Literature DB >> 35877674

Occult hepatitis B virus infections and risk factors among school-going adolescent voluntary blood donors in Kwale County Kenya, January 2020-June 2021: Cross sectional study.

Peter Kitemi Wahome1,2, Polly Kiende3, Rocky Jumapili Nakazea2, Narcis Mwakidedela Mwasowa2, Gibson Waweru Nyamu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections remain a safety concern worldwide. The prevalence in Kenya ranges from 2.6% to 4.4% among secondary school-going voluntary blood donors. This study estimated the prevalence of occult HBV infections among school-going voluntary blood donors through donations made to Kwale Satellite Blood Transfusion Center (KSBTC).
METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional study on data collected by the KSBTC between January 2020 and June 2021 among secondary school-going voluntary blood donors. Data were collected in MS Excel 2013 and analyzed in Epi Info 7. Descriptive statistics were calculated and we compared donors with positive Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) to those with negative HBsAg. Crude Prevalence Odds Ratios (cPOR) at 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to identify factors associated with positive HBsAg.
RESULTS: A total of 613 records were analyzed. The mean age of the donors was 19.1 years (± 1.8 years), there were 457 males (74.5%), 502 individuals were in the age group 18-25 years (82.3%), and the mean hemoglobin level was 14.1 g/dl (±1.6 g/dl). First-time blood donors made up 84.8% of all donors (513/605) and the mean inter-donation period was 20 months (±5.8 months) for repeat donors. The sero-positivity for HBsAg was 8.8% (54/613). Age category 16-17 years with positive HBsAg were 10.2% (11/108), femaleswere10.9% (17/156), and first-time donors were 9.4% (48/513). On bivariate analyses, first-time blood donors were 1.5 times more likely to test positive for HBsAg compared to repeat donors (cPOR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.61-3.57). Females were 1.4 times more likely to test positive for HBsAg compared to male donors (cPOR = 1.4, 95% CI 0.76-2.54).
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the voluntary blood donors were males and the majority of occult HBV infections came in the first-time blood donor group. We recommend increasing targeted recruitment of repeat donors by encouraging healthy first-timer donors to be regular donors, and suggest this population should be vaccinated against HBV infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35877674      PMCID: PMC9312369          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


Background

Blood and blood products are essential commodities used to save lives. The safety of blood and blood products is of utmost importance as patients are often transfused in a vulnerable health state. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) being a transfusion-transmissible infection, it remain hazardous in donated blood in spite of the current blood donation safety developments put in place [1]. It is also compounded by the fact that donor blood is majorly sourced from adolescents mainly in learning institutions [2]. In this period in life the adolescence are highly vulnerable to the disease as this is the period of the beginning of very active and risky sexual behaviors and other practices that increase the risks of exposure to HBV infection [3]. A person with occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) has a risk of reactivation during immunosuppression and due to lack of detectable HBsAg there is an ongoing risk of transmission to others [4]. Globally, OBI is ≥8% prevalence in endemic regions and is high in populations at high risk of infection including the HIV infected or people who inject drugs [5]. A majority of people are unaware of their HBV infection, and often present with advanced disease [13], as noted in Nigeria where 5.4% of the donors had anti-HBcIg M as the only serological evidence of HBV infection [14]. In Africa, the prevalence of OBI is estimated to be between 7–50% among blood donors or healthcare workers [6, 7], and 6–30% in HIV infected populations [8]. High rates of OBI was reported in HIV-positive individuals initiating antiretroviral therapy in Botswana [9]. In sub-Saharan Africa, 12.5% of patients who receive blood transfusion are at risk of post-transfusion OBI [10]. Studies conducted in Kenya related to sero-prevalence of HBV have focused on HIV patients, blood donors in general, and the general population with a few focusing on adolescents in Kenya. One study in Western Kenya showed a sero-prevalence of 3.4% HBsAg among school-going adolescent donors aged 18 to 25 years [11]. In Kwale County, while it is known that the annual demand for blood is approximately 9000 units according to the 2019 census population [12], no such study has been conducted in this area and therefore the prevalence of OBI is not known. This study aims to estimate the magnitude of OBI and the possible risk factors among school-going adolescent donors in Kwale County. The results will help programs undertaken by the Kwale Satellite Blood Transfusion Centre (KSBTC) and non-government agencies to inform policy decisions and planning with an aim of supporting existing structures and improving blood safety and availability.

Methods

Study setting

This study was conducted among voluntary school-going adolescent donors through mobile site collection in the various secondary schools in Kwale County. The KSBTC is located at Msambweni County Referral Hospital (MCRH) (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Map showing the study site—Kenyan map.

Counties sampled (Map developed by Author using QGIS Version 2.18.10) with geographical data was obtained from https://africaopendata.org/dataset/kenya-counties-shapefile and data on geo—coordinates and category of health facility (Msambweni County Referral Hospital) was obtained from Kenya Master Health facility list http://kmhfl.health.go.ke/.

Map showing the study site—Kenyan map.

Counties sampled (Map developed by Author using QGIS Version 2.18.10) with geographical data was obtained from https://africaopendata.org/dataset/kenya-counties-shapefile and data on geo—coordinates and category of health facility (Msambweni County Referral Hospital) was obtained from Kenya Master Health facility list http://kmhfl.health.go.ke/. Trained medical personnel made appointments with leaders of schools by writing letters, emailing, and making phone calls to explain the purpose and the intention of conducting the blood drive donation in their respective secondary schools. Once permission was granted, the pre-donation health talk was given to the prospective donors. This covered the importance of blood donation, the characteristics of blood donors, and donor deferrals. The prospective donors were subjected to the national blood transfusion questionnaires for risk assessment and those who met the criteria for blood donation as per the national guidelines were allowed to donate and signed a consent form after having been informed about testing of several TTIs namely, HBV, HIV, HCV, and syphilis. The collected blood was then packed in a cooler box and shipped to the KSBTC for screening of TTIs. Blood samples collected from each subject were placed into sterile serum collection bottles and centrifuged at 1,500 revolutions per minute for 15 minutes. The separated serum was placed in sterile cryovials and stored at 2–8°C. Thereafter, all blood tests were done at the KSBTC laboratory using Murex HBsAg version 3 (Manufactured by Diasorin S.p.A UK Branch). All the tests, which showed optical density values above the cut-off value as calculated by the manufacturer’s instructions, were considered reactive for HBsAg. The quality controls were conducted for every run where three control wells for both positive and negative test results were included, known positive and negative samples were also included and the known controls/samples were treated and ran simultaneously with donor’s samples.

Study design and population

This study was a retrospective, cross-sectional, secondary analysis of the archived donor’s clinical forms and data from the KSBTC between January 2020 and June 2021 to estimate the prevalence of HBsAg among voluntary school-going adolescent blood donors. The study included voluntary school-going adolescent blood donors who met the KNBTS donation requirements [13]. The donor had to be aged between 16 and 65 years for donation though for inclusion in the study one had to be aged between 16–25 years. The donor had to have a body weight of 50 kg or more. The individual’s hemoglobin of not less than 12.5 g/dl. Informed written consent to participate in the study. The study excluded students at secondary schools in the study period that donated blood for family/friends at the KSBTC and those who didn’t meet the KNBTS donation criterion.

Sample size determination

Cochran’s formula [14] was used to calculate the sample size required to estimate the prevalence of HBsAg among voluntary school-going adolescent blood donors. The study assumed a 95% confidence interval, 80% power, prevalence of HBsAg 50%, and we adjusted by 10% to account for missing or incomplete data. We calculated the desired sample size as 424 participants; however, considering that period reports were evaluated in this study, a census-type sampling technique was used. A larger sample size (n  =  613) was included and analyzed to allow for adequate statistical power.

Data management and analysis

The data were entered into MS Excel 2013, cleaned, and double-checked before analysis using Epi-info 7 statistical package (CDC, Atlanta, USA). Frequencies and proportions were calculated for categorical variables. Means, standard deviations (SD) of continuous symmetrical variables, medians, and interquartile ranges for the continuous asymmetrical variables were calculated. We conducted a bivariable analysis and calculated the crude odds ratios (cPORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and considered p-values ≤ 0.05 as statistically significant. Variables collected included age, sex, number of donations, religion, secondary schools, and HBsAg status as the outcome variable. We compared the HBsAg positive and negative participants.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from the Technical University of Mombasa Ethics Review Committee (TUM ERC BSC/040/2020). Permission was granted to conduct the study by the Kwale County Department of Health (CG/KWL/6/5/1/CECM/Vol/1/15) and the director of KSBTC. Study participants informed consent was not required in this case, as this is secondary data obtained from an electronic database, and is impossible to track back blood donors for consent, however, the study participant’s identity was fully anonymous during data acquisition and analysis. Also, this study included voluntary donors only and before blood donation is done every prospective donor has to consent to the testing of several TTIs namely; HBV, HIV, HCV, and syphilis. The source documents were stored in a lock and key cupboard and the electronic version was stored in password-protected computers.

Results

Voluntary blood donor’s social-demographics

A total of 613 voluntary secondary school-going adolescent blood donors were included in the analysis. The mean age was 19.1 years (± 1.8 years), there were 457 males (74.5%), 502 donors were aged between 18–25 years (82.3%), and Muslims comprised 335 individuals (54.9%). The mean Hb was 14.1 g/dl (±1.6 mg/dl). The most frequent donor blood groups were 56.7% O Rhesus positive (343/605), 20.7% A Rhesus positive (125/605) and 17.7% B Rhesus positive (107/605) (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of blood group types among voluntary school-going adolescents’ blood donors at KSBTC, January 2020-June 2021 (n = 605).

Blood groups typesFrequencyPercent
O Rhesus Positive34356.7
A Rhesus Positive12520.7
B Rhesus Positive10717.7
AB Rhesus Positive193.1
O Rhesus Negative81.3
A Rhesus Negative20.3
B Rhesus Positive10.2
The number of first-time donors was 513 (84.8%) and for donors who were donating for the second time were 92 (15.2%). The mean month for the inter-donation period was 20 months (±5.8 months).

Prevalence and factors associated with HBsAg positivity

The sero-positivity for HBsAg among the voluntary blood donors was 8.8% (54/613). The characteristics of donors with positive HBsAg were as follows: the age group 16–17 years comprised 10.2% (11/108), females comprised 10.9% (17/156), Christians made up 9.1% (25/275) and first-time donors were 9.4% (48/513) (Table 3). Regarding secondary school HBsAg positivity distribution, Lukore secondary had a positivity rate of 25.0% (8/32), Muhaka secondary had a positivity rate of 23.1% (3/13), and Waa Boys secondary had 10.2% (12/118) positivity rate (Table 2).
Table 3

Bivariate analyses of voluntary school-going adolescents’ blood donors at KSBTC, January 2020-June 2021 (n = 613).

VariablesNumber = 613PositivePercentCrude POR 95% CIp value
Age group (years)
16–171081110.21.2 (0.60–2.43)0.59
18–25502438.61
Sex
Female1561710.91.4 (0.76–2.54)0.29
Male420378.11
Religion
Christianity275259.11.1 (0.60–1.85)0.85
Islam335298.71
Donation frequency
First timer513489.41.5 (0.61–3.57)0.38
Repeat9266.51 

**POR, prevalence odds ratio, CI, confidence interval**.

Table 2

Distribution of HBsAg positivity among secondary schools at KSBTC, January 2020-June 2021 (n = 613).

Secondary SchoolsN = 613PositivePercent
Lukore Secondary32825
Muhaka Secondary13323.1
Magaoni Secondary32618.8
Waa Girls Secondary43716.3
Mwanambeyu Secondary15213.3
Kingwende Secondary23313
Dori Girls Secondary19210.5
Waa Boys Secondary1181210.2
Kwale High Secondary9177.7
Madago Secondary1616.3
Gombato Secondary2015
Mwereni Secondary2613.9
Kinondo Secondary3213.1
Golini Secondary2600
Kichakasimba Secondary2600
Mvideni Secondary3100
Shimba Hills Seconadry5000
On bivariate analyses, first-time blood donors were 1.5 times more likely to test positive for HBsAg compared to repeat donors (cPOR = 1.5, 95% CI 0.61–3.57, p-value 0.38). Females were 1.4 times more likely to test positive for HBsAg compared to male donors (cPOR = 1.4, 95% CI 0.76–2.54, p-value 0.29). There was a trend of 16–17 age group testing positive for HBsAg more frequently compared to 18–25 age group, though this difference was not statistically significant (cPOR = 1.2,95%CI = 0.60–2.45), p-value 0.59) (Table 3). **POR, prevalence odds ratio, CI, confidence interval**.

Discussion

The main challenge with blood transfusion is blood safety besides blood shortage. However over the past years a reduction in transfusion transmitted HBV has been documented but there still exist the risk for viral infections transmitted post blood transfusion. This study confirms that HBV infection remains a safety concern in blood donated in this region. One possible explanation for this is that this region relies on blood supply from mobile voluntarily adolescents aged 16 to 24 years in learning institutions who are also at high risk due to their onset of active sexual and other practices that increase their exposure to the virus [2, 3]. In this study male donors were 89.1% while female donors were 10.9%. Higher proportion of male donors has also been reported in other studies including Bartonjo et al [15], who reported 72% were male donors, Wamamba et al reported 76% were male donors [16], and Ali et al reported a ratio of 1:5 were male voluntary young donors [17]. Sometimes voluntary donors among girls at this age could be deferred due to low hemoglobin levels as a result of heavy menstrual flows or even early pregnancies [18]. On the other hand we note that from the blood donation drives 60% of the secondary schools included were all boy schools which could also probably affect the ratio in our study. The prevalence of HBV infections was approximately 9% which is higher than the prevalence reported among young adults (18–25 years) voluntary blood donors in the three Kenyan Counties of Siaya 4.4%, Homabay 3.4%, and Kisumu 2.6% [19]. However, the prevalence was lower than the study conducted in Nigeria among secondary students who had a prevalence of 18.4% [20]. These differences in zero-prevalence could be attributed to variations in geographical locations and the sensitivity of the screening techniques used in the detection of the HBsAg for the different studies. Other drivers of this difference may include the pre-donation screening tools employed by KNBTS, where prospective donors are given a risk assessment questionnaire that asks about the past medical history of the potential donors and their sexual behavior which helps minimize the chances of receiving infected blood. First-time blood donors were 50% more likely to test positive for HBsAg compared to repeat donors although this was not statistically significant. Several previous studies found varying results and reported a higher prevalence of HBV markers for the first-timer donors. A study in Sierra Leone reported 38.4-fold greater odds of having HBV in first-timer donors compared to repeat donors [21]. In Kenya, first-time donors were 1.7 times more likely to test positive for HBsAg [16]. This may be confounded by the fact that they are absolutely not aware of their status unlike the previous donors who could probably have prior knowledge from past screening. It is unlikely that if one donates blood once and tests positive for HBV that they will volunteer to donate again. The percentage of first-time volunteer blood being discarded was 17% in Bobo-Dioulasso but 23.1% and 23.9% in Ouagadougou and Fada’Ngourma, respectively [22]. In our study, the age group 16–17 years had a 20% higher chance of testing positive for HBsAg compared to the age group 18–25 years. In contrast to this study, teenagers aged (16–19 years)were 47% less likely to test positive for HBsAg compared to students above 20 years in three counties for Western Kenya [23]. The reported high prevalence among this age category is of concern, for it is expected that all of the study participants may have received childhood vaccination for HBV infections as Kenya introduced the vaccine in the year 2002 [24], thus, the data from this study might be used to evaluate the efficacy of HBV vaccine in the study area. Female voluntary donors were 40% more likely to test positive for HBsAg compared to male donors. This is most likely because this study couldn’t recruit enough females although similar studies in Ghana have reported a high prevalence of HBV infections among the female gender [25, 26]. In contrast, several other studies reported higher proportions of HBsAg positivity among male blood donors [16, 19, 27, 28]. The likely reasons for the different results were the different designs and settings employed by the different studies. This study provides insights into the characteristics of potential risky blood donor populations, which is an important tool for blood safety and can be useful for policy formulation. This study employed a census-type sampling technique which minimized potential selection bias in sampling a well-defined study population and this should increase comparability. This study also had several limitations. The study did not conduct a follow-up on the individuals to monitor the disease progression of those with occult infections. Also, the study included only healthy voluntary blood donors who were attending secondary level of education; hence, our results may not reflect the overall prevalence of HBV infections in the general population of Kwale County. This might potentially underestimate infections; nevertheless, this study can provide proxy prevalence and predictors in this region when community-based surveys are not feasible. Another study limitation may be an intrinsic weakness in the diagnostic tests used. The use of serological techniques as opposed to nucleic acid-based techniques. However, the internal quality controls were performed for both positive and negative cases.

Conclusion

This study reveals that the majority of the voluntary young blood donors were male, is blood group O positive, and that occult HBV infection remains a considerable safety concern in the age group of 16–25 years, first-time and female donors. Therefore, greater coverage of primary HBV vaccination should be encouraged in this area, and for those who have received their primary vaccine, a booster HBV vaccine could be provided in order to more effectively prevent HBV infection. This study recommends the KSBTC personnel’s should adopt strategies to increase repeat donors and encourage healthy first-timer donors to be regular donors should be intensified as such medical selection of blood donors may reduce the frequency of hepatitis B infections in blood donors, which will go a long way improving blood safety and availability. Also, these findings underline the need for confirmatory strategies to avoid blood wastage and to re-evaluate Hepatitis B infections prevalence in the study area among blood donors that may be overestimated. (XLS) Click here for additional data file. 19 Oct 2021
PONE-D-21-26727
Occult Hepatitis B virus infection and risk factors among school-going adolescent voluntary blood donors in Kwale County, Kenya, January 2020–June 2021: Cross sectional study
PLOS ONE Dear Dr. Nyamu, Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, your study was found interesting but contains some written errors that require correction before the manuscript can be accepted.  Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.
Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 03 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file. Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:
A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'. A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'. An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'. If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter. If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols. We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript. Kind regards, Colin Johnson, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Journal Requirements: When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements. 1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf 2. Please include your tables as part of your main manuscript and remove the individual files. Please note that supplementary tables (should remain/ be uploaded) as separate "supporting information" files 3. In ethics statement in the manuscript and in the online submission form, please provide additional information about the patient records/samples used in your retrospective study. Specifically, please ensure that you have discussed whether all data/samples were fully anonymized before you accessed them and/or whether the IRB or ethics committee waived the requirement for informed consent. If patients provided informed written consent to have data/samples from their medical records used in research, please include this information 4. Please update your submission to use the PLOS LaTeX template. The template and more information on our requirements for LaTeX submissions can be found at http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/latex 5. Thank you for stating the following financial disclosure: "Not applicable" At this time, please address the following queries: a) Please clarify the sources of funding (financial or material support) for your study. List the grants or organizations that supported your study, including funding received from your institution. b) State what role the funders took in the study. If the funders had no role in your study, please state: “The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.” c) If any authors received a salary from any of your funders, please state which authors and which funders. d) If you did not receive any funding for this study, please state: “The authors received no specific funding for this work.” Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf 6. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For more information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions. In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts: a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially sensitive information, data are owned by a third-party organization, etc.) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent. b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories. We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide 7. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide 8. We note that your paper includes detailed descriptions of individual patients/participants. As per the PLOS ONE policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-human-subjects-research) on papers that include identifying, or potentially identifying, information, the individual(s) or parent(s)/guardian(s) must be informed of the terms of the PLOS open-access (CC-BY) license and provide specific permission for publication of these details under the terms of this license. Please download the Consent Form for Publication in a PLOS Journal (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=8ce6/plos-consent-form-english.pdf). The signed consent form should not be submitted with the manuscript, but should be securely filed in the individual's case notes. Please amend the methods section and ethics statement of the manuscript to explicitly state that the patient/participant has provided consent for publication: “The individual in this manuscript has given written informed consent (as outlined in PLOS consent form) to publish these case details 9. We note that Figure 1 in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright. We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission: 1. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure 1 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text: “I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.” Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission. In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].” 2. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only. The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful: USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/ The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/ Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/ Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/ USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/# Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/ Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice. [Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.] Reviewers' comments: Reviewer's Responses to Questions Comments to the Author 1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions? The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously? Reviewer #1: I Don't Know ********** 3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available? The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English? PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here. Reviewer #1: Yes ********** 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters) Reviewer #1: I have gone through the manuscript and found it interesting. However, the authors should make some changes: The introduction is too long and the purpose is not clear, please rewrite it clearly; The implication of the occult HBV infection is not clear neither in the introduction nor in the discussion sections; Row 62: Reference 5 is too old, please update the knowledge about HBV genotypes and serotypes (there are 10 genotypes not 8); Row 169: include a space between comprised and 335; Row 179: « females » instead of « females’ »; Row 188: 18-25 age groupe and not 18-15; Row 225: « male donors » instead of « male’s »; Row 237: « level of education; hence, our results » instead of « level of education hence our results » Row 245: the majority … is male, is blood group O positive not are blood group O positive ********** 6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files. If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public. Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy. Reviewer #1: Yes: Abdelouaheb Benani [NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.] While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.
23 Nov 2021 The reviews have been uploaded Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers_HBV_Manuscript.docx Click here for additional data file. 20 Jan 2022 Occult Hepatitis B virus infection and risk factors among school-going adolescent voluntary blood donors in Kwale County, Kenya, January 2020–June 2021: Cross sectional study PONE-D-21-26727R1 Dear Dr. Nyamu, We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements. Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication. An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org. Kind regards, Colin Johnson, Ph.D. Academic Editor PLOS ONE Additional Editor Comments (optional): Reviewers' comments: 8 Mar 2022 PONE-D-21-26727R1 Occult Hepatitis B virus infection and risk factors Among School-going Adolescent Voluntary Blood Donors in Kwale County, Kenya, January 2020–June 2021: Cross sectional study. Dear Dr. Nyamu: I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org. If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org. Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access. Kind regards, PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff on behalf of Dr. Colin Johnson Academic Editor PLOS ONE
  18 in total

1.  Seroprevalence and incidence of transfusion-transmitted infectious diseases among blood donors from regional blood transfusion centres in Burkina Faso, West Africa.

Authors:  Bolni Marius Nagalo; Cyrille Bisseye; Mahamoudou Sanou; Kisito Kienou; Yacouba K Nebié; Alice Kiba; Honorine Dahourou; Siaka Ouattara; Jean Baptiste Nikiema; Rémy Moret; Jean Didier Zongo; Jacques Simpore
Journal:  Trop Med Int Health       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  Seroprevalence of hepatitis B and hepatitis C among blood donors in Sierra Leone: A multi-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Francesca Tognon; Stephen Sevalie; Joseph Gassimu; John Sesay; Katrina Hann; Mohamed Sheku; Emily Bearse; Francesco Di Gennaro; Claudia Marotta; Giampietro Pellizzer; Giovanni Putoto; Marta Lado; Molly F Franke; Yusupha Dibba; Sahr Gevao; Fenella Beynon; Annelies W Mesman
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Blood donors in Kenya: a comparison of voluntary and family replacement donors based on a population-based survey.

Authors:  D Kimani; J Mwangi; M Mwangi; R Bunnell; T A Kellogg; T Oluoch; A Gichangi; R Kaiser; N Mugo; T Odongo; M Oduor; L Marum
Journal:  Vox Sang       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 2.144

4.  Early sexual debut and associated factors among in-school adolescents in eight African countries.

Authors:  Karl Peltzer
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.299

5.  High prevalence of active and occult hepatitis B virus infections in healthcare workers from two provinces of South Africa.

Authors:  Tsakani H Sondlane; Lesego Mawela; Lufuno L Razwiedani; Selokela G Selabe; Ramokone L Lebelo; J Nare Rakgole; M Jeffrey Mphahlele; Carine Dochez; Antoon De Schryver; Rosemary J Burnett
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Transfusion Transmissible Infections Among Walk-In Blood Donors at Kisumu Regional Blood Transfusion Centre, Kisumu County, Kenya, 2015.

Authors:  Dominic Wamamba; Dickens Onyango; Elvis Oyugi; Evalyne Kanyina; Mark Obonyo; Jane Githuku; James Ransom
Journal:  Lab Med       Date:  2017-11-08

7.  Hepatitis B infection among HIV infected individuals in Gabon: Occult hepatitis B enhances HBV DNA prevalence.

Authors:  Berthold Bivigou-Mboumba; Marie Amougou-Atsama; Samira Zoa-Assoumou; Hervé M'boyis Kamdem; Guy Francis Nzengui-Nzengui; Angélique Ndojyi-Mbiguino; Richard Njouom; Sandrine François-Souquière
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sero-prevalence of hepatitis B infection among blood donors in a secondary care hospital, Ghana (2014): a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Eric Osei; Sylvester Yao Lokpo; Eric Agboli
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2017-08-10

9.  Characterization of occult hepatitis B virus infection among HIV positive patients in Cameroon.

Authors:  George Gachara; Tshifhiwa Magoro; Lufuno Mavhandu; Emmaculate Lum; Helen K Kimbi; Roland N Ndip; Pascal O Bessong
Journal:  AIDS Res Ther       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.250

10.  High prevalence and poor linkage to care of transfusion-transmitted infections among blood donors in Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania.

Authors:  Zameer Mohamed; Jin U Kim; Alex Magesa; Mabula Kasubi; Sarah F Feldman; Stephane Chevaliez; Promise Mwakale; Simon D Taylor-Robinson; Mark R Thursz; Yusuke Shimakawa; John Rwegasha; Maud Lemoine
Journal:  J Viral Hepat       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.728

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.