Ellen C Meltzer1,2, Kelly S Vorseth3, Ivana T Croghan4, Yu-Hui H Chang5, Carolyn Mead-Harvey5, Lori A Johnston2, Racquel D Strader2, Kathleen J Yost6, Lisa A Marks7, Kenneth G Poole2,8. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona meltzer.ellen@mayo.edu. 2. Office of Patient Experience, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona. 3. Office of Patient Experience, Mayo Clinic, Sheikh Shakhbout Medical City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. 4. Division of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 5. Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona. 6. Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota. 7. Library Services, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona. 8. Division of Community Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Use of the electronic health record (EHR) during face-to-face clinical encounters affects communication, and prior research has been inconclusive regarding its effect. This survey study assessed health care practitioner use of EHR-specific communication skills and patient and practitioner experiences and attitudes regarding EHR use during clinical encounters. METHODS: For this US-based study, we distributed previously validated surveys to practitioners and adult patients (aged >18 years) at academic primary care practices from July 1, 2018 through August 31, 2018. The electronic practitioner survey was completed first; a paper survey was administered to patients after appointments. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and the Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess for associations between key variables. RESULTS: The practitioner response was 72.9% (43/59); patient response, 45.2% (452/1,000). Practitioners reported maintaining less eye contact (79.1%), listening less carefully (53.5%), focusing less on patients (65.1%), and visits feeling less personal (62.8%). However, patients reported that practitioners provided sufficient eye contact (96.8%) and listened carefully (97.0%); they disagreed that practitioners focused less on them (86.7%) or that visits felt less personal (87.2%). Patients thought EHR use was positive (91.7%); only one-third of practitioners (37.2%) thought that patients would agree with that statement. Practitioners reported stress, burnout, and a lack of sufficient time for EHR documentation. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy existed in this study between patient and practitioner experiences and attitudes about EHR use, which appeared to negatively affect the experience of health care practitioners but not patients. Organizations should adopt formal strategies to improve practitioner experiences with EHR use.
PURPOSE: Use of the electronic health record (EHR) during face-to-face clinical encounters affects communication, and prior research has been inconclusive regarding its effect. This survey study assessed health care practitioner use of EHR-specific communication skills and patient and practitioner experiences and attitudes regarding EHR use during clinical encounters. METHODS: For this US-based study, we distributed previously validated surveys to practitioners and adult patients (aged >18 years) at academic primary care practices from July 1, 2018 through August 31, 2018. The electronic practitioner survey was completed first; a paper survey was administered to patients after appointments. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and the Cochran-Armitage test was used to assess for associations between key variables. RESULTS: The practitioner response was 72.9% (43/59); patient response, 45.2% (452/1,000). Practitioners reported maintaining less eye contact (79.1%), listening less carefully (53.5%), focusing less on patients (65.1%), and visits feeling less personal (62.8%). However, patients reported that practitioners provided sufficient eye contact (96.8%) and listened carefully (97.0%); they disagreed that practitioners focused less on them (86.7%) or that visits felt less personal (87.2%). Patients thought EHR use was positive (91.7%); only one-third of practitioners (37.2%) thought that patients would agree with that statement. Practitioners reported stress, burnout, and a lack of sufficient time for EHR documentation. CONCLUSIONS: A discrepancy existed in this study between patient and practitioner experiences and attitudes about EHR use, which appeared to negatively affect the experience of health care practitioners but not patients. Organizations should adopt formal strategies to improve practitioner experiences with EHR use.
Authors: Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Matthew F Burke; Michael C Hoaglin; David Blumenthal Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: Mark Linzer; Sara Poplau; Stewart Babbott; Tracie Collins; Laura Guzman-Corrales; Jeremiah Menk; Mary Lou Murphy; Kay Ovington Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard Frankel; Andrea Altschuler; Sheba George; James Kinsman; Holly Jimison; Nan R Robertson; John Hsu Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Frances E Biagioli; Diane L Elliot; Ryan T Palmer; Carla C Graichen; Rebecca E Rdesinski; Kaparaboyna Ashok Kumar; Ari B Galper; James W Tysinger Journal: Acad Med Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 6.893
Authors: Ellen C Meltzer; Zhenzhen Shi; Alexandra Suppes; Jennifer E Hersh; Jay D Orlander; Aaron W Calhoun; Judy Tung; Lia Logio; Ruth Manna; Philip A Bialer; Cathleen A Acres; Joseph J Fins Journal: J Grad Med Educ Date: 2017-08