| Literature DB >> 35876915 |
Zhi-Xue Zhao1, Xiao-Xiao Yin1, Sha Li1, Yu-Ting Peng1, Xiu-Lian Yan1, Chen Chen1, Beenish Hassan1, Shi-Xin Zhou1, Mei Pu1, Jing-Hao Zhao1, Xiao-Hong Hu1, Guo-Bang Li1, He Wang1, Ji-Wei Zhang1, Yan-Yan Huang1, Jing Fan1, Yan Li1, Wen-Ming Wang2.
Abstract
Flower opening and stigma exertion are two critical traits for cross-pollination during seed production of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.). In this study, we demonstrate that the miR167d-ARFs module regulates stigma size and flower opening that is associated with the elongation of stamen filaments and the cell arrangement of lodicules. The overexpression of miR167d (OX167d) resulted in failed elongation of stamen filaments, increased stigma size, and morphological alteration of lodicule, resulting in cleistogamy. Blocking miR167d by target mimicry also led to a morphological alteration of the individual floral organs, including a reduction in stigma size and alteration of lodicule cell morphology, but did not show the cleistogamous phenotype. In addition, the four target genes of miR167d, namely ARF6, ARF12, ARF17, and ARF25, have overlapping functions in flower opening and stigma size. The loss-of-function of a single ARF gene did not influence the flower opening and stigma size, but arf12 single mutant showed a reduced plant height and aborted apical spikelets. However, mutation in ARF12 together with mutation in either ARF6, ARF17, or ARF25 led to the same defective phenotypes that were observed in OX167d, including the failed elongation of stamen filaments, increased stigma size, and morphological alteration of lodicule. These findings indicate that the appropriate expression of miR167d is crucial and the miR167d-ARFs module plays important roles in the regulation of flower opening and stigma size in rice.Entities:
Keywords: Auxin response factor; Flower opening; Oryza sativa; Stigma size; miR167d
Year: 2022 PMID: 35876915 PMCID: PMC9314575 DOI: 10.1186/s12284-022-00587-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rice (N Y) ISSN: 1939-8425 Impact factor: 5.638
Fig. 1Phenotypic analysis of the spikelets and flowers in OX167d. a The inheritance of cleistogamy in the OX167d lines. The white arrows indicate the anthers that move out from the flowers. Red arrows indicate the stamens that remain inside the spikelets, forming the black dots. b, c The inner view of the flowers at the different stages. The early filling stage (c I), middle filling stage (c II), and late filling stage (b, c III). Red arrows indicate the stamens
Fig. 2Phenotypic analysis of the floral organs in OX167d. a Overview of the inner floral organs in KA and OX167d lines. b Overview of the stigmas and lodicules. The stamen was removed from (a). Red arrows indicate lodicules. c The phenotype of the filament elongation in the indicated lines. d Close-up view of the stigmas. Bars, 2 mm. e Comparison of the stigma width in the indicated lines. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD) (n = 10). **P < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). f Close-up view of the lodicules in KA and OX167d. Bars, 100 μm. g Cell morphological features of lodicules in KA and OX167d. Bars, 50 μm. h Comparison of the cell length and cell width from (g). Error bars indicate standard deviation (SD) (n = 20). **P < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). i Transverse section of the flowers in KA and OX167d
Fig. 3Phenotypic analysis of the floral organs in MIM167d. a Phenotype of the flowers. The anthers from KA and MIM167d move out from the flowers. b Overview of the inner floral organs in KA and MIM167d lines. c Phenotype of the filament elongation. d Phenotype of the stigmas. The stamen was removed from (b). Red arrows indicate the stigmas. Bars, 2 mm. e Comparison of the stigma width. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD) (n = 10). **P < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). f Close-up view of the lodicules in KA and MIM167d. Bars, 100 μm. g Cell morphological features of lodicules in KA and MIM167d. Bars, 50 μm. h Comparison of the cell length and cell width from (g). Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD) (n = 20). **P < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). (i) Transverse sections of flower in KA and MIM167d
Fig. 4Panicle and flower phenotypes of the ARF single mutants. a-c Panicles of KA and ARF single mutants. Overview of the panicles (a), Close-up view of the panicles (b, c). Blue arrows indicate aborted apical spikelets. Red arrows indicate the anthers that move out from the flowers. d The inner view of the flowers at the later grain filling stage
Fig. 5Phenotypic analysis of the floral organs in ARF single mutants. a The phenotype of the filament elongation in the indicated lines. b Phenotype of the pistils. Bars, 2 mm. c Comparison of the stigma width. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD) (n = 10). **(P < 0.01) (Student’s t-test). d Transverse sections of flower in KA and ARF single mutants
Fig. 6Panicle and flower phenotypes of the ARF double homozygous mutants. a-c Panicles of KA and ARF double mutants. Overview of the panicles (a). Close-up view of the panicles (b–c). Blue arrows indicate aborted apical spikelets. d Zoom-in view of the red box in (c). Red arrows indicate the anthers that move out from the flowers. e The inner view of the flowers at the later grain filling stage. Red arrows indicate stamens
Fig. 7Phenotypic analysis of the floral organs in ARF double mutants. a The phenotype of the filament elongation in the indicated lines. b Phenotype of the pistils. Bars, 2 mm. c Comparison of the stigma width. Error bars indicate the standard deviation (SD) (n = 10). **P < 0.01 (Student’s t-test). d Transverse sections of flower in the KA and ARF double homozygous mutants