Literature DB >> 35880227

Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Publications in The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Dylan Luxenburg1, David Constantinescu2, Gemma St Louis1, Kevin J Bondar1, Suleiman Y Sudah3, Michele D'Apuzzo2.   

Abstract

Background: This study aims to identify the most frequently cited articles published in the Journal of Arthroplasty (JOA) and to analyze the trends in the content and contributors of the literature within the journal.
Methods: The 100 most cited articles published in the JOA were accessed using the Scopus database. The number of citations, year of publication, level of evidence (LOE), article type, country of origin, and contributing institution were each recorded for each article.
Results: The United States (63%) was the most prolific publishing nation. The 1990s (30%) and 2000s (47%) were the most productive decades. The most common article category was clinical outcomes (33%), followed by technical note (16%) and biomechanics (14%). The plurality of the top 100 articles were well-designed case-control or cohort studies of LOE II (46%) followed by LOE V (32%) and LOE I (11%). Conclusions: Using citation analysis, the most influential articles in the JOA were comprehensively and objectively analyzed. The most popular fields of research involved clinical outcomes (33%) and technical note (16%), both of which increase an article's likelihood of being highly cited. Knowledge of the most influential articles in the JOA allows for appreciation of current and potential future areas of literature regarding diagnosis, management, and outcome of a patient undergoing arthroplasty.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bibliometric study; Citation analysis; Publications; The Journal of Arthroplasty; Top-cited

Year:  2022        PMID: 35880227      PMCID: PMC9307491          DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroplast Today        ISSN: 2352-3441


Introduction

Peer-reviewed literature remains the foundation of how evidence-based medicine is practiced by clinicians all around the world. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA), including both total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty, comprises a large cohort of surgical procedures performed in the United States of America (USA) [1]. The ever-growing body of literature across numerous journals regarding arthroplasty provides a challenge to sift through and find the highest quality of evidence studies that can directly impact patient care. Bibliometric analysis has become a popular method to identify and analyze specific topics or trends by using the most influential articles in each topic or journal. The analysis is run by order of citations to determine the impact and influence of each article. This method has been used to highlight topics of interest, shed light on under-researched topics, and determine the quality of contributions from various orthopaedic journals [2,3]. This method has also been useful for analyzing orthopaedic injuries and procedures such as meniscal injuries, unicondylar knee arthroplasty, and hip and knee arthroplasty [[4], [5], [6]]. The Journal of Arthroplasty (JOA) is one of the top journals in orthopaedic surgery and the number 1 journal focusing on joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee when measured by impact factor. There is, however, lack of a coherent summary of the most relevant content of this journal. Our study aims to analyze the characteristics and trends of the top 100 most cited articles in the JOA. The purpose of this analysis is to elucidate the influence this journal has had in its various areas of research focus. We hypothesize that most of the literature comes from research groups out of the USA and are focused on clinical outcomes regarding prosthetic joint infection.

Material and methods

In September 2021, the Scopus database was used to identify articles published in the JOA. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were used in the collection of data. We began by defining the topic of this study as a bibliometric analysis of articles published in the JOA. Our search term in the Scopus database was “Arthroplasty,” and our “search within” was set to “source title.” We searched the journal since its inception in 1986 for all studies it has published. The articles were sorted in descending order of times cited. All included studies were written in English and peer reviewed. A combination of Scopus metrics and data collection via author review was performed using Microsoft Excel. The following data were extracted from each article: title, study design, main topic, citations, year, institutional affiliation, country of origin, and level of evidence (LOE). The countries of origin were determined by the locations of the authors’ affiliated institutions. The order of the top 100 articles was determined by the number of citations per each article. If multiple articles had the same number of citations, then the most recently published article had a prioritized ranking. The LOE was either provided upon evaluation of the abstract or determined by full-text review using the Oxford LOE Guidelines. The lead author (DL) determined article classifications of each study which included the following: surgical technique, clinical outcomes, anatomy/biomechanical, natural history, clinical guidelines, classification, imaging, technical note, and biomechanics. The following topics were used to classify publications: primary hip arthroplasty, primary knee arthroplasty, prosthetic joint infection, hip and knee arthroplasty, revision hip arthroplasty, primary shoulder arthroplasty, healthy knee, venous thromboembolism, implant, and revision knee arthroplasty. The topic of TJA was applied to articles that evaluated joint arthroplasty in more than 2 joints. Articles were placed into only one category via reviewer determination, and this single most applicable category for that article was selected. These data were verified by a separate investigator, with discrepancies being reviewed by the lead author.

Results

The top 100 most cited articles meeting our inclusion criteria were analyzed. All articles were published between 1987 and 2018. The greatest number of citations in 1 article was 914, while the least number was 169 (Table 1). The total amount of citations was 26,278, which provides an average of 263 citations per article. In terms of productivity by decade, the 2000s were the most productive (n = 47 publications), followed by the 1990s (n = 30 publications), the 2010s (n = 18 publications), and lastly the 1980s (n = 5 publications) (Fig. 1).
Table 1

The top 100 most cited articles.

RankPublicationTotal citation
1Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Watson H., Schmier J.K., Parvizi J. Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the united states. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012914
2Paprosky W.G., Perona P.G., Lawrence J.M. Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1994697
3Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Schmier J., Ong K.L., Zhao K., Parvizi J. Infection Burden for Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008662
4Walch G., Badet R., Boulahia A., Khoury A. Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1999631
5Zahiri C.A., Schmalzried T.P., Szuszczewicz E.S., Amstutz H.C. Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1998579
6[No author name available] Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate vs North American Enoxaparin Regimen for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism After Knee Arthroplasty Surgery. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009543
7Muratoglu O.K., Bragdon C.R., O'Connor D.O., Jasty M., Harris W.H. A novel method of cross-linking ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene to improve wear, reduce oxidation, and retain mechanical properties: Recipient of the 1999 HAP Paul award. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2001508
8Dumbleton J.H., Manley M.T., Edidin A.A. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2002475
9Franklin J.L., Barrett W.P., Matsen F.A., III Glenoid loosening in total shoulder arthroplasty: Association with rotator cuff deficiency. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1988458
10Kennedy J.G., Rogers W.B., Soffe K.E., Sullivan R.J., Griffen D.G., Sheehan L.J. Effect of acetabular component orientation on recurrent dislocation, pelvic osteolysis, polyethylene wear, and component migration. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1998425
11Massin P., Engh C.A. Evaluation of cementless acetabular component migration: An experimental study. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1989409
12Parvizi J., Tan T.L., Goswami K., Higuera C., Della Valle C., Chen A.F., Shohat N. The 2018 Definition of Periprosthetic Hip and Knee Infection: An Evidence-Based and Validated Criteria. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2018397
13Parvizi J., Gehrke T. Definition of periprosthetic joint infection. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2014393
14Jolles B.M., Zangger P., Leyvraz P.-F. Factors predisposing to dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty: A multivariate analysis. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2002382
15Fang D.M., Ritter M.A., Davis K.E. Coronal Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Just How Important is it? Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009369
16Mason J.B., Fehring T.K., Estok R., Banel D., Fahrbach K. Meta-Analysis of Alignment Outcomes in Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Surgery. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2007368
17Sharkey P.F., Lichstein P.M., Shen C., Tokarski A.T., Parvizi J. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today-has anything changed after 10 years? Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013358
18Namba R.S., Paxton L., Fithian D.C., Stone M.L. Obesity and perioperative morbidity in total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005343
19Ong K.L., Kurtz S.M., Lau E., Bozic K.J., Berry D.J., Parvizi J. Prosthetic Joint Infection Risk After Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Medicare Population. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009323
20Choong P.F., Dowsey M.M., Stoney J.D. Does Accurate Anatomical Alignment Result in Better Function and Quality of Life? Comparing Conventional and Computer-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty 2009305
21Kienapfel H., Sprey C., Wilke A., Griss P. Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1999297
22Price A.J., Webb J., Topf H., Dodd C.A.F., Goodfellow J.W., Murray D.W. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2001287
23Lindahl H., Malchau H., Herberts P., Garellick G. Periprosthetic femoral fractures: Classification and demographics of 1049 periprosthetic femoral fractures from the Swedish National Hip Arthroplasty Register. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005287
24Mancuso C.A., Salvati E.A., Johanson N.A., Peterson M.G.E., Charlson M.E. Patients' expectations and satisfaction with total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1997279
25Behrend H., Giesinger K., Giesinger J.M., Kuster M.S. The “Forgotten Joint” as the Ultimate Goal in Joint Arthroplasty. Validation of a New Patient-Reported Outcome Measure. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012276
26Kwon Y.-M., Ostlere S.J., McLardy-Smith P., Athanasou N.A., Gill H.S., Murray D.W. “Asymptomatic” Pseudotumors After Metal-on-Metal Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty. Prevalence and Metal Ion Study. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2011267
27Barrett W.P., Turner S.E., Leopold J.P. Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013266
28Bullens P.H.J., Van Loon C.J.M., De Waal Malefijt M.C., Laan R.F.J.M., Veth R.P.H. Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: A comparison between subjective and objective outcome assessments. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2001265
29Masri B.A., Duncan C.P., Beauchamp C.P. Long-term elution of antibiotics from bone-cement: An in vivo study using the prosthesis of antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement (PROSTALAC) system. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1998259
30Bozic K.J., Chan V., Valone F.H., Feeley B.T., Vail T.P. Trends in hip arthroscopy utilization in the United States. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013258
31Parvataneni H.K., Shah V.P., Howard H., Cole N., Ranawat A.S., Ranawat C.S. Controlling Pain After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Using a Multimodal Protocol With Local Periarticular Injections. A Prospective Randomized Study. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2007253
32Malinzak R.A., Ritter M.A., Berend M.E., Meding J.B., Olberding E.M., Davis K.E. Morbidly Obese, Diabetic, Younger, and Unilateral Joint Arthroplasty Patients Have Elevated Total Joint Arthroplasty Infection Rates. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009252
33Burroughs B.R., Hallstrom B., Golladay G.J., Hoeffel D., Harris W.H. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes: An in vitro study. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005246
34Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., Scaddan M., Beaver R. Good Alignment After Total Knee Arthroplasty Leads to Faster Rehabilitation and Better Function. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009246
35Banks S.A., Markovich G.D., Hodge W.A. In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1997243
36Chelly J.E., Greger J., Gebhard R., Coupe K., Clyburn T.A., Buckle R., Criswell A. Continuous femoral blocks improve recovery and outcome of patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2001243
37Brady O.H., Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2000239
38Bobyn J.D., Toh K.-K., Hacking S.A., Tanzer M., Krygier J.J. Tissue response to porous tantalum acetabular cups: A canine model. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1999236
39Cartier P., Sanouiller J.-L., Grelsamer R.P. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996234
40DiGioia III A.M., Plakseychuk A.Y., Levison T.J., Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2003234
41Penner M.J., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. Elution characteristics of vancomycin and tobrarnycin combined in acrylic bone-cement. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996233
42Collier J.P., Sperling D.K., Currier J.H., Sutula L.C., Saum K.A., Mayor M.B. Impact of gamma sterilization on clinical performance of polyethylene in the knee. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996233
43Oral E., Christensen S.D., Malhi A.S., Wannomae K.K., Muratoglu O.K. Wear Resistance and Mechanical Properties of Highly Cross-linked, Ultrahigh-Molecular Weight Polyethylene Doped With Vitamin E. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2006233
44Anderson J.G., Wixson R.L., Tsai D., Stulberg S.D., Chang R.W. Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996231
45Walter W.L., O'Toole G.C., Walter W.K., Ellis A., Zicat B.A. Squeaking in Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hips. The Importance of Acetabular Component Orientation. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2007231
46DiGioia A.M., III, Jaramaz B., Plakseychuk A.Y., Moody J.E., Jr., Nikou C., LaBarca R.S., Levison T.J., Picard F.Comparison of a mechanical acetabular alignment guide with computer placement of the socket. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2002230
47Schroer W.C., Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V., Barnes C.L., Bolognesi M.P., Berend M.E., Ritter M.A., Nunley R.M. Why are total knees failing today? Etiology of total knee revision in 2010 and 2011. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013230
48Nevelos J., Ingham E., Doyle C., Streicher R., Nevelos A., Walter W., Fisher J. Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2000229
49Lynch A.F., Rorabeck C.H., Bourne R.B. Extensor mechanism complications following total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1987224
50Widmer K.-H. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2004224
51Decking R., Markmann Y., Fuchs J., Puhl W., Scharf H.-P. Leg axis after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized trial comparing computer-navigated and manual implantation. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005224
52Eldridge J.D.J., Smith E.J., Hubble M.J., Whitehouse S.L., Learmonth I.D. Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1997219
53Griffin F.M., Insall J.N., Scuderi G.R. Accuracy of soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2000216
54Dennis D.A., Komistek R.D., Stiehl J.B., Walker S.A., Dennis K.N. Range of motion after total knee arthroplasty: The effect of implant design and weight-bearing conditions. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1998213
55Sadoghi P., Liebensteiner M., Agreiter M., Leithner A., Böhler N., Labek G. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: A complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013213
56Mizner R.L., Petterson S.C., Clements K.E., Zeni J.A., Irrgang J.J., Snyder-Mackler L. Measuring Functional Improvement After Total Knee Arthroplasty Requires Both Performance-Based and Patient-Report Assessments. A Longitudinal Analysis of Outcomes. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2011212
57Devane P.A., Horne J.G., Martin K., Coldham G., Krause B. Three-dimensional polyethylene wear of a press-fit titanium prosthesis: Factors influencing generation of polyethylene debris. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1997209
58Dowson D., Hardaker C., Flett M., Isaac G.H. A hip joint simulator study of the performance of metal-on-metal joints: Part II: Design. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2004208
59Landy M.M., Walker P.S. Wear of ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene components of 90 retrieved knee prostheses. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1988204
60Hetaimish B.M., Khan M.M., Simunovic N., Al-Harbi H.H., Bhandari M., Zalzal P.K. Meta-Analysis of Navigation vs Conventional Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012202
61Petersen T.L., Engh G.A.Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1988199
62Reuben J.D., Meyers S.J., Cox D.D., Elliott M., Watson M., Shim S.D. Cost comparison between bilateral simultaneous, staged, and unilateral total joint arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1998197
63Parvizi J., Pawasarat I.M., Azzam K.A., Joshi A., Hansen E.N., Bozic K.J. Periprosthetic joint infection: The economic impact of methicillin-resistant infections. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2010197
64Asayama I., Chamnongkich S., Simpson K.J., Kinsey T.L., Mahoney O.M. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005196
65Chimento G.F., Pavone V., Sharrock N., Kahn B., Cahill J., Sculco T.P. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: A prospective randomized study. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005194
66Dorr L.D., Kane III T.J., Conaty J.P. Long-term results of cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients 45 years old or younger. A 16-year follow-up study. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1994192
67Anderson K.C., Buehler K.C., Markel D.C. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: Comparison with conventional methods. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005192
68Mahaluxmivala J., Bankes M.J.K., Nicolai P., Aldam C.H., Allen P.W. The effect of surgeon experience on component positioning in 673 press fit condylar posterior cruciate-sacrificing total knee arthroplasties. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2001188
69Chin P.L., Kuang Y.Y., Seng J.Y., Ngai N.L. Randomized control trial comparing radiographic total knee arthroplasty implant placement using computer navigation versus conventional technique. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005187
70Brand R.A., Pedersen D.R., Davy D.T., Kotzar G.M., Heiple K.G., Goldberg V.M. Comparison of hip force calculations and measurements in the same patient. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1994185
71Griffin F.M., Math K., Scuderi G.R., Insall J.N., Poilvache P.L. Anatomy of the epicondyles of the distal femur: MRI analysis of normal knees. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2000184
72Boyd A.D., Jr., Thomas W.H., Scott R.D., Sledge C.B., Thornhill T.S. Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty: Indications for glenoid resurfacing. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1990183
73Walter W.L., Insley G.M., Walter W.K., Tuke M.A. Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: Stripe wear. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2004179
74Kop A.M., Swarts E. Corrosion of a Hip Stem With a Modular Neck Taper Junction. A Retrieval Study of 16 Cases. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009179
75Restrepo C., Parvizi J., Pour A.E., Hozack W.J. Prospective Randomized Study of Two Surgical Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2010178
76Iorio R., Clair A.J., Inneh I.A., Slover J.D., Bosco J.A., Zuckerman J.D. Early Results of Medicare's Bundled Payment Initiative for a 90-Day Total Joint Arthroplasty Episode of Care. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2016178
77Oswald M.H., Schneider E. Radiological analysis of normal axial alignment of femur and tibia in view of total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1993177
78Muratoglu O.K., Bragdon C.R., O'Connor D., Perinchief R.S., Estok II D.M., Jasty M., Harris W.H. Larger diameter femoral heads used in conjunction with a highly cross-linked ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: A new concept. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2001176
79Schmalzried T.P., Peters P.C., Maurer B.T., Bragdon C.R., Harris W.H. Long-duration metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties with low wear of the articulating surfaces. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996175
80Blunn G.W., Joshi A.B., Minns R.J., Lidgren L., Lilley P., Ryd L., Engelbrecht E., Walker P.S. Wear in retrieved condylar knee arthroplasties: A comparison of wear in different designs of 280 retrieved condylar knee prostheses. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1997175
81Edidin A.A., Pruitt L., Jewett C.W., Crane D.J., Roberts D., Kurtz S.M. Plasticity-induced damage layer is a precursor to wear in radiation- cross-linked UHMWPE acetabular components for total hip replacement. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1999175
82Jenny J.-Y., Clemens U., Kohler S., Kiefer H., Konermann W., Miehlke R.K. Consistency of implantation of a total knee arthroplasty with a non-image-based navigation system: A case-control study of 235 cases compared with 235 conventionally implanted prostheses. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2005175
83Taylor S.J.G., Walker P.S., Perry J.S., Cannon S.R., Woledge R. The forces in the distal femur and the knee during walking and other activities measured by telemetry. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1998174
84Peters C.L., Shirley B., Erickson J. The Effect of a New Multimodal Perioperative Anesthetic Regimen on Postoperative Pain, Side Effects, Rehabilitation, and Length of Hospital Stay After Total Joint Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2006174
85Pugely A.J., Callaghan J.J., Martin C.T., Cram P., Gao Y. Incidence of and risk factors for 30-day readmission following elective primary total joint arthroplasty: Analysis from the ACS-NSQIP. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013174
86Bryan D., Parvizi J., Austin M., Backe H., Valle C.D., Kolessar D.J., Kreuzer S., Malinzak R., Masri B., McGrory B.J., Mochel D., Yates A. Obesity and total joint arthroplasty. A literature based review. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2013174
87Figgie M.P., Sobel M. The results of treatment of supracondylar fracture above total knee arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1990173
88Martell J.M., Verner J.J., Incavo S.J. Clinical performance of a highly cross-linked polyethylene at two years in total hip arthroplasty: A randomized prospective trial. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2003173
89Nakata K., Nishikawa M., Yamamoto K., Hirota S., Yoshikawa H. A Clinical Comparative Study of the Direct Anterior With Mini-Posterior Approach. Two Consecutive Series. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2009173
90Greene K.A., Wilde A.H., Stulberg B.N. Preoperative nutritional status of total joint patients: Relationship to postoperative wound complications. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1991172
91Yoshino N., Takai S., Ohtsuki Y., Hirasawa Y. Computed tomography measurement of the surgical and clinical transepicondylar axis of the distal femur in osteoarthritic knees. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2001172
92Ladon D., Doherty A., Newson R., Turner J., Bhamra M., Case C.P. Changes in metal levels and chromosome aberrations in the peripheral blood of patients after metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2004172
93Engh Jr. C.A., Stepniewski A.S., Ginn S.D., Beykirch S.E., Sychterz-Terefenko C.J., Hopper Jr. R.H., Engh C.A. A Randomized Prospective Evaluation of Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Cross-linked Marathon and Non-cross-linked Enduron Polyethylene Liners. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2006172
94Noble J.W., Moore C.A., Liu N. The Value of Patient-Matched Instrumentation in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2012172
95Lavernia C.J., Guzman J.F. Relationship of surgical volume to short-term mortality, morbidity, and hospital charges in arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1995170
96Healy W.L., Wasilewski S.A., Takei R., Oberlander M. Patellofemoral complications following total knee arthroplasty. Correlation with implant design and patient risk factors. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 1995170
97Mancuso C.A., Ranawat C.S., Esdaile J.M., Johanson N.A., Charlson M.E. Indications for total hip and total knee arthroplasties: Results of orthopaedic surveys. Journal of Arthroplasty. 1996170
98Weeden S.H., Paprosky W.G. Minimal 11-year follow-up of extensively porous-coated stems in femoral revision total hip arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2002170
99Kim S., Losina E., Solomon D.H., Wright J., Katz J.N. Effectiveness of clinical pathways for total knee and total hip arthroplasty: Literature review. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2003169
100Pulido L., Parvizi J., Macgibeny M., Sharkey P.F., Purtill J.J., Rothman R.H., Hozack W.J. In Hospital Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty. Journal of Arthroplasty. 2008169
Figure 1

Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by decade.

The top 100 most cited articles. Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by decade. Fourteen countries contributed to the top 100 articles. The USA had the greatest number of contributions with 63 articles. The United Kingdom (UK), Canada, and Australia followed with 8, 7, and 5 contributions, respectively. All other countries had less than 4 contributions (Fig. 2).
Figure 2

Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by country.

Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by country. The most recurring LOE was II (n = 46 articles) and V (n = 32 articles). The remaining number of publications at each LOE was as follows: I (n = 11 articles), III (n = 5 articles), and IV (n = 6 articles) (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by level of evidence.

Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by level of evidence. Articles were classified into 9 different article types. The most frequent article type was clinical outcomes (n = 33 articles), followed by technical note (n = 16 articles) and biomechanics (n = 14 articles). All other articles types have 10 or less publications (Fig. 4). Articles were classified into 11 different topics. The most frequent article topic was primary hip arthroplasty (n = 33 articles), followed by primary knee arthroplasty (n = 30 articles), TJA (n = 13 articles), and prosthetic joint infection (n = 7 articles) (Fig. 5).
Figure 4

Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by type of article.

Figure 5

Frequency of publications by article topic.

Top 100 articles in the Journal of Arthroplasty by type of article. Frequency of publications by article topic.

Discussion

This bibliometric analysis highlighted the most influential articles published by the JOA. The 100 articles were comprehensively analyzed across categories of publication, LOE, country of origin, authors, and frequency across decade. Since its establishment in 1991, the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons has brought the most up-to-date information on a wide array of scientific topics to its members. Through its original, peer-reviewed articles, the JOA has been on the forefront of publishing high-impact medical literature. Previous bibliometric analyses have highlighted the impact that the contributions from this journal have had in the most influential THA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty research [7,8]. A recent study analyzing authorship trends in the JOA found that over time there has been a significant increase in last authors with an MD/PhD and MD/MBA, increases in contribution from international authors, and increases in the mean number of authors per article [9]. The present study highlights the most influential articles published by this journal that have further developed the advancements in arthroplasty research. Notably, 57% of the publications had an LOE of I or II which is slightly higher relative to other orthopaedic journals. In 2005, Obremskey et al. evaluated the LOE in various orthopaedic journals and found 32% of articles to have an LOE of I or II [10]. In the current study, 11% of the articles had level I evidence while 46% had level II evidence. Over the past 20 years, there has been a significant increase in the number of articles with LOE of I and II possibly due to the increasing emphasis on publication quality in orthopaedics [11]. Additionally, through categorization by article type, we were able to analyze patterns in the top 100 most cited arthroplasty articles. Specifically, clinical outcomes of various interventions comprised about one-third of this list (33%), followed by studies of technical note (16%) and biomechanical studies (14%). Other similar studies have found that clinical outcomes of arthroplasty dominate the orthopaedic literature with respect to citation frequency [3,8]. The most cited article was published by Kurtz et al. in 2012, and it emphasized the financial implications of periprosthetic joint infections. The research team projected that with an increasing demand for joint arthroplasty, cost of infected revisions to US hospitals may exceed $1.62 billion by 2020 [12]. The JOA recently published an article with similar evidence pointing toward increasing cost projects primarily due to increases in the total number of these procedures being performed [13]. The third most cited article also came from the work of Dr. Kurtz. This article focused on infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty [14]. It was published in 2008, during the decade which has had the greatest number of publications on our list. This further exemplifies the academic growth in arthroplasty research during this time span. The second most cited article followed 147 patients undergoing acetabular component revision and classified their acetabular defects. Their paper stated that by adhering to the used classification system and utilizing the appropriate surgical technique, acceptable and predictable results of acetabular revision can be expected [15]. While most publications in this analysis focused on primary hip or knee arthroplasty, there has been increasing recent research in revision arthroplasty. Specifically with revision THA, there has been a focus on clinical outcomes with most papers having an LOE of II [16]. However, in this analysis, the authors did not find trends changing over time. Furthermore, the USA is the country of origin for the majority of the articles in this list (63%), followed by the UK (8%) and Canada (7%). This follows the major trend in bibliometric studies, with America contributing the most to medical journals, especially in orthopaedic journals. However, a 2013 study evaluating knee arthroplasty and soft-tissue surgery reported that the USA had declined in publishing over the past 16 years, while the UK and Japan became more prolific in publishing [17]. Nonetheless, the USA continues to contribute the most to top 100 lists in terms of citation frequency [8]. We can attribute this to most renowned medical journals originating in the US, publishing in the English language, and more funding opportunities [18]. There were several limitations of this study. A bibliometric analysis that uses total citation count to rank publications naturally presents bias toward older articles because there has been a longer time period for these articles to accrue cumulative citations. Article classification and LOE were assigned by author review, which involves subjective interpretation despite the use of standard LOE guidelines. The country of origin analysis may not account for the potential multinational collaboration. Outside of Scopus indexing and updates reporting, it cannot be independently verified that all of the most recent JOA articles are indexed within the Scopus database.

Conclusions

Using citation analysis, the most influential articles in the JOA were comprehensively and objectively analyzed. The most popular fields of research involved clinical outcomes (33%) and technical note (16%), both of which increase an article’s likelihood of being highly cited. Knowledge of the most influential articles in the JOA allows for appreciation of current and potential future areas of literature regarding diagnosis, management, and outcome of a patient undergoing arthroplasty.

Conflict of interest

Michele D’Apuzzo is a paid consultant at Zimmer Biomet and is a board member of the Florida Orthopedic Society and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery; all other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest. For full disclosure statements refer to https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2019.12.004.

Informed patient consent

The author(s) confirm that informed consent has been obtained from the involved patient(s) or if appropriate from the parent, guardian, power of attorney of the involved patient(s); and, they have given approval for this information to be published in this article.
  18 in total

1.  Level of evidence in orthopaedic journals.

Authors:  William T Obremskey; Nick Pappas; Emad Attallah-Wasif; Paul Tornetta; Mohit Bhandari
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Authorship Trends in 30 Years of the Journal of Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jason D Lehman; William W Schairer; Alex Gu; Jason L Blevins; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Orthopedics research output from China, USA, UK, Japan, Germany and France: A 10-year survey of the literature.

Authors:  X Zhi; J Cui; Z Gu; L Cao; W Weng; Q Li; X Chen; J Su
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2016-06-11       Impact factor: 2.256

Review 4.  Level of evidence and authorship trends of clinical studies in knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy, 1995-2015.

Authors:  Ryan P Judy; Jason J Shin; Christopher McCrum; Olufemi R Ayeni; Kristian Samuelsson; Volker Musahl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-14       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Projected Economic Burden of Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee in the United States.

Authors:  Ajay Premkumar; David A Kolin; Kevin X Farley; Jacob M Wilson; Alexander S McLawhorn; Michael B Cross; Peter K Sculco
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: A Bibliometric Analysis of the 50 Most Commonly Cited Studies.

Authors:  Ramakanth Yakkanti; Dylan N Greif; Jessica Wilhelm; Paul R Allegra; Rukmini Yakkanti; Victor H Hernandez
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2020-11-10

8.  Prevalence of Total Hip and Knee Replacement in the United States.

Authors:  Hilal Maradit Kremers; Dirk R Larson; Cynthia S Crowson; Walter K Kremers; Raynard E Washington; Claudia A Steiner; William A Jiranek; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Infection burden for hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Jordana Schmier; Kevin L Ong; Ke Zhao; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Bibliometric and authorship trends over a 30 year publication history in two representative US sports medicine journals.

Authors:  Joseph Dynako; Garrett W Owens; Randall T Loder; Tony Frimpong; Rolando Gabriel Gerena; Fawaz Hasnain; Dayton Snyder; Serena Freiman; Kyle Hart; Melissa A Kacena; Elizabeth C Whipple
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2020-03-31
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  The most influential studies concerning revision shoulder arthroplasty research.

Authors:  Alina Syros; Olivia F Perez; Dylan Luxenburg; Jacob L Cohen; Ronald Swonger; Samuel Huntley
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-10-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.