its identification of prediabetes specific for type 1 diabetes has not been assessed. A composite glucose and C-peptide measure, Index60, identifies individuals at high risk for type 1 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: We compared Index60 and HbA1c thresholds as markers for type 1 diabetes risk. METHODS: TrialNet Pathway to Prevention study participants with ≥ 2 autoantibodies (GADA, IAA, IA-2A, or ZnT8A) who had oral glucose tolerance tests and HbA1c measurements underwent 1) predictive time-dependent modeling of type 1 diabetes risk (n = 2776); and 2) baseline comparisons between high-risk mutually exclusive groups: Index60 ≥ 2.04 (n = 268) vs HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (n = 268). The Index60 ≥ 2.04 threshold was commensurate in ordinal ranking with the standard prediabetes threshold of HbA1c ≥ 5.7%. RESULTS: In mutually exclusive groups, individuals exceeding Index60 ≥ 2.04 had a higher cumulative incidence of type 1 diabetes than those exceeding HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (P < 0.0001). Appreciably more individuals with Index60 ≥ 2.04 were at stage 2, and among those at stage 2, the cumulative incidence was higher for those with Index60 ≥ 2.04 (P = 0.02). Those with Index60 ≥ 2.04 were younger, with lower BMI, greater autoantibody number, and lower C-peptide than those with HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Individuals with Index60 ≥ 2.04 are at greater risk for type 1 diabetes with features more characteristic of the disorder than those with HbA1c ≥ 5.7%. Index60 ≥ 2.04 is superior to the standard HbA1c ≥ 5.7% threshold for identifying prediabetes in autoantibody-positive individuals. These findings appear to justify using Index60 ≥ 2.04 as a prediabetes criterion in this population.
CONTEXT: HbA1c from ≥ 5.7% to < 6.5% (39-46 mmol/mol) indicates prediabetes according to American Diabetes Association guidelines, yet its identification of prediabetes specific for type 1 diabetes has not been assessed. A composite glucose and C-peptide measure, Index60, identifies individuals at high risk for type 1 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: We compared Index60 and HbA1c thresholds as markers for type 1 diabetes risk. METHODS: TrialNet Pathway to Prevention study participants with ≥ 2 autoantibodies (GADA, IAA, IA-2A, or ZnT8A) who had oral glucose tolerance tests and HbA1c measurements underwent 1) predictive time-dependent modeling of type 1 diabetes risk (n = 2776); and 2) baseline comparisons between high-risk mutually exclusive groups: Index60 ≥ 2.04 (n = 268) vs HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (n = 268). The Index60 ≥ 2.04 threshold was commensurate in ordinal ranking with the standard prediabetes threshold of HbA1c ≥ 5.7%. RESULTS: In mutually exclusive groups, individuals exceeding Index60 ≥ 2.04 had a higher cumulative incidence of type 1 diabetes than those exceeding HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (P < 0.0001). Appreciably more individuals with Index60 ≥ 2.04 were at stage 2, and among those at stage 2, the cumulative incidence was higher for those with Index60 ≥ 2.04 (P = 0.02). Those with Index60 ≥ 2.04 were younger, with lower BMI, greater autoantibody number, and lower C-peptide than those with HbA1c ≥ 5.7% (P < 0.0001 for all comparisons). CONCLUSION: Individuals with Index60 ≥ 2.04 are at greater risk for type 1 diabetes with features more characteristic of the disorder than those with HbA1c ≥ 5.7%. Index60 ≥ 2.04 is superior to the standard HbA1c ≥ 5.7% threshold for identifying prediabetes in autoantibody-positive individuals. These findings appear to justify using Index60 ≥ 2.04 as a prediabetes criterion in this population.
Authors: Laura M Jacobsen; Laura Bocchino; Carmella Evans-Molina; Linda DiMeglio; Robin Goland; Darrell M Wilson; Mark A Atkinson; Tandy Aye; William E Russell; John M Wentworth; David Boulware; Susan Geyer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Jeffrey L Mahon; Jay M Sosenko; Lisa Rafkin-Mervis; Heidi Krause-Steinrauf; John M Lachin; Clinton Thompson; Polly J Bingley; Ezio Bonifacio; Jerry P Palmer; George S Eisenbarth; Joseph Wolfsdorf; Jay S Skyler Journal: Pediatr Diabetes Date: 2008-09-24 Impact factor: 4.866
Authors: Ezio Bonifacio; Liping Yu; Alastair K Williams; George S Eisenbarth; Polly J Bingley; Santica M Marcovina; Kerstin Adler; Anette G Ziegler; Patricia W Mueller; Desmond A Schatz; Jeffrey P Krischer; Michael W Steffes; Beena Akolkar Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2010-05-05 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Brandon M Nathan; Maria J Redondo; Heba Ismail; Laura Jacobsen; Emily K Sims; Jerry Palmer; Jay Skyler; Laura Bocchino; Susan Geyer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Maria J Redondo; Brandon M Nathan; Laura M Jacobsen; Emily Sims; Laura E Bocchino; Alberto Pugliese; Desmond A Schatz; Mark A Atkinson; Jay Skyler; Jerry Palmer; Susan Geyer; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2021-01-26 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Liping Yu; David C Boulware; Craig A Beam; John C Hutton; Janet M Wenzlau; Carla J Greenbaum; Polly J Bingley; Jeffrey P Krischer; Jay M Sosenko; Jay S Skyler; George S Eisenbarth; Jeffrey L Mahon Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Richard A Insel; Jessica L Dunne; Mark A Atkinson; Jane L Chiang; Dana Dabelea; Peter A Gottlieb; Carla J Greenbaum; Kevan C Herold; Jeffrey P Krischer; Åke Lernmark; Robert E Ratner; Marian J Rewers; Desmond A Schatz; Jay S Skyler; Jay M Sosenko; Anette-G Ziegler Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Brandon M Nathan; David Boulware; Susan Geyer; Mark A Atkinson; Peter Colman; Robin Goland; William Russell; John M Wentworth; Darrell M Wilson; Carmella Evans-Molina; Diane Wherrett; Jay S Skyler; Antoinette Moran; Jay M Sosenko Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 19.112