Literature DB >> 35879471

Low prognostic nutritional index is associated with poor outcome in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Bo Wu1, Ling-Qin Ni1, Yong Wang1, Hai-Hua Yang2, Shan-Kun Zhao3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and age are effective prognostic factors for patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and an interaction between them may exist. However, the age cutoff value is generally set at 45 years in current studies. The clinical implications of PNI in middle-aged and elderly patients are unclear. Therefore, we aimed to uncover this issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 132 middle-aged and elderly (≥ 45 years old) patients with non-metastatic NPC. The association between covariates and the PNI was analyzed using 2 or t-test. The effect of PNI on the prognosis was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Unadjusted and multivariate-adjusted models were applied. Stratified and interactive analyses were performed to investigate the potential source of heterogeneity.
RESULTS: Median age (61.0 years versus 59.5 years) and the proportion of patients aged ≥ 60 years (57.6% versus 50.0%) in the low-PNI group were higher than those in the high-PNI group (P > 0.05). The patients with a low PNI had shorter overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.80-0.93; P < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87-0.99; P = 0.034). The results remained stable after three adjusted models of covariates, including age (P < 0.05). No significant interactions were observed in middle-aged (45-59 years) and elderly (≥ 60 years) subgroups for OS and PFS (P for interaction > 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Although there is an interaction between PNI and age, PNI is an independent prognostic factor in middle-aged and elderly patients with non-metastatic NPC.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Middle-aged and elderly patients; Nasopharyngeal carcinoma; Overall survival; Prognostic nutritional index; Progression free survival

Year:  2022        PMID: 35879471     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07286-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.359


  29 in total

1.  Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery.

Authors:  G P Buzby; J L Mullen; D C Matthews; C L Hobbs; E F Rosato
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  The prognostic significance of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score for surgically treated renal cell cancer and upper urinary tract urothelial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lei Peng; Chunyang Meng; Jinze Li; Chengyu You; Yuelin Du; Wei Xiong; Zhongyou Xia; Dehong Cao; Yunxiang Li
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 4.884

3.  [Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients].

Authors:  T Onodera; N Goseki; G Kosaki
Journal:  Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1984-09

Review 4.  Diet, nutrition, and cancer: past, present and future.

Authors:  Susan T Mayne; Mary C Playdon; Cheryl L Rock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-03-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an evolving paradigm.

Authors:  Kenneth C W Wong; Edwin P Hui; Kwok-Wai Lo; Wai Kei Jacky Lam; David Johnson; Lili Li; Qian Tao; Kwan Chee Allen Chan; Ka-Fai To; Ann D King; Brigette B Y Ma; Anthony T C Chan
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 6.  Prognostic role of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in urological tumors: an umbrella review of evidence from systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Georges Mjaess; Roy Chebel; Aya Karam; Ilan Moussa; Dominique Pretot; Georges Abi Tayeh; Julien Sarkis; Albert Semaan; Alexandre Peltier; Fouad Aoun; Simone Albisinni; Thierry Roumeguère
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 4.089

7.  Prognostic Nutritional Index as an independent prognostic factor in locoregionally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Gema Bruixola; Javier Caballero; Federica Papaccio; Angelica Petrillo; Aina Iranzo; Miguel Civera; Miriam Moriana; Neus Bosch; Maria Maroñas; Ines González; Miguel Pastor; Andrés Cervantes
Journal:  ESMO Open       Date:  2018-10-24

8.  Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) in Patients With Breast Cancer Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy as a Useful Prognostic Indicator.

Authors:  Li Chen; Ping Bai; Xiangyi Kong; Shaolong Huang; Zhongzhao Wang; Xiangyu Wang; Yi Fang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2021-03-30

9.  Baseline prognostic nutritional index and changes in pretreatment body mass index associate with immunotherapy response in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Paul Johannet; Amelia Sawyers; Yingzhi Qian; Samuel Kozloff; Nicholas Gulati; Douglas Donnelly; Judy Zhong; Iman Osman
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 13.751

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.