Literature DB >> 35879641

A model for the uptake of advance care planning in older cancer adults: a scoping review.

Yiping Chen1,2, Liyuan Hou1,2, Xianhui Zhang1,2, Yifei Du1,2, Xiaoqing Zhang1,2, Min Li1,2, Chaoyue Gao1,2, Hui Yang3,4,5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Advance care planning (ACP) might assist older cancer patients in expressing their goals, values, and care preferences; yet, the ACP uptake rates in this group are low. The goal of this study is to discover factors that influence ACP uptake in older cancer adults and to construct a model that integrates these factors.
METHODS: Using Arksey and O' Malley's methodology, we systematically searched seven electronic databases of ACP literature in older cancer adults from inception to March 2022. To identify factors linked to ACP uptake in elderly cancer patients, researchers used a pre-piloted extraction form. There were two phases to the thematic analysis of the labeled factors. First, factors were grouped into one of three categories using a directed content analysis approach: patient context, provider context, or mechanism. Second, we took both a deductive and inductive thematic approach to identifying and coding contributing factors in each category to identify themes and subthemes. Deductive coding was undertaken using the Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization. Finally, results were visualized into a conceptual model.
RESULTS: In the including 37 articles, 131 factors were extracted. Thematic analysis of patient context factors (n = 72) showed that ACP uptake in older cancer adults is associated with predisposing characteristics, enabling resources and need. Factors attributed to provider context (n = 28) concerned predisposing characteristics and enabling resources. Mechanism factors (n = 31) are related to perceived value and patient trust, and the C-ACP uptake model was created.
CONCLUSION: ACP uptake in older cancer patients is commonly influenced by patient-provider-related contextual factors, and highlights the fact that ACP uptake is more likely to be mediated through both perceived value and patient trust. This review serves as a resource for providers exploring ACP implementation options in older cancer adults.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advance care planning; Cancer; Model; Older adults; Scoping review

Year:  2022        PMID: 35879641     DOI: 10.1007/s40520-022-02184-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res        ISSN: 1594-0667            Impact factor:   4.481


  62 in total

Review 1.  The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Arianne Brinkman-Stoppelenburg; Judith A C Rietjens; Agnes van der Heide
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 4.762

Review 2.  Advance care planning in the elderly.

Authors:  Hillary D Lum; Rebecca L Sudore; David B Bekelman
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.456

3.  Changing Demographics: A New Approach to Global Health Care Due to the Aging Population.

Authors:  Valentin Fuster
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 4.  Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices.

Authors:  Rachelle E Bernacki; Susan D Block
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 21.873

Review 5.  Implementation of Advance Care Planning in Oncology: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Christine M Bestvina; Blase N Polite
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Improving the Evidence Base for Treating Older Adults With Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement.

Authors:  Arti Hurria; Laura A Levit; William Dale; Supriya G Mohile; Hyman B Muss; Louis Fehrenbacher; Allison Magnuson; Stuart M Lichtman; Suanna S Bruinooge; Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis; William P Tew; Michael A Postow; Harvey J Cohen
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  The Evolution of Geriatric Oncology and Geriatric Assessment over the Past Decade.

Authors:  Darryl Outlaw; Maya Abdallah; Luiz A Gil-Jr; Smith Giri; Tina Hsu; Jessica L Krok-Schoen; Gabor Liposits; Tânia Madureira; Joana Marinho; Ishwaria M Subbiah; Gina Tuch; Grant R Williams
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 5.934

8.  Experience with age discrimination and attitudes toward ageism in older patients with cancer and their caregivers: A nationwide Korean survey.

Authors:  Dong Wook Shin; Keeho Park; Ansuk Jeong; Hyung Kook Yang; So Young Kim; Mihee Cho; Jong Hyock Park
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  The clinical course of advanced dementia.

Authors:  Susan L Mitchell; Joan M Teno; Dan K Kiely; Michele L Shaffer; Richard N Jones; Holly G Prigerson; Ladislav Volicer; Jane L Givens; Mary Beth Hamel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-15       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rebecca L Siegel; Lindsey A Torre; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 508.702

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.