| Literature DB >> 35880189 |
Bo Li1, Guoxin Miao1,2.
Abstract
Positive emotions are regarded as vital issues in English as a foreign language (EFL) instruction. This study attempted to consider the relationships between Chinese EFL teachers' psychological well-being, loving Pedagogy, and work engagement as the constructs of positive psychology in academic contexts. It also tried to examine the contribution of psychological well-being and loving pedagogy in work engagement. To this end, 414 Chinese EFL teachers including participated in this study. The three questionnaires called Dispositions toward Loving Pedagogy Scale, Index of Psychological Well-Being at Work, and Self-report Engagement Questionnaire were distributed among learners. The findings showed significant relationships between well-being, loving pedagogy, and work engagement. Moreover, the results indicated that teachers' psychological well-being significantly predicted their work engagement. This study provided some implications for teachers, teacher educators, and educational policy-makers to raise their awareness of adopting loving pedagogy and boosting teacher well-being for the enhancement of teacher involvement in academic contexts.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese EFL teachers; English as a foreign language; academic engagement; loving pedagogy; teachers’ well-being
Year: 2022 PMID: 35880189 PMCID: PMC9307991 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.941226
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Reliability of the questionnaires.
| Questionnaire | Cronbach’s alpha | N of items |
| Psychological well-being | 0.97 | 25 |
| Loving pedagogy | 0.98 | 29 |
| Work engagement | 0.97 | 17 |
Test of normality for psychological well-being, loving pedagogy, work engagement.
| Kolmogorov–Smirnov | Shapiro–Wilk | |||||
| Statistic | df | Sig. | Statistic | df | Sig. | |
| PWB | 0.174 | 417 | 0.000 | 0.900 | 417 | 0.000 |
| LP | 0.227 | 417 | 0.000 | 0.840 | 417 | 0.000 |
| WE | 0.095 | 417 | 0.000 | 0.947 | 417 | 0.000 |
Correlation among for psychological well-being, loving pedagogy, work engagement.
| Correlations | |||||
| Spearman’s rho | PWB | PWB | LP | WE | |
| Correlation coefficient | 1.000 | 0.700 | 0.607 | ||
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| LP | N | 417 | 417 | 417 | |
| Correlation coefficient | 0.700 | 1.000 | 0.530 | ||
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 | |||
| WE | N | 417 | 417 | 417 | |
| Correlation coefficient | 0.607 | 0.530 | 1.000 | ||
| Sig. (two-tailed) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
**Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (two-tailed).
Model summary for psychological well-being, loving pedagogy, work engagement.
| Model |
| Adjusted | Std. error of the estimate | |
| 1 | 0.650 | 0.422 | 0.419 | 13.33 |
ANOVA for psychological well-being, loving pedagogy, work engagement.
| Model | Sum of squares | df | Mean square | F | Sig. | |
| 1 | Regression | 53,704.39 | 2 | 26,852.19 | 151.04 | 0.000 |
| Residual | 73,601.26 | 414 | 177.78 | |||
| Total | 127,305.65 | 416 |
Coefficients for psychological well-being, loving pedagogy, work engagement.
| Model | Unstandardized coefficients | Standardized coefficients | ||||
|
| Std. error | Beta |
| Sig. | ||
| 1 | (Constant) | 1.801 | 5.746 | 0.313 | 0.754 | |
| PWB | 0.876 | 0.081 | 0.621 | 10.867 | 0.000 | |
| LP | 0.052 | 0.080 | 0.037 | 0.650 | 0.516 | |