| Literature DB >> 35877368 |
Niels Oppel1, Malena Ezzat1, Philipp Krüger2, Katharina Schmitt1, Alexandra Napp1, Friederike Pohl1, Andre Bleich3, Thomas Lenarz1,4, Tobias Stein2, Gerrit Paasche1,4, Robert Schuon1.
Abstract
Otitis media is often connected to Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD). Until now, there was no large animal model available for the examination of new treatment methods such as stents for the Eustachian tube (ET). Thus, the aim of the study was to develop a method to reproducibly induce ETD by injection of fillers and without permanent closure of the ET. Tools for safe injection of hyaluronic acid (HA) in the surrounding of the ET were developed. In ex vivo experiments, HA mixed with Imeron® was injected close to the nasopharyngeal orifice of the ET of blackface sheep. The established depot was visualized using cone beam computer tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, and stents could be placed into the ET. A reliable position of the HA depot was achieved. This method was transferred to in vivo, and middle ear ventilation was investigated by tympanometry. ETD was achieved with amounts of 2.5 mL HA or higher. None of the animals showed any sign of discomfort or complications. The induced ETD lasted for 3 to 13 (maximum observation period) weeks and was also combined with middle ear effusion. A model of ETD based on injection of HA next to the ET was successfully established and is now available to test novel treatment options for ET functionality.Entities:
Keywords: Eustachian tube dysfunction; animal model; cone beam CT; hyaluronic acid; otitis media with effusion; tympanometry
Year: 2022 PMID: 35877368 PMCID: PMC9311709 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9070317
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioengineering (Basel) ISSN: 2306-5354
Figure 1Injection instrument with the retractable cannula being pushed forward.
Figure 2Endoscopic view of the pharyngeal orifice of the ET. The cannula is inserted in the target area (marked in red) in front of the crescent-shaped ET orifice (black arrows).
Results of the ex vivo experiments.
| ET | HA [mL] | Insertion | Insertion Side | Outflow of HA | CBCT/MRI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.3 | n/a | n/a | No | |
|
| 1 | n/a | n/a | No | |
|
| 0.3 | n/a | n/a | No | |
|
| 0.35 | 30° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.35 | 30° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.35 | 30° | Aligned | Yes | Good |
|
| 0.4 | 30° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.3 | 45° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.3 | 45° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.4 | 40° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.4 | 40° | Central slightly behind the entrance | No | Too nuchal |
|
| 0.3 | 40° | Aligned | Yes | Hardly visible |
|
| 0.3 | 40° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.3 | 40° | Aligned | No | Hardly visible |
|
| 0.65 | 40° | Approx. 2 mm further rostral | Yes | Good with rostral bulge |
|
| 0.3 | 50° | Central slightly behind the entrance | No | Good |
|
| 0.4 | 40° | Aligned | No | Good with rostral bulge |
|
| 0.3 | 40° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.3 + 0.75 | 40° | Aligned | No | Good with rostral bulge |
|
| 0.5 | 40° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.5 + 0.5 | 40° | Aligned | Yes | Good with rostral bulge |
|
| 0.2 | 40° | Approx. 4 mm further rostral | No | Just rostral of the ET |
|
| 0.4 | 40° | Aligned | No | Good |
|
| 0.4 + 0.2 | 40° | Approx. 2 mm further rostral | No | Good with a separate depot |
|
| 1.2 (s) | 40° | Aligned | No | Good with rostral bulge (MRI) |
|
| 0.5 (s) | 40° | Aligned | No | Good (MRI) |
n/a—not applicable (not documented); s—stabilized HA; aligned—position according to Figure 2; good—depot is located according Figure 3. In cases with a/b, the same ET was used for a second injection after a CBCT scan.
Figure 3CBCT scans of cadaver heads after injection of 0.3 mL HA (A; case 13) or 1 mL HA (B; case 19b). The depots (white arrows) were visualized by addition of Imeron® and were classified as good (A) and good with rostral bulge (B) (compare Table 1).
Health score as used in the current study. It was based on and modified from Pohl et al. [15].
| Category | Observed Behavior | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Vocalization | Occasional communication with each other | 0 |
| Occasional teeth grinding, sporadic snorting | 1 | |
| Frequent grinding of teeth, frequent snorting | 2 | |
| Moaning/sighing during expiration | 3 | |
| Activity | Sleeping, quietly standing or lying down | 0 |
| Frequent changes of position and attempts to stand up | 1 | |
| Restlessness (e.g., running around bleating) | 2 | |
| Feed/water intake | Normal, normal rumination | 0 |
| Only special food, moderate rumination | 1 | |
| No food intake, no rumination | 2 | |
| Behavior/facial expression | Interested in the environment, searches in the straw, head is carried straight | 0 |
| Depressed, dull, sporadic moderate head tilting and/or head shaking | 1 | |
| Flehming, absent staring, permanent head tilting and/or head shaking | 2 | |
| Breathing rate | Up to 25 breaths/min | 0 |
| 25–30% increase above normal | 0.5 | |
| More than 50% increase above normal | 1 | |
| Other abnormalities | None | 0 |
| Temperature increase, serous nasal discharge | 1 | |
| Fever, purulent nasal discharge, bloody nasal discharge | 2 |
Scoring was done daily for seven days after anesthesia, if inconspicuous thereafter according to the basic control interval every 2–3 days.
Figure 4MRI images of a cadaver head (cases 22 and 23). The HA depots are marked by white arrows.
Figure 5CBCT scan of a head with stent prototypes inserted into the ETs. (A): Both depots (cases 1 (left ET) and 2 (right ET)) are visible and marked by white arrows. Next to the depots, air filled stents can be seen. The green line indicates the course of the left ET. (B): Enlargement of one stented ET with the depot. The yellow lines (A; B; C) mark the position of the respective cross sections depicted on the right side.
In vivo cases injected with non-stabilized HA in chronological order.
| ET Case | HA [mL] | Bending Angle | Insertion Point | Insertions Needed | Outflow of HA | Protrusion |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.3 | 45° | Aligned | 1 | No | 0 |
|
| 0.5 | 50° | Aligned | 2 | No | 1 |
|
| 0.5 | 50° | Centrally behind the entrance | 2 | No | 0 |
|
| 0.9 | 50° | Aligned | 3 | Yes | 1 |
|
| 1 | 45° | Aligned | 1 | No | 1 |
Aligned—position according to Figure 2; protrusion rating: 0—no protrusion, 1—small.
Results of tympanometric measurements over the experimental period after injection of non-stabilized HA.
| Days and Respective Tympanometric Measurement Results | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 (0.3 mL HA) | −7 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 19 | 26 | 36 | 40 | 47 | 54 | 61 | 68 | 77 | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Case 2 (0.5 mL HA) | −7 | −5 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 31 | 35 | 42 | 49 | 56 | 63 | 72 | 77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Case 3 (0.5 mL HA) | −6 | −1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 20 | 30 | 34 | 41 | 48 | 55 | 62 | 71 | 76 | 83 | 90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| −7 | −4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 10 | 14 | 21 | 28 | 35 | 42 | 51 | 56 | 63 | 70 | 78 | ||
| Case 4 (0.9 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Case 5 (1.0 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
A—physiological curve type A; B*—flat curve but ear canal volume greater than 9 mL, indicating a ruptured tympanic membrane; C—pathological curve type C (shifted into the negative pressure range). Note: the days of tympanometric measurements vary among cases and are listed with the cases.
In vivo cases injected with stabilized HA in chronological order.
| ET Case | Observation [Weeks] | HA [mL] | Bending Angle | Insertion Point | Insertions Needed | Outflow of HA | Protrusion | Protrusion w 1 | Protrusion w 7 | Protrusion w 13 (12) | TM w 1 | TM w 7 | TM w 13 (12) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13 | 1 | 50° | Slightly inside the ET | 1 | No | 1 | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a |
|
| 12 | 3 | 35° | Distributed at the | 6 | Yes | 3 | 3 (day 14) | n/a | 1 | Phys. (day 14) | n/a | Phys. |
|
| 13 | 1.47 | 40° | Aligned | 4 | Yes | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | Phys. | Phys. | Phys. |
|
| 1 | 2.48 | 40° | Aligned | 2 | Yes | 2 | 1 | n/a | n/a | Bulg. | n/a | n/a |
|
| 13 | 3.38 | 25° | Aligned | 1 | No | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Rupt. | Bulg. | Bulg. |
|
| 1 | 4.25 | 25° | Dorsally aligned | 1 | Yes | 3 | 3 | n/a | n/a | Bulg. | n/a | n/a |
|
| 1 | 3.5 | 20° | Aligned | 1 | Yes | 2 | 3 | n/a | n/a | Bulg. | n/a | n/a |
|
| 13 | 3 | 20° | Aligned | 1 | No | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | Bulg. | Bulg. | Bulg. |
|
| 13 | 3.65 | 20° | Aligned | 3 | Yes | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Phys. | Bulg. | Phys. |
|
| 1 | 3 | 30° | Aligned | 1 | No | 2 | 3 | n/a | n/a | Phys. | n/a | n/a |
|
| 1 | 2.5 | 25° | Aligned | 1 | No | 2 | 3 | n/a | n/a | Phys. | n/a | n/a |
|
| 13 | 2.4 | 25° | Aligned | 1 | No | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | Phys. | Phys. | Phys. |
|
| 1 | 2 | 25° | Aligned | 1 | No | 2 | 3 | n/a | n/a | Phys. | n/a | n/a |
|
| 13 | 2 | 30° | Aligned | 1 | No | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Phys. | Phys. | Phys. |
|
| 1 | 3 | 30° | Aligned | 1 | Yes | 3 | 3 | n/a | n/a | Phys. | n/a | n/a |
|
| 13 | 3 | 40° | Aligned | 1 | Yes | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | Bulg. | Phys. | Phys. |
|
| 1 | 3.2 | 40° | Aligned | 1 | No | 3 | 2 | n/a | n/a | Phys. | n/a | n/a |
n/a—not applicable; Phys.—physiological; TM—tympanic membrane; w—week; Bulg.—bulged TM; Rupt.—fluid in front of TM (TM probably ruptured); aligned—location according Figure 2; protrusion rating: 0—no protrusion, 1—small, 2—medium, 3—strong.
Figure 6Endoscopic view of the ET of in vivo case 12 after injection of HA. A bulge is clearly visible in the ventro-rostral area of the tube (compare Figure 2). The insertion instrument is still in place.
Figure 7Endoscopic view of the nasopharynx of in vivo case 21/22. (A) Before HA injection; (B) after injecting the left tube (case 21, shown here on the right); (C) after bilateral injection; (D) on day 7. The ET orifices are marked by black arrows.
Results of tympanometric measurements over the experimental period after injection of stabilized HA.
| Days and Respective Tympanometric Mesurement Results | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 6 (1.0 mL HA) | −7 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 21 | 26 | 27 | 33 | 40 | 48 | 54 | 64 | 68 | 75 | 82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Case 7 (3.0 mL HA) | −7 | −3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ←→ | 32 | 35 | 37 | 39 | 42 | 44 | 46 | 49 | 51 | 53 | 56 | 63 | 70 | 77 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| −10 | −3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 90 | |||||||||||
| Case 8 (1.47 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Case 9 (2.48 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Case 10 (3.38 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Case 11 (4.25 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| −8 | −1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 87 | ||||||||
| Case 12 (3.5 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Case 13 (3.0 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −8 | −1 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 57 | 59 | 62 | 64 | 66 | 69 | 71 | 73 | 76 | 78 | 80 | 83 | 85 | 87 | |||||
| Case 14 (3.65 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Case 15 (3.0 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| −7 | −1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 10 | 13 |
| 90 | ||||||||||||||
| Case 16 (2.5 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Case 17 (2.4 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| −7 | −1 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 | ←→ | 34 | 36 | 37 | 41 | 43 | ←→ | 64 | 66 | 69 |
| 90 | ||||||
| Case 18 (2.0 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Case 19 (2.0 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Case 20 (3.0 mL HA) | −14 | −7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
| −4 | −3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 11 | 14 | 47 | 18 | 21 | 23 | 25 | 28 | 30 | ←→ | 74 | 77 | 79 | ←→ | 88 | |||
| Case 21 (3.0 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Case 22 (3.2 mL HA) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
A—physiological curve type A; B—pathological flat curve type B; C—pathological curve type C (shifted into the negative pressure range). Note: the days of tympanometric measurements vary among cases and are listed with the cases.
Figure 8Success of the induction of ETD 7 days after injection of different amounts of HA.
Figure 9Endoscopic view of the tympanic membrane, (A) physiologic membrane (case 21, before the injection); (B) bulbed membrane (case 21, week 1); (C) fluid level in front of the membrane (case 10, week 1).
Figure 10MRI image of case 21 after 13 weeks. The HA depot is marked by a white arrow.