Electronic recording of lifetime locomotory activity patterns of adult medflies.

Age-specific and diurnal patterns of locomotory activity, can be considered as biomarkers of aging in model organisms and vary across the lifetime of individuals. Τhe Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly), Ceratitis capitata, is a commonly used model-species in studies regarding demography and aging. In the present study, we introduce a modification of the automated locomotory activity electronic device LAM25system (Locomotory Activity Monitor)-Trikinetics, commonly used in short time studies, to record the daily locomotory activity patterns of adult medflies throughout the life. Additionally, fecundity rates and survival of adult medflies were recorded. Male and female medflies were kept in the system tubes and had access to an agar-based gel diet, which provided water and nutrients. The locomotory activity was recorded at every minute by three monitors in the electronic device. The locomotory activity of females was higher than that of males across the different ages. For both sexes locomotory rates were high during the first 20 days of the adult life and decreased in older ages. The activity of males was high in the morning and late afternoon hours, while that of females was constantly high throughout the photophase. Negligible locomotory activity was recorded for both sexes during the nighttime. Males outlived females. Fecundity of females was higher in younger ages. Our results support the adoption of LAM25system in studies addressing aging of insects using medfly as a model organism.

Introduction

Aging is the gradual decline in physiological integrity and function combined with increased chance of death and reduced probability to reproduce [1,2]. “Normal” aging is defined as the summary of physiological changes that occur in an organism over time [3], while “functional senescence” describes the progressive decline in activity and function with aging [4]. Age-related behavioral changes result in progressive deterioration of many spontaneous responses including locomotory activity [3]. The spontaneous behavior of organisms is directly associated with movement. It catalyzes the ability of the individual to respond to environmental stimuli and to daily vital needs, such us survival and reproduction, which are firmly correlated with its fitness traits and age [5].

Model organisms are non-human species which are used in biological research to investigate, among others, complex behaviors and biological phenomena and to provide information regarding life history traits of humans and mammals [6,7]. Fruit flies’ activity and other specific behaviors (e.g. sexual signaling, supine behavior, feeding) vary during the life course of the individuals, with some of them expressing age related patterns. As a result, fruit flies can be exploited in demographic, aging and behavioral research [8-11]. Changes in spontaneous behavior and locomotory activity in relation to age had been described in Drosophila species and the Mediterranean fruit fly (medfly), Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae), providing insights to understand the aging process [8,11-15].

In this study, we used medfly a common model organism in demographic and gerontology research, to test age related locomotory activity [11,14,16-18]. Previous studies showed that the daily frequency of supine behavior was positively correlated with the time of the individual’s death, while the frequency of performing sexual signaling by the males was negatively correlated with the predicted time to death [17,19,20].

Differences of daily behavioral patterns in adult medflies were previously attributed to sex and age. Generally, regardless the mating status, males are more active and longer-lived than females and sexual signaling represents their foremost activity during the day [21]. A voluminous part of literature examines the age-related patterns of Drosophilids’ and Tephritids’ behavior [3,4,11], but only few of them examine the details of locomotory activity throughout the lifespan of individuals, which is challenging to address (e.g. time- consuming and labor intensive). A large number of individuals is impossible to be observed visually. Though, the available commercial laboratory equipment is not easily applicable for lifetime studies yet, as such large datasets are difficult to be handled. Nevertheless, the combination of lifetime locomotory activity with survival and egg production is expected to generate important data towards understanding functional senescence in model organisms.

In order to study the age-related patterns of locomotory activity in medflies we used the LAM25system, an automated electronic device. Spontaneous activity and behavior of flies have been investigated in the past and ranged from simple visual observation to the use of various electronic devices [5]. The simplest approach is the “grid of square” method [22], where flies are kept individually in a chamber with a grid of circles drawn on its base. The number of crossed circles by the adult define the level of activity [22]. Ewing [23] developed the “labyrinth” method, where a series of cones allowed a unidirectional passage of individuals. Flies were released in the first cone-compartment and the distribution of them in the next compartments, generated data to assess the level of activity. Devices such as the “Actimeter” and the “Locomotron”, consisting of a small chamber with an infrared light gate located in the center, are examples of automated equipment for measuring activity. An activity event is recorded whenever the fly crosses the light gate. Several variants of these apparatus have been developed, depending on the purpose of the study. Automated devices based on video-camera tracking systems were greatly improved in the last decade and were used to record the activity of fruit flies and Drosophila species [14,24-26]. For example, Zou et al. [14] and Chiu et al. [27], using a Behavioral Monitoring System- BMS, recorded the lifetime daily behavior in females of Anastrepha ludens, in relation to food quality, revealing different diurnal patterns of behavior of young, middle-aged, and old adults. The need for constant monitoring individual insects, under fluctuating laboratory conditions and for long time periods, led to the development of high quality, automated devices to track their movement [28]. The LAMsystem- Locomotory Activity Monitor and DAMsystem- Drosophila Activity Monitor (Trikinetics), are extensively used devices for this type of assays [28-30].

The effect of different environmental and rearing conditions on the locomotory activity οf fruit flies was traditionally measured by visual observations, which are time consuming, and observer biased. During the last two decades, the introduction, of the automatic DAM and LAM systems simplified the study of locomotory activity of fruit flies. For example, using the LAM system (in the frameworks of quality control tests of Sterile Insect Technique programs), the daily locomotory activity of Bactrocera tryoni adults was found to be positively correlated with protein and nutrient concentration in adult diet [26,31]. Utilizing the same system, Dominiak et al. [32] defined the effect of radiation inducing sterilization, on the activity of adult B. tryoni. Additionally Weldon et al. [24], reported the differences in daily behavior between fertile and sterile adults, by using a video system. Recently, the LAM system was used to determin differences in the activity patterns of B. tryoni adults with or without access to a diet rich in endosymbiotic bacteria [33], and of a wild-type and a self-limiting transgenic strain of Bactrocera oleae population [34].

Day and night lifetime locomotory activity has not been previously assessed in C. capitata adults. The aim of the present study was to establish a system to automatically record the activity of adult fruit flies throughout their lifespan as a foundation for research in aging and health dynamics using invertebrate model systems. For this purpose, we used, for the first time, the LAM25system by Trikinetics which records the movement of the flies on three different spots within the chamber where they were individually kept. Also, we recorded the fecundity of females with daily visual observations.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Flies and rearing conditions

The study was conducted in the Laboratory of Entomology and Agricultural Zoology at the University of Thessaly, Greece, from September 2019 to December 2020, under constant laboratory conditions, 25 ± 2°C, 65 ± 5% RH, and a photoperiod of L14:D10 with photophase starting at 7:00 and ending at 21:00. Light intensity ranged from 1500 to 2000 Lux. We used males and females of the Mediterranean fruit fly laboratory strain “Benakio”, that was maintained under laboratory conditions for more than 30 years [35].

The rearing procedure of flies was implemented as described in [36] and [37], by keeping adults in groups of 100 individuals in wooden, wire-screened cages (30 × 30 × 30 cm) provided, ad libitum, with water and an adult diet consisting of a mixture of yeast hydrolysate, sugar, and water at a 4:1:5 ratio. Females deposited eggs on the inner surface of an artificial substrate (dome), comprised by a hollow, red plastic hemisphere (5 cm Ø), which was punctured with 40–50 evenly distributed holes (1 mm Ø). Each dome was fitted in the cover of a plastic Petri dish (5.5-cm Ø). A plastic cup with 0.5 ml of orange juice was added in every Petri dish to stimulate oviposition. Water was placed in the Petri dish to maintain high humidity levels in the dome for female oviposition [38]. Domes were placed in rearing cages for 24h to collect eggs for the experimental needs. Collected eggs were placed on a cotton disk (5.5- cm Ø, 2 mm width), serving as a bulking agent for larval diet, within a petri dish. We placed 100 eggs per cotton disk which was previously soaked in the larval diet consisting of 200 g sugar, 200 g brewer’s yeast, 100 g soybean flour, 4 g salt mixture, 16 g ascorbic acid, 16 g citric acid, 3 g sodium propionate, and 1 l water [38]. Petri dishes were placed into plastic containers on a layer of sterilized sand, where larvae pupated.

2.2. Assaying locomotory activity patterns of adult medflies

We recorded the locomotory activity patterns of adult medflies by using the Locomotory Activity Monitor- LAM25system (Trikinetics). In this system, flies were individually kept in 32 glass tubes (25 mm Ø, 125 mm length). Each tube was vertically crossed by three ray-rings of infrared light beams (monitors) at three different planes (close to the two ends of the tube and one in the middle) (Fig 1A). Activity was measured every minute, as the number of times the fly passed through an infrared beam.

Fig 1

Side view of the LAM25system set in the laboratory (A). Vinyl plastic stopper placed on one end with the agar-based gel diet (B). Cap with organdie cloth placed on the other end for ventilation of tubes (C) and for egg deposition (D). Wooden- plastic, handmade construction, for egg collection (E).

The day that adults emerged, fifteen unmated males and sixteen unmated females were individually positioned in the tubes and stayed until death. Maintenance of flies in the tubes was ensured with minimum frequency of disturbances (jolts, flicks, shakes) that would affect their normal activity. We prepared an agar-based gel diet consisting of sugar, yeast hydrolysate, agar, nipagin and water (4:1:0.2:0.1:20) to provide adults with both nutrients and water simultaneously. The gel diet was replaced every four days to avoid dehydration.

On the one end of the tube, we adjusted a vinyl plastic stopper (CAP25-BLK- Vinyl Tube Cap- Trikinetics) with the gel diet and on the other end (Fig 1B), a cap with organdie cloth (Fig 1C), which served for the ventilation of tubes and also as an oviposition substrate (Fig 1D) [39]. Outside the oviposition substrate end of the tube, we adjusted a wooden, custom-made frame with four Plexiglas platforms (Fig 1E), where the eggs deposited by each female landed on a black filter paper. Adult mortality and the number of deposited eggs were daily recorded with visual observations until the death of all individuals.

2.3. Data processing and analyses

We calculated the mean daily (24h) locomotory activity of every male and female, recorded in one-minute intervals throughout their lifetime. The LAM25system was set to record, in each of the three monitors, the sum of movements an adult performed every minute. To calculate the mean activity of an individual for a given period of time, we summarized the recordings of the three monitors per minute during this period. Then, we summarized the recordings for every individual during 24h (1440 recordings), during daytime (840 recordings) and during nighttime (600 recordings). Accordingly, we constructed three event-history diagrams (24h interval, daytime– 14h interval, and night– 10h interval). An event-history diagram [40], depicts age-specific activity patterns using different color-coding for different levels of activity. Adult flies are represented in the diagram by horizontal "lines" proportional to their lifespan. Activity is color-grouped according to the summarized movements of an adult during the tested period. Three activity levels are represented by a separate color (low-green, medium-yellow, high-red).

Additionally, we calculated the mean activity per 24h interval for the cohorts of males and females, recorded during four selected ages (2, 11, 21, 42 and 81 days old). More specifically, for every individual, we summarized the recordings of the three monitors per minute, during the 24h interval for each selected day. The five selected ages were characterized as: newly emerged adults (2-days old), reproductively mature adults (11-days old), middle-aged adults (21-days old), elderly adults (42-days old) and extreme aged adults (81 days old) [6,41].

Survival analysis for males and females during their maintenance in the tubes of LAM25system was conducted with IBM SPSS 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, U.S.A.). Differences in survival between the two sexes were tested with the Cox proportional hazards model [37].

Activity data were analyzed with R v.4.0.0 (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) using the “geepack” package for Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs) [42] to account for within-subject dependency. Clusters of subjects that were considered within subject observations are correlated (time-dependency). The Poisson model was used for the response variable “Activity” since the response variable represents count data (sum activity/ fly/day). In addition, we tested the effect of age and sex on average daily activity of flies. The average daily activity was estimated by the sum of daily movements recorded on the three monitors for each fly per minute, divided by the total number of flies which survived each day until the age of 91 days. Finally, the total activity of flies per time period (night, 21:00–6:59; morning, 7:00–13:59; midday, 14:00–17:59; evening, 18:00–20:59) was compared between males and females for 5 different ages (2, 11, 21, 42, 81 days old). Parameter estimates are presented as Incidence Rate Ratios (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), which is the ratio of the activity level in a group of interest to the number of activities of the group used as reference. To interpret the results, for IRR >1, the activity is higher for the group of interest rather than the reference group, while IRRs lower than 1 indicate less activity for the group of interest comparing to the reference. Pairwise contrasts for estimated marginal means were assessed using the Tukey adjustment for multiple comparisons.

3.Results

3.1. Demographic parameters

Males lived longer than females (Wald χ2 = 5.38, df = 1, P = 0.02) (Fig 2). The first dead adult was observed on day 48 and on day 53 of age, for males and females, respectively. Female mortality rates increased dramatically after the age of 50 days compared to males. Half of the female and male cohorts survived 59 and 74 days, respectively (Fig 2A). The lifespan of the longest-lived male (166 days) differed by 75 days from that of the longest-lived female (91 days).

Fig 2

Age-specific survival curves with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) (A) and box plots depicting lifespan of males and females (B) kept in the tubes of the LAM25system.

The mean lifetime fecundity was 973.4 ± 56.6 (SE) eggs per unmated female. Females reached their maximum oviposition rate on the 13th day of age with an average of 42.6 ± 4.6 eggs (Fig 3). Fecundity rates followed a linear downward trend from day 30 of age onwards.

Fig 3

LOESS curves (Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing curves) for age-specific fecundity rates with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) of females kept in the tubes of LAM25system.

3.2. Activity

Age-specific locomotory activity

The age-specific locomotory activity patterns of males and females is presented in Fig 4. Activity levels were estimated for the whole 24h interval, and for daytime and nighttime separately. Females were more active than males during the 24h and the daytime periods regardless of their age (Table 1; Fig 4). The locomotion activity of both sexes declined with age and was not affected by the tested period (24h, daytime, nighttime). No significant differences were recorded in activity levels between the two sexes during nighttime (Table 1). Τhe pattern of declining activity with aging of males both during day- and nighttime was smooth and progressive. Age-specific patterns in female activity were high during the first 20 days of adult life, declining sharply to day 30 stabilized up to approximately day 45 and then declining again to day 60 and stabilized to day 80 of age. Age-specific patterns of females differed a great deal between day and night.

Fig 4

LOESS curves (Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing curves) for mean activity of males (blue) and females (red) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI), during the 24h period (A), daytime (B) and nighttime (C). Mean activity was estimated by the sum of movements of all individuals during the period of interest (24h, daytime, nighttime), divided by the number of individuals surviving on each day.

Table 1

Variables of the GEEs with significant effects on the age-specific activity of flies during the 24h day-night interval, the daytime and the nighttime periods, for their entire lifespan, by the factors: Sex (males, females) and age.

	Day and night		Day		Night
Factor	IRR (95% CI)	P value	IRR (95% CI)	P value	IRR (95% CI)	P value
Sex (ref: female)	0.710 (0.623, 0.809)	< 0.001 *	0.687 (0.605, 0.782)	< 0,001 *	0.858 (0.698, 1.050)	0.144
Age	0.986 (0.983, 0.988)	< 0.001 *	0.985 (0.983, 0.987)	< 0,001 *	0.989 (0.987, 0.992)	< 0,001 *

An event history chart was used to depict the detail of age-specific locomotory activity of males and females for the whole 24h period, as well as for daytime and nighttime periods (Fig 5). The females were found to be more active than males throughout their lifespan. Males exhibit high levels of locomotory activity (>2000 movements) during the first 10 days of their life. Activity levels remained at a rather medium level (501–2000) from day 10 to day 60 and further reduced in older ages. The activity of females was high for all individuals during the first 20 days. High variability in activity patterns among females was reported from day 30 to 60. During nighttime, no different patterns in age-specific locomotory activity were observed between the two sexes. All flies were moribund for one or two days before death.

Fig 5

Event history diagram providing a detailed picture of the ages when activity was recorded during the 24h interval (A), daytime (B) and nighttime (C). Red: > 2000 movements during 24h and daytime and > 200 during nighttime, yellow: 501–2000 movements during 24h and daytime and 51–200 during nighttime, green: 0–500 movements during 24h and daytime and 0–50 during nighttime.

Fine-scale 24h locomotory activity rhythms

Both males and females were more active during daytime (from the beginning until the end of the photophase) and remained almost motionless during darkness, regardless of the age group (Fig 6). Locomotory activity started at approximately 06:00, shortly before the start of the photophase (7:00) and stopped at approximately 22:00 shortly after its end (21:00), lasting for almost 16 hours. Flies of the different age groups exhibited different patterns of locomotory activity. Therefore, we separated the 24h interval in four different periods (night, morning, midday and evening) to compare males and females (S1 Table). Male medflies exhibit a specific diurnal pattern of sexual signaling characterized by increased intensity in the morning and afternoon hours as it was demonstrated earlier [8,19,36].

Fig 6

LOESS curves (Locally Estimated Scatterplot Smoothing curves) with 95% Confidence intervals (CI) of the mean 24h locomotory activity for males and females at ages 2, 11, 21, 42 and 81 days.

No significant differences were recorded in the activity patterns between males and females on the 2nd and 81st day of life, adjusting for day period (S1 Table). During the photophase, flies were more active in the morning and less active in the midday and the evening. Reproductively mature (11-days old), middle-aged (21-days old) and elderly (42-days old) females were more active than males, adjusting for day period. Flies of the three respective ages were more active during the morning than in the midday and evening. The lowest activity was recorded during the night for all five ages tested (S1 Table).

4. Discussion

This is the first study on the fine-scale patterns of lifetime locomotory activity for adult medflies. A major advance of our study includes the adaptation of the LAM25system for long-term activity recordings (almost six months), as until now this system was used only for short time studies (few days), such us recording activity levels of newly emerged adult fruit flies, mainly addressing quality control issues, for their use in SIT programs [24,26,31,32]. Also, the same system was implemented to characterize the circadian rhythms and sleep patterns of other Diptera species such as Drosophilids but again only for a few days [28,29,43]. However, Koh and co-workers [12], measured lifetime activity of D. melanogaster adults using the DAMsystem, but flies had to be transferred often to new vials to ensure access to fresh food. Apart from extending the study of locomotory activity to the whole lifespan of the tested organism, we managed to simultaneously record the lifetime fecundity of females. For this purpose, we developed and adjusted an egg laying system to the LAM25system, while flies were kept in good health in the tubes. Our approach enabled the recording of adult survival and female fecundity daily, without causing disturbances in the system that would affect the activity of the flies. The current modified system can be used to answer questions regarding (a) the relationships among reproductive effort (i.e., fecundity), activity patterns and female longevity, (b) the aging process, and (c) health dynamics using medfly as a model organism.

In agreement with previous studies, our results demonstrate that males outlived females [44-47]. Females face higher reproductive cost due to the reproductive system attrition caused by egg production and oviposition events and this cost leads on decreased longevity. Females medflies exhausting their reproductive potential rapidly, are predicted to have shorter lifespan [41]. However, in males the higher rates of sexual signaling in young ages is strongly correlated with longer lifespan [48]. Males face a lower cost of reproduction than females [8,21]. In our study, young females (9th-17th day) laid more eggs, while from the 35th day onwards the fecundity rates substantially decreased, and the lowest egg production was recorded in older females. According to the models of Müller et al. [41], and Novoseltsev et al. [49], after attaining peak rates the fecundity of female medflies decreases rapidly, and the mortality gradually supervenes. Our results are consistent with both studies above since mortality rates of females increased rapidly after day 50 and daily egg laying dramatically deteriorated after peak was recorded. Young female medflies invest high levels of energy in egg production and older ones in survival [18], but this strategy is not sufficient to prolong lifespan in comparable levels to that of males.

Virgin females and non-mated males were considered in our current study and flies were kept in isolation. Therefore, effects of mating per se, reproduction related social interactions and effects of crowding that may negatively affect both health and longevity of adult medflies were not considered [50-52]. In preliminary trials, we found longer longevity and higher reproductive rates of female medflies kept at the LAM tubes than in our standard, plastic individual, demographic cages (S2 Table and S1 Fig). Restriction of flight may save energy reserves that can be invested to reproduction and soma maintenance extending life span. Similar conclusions were obtained by Koveos et al., [53], when the olive fly adults (Bactrocera oleae) were kept in small cages that did not allow flight.

Age-specific locomotory activity showed a declining trend with age in both sexes. Females were more active than males throughout lifespan, in contrast to the expression of other specific behaviors of medfly [21]. In other tephritid species, such as B. tryoni [31] males were more active than females. Medfly males were found to perform sexual signaling with greater frequency and duration throughout most of the photoperiod [8,19,21]. Apparently, males performing sexual signaling remain stationary and hence no activity/ movement can be recorded by the LAM25system. Sexual signaling is an indicator of longevity, and higher frequency is positively correlated with males’ survival [19,21,54,55]. The LAM25system can only detect movement and therefore could not record the sexual signaling behavior of males. Although not directly measured, we can assume that differences in age-specific locomotory activity between males and females resulted mainly because males invested most of the time during photophase in performing sexual signaling (8, 19, 20, 21).

Locomotory and fecundity rates of female medflies were high at young ages (first 20 days) and then gradually declined. A progressive decrease in daily activity with increasing age was previously reported in female medflies [11,17,19,21], and in both sexes of A. ludens [14] and of D. melanogaster [3,4,56]. Walking, flying, and feeding frequencies were higher at young ages of medfly and D. melanogaster, in contrast to other motionless behaviors like resting and grooming, which remained in similar levels despite aging [11]. Consistent with our results, daily activity patterns of Drospophila spp. differed by sex, age and reproductive maturity [5,12,57] with young flies being more active and fecund than older ones. According to Bochicchio et al. [57], and references therein, aging is directly associated with the gradual reduction of activity and the expression of activity is an indicator of the “functional state” of the individual. Specifically, aging implies a progressive deterioration in the ability to maintain homeostasis, metabolism, and normal functions at high levels [58]. Research concerning the functional deterioration in relation to age identifies key organic systems that fail to function satisfactory in older ages [59]. Both the modification of LAM25system to record lifetime locomotory activity and the results of our study could assist towards understanding the aging process in insect model organisms.

Consistent with previous studies on activity of Tephritidae, our results showed that medfly locomotory activity patterns of selected ages (2, 11, 21, 42, 81 days) were higher during the photoperiod [51]. Generally, activity levels differed between male and females [8,36,54,60-65]. Specifically, both sexes were more active in the morning than in midday and evening. Visual observations confirmed that during evening both sexes invested time in the less active behavior of feeding [54,60,61]. During early morning period (7:00–10:00), males exhibited similar activity with females, but females were more active throughout the rest of the day. Previous studies also showed that early in the morning, males in nature are involved in lekking activities trying to establish or locate leks [54,60,61]. Conversely, they exhibit mainly sexual signaling and remain stationary during the morning and midday [8,36,60]. A slight increase of activity observed during late evening (on 7:00 pm) could be explained by male re-activation and exhibition of sexual signaling as described earlier by Papadopoulos et al. [8] and Diamantidis et al. [36]. According to Warburg & Yuval [54] and Díaz-Fleischer & Aluja [61], female tephritids perform all type of behaviors throughout the day, without these behaviors being separated by the time period of day, which is consistent with our findings.

5.Conclusion

Our study highlights the modification and use of the LAM25system to record individual lifetime locomotory activity patterns of true fruit flies, in combination with fecundity and survival. We revealed a strong connection between decreasing locomotory activity and fecundity with aging. This system could be exploited in studies of demography and aging process, provided that these factors are strongly correlated with functional senescence of true fruit flies. In addition, our experimental procedure could be used in quality control tests performed in SIT, or in studies dealing with stress physiology and phenotypic plasticity.

Although, the trials reported in the current paper have been conducted with a limited number of individuals, we successfully demonstrated several important patterns of activity in medflies, differences between males and females and a connection of activity with aging and fecundity. Hence, our study forms the basis for future exploration of the correlation among locomotory activity, functional aging, and reproduction elements.

Age-specific survival curves with and box plots depicting lifespan of males and females kept in the tubes of the LAM25system and in the plastic cup cages.

(PNG)

Click here for additional data file.

Variables of the GEEs with significant effects on the activity of flies by the factors: Sex (males, females) and time period (night, morning, midday, evening) of days 2, 11, 21, 42, 81.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

Average fecundity and duration of reproduction periods in days (pre- oviposition, oviposition, and post- oviposition) of females kept in tubes of LAM25system and in standard plastic cup cages.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.

14 Feb 2022

Submitted filename: PONE-D-22-00246-annotated.pdf

Click here for additional data file.

14 Apr 2022

A list of responses to each of the Reviewers’ specific comments is given bellow:

Reviewer #1

The manuscript by Rodovitis et al. describes individual lifetime locomotor activity patterns in Ceratitis capitata (Mediterranean fruit fly) in combination with survival and female egg production. The manuscript is generally well written, and the experimental design is mostly sound. One concern I have with this manuscript is the use of virgin females used in this experiment to measure reproduction. Gravid females would likely produce more eggs at an earlier interval during the experimental period, which could potentially impact their survival. Additionally, the use of gravid females would permit the quantification of egg hatch, which is a measure of reproduction. The authors should provide a rationale for using virgin female flies as a proxy to measure fertility. In my opinion, this experiment measured the fecundity of virgin females, not reproduction. Changes should be made throughout the manuscript to correct this or additionally experiments should be performed that more accurately measure reproduction. This manuscript should be considered for publication because C. capitata is a major agricultural pest and the monitoring system developed for these experiments will prove useful for other pestiferous Tephritidae species.

Response: We definitely appreciate this comment of Reviewer #1. Indeed, referring to reproduction might not be appropriate and hence we replace the term reproduction by fecundity/egg production. Using gravid females and measuring hatch rates would be a very interesting subject for a future study. Measuring fecundity patterns of virgin female medflies is a common experimental method in demographic research of Tephritids. Whether mated, and virgin females exhibit different lifetime activity pattern would be an interesting topic of our future research.

Specific comments:

My recommendation is a minor revision to address the concerns raised above and to consider the specific comments described below:

1. Lines 142 and 399: 7:00 am, 9:00 pm, and 7:00 pm are used. Please be consistent with time and use the 24-hour clock throughout the manuscript for time descriptions.

Response: The time periods reported using the 24-hour clock throughout the text.

2. Line 211, 317: change middleaged to middle-aged

Response: the word “middleaged” was replaced by “middle-aged”

3. Line 225-228: Move time descriptions to the beginning of the section.

Response: the text was revised and the time descriptions moved in the beginning of the section.

4. Line 351: remove apparently, seems unnecessary.

Response: removed

5. Line 370-372: “Although not directly measured, we can assume that differences in age specific locomotory activity between males and females resulted mainly because males invested most of the time during photophase in performing sexual signaling.” Please provide references supporting this assumption.

Response: the requested references added in the text

6. Line 339, 412: change reproduction to fecundity

Response: the term ‘reproduction’ was replaced throughout the text with the terms ‘fecundity’ and ‘egg production’

7. Line 433: double-check format for reference

Response: the references were checked and reviewed throughout the text

8. Change age specific to age-specific throughout

Response: the term ‘age specific’ replaced by the term ‘age-specific’ throughout the text

Reviewer #2

Generally, the paper is well written and the subject matter is an interesting contribution to science. Regarding the use of “medflies”, this is an abbreviation of “Mediterranean fruit fly”. Given that “Mediterranean” is a noun, it is capitalised. There is some logic that “medfly” should be “Medfly” if you follow the naming convention. We don’t write about the mediterranean sea – these are names and are capitalised. There are not many suggestions, other than the abstract looks like it was written last, as it should be. Most edits are in the abstract, probably because this was the least text reviewed by the authors. Writers should write for the reader. Therefore, words such as “also” and “therefore” should be at the start of the sentence to tell the reader that something additional is coming. Placing these words in the middle of the text does not prepare the reader for change. I am not a fan of long caveats in front of factual statements. Say the important stuff first, then provide the circumstances (the caveat). Your results “are consistent with” the results of other scientists. But technically, they are not in agreement. They might reach similar conclusions, but they do not agree with each other. This “agreement” phrase needs to be replaced with the “consistent with” phrase. I am not a fan of “has been” verbs, particularly when there are references that report things “were” or “was” found. “Has been” is less direct and less confident. They are not wrong, but they are not direct.

Response: We appreciate the comment of the Reviewer #2 regarding writing of medfly – Medfly. We consider medfly as a common name similar to “dog” that’s why we do not capitalize the first letter. However, we could follow the suggestion of the reviewer if the editor thinks so. We thank the reviewer for the editing on the abstract that improves the text.

Specific comments:

1. Line 37- try “… activity can be considered … organisms and vary …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

2. Line 43 – try “Additionally, fecundity rates …” and delete the “as well”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

3. Line 45 – try “… which provided and nutrients.”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

4. Line 46 – try “… three monitors in the electronic …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

5. Line 50 – try “… that of females was constantly high …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

6. Line 64-67 – sentence too long – I aim at 28-35 words per sentence – try two sentences

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

7. Line 70-73 – sentence too long, try two sentences

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

8. Line 74 – this is the first use of “Mediterranean fruit fly” – the full name needs to be here and not in line 76.

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

9. Line 84 – try “… and age. Generally, males are …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

10. Line 91-92 – say the important stuff first. Try “Spontaneous activity … past and ranged from …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

11. Line 103 – try “… systems were greatly …” – you have references to support the statement

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

12. Line 114 – try “During the last two decades, the introduction of the …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

13. Line 118-121 – too long. Try a new sentence starting “Additionally, Weldon et al used an …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

14. Line 121 – try “Recently, the LAM system was …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

15. Line 131 – try “Also, we recorded …’

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

16. Line 172 – try “… tubes and stayed until death.”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

17. Line 206 – try “Additionally, we calculated …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

18. Line 216 – I think it needs a reference

Response: A reference was added according to re reviewer’s suggestion

19. Line 222 – try “Additionally, we test …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

20. Line 239-244 – great text – very clear – well written thanks bro

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

21. Line 250-252 – again, good clear text – easy to read and understand thanks bro

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

22. Line 263 – I am not a fan of “as well” – try “and”. Why use two (or three) words when one word will do.

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

23. Line 293 – try “… females were found from …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

24. Line 308 – try “… 16 hours. Flies of the … exhibited …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

25. Line 309 – try “… activity. Therefore, we separated …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

26. Line 331 and 333 – replace “has been” with “was” – this is more direct and confident language

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

27. Line 347-349 – try “Females face higher reproductive cost due to … events and this cost leads to decreased longevity.”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

28. Line 351 – technically, lifespan should be “longer” because it related to time. The number might be “higher” but lifespan is longer.

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

29. Line 356 – technically, we say “our results are consistent with …”. Alignment is something different.

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

30. Line 358 – do you mean “deteriorate” or “decorate”?

Response: the word “decorate” replaced by the word “deteriorate”

31. Line 358-360 – try “… recorded. Young female … survival [18] but this strategy…”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

32. Line 362 – I think you need to state that more energy use leads to death or shorter lifespan

33. Response: Previous studies showed that increased flight activity and locomotion in Diptera, lead to shorter lifespan/ have a tradeoff in lifespan. In our study, there seems to be a similar trend of female medflies, depicted in the event- history graphs. However, the statistical analysis did not support this finding. Therefore, we prefer not to include this statement in our discussion.

34. Line 368 – try “… and higher frequency is positively …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

35. Line 375 – replace “has been” with “was” – replace “as well as” with “and” done

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

36. Line 378-379 – try “Consistent with our results, daily …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

37. Line 389 – try the “consistent with” phrase rather than “agreement”.

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

38. Line 389-392 – is very long – try two sentences.

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

39. Line 396 – try “… day. Also, previous studies reported …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

40. Line 397 – try “…59]. Conversely, they exhibit …during later in the morning and midday.”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

41. Line 403 – use the “consistent with” phrase – not “agreement”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

42. Line 411 – try “We found a …”. Technically, the results are a thing and it can’t do anything. Results can’t see or find or think. That is what the scientists, the humans, do. So use the “we” words. Results are something you create but results don’t do the thinking or showing.

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

43. Line 412-414. Say the important stuff first. Try “This system could be … aging process, provided that …”

Response: The text was revised throughout according to reviewer’s suggestions

44. Line 417-420 – sentence too long. Try “… the trials … individuals. We successfully demonstrated several …”

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

45. References – some are abbreviated – some are in full. Pick the journal standard and stick to it

Response: The references were revised according to reviewer’s suggestion and the journal’s standards

Reviewer #3

A well-designed study investigating the lifelong locomotor activity of Medflies. Findings are providing valuable insights in the fecundity and activity patters of the flies during a period of many months (usually those studies are restricted in few 24 hrs periods for the purpose of evaluating quality of SIT flies. I would recommend this paper to be published, pending few minor corrections and suggestions that I submit for the consideration of the authors in the annotated PDF.

General comments:

1. It is known that social interactions and caging density affect the health of the flies, I would like to see some comment in discussion, since the experimental flies spent all their life under severely restricted solitary conditions.

Response: Following reviewer’s suggestion, we included a paragraph in the discussion addressing the effect of social interaction on adult fruit flies.

2. The authors do mention the benefits of the modified LAM system for studying the activity patterns over very long periods of time. I would like to see in the discussion a brief comparison with other methods aiming to also access the organism’s physiological status over long period of time (lipids-proteins from subsamples, video recording?)

Response: Trying to connect activity patterns with physiological responses and longevity is an interesting subject that required a meticulously designed studies and adoption of elaborated protocol to see the dynamics of metabolic and other physiological processes. The current study approaches activity and life span from a demographic perspective and we prefer not to expand to physiological responses. The behavioral pattern of single individuals differentiates with aging. In our study we tried to investigate the connection between locomotory activity signature of flies with health and lifespan, which factors are strongly correlated with the physiological status. Therefore, such methods which made the correlation of lipids- proteins contents with aging (Nestel et al., 2004), cannot produce the type of data that we need. Other methods that have been applied to measure the behavior or activity during aging are the BMS (Behavioral Monitoring System) which cannot measure the detailed activity for every single minute and for long periods like the LAM25system. Generally, the other system cannot produce so detailed recordings regarding the locomotory activity for every minute during the 24h and additionally they cannot measure the activity during the night in the absence of light sources.

3. It would be interesting to access the effects of mating status, by monitoring mated vs virgin females (if not in this study, it would be worthy to mention it as basis for future experiments?)

Response: This in an excellent proposal for future studies regarding differences in locomotory activity between mated and virgin medflies. The cost of reproduction is strongly correlated with the aging process in medflies life history traits. Therefore, in future studies we agree that would be extremely interesting to investigate the differences between the locomotory activity patterns for virgin and mated flies during aging.

Specific comments:

1. Line 45

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

2. Line 53

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

3. Line 71

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

4. Line 77, 80, 81, 82

Response: The paragraph was revised thoroughly according to the reviewers’ suggestions

5. Line 84: need to clarify the mating status, as this is of importance for longevity

Response: The mating status of the flies was clarified revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

6. Line 88: maybe explain constrains?

Response: Some specific constrains added according to the reviewer’s suggestion

7. Line 132-134: This sentence belongs to the conclusions

Response: The text was revised according to reviewer’s suggestions

8. Line 142: light intensity?

Response: The light intensity was clarified according to reviewer’s suggestions

9. Line 155: dimensions of cotton disk? thickness?

Response: The cotton disk’s thickness and dimensions clarified

10. Line 250: clarify mating status

Response: The mating status was clarified

11. Line 339: how? it is not clear that females were mated, so only fecundity of unfertilized eggs is expected to be measured during those experiments

12. Response: The term ‘reproduction’ was replaced by the term ‘fecundity’ throughout the whole text. We also reported the mating status of the flies in the M&M section.

13. Line 344: only with reference to mated adult flies

Response: The text was revised for clarity

14. Line 363: reference to the restricted conditions needs to be presented here, since those flies did not had ability to fly in open space, or to develop social interactions that affect longevity.

15. Response: We thanks the reviewer for pointing this out. We have included a paragraph to address his concerns (see lines 377 - 386)

16. Line 418: Please note the number of individuals (males-females) and replications in M&M.

Response: The replicates were clarified in the M&M section

The data for the supplementary S2Table and S3Fig are given in:

https://data.world/vasrod43/lamsystem-data-for-s2-table-and-s3-fig

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers1.docx

Click here for additional data file.

1 Jun 2022

Electronic recording of lifetime locomotory activity patterns of adult medflies

PONE-D-22-00246R1

Dear Dr. Papadopoulos,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Nicholas C. Manoukis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Thank you for addressing all comments! Congratulations on completing a nice study.

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The experiments described in this manuscript will prove useful for other pestiferous Tephritidae species and I therefor recommend this article for publication.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

7 Jun 2022

PONE-D-22-00246R1

Electronic recording of lifetime locomotory activity patterns of adult medflies

Dear Dr. Papadopoulos:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Nicholas C. Manoukis

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE