Literature DB >> 27296711

Orthopedics research output from China, USA, UK, Japan, Germany and France: A 10-year survey of the literature.

X Zhi1, J Cui1, Z Gu2, L Cao2, W Weng2, Q Li2, X Chen3, J Su4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past decade, researchers have made great progress in the field of Orthopedics. However, the research status of different countries is unclear. To summarize the number of published articles, we assessed the cumulative impact factors in top orthopedic journals. The aims of the study were to measure: 1) the quality and quantity of publications in orthopedics-related journals from China and other five counties, 2) the trend of the number of publications in orthopedics-related journals.
METHODS: The related journals were selected based on the 2014 scientific citation index (SCI) and articles were searched based on the PubMed database. To assess the quantity and quality of research output, the number of publications including clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, case reports, reviews, citations, impact factors, number of articles in the top 10 journals and most popular journals were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 143,138 orthopedics articles were published from 2005 to 2014. The USA accounts for 24.9% (35,763/143,138) of the publications, followed by UK (7878/143,138 (5.5%)), Japan (7133/143,138 (5.0%)), Germany (5942/143,138 (4.2%)), China (4143/143,138 (2.9%)) and France (2748/143,138 (1.9%)). The ranking for accumulated impact factors as follows: USA, UK, Japan, Germany, France and China. The mean impact factor's order is USA, China, Germany, Japan, France, UK, and interestingly the mean impact factors in Japan is similar to the Germany in 2005-2014. The USA had the highest percentage of articles in the top 10 journals, while China owns the least. The USA had the highest number of average citations, while Japan had lowest number of average citations.
CONCLUSIONS: According to this study, we can conclude that the USA has had been leading the orthopedics research in the past 10 years. Although China still falls behind, it has made considerable progress in the orthopedics research, not only in quantity but also quality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

Keywords:  Impact factor; Journal citation reports (JCR); Orthopedics; Publication research

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27296711     DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res        ISSN: 1877-0568            Impact factor:   2.256


  6 in total

1.  Global research in arthroscopy of the anterior cruciate ligament: A bibliometric and visualized study.

Authors:  Fabriccio J Visconti-Lopez; Akram Hernández-Vásquez; Diego Azañedo; Jose Fernando Sanchez Carbonel
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-05-05

2.  Institution Origin and Medical School Rank Impact the Citation Frequency and Publication Rate in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Journals.

Authors:  Varag Abed; Dylan S Koolmees; Kareem Elhage; Luke Hessburg; Eric C Makhni
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-02-08

Review 3.  A 14-year literature survey on spine-related clinical research output by orthopedic surgeons from mainland China.

Authors:  Gao Si; Xiao Liu; Nanfang Xu; Miao Yu; Xiaoguang Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Significant increase in quantity and quality of knee arthroplasty related research in KSSTA over the past 15 years.

Authors:  Stephanie Kirschbaum; Thilo Kakzhad; Fabian Granrath; Andrzej Jasina; Jakub Oronowicz; Carsten Perka; Sebastian Kopf; Clemens Gwinner; Matthias Pumberger
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Characteristics and Trends of the Most Cited Publications in The Journal of Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dylan Luxenburg; David Constantinescu; Gemma St Louis; Kevin J Bondar; Suleiman Y Sudah; Michele D'Apuzzo
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Is Research in Simulation as Accessible as Traditional Clinical Research? A Review of the 'Association for Simulated Practice in Healthcare' Conference.

Authors:  Ben Gabbott; Philip Beak; Michael Stoddart; Rebecca V Morgan; Dean Malik; Deborah M Eastwood
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-08-17
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.