Literature DB >> 25330167

Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices.

Rachelle E Bernacki1, Susan D Block2.   

Abstract

An understanding of patients' care goals in the context of a serious illness is an essential element of high-quality care, allowing clinicians to align the care provided with what is most important to the patient. Early discussions about goals of care are associated with better quality of life, reduced use of nonbeneficial medical care near death, enhanced goal-consistent care, positive family outcomes, and reduced costs. Existing evidence does not support the commonly held belief that communication about end-of-life issues increases patient distress. However, conversations about care goals are often conducted by physicians who do not know the patient, do not routinely address patients' nonmedical goals, and often fail to provide patients with sufficient information about prognosis to allow appropriate decisions; in addition, they tend to occur so late in the patient's illness that their impact on care processes is reduced. This article (1) reviews the evidence and describes best practices in conversations about serious illness care goals and (2) offers practical advice for clinicians and health care systems about developing a systematic approach to quality and timing of such communication to assure that each patient has a personalized serious illness care plan. Best practices in discussing goals of care include the following: sharing prognostic information, eliciting decision-making preferences, understanding fears and goals, exploring views on trade-offs and impaired function, and wishes for family involvement. Several interventions hold promise in systematizing conversations with patients about serious illness care goals: better education of physicians; systems to identify and trigger early discussions for appropriate patients; patient and family education; structured formats to guide discussions; dedicated, structured sections in the electronic health record for recording information; and continuous measurement. We conclude that communication about serious illness care goals is an intervention that should be systematically integrated into our clinical care structures and processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25330167     DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Intern Med        ISSN: 2168-6106            Impact factor:   21.873


  277 in total

1.  A Framework to Improve Surgeon Communication in High-Stakes Surgical Decisions: Best Case/Worst Case.

Authors:  Lauren J Taylor; Michael J Nabozny; Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Karen J Brasel; Sara K Johnson; Amy Zelenski; Paul J Rathouz; Qianqian Zhao; Kristine L Kwekkeboom; Toby C Campbell; Margaret L Schwarze
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Oncologist Experience Implementing Goals of Care Discussions in Everyday Ambulatory Oncology Practice: Implications for Education.

Authors:  Carole A Robinson; Gillian Fyles; Michael McKenzie
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Association between strong patient-oncologist agreement regarding goals of care and aggressive care at end-of-life for patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Sara L Douglas; Barbara J Daly; Amy R Lipson; Eric Blackstone
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Quality versus quantity in end-of-life choices of cancer patients and support persons: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Amy Waller; Rob Sanson-Fisher; Scott D Brown; Laura Wall; Justin Walsh
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Improving Medical-Legal Advance Care Planning.

Authors:  Sarah Hooper; Charles P Sabatino; Rebecca L Sudore
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 3.612

6.  Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Mnemonic Approach to Teach Residents How to Assess Goals of Care.

Authors:  Toluwalase A Ajayi; David Shaw; Kyle P Edmonds
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2019-01-31       Impact factor: 2.947

7.  What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists.

Authors:  Masanori Mori; Chikako Shimizu; Asao Ogawa; Takuji Okusaka; Saran Yoshida; Tatsuya Morita
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Goals-of-care discussions.

Authors:  Catherine Saiki; Betty Ferrell; Denise Longo-Schoeberlein; Vincent Chung; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Community Support Oncol       Date:  2017 Jul-Aug

9.  Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatments in Perceived Devastating Brain Injury: The Key Role of Uncertainty.

Authors:  Christos Lazaridis
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 3.210

10.  Advance Care Planning Meets Group Medical Visits: The Feasibility of Promoting Conversations.

Authors:  Hillary D Lum; Jacqueline Jones; Daniel D Matlock; Russell E Glasgow; Ingrid Lobo; Cari R Levy; Robert S Schwartz; Rebecca L Sudore; Jean S Kutner
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.166

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.