| Literature DB >> 29728102 |
Friederike Pohl1,2, Robert A Schuon1,2, Felicitas Miller1,3, Andreas Kampmann3, Eva Bültmann4, Christian Hartmann5, Thomas Lenarz1,2, Gerrit Paasche6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Untreated chronic otitis media severely impairs quality of life in affected individuals. Local destruction of the middle ear and subsequent loss of hearing are common sequelae, and currently available treatments provide limited relief. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the feasibility of the insertion of a coronary stent from the nasopharynx into the Eustachian tube in-vivo in sheep and to make an initial assessment of its positional stability, tolerance by the animal, and possible tissue reactions.Entities:
Keywords: Auditory tube; Middle ear ventilation; Otitis media; Sheep as animal model; Stent; Tissue reaction
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29728102 PMCID: PMC5935938 DOI: 10.1186/s13005-018-0165-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Head Face Med ISSN: 1746-160X Impact factor: 2.151
Fig. 1Study design in weeks. The arrows indicate time points of general anesthesia with endoscopic control (white), instillation of inflammatory mediators, or stent implantation
Score for semi quantitative evaluation of the endoscopic images of the nasopharyngeal orifice of the ET
| Criteria | Endoscopic score value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| None | Mild | Moderate | Severe | |
| Quality of mucus | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Opening degree of n. orificea | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Inflammatory erythema | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Inflammatory swelling | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Fig. 2Endoscopic view of the ET for the evaluation of stent position and inflammation. Examples of (a) no [endoscopic score 1–3], (b) mild [score 4–6] and (c) moderate [score 7–9] inflammation in the nasopharyngeal orifice region are shown
Fig. 3Coronal CT sections of both stents (*) in-situ for each sheep. Tympanic cavity (ME), nasopharynx (NP) and spinal canal were used for orientation and evaluation. The lines indicate the regions of histologic evaluation
Fig. 4Slice of the ET with plotted ellipse illustrating the region of analysis of stent expansion. Depicted are Rüdinger’s safety canal (RC), auxiliary gap (AG), the tubal cartilage (C) and free lumen (LF) of the ET. An ellipse is depicted on the struts (*) indicating the position of the stent
Fig. 5Recorded endoscopic score values. a Left (long stent) and (b) right (short stent) ET of each sheep under general anesthesia in the course of the experiment. In the first GA (week − 1) a score of zero was observed
Fig. 6Areas of tissue occurrence (T), lumen (L), secretion (S) and free lumen (LF). Depicted are parts 1 (a) and 4 (b) of the ET for both stents (compare Fig. 3). The total area of the ET (ROI) was set as 100%
Fig. 7Mean stent area. Parts 1 and 4 (compare Fig. 3) of the implanted 2.75 mm × 26 mm (a) and 2.0 mm × 20 mm (b) stents with the calculated reference for each stent size. The data are shown as mean + SD
Fig. 8Percentage of struts not covered by tissue. Depicted from the nasopharynx (part 1) to the middle ear (part 4) for both types of stents
Fig. 9Interface between mucosa and lumen. Illustrated are the Eustachian tube (ET) and the nasal cavity (NC) of sheep 3 (right ET, part 4) showing prismatic epithelium (Prism. epith.) topped with cilia at 2× magnification