Literature DB >> 35876696

Metabolic Glycan Labeling of Cancer Cells Using Variably Acetylated Monosaccharides.

Daniel R Parle1, Flaviu Bulat2, Shahd Fouad1, Heather Zecchini2, Kevin M Brindle2, André A Neves2, Finian J Leeper1.   

Abstract

Methylcyclopropene (Cyoc)-tagged tetra-acetylated monosaccharides, and in particular mannosamine derivatives, are promising tools for medical imaging of cancer using metabolic oligosaccharide engineering and the extremely fast inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder bioorthogonal reaction. However, the in vivo potential of these monosaccharide derivatives has yet to be fully explored due to their low aqueous solubility. To address this issue, we sought to vary the extent of acetylation of Cyoc-tagged monosaccharides and probe its effect on the extent of glycan labeling in various cancer cell lines. We demonstrate that, in the case of AcxManNCyoc, tri- and diacetylated derivatives generated significantly enhanced cell labeling compared to the tetra-acetylated monosaccharide. In contrast, for the more readily soluble azide-tagged sugars, a decrease in acetylation led to decreased glycan labeling. Ac3ManNCyoc gave better labeling than the azido-tagged Ac4ManNAz and has significant potential for in vitro and in vivo imaging of glycosylated cancer biomarkers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35876696      PMCID: PMC9389531          DOI: 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.2c00169

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioconjug Chem        ISSN: 1043-1802            Impact factor:   6.069


Introduction

Abnormal glycosylation has been associated with a variety of diseases, including cancer,[1,2] highlighting the vital role glycans play in many cellular interactions. This aberrant glycosylation is involved in tumor proliferation and progression, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and immunomodulation.[3,4] Altered cancer cell-surface glycoproteins are a target for molecular imaging and targeted therapeutics.[5−7] Abnormal glycosylation is often the result of changes in the monosaccharide composition of the glycans. These include increased N-glycan branching via GlcNAc,[8] an increase in mucin-type glycans initiated by GalNAc,[6,9] and increased sialylation (synthesized intracellularly from ManNAc).[10−12] Consequently, these glycan signatures offer potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets for exploiting the aberrant glycan structures displayed by tumor cells. Metabolic oligosaccharide engineering (MOE) has been widely used as a technique for labeling glycans in several tissue types.[13] A variety of bioorthogonal reactions have been exploited to achieve this, including Staudinger ligations,[14] inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder (IED-DA) reactions,[15] and azide-alkyne cycloadditions.[16] For metabolic labeling, the nature of the chemical reporter on the monosaccharide is key. Large motifs are often not tolerated by glycosyltransferase enzymes in the biosynthetic pathways of glycan production; small chemical reporters such as azide[14] and isonitrile[17] groups are generally thought to be preferred. IED-DA reactions can show very fast kinetics for bioorthogonal ligation reactions and can be orthogonal to the widely used strain-promoted alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) reactions, allowing both reactions to be used concurrently in dual-labeling studies.[18−20] While many motifs such as trans-cyclooctenes show very rapid IED-DA kinetics with tetrazines,[15] their use in metabolic labeling is limited due to their relatively large size, which limits their incorporation. However, the smaller cyclopropene motif is better tolerated by glycosyltransferases for glycan incorporation[21] and is hence an exciting novel tool for MOE, along with its fast reaction partner, tetrazine (Tz). Unsubstituted cycloprop-2-ene-1-carbonyl (Cp) derivatives are generally unstable. Despite this, Ac4ManNCp[22]1 (Figure ) and other Cp-labeled sugars[23] have been used for MOE. Methyl cyclopropenes[21,24] (Cyc) such as ManNCyc (2) are more stable and thus suitable for MOE[25] but reaction speeds with tetrazines are ca. threefold slower than unmethylated analogues.[18] However, both ManNCp (1) and ManNCyc (2) groups have a carbonyl group directly attached to the cyclopropene, and this electron-withdrawing group slows down the IED-DA reaction with tetrazines by more than 50-fold relative to carbamate-linked cyclopropene (Cyoc) groups, as in 3.[26] The enhanced kinetics of the carbamate compensate for the reduced incorporation of 3 relative to 1 and 2.[23] ManNCyoc 3 was shown to react with a tetrazine with a rate constant of 0.99 M–1 s–1 at 20 °C.[18] Ac4ManNCyoc has, for example, been used to metabolically label a human leukemic T-lymphocyte line (Jurkat) and its incorporation into cell-surface glycans was imaged with either a Tz-biotin/avidin combination or a directly linked Tz-fluorophore,[26] targeting the increased levels of sialylation observed in cancer cell lines.
Figure 1

Different cyclopropene derivatives of mannosamine (ManN) that have been reported.

Different cyclopropene derivatives of mannosamine (ManN) that have been reported. Tetra-acetylated monosaccharides are generally used for MOE to aid cell permeability, as the unacetylated monosaccharides are too polar for passive diffusion through the plasma membrane (Figure ). After cell uptake, the acetylated monosaccharides are deacetylated by nonspecific esterases in the cytosol.[27] Despite demonstrations of in vitro ligation reactions, in vivo applications of cyclopropene-tagged sugars have been limited, to our knowledge, to a single report[22] using 1 with detection of the label performed ex vivo. This may be a consequence of the poor aqueous solubility of Ac4ManNCyoc, even in the presence of a cosolvent (e.g. 10% DMSO). In contrast, tetraacetylated azido-tagged sugars have been widely used for in vivo applications.[28−30] We believe this difference is due to the better solubility of the azido-tagged sugars relative to their cyclopropene counterparts, which is related to their reduced c log P (Figure ).
Figure 2

Striking a balance between aqueous solubility and cell permeability by varying the degree of acetylation of Cyoc- and azido-tagged monosaccharides. The c log P values of AcManNCyoc and AcManNAz are shown as examples.[31]

Striking a balance between aqueous solubility and cell permeability by varying the degree of acetylation of Cyoc- and azido-tagged monosaccharides. The c log P values of AcManNCyoc and AcManNAz are shown as examples.[31] Here, we investigate whether partially acetylated Cyoc-tagged sugars are more effective for MOE than the peracetylated versions. We show that the di- and triacetylated ManNCyoc derivatives are not only more soluble in aqueous media than Ac4ManNCyoc but also better incorporated into cell-surface glycans in vitro and, therefore, more suitable for use in MOE experiments.

Results and Discussion

Synthesis of Monosaccharides

Unacetylated cyclopropene-tagged mannosamine (ManNCyoc), galactosamine (GalNCyoc), and glucosamine (GlcNCyoc) derivatives were prepared using previously reported methods.[26] The tetraacetylated derivatives were synthesized by reacting the unacetylated tagged sugars with excess pyridine and acetic anhydride, as described previously.[26] The same approach was used for azido-tagged ManNAz, GalNAz, and GlcNAz.[32] While methods exist to synthesize many different selectively acetylated sugar derivatives,[33] the standard procedures largely use acidic conditions (for acetal hydrolysis), hydrogenation (for removal of benzyl groups), and/or oxidative conditions (e.g., for removal of p-methoxybenzyl groups or activation of an anomeric leaving group). Unfortunately, the Cyoc group does not tolerate any of these conditions[22,23] and even decomposes upon heating to 80 °C. We were, therefore, very limited in the types of reactions we could use. To synthesize mono- and diacetylated Cyoc-tagged derivatives, the unacetylated sugars were dissolved in pyridine and the corresponding stoichiometric amount of acetic anhydride added (Figure ). This approach, however, did not yield a single level of acetylation but instead a range of different degrees of acetylation as well as different regioisomers, resulting in a complex mixture of products, as detected by NMR and LCMS. However, the more polar products could be partially separated by multiple rounds of normal phase chromatography. This separated the mono- and diacetylated sugars for both the azide and cyclopropene series with good control over the level of acetylation but no control over the position of acetylation.
Figure 3

Synthesis of mono- and diacetylated monosaccharides. Acetylation of the ManN derivatives is shown as an example.

Synthesis of mono- and diacetylated monosaccharides. Acetylation of the ManN derivatives is shown as an example. For the triacetylated derivatives, we used instead selective deacetylation of the corresponding tetraacetylated monosaccharide. Numerous reagents have been used to achieve selective deacetylation including hydrazine hydrate,[34] ammonium carbonate,[35] and zinc acetate.[36] We found that addition of 7 M ammonia in methanol to the tetra-acetylated sugar dissolved in THF, as described by Fiandor et al.,[37] resulted in selective conversion to the triacetylated sugar in 2 h and was compatible with both the azide and cyclopropene tags (Figure ). We confirmed by NMR that it is the anomeric position that is deacetylated (Figure S2.1). This method was used to synthesize pure triacetylated analogues of each tagged sugar in this study, with excellent regioselectivity and anomeric control (α-selective), as described in the initial report of this method.[37]
Figure 4

Selective synthesis of triacetylated monosaccharides via anomeric deacetylation. Deacetylation of the Ac4ManN derivatives is shown as an example.

Selective synthesis of triacetylated monosaccharides via anomeric deacetylation. Deacetylation of the Ac4ManN derivatives is shown as an example. In summary, we synthesized mono- and diacetylated azido and Cyoc-tagged ManN, GalN, and GlcN with no control over the position of acetylation but good control of the level of acetylation. Tri-acetylated sugars, on the other hand, were synthesized as pure compounds, with respect to the position and level of acetylation and stereochemistry at the anomeric position (further discussed in Section 2.1 of the Supporting Information). In contrast, previous studies with tetra-acetylated Cyoc-tagged sugars have all used a mixture of anomers.

In Vitro Labeling

Next, we investigated the effect of the degree of acetylation of these tagged sugars on metabolic labeling in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (COLO205). COLO205 cells were incubated with 125 μM of each of the differently acetylated Cyoc-tagged sugars: Ac, Ac2, Ac3, and Ac4. Cyoc-tagged sugars were detected using a Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 dye[38] and azido-tagged sugars using a TMDIBO-Lys-AlexaFluor647 dye (Figure ).[39]
Figure 5

In vitro labeling strategy. The figure was created with BioRender.com.

In vitro labeling strategy. The figure was created with BioRender.com. A direct bioorthogonal reaction was used for labeling rather than using a biotinylated probe followed by detection using a fluorescently tagged streptavidin. While the two-step approach should lead to a reduced background signal and hence an increased signal-to-background ratio (SBR),[40] it would be less applicable in vivo. Whereas, by using a fluorescently labeled tetrazine, this same system could then be directly translated to an experiment in vivo, using a single bioorthogonal reaction. The insolubility of the tetraacetylated cyclopropene sugars was immediately apparent, with visible turbidity occurring upon addition of a solution Ac4ManNCyoc in DMSO to the culture medium. For the less acetylated sugars, this was not observed. Figure shows a flow cytometric analysis of metabolic labeling with AcManNCyoc, as a function of the degree of acetylation of the sugar (Ac1–Ac4) in COLO205 cells. The median fluorescence intensity (MFI) was (17.4 ± 0.4)- and (16.6 ± 0.8)-fold higher than the control (PBS) for the di- and triacetylated compounds, respectively. In contrast, Ac4ManNCyoc-treated cells showed a much-reduced signal intensity, which can be explained by the poor aqueous solubility of this peracetylated monosaccharide. Ac1ManNCyoc also showed decreased signal intensity, presumably due to its reduced cell-membrane permeability. Ac3ManNCyoc and Ac2ManNCyoc are therefore better candidates for imaging of tumor hypersialylation than the widely used tetraacetylated derivative. These results contrast with earlier work,[41] which showed that for ManNAc (without any bio-orthogonal tag) increased sialic acid production was observed with more hydrophobic hydroxyl protecting groups than acetyl.
Figure 6

Glycan labeling with AcManNCyoc. COLO205 cells were incubated in the presence or absence (control) of the indicated AcManNCyoc sugar at 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are shown above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).

Glycan labeling with AcManNCyoc. COLO205 cells were incubated in the presence or absence (control) of the indicated AcManNCyoc sugar at 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are shown above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05). The same methodology was used with the AcGalNCyoc and AcGlcNCyoc derivatives (Figure ). However, the same effect was not observed for these monosaccharides. Instead, tetra- and triacetylated derivatives produced moderate SBRs of (1.6 ± 0.1) and (1.6 ± 0.2) for Ac4GalNCyoc and Ac3GalNCyoc, respectively, and (1.6 ± 0.1) and (1.4 ± 0.2) for Ac4GlcNCyoc and Ac3GlcNCyoc, respectively, whereas lower acetylation levels resulted in no significant sugar incorporation. Therefore, in this case, it is not solubility that limits the incorporation of the monosaccharide into the cell surface glycans but the inherently low labeling efficiency with these sugars. The significantly lower labeling with Ac4GalNCyoc and Ac4GlcNCyoc than with Ac4ManNCyoc has been observed previously in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T).[23,42] Poor labeling with other tagged GalN and GlcN analogues (relative to their ManN counterparts) has also been reported previously.[43,44] Monosaccharides can be interconverted intracellularly to some extent by epimerases and so it is possible that some AcGlcNCyoc is eventually expressed on the cell surface as sialic acid residues.[45]
Figure 7

Glycan labeling with AcGalNCyoc and AcGlcNCyoc. COLO205 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of the indicated sugar (A) GalNCyoc and (B) GlcNCyoc 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001,***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).

Glycan labeling with AcGalNCyoc and AcGlcNCyoc. COLO205 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of the indicated sugar (A) GalNCyoc and (B) GlcNCyoc 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001,***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05). Tetra-acetylated azido-tagged sugars have been widely used for MOE both in vitro and in vivo,[28−30] but it has not been shown that tetra-acetylation is the optimum level of acetylation. When the variably acetylated azido-tagged sugars were tested on COLO205 cells, the tetra-acetylated derivatives showed the best labeling efficiency (Figure ). Reduced incorporation of AcGalNAz and AcGlcNAz relative to AcManNAz was again observed as previously demonstrated for the cyclopropene-tagged sugars (Figures and 7).
Figure 8

Glycan labeling with azide-tagged sugars. COLO205 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of the appropriate sugar, (A) ManNAz, (B) GalNAz, and (C) GlcNAz 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4), for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes TMDIBO-Lys-AlexaFluor647 (30 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).

Glycan labeling with azide-tagged sugars. COLO205 cells were incubated in the presence or absence of the appropriate sugar, (A) ManNAz, (B) GalNAz, and (C) GlcNAz 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4), for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes TMDIBO-Lys-AlexaFluor647 (30 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05). We believe that the difference between the ManNCyoc derivatives (where the di- and triacetylated sugars were better incorporated) and the ManNAz derivatives (where the tetra-acetylated sugar is the best incorporated) is due to the greater inherent solubility of Ac4ManNAz. This is supported by its much lower c log P value relative to Ac4ManNCyoc (Figure ). Therefore, the solubility of Ac4ManNAz does not limit its incorporation and lower levels of acetylation reduce the labeling, presumably due to reduced cell permeability. There is, in fact, evidence in the literature that the permeability of Ac4ManNAz is less than ideal as the tetrabutanoylated Bu4ManNAz is better incorporated.[46] However, Bu4ManNAz may be too nonpolar as 1,3,4-Bu3ManNAz is incorporated better still.[7,46] Recent reports[47,48] of nonenzymic S-glyco modification of proteins by anomerically deacetylated monosaccharides are not thought to explain the increase in labeling with Ac3ManNCyoc and Ac2ManNCyoc (relative to Ac4ManNCyoc). If the labeling increase was due to S-glyco modification, the same effect would have been expected in other di- and triacetylated sugars (e.g., GalNCyoc and GlcNCyoc) since GalN and GlcN derivatives can also be substrates for S-glyco modification. All three azido-tagged sugars have been shown to participate in this modification,[47,48] and in this study, none of the lower degrees of acetylation of the azido sugars showed enhanced labeling. Since only Ac3ManNCyoc and Ac2ManNCyoc show increased labeling relative to the tetraacetylated derivative, this nonenzymatic reaction is unlikely to be responsible for the enhanced labeling. Next, we determined whether the enhanced cell labeling we had observed with partially acetylated AcManNCyoc in COLO205 cells was replicated in other tumor cell lines. MDA-MB-231, an invasive triple-negative epithelial human breast cancer cell line, and PANC-1, a pancreatic carcinoma cell line, were selected. For both cell lines, the extent of labeling was significantly increased at all levels of acetylation compared to COLO205 cells (Figure ). The increase in labeling with the tri- and diacetylated ManNCyoc derivatives compared to the tetra-acetylated derivative was further evidence that solubility can become a limiting factor when the tagged sugars show high levels of incorporation
Figure 9

Glycan labeling of other cell lines with AcManNCyoc. (A) MDA-MB-321 and (B) PANC-1 cells were incubated in the presence or absence (control) of the appropriate AcManNCyoc sugar 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).

Glycan labeling of other cell lines with AcManNCyoc. (A) MDA-MB-321 and (B) PANC-1 cells were incubated in the presence or absence (control) of the appropriate AcManNCyoc sugar 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05). Epifluorescence microscopy confirmed these findings. MDA-MB-231 cells were incubated with either Ac2ManNCyoc, Ac3ManNCyoc, Ac4ManNCyoc (125 μM for 24 h at 37 °C), or vehicle (PBS). Visualization of the cells after incubation with Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (and DAPI) showed strong labeling of the sugar-treated cells (Figure ). Vehicle-treated cells showed very little nonspecific labeling, confirming that Ac3ManNCyoc is a promising tool for imaging tumor hypersialylation. No significant effect on cell viability with Ac3ManNCyoc addition was seen at 125 μM (Figure S1.3).
Figure 10

Epifluorescence microscopy of labeled MDA-MB-231 cell glycans. Cells were cultured with or without AcManNCyoc (125 μM) for 24 h and then incubated with Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) and DAPI (100 nM) nuclear stain for 15 min at 37 °C. Red: AlexaFluor647, blue: DAPI. Scale bar: 50 μm.

Epifluorescence microscopy of labeled MDA-MB-231 cell glycans. Cells were cultured with or without AcManNCyoc (125 μM) for 24 h and then incubated with Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) and DAPI (100 nM) nuclear stain for 15 min at 37 °C. Red: AlexaFluor647, blue: DAPI. Scale bar: 50 μm.

Conclusions

Ac3ManNCyoc and Ac2ManNCyoc are novel candidates for probing tumor hypersialylation using metabolic labeling and subsequent imaging. They represent the optimal compromise between sugar solubility and membrane permeability. Ac3ManNCyoc is the preferred choice, as it is the more easily synthesized of the two compounds and is a single compound. It is notable that Ac3ManNCyoc yielded a threefold greater signal-to-background ratio than Ac4ManNAz and could, therefore, be considered the monosaccharide of choice for sialic acid imaging. We believe that this improvement in labeling is probably due to the faster IED-DA reaction of the Cyoc group[23] (ca. 1 M–1 s–1) compared with the SPAAC reaction of the azide[49] (ca. 0.1 M–1 s–1), meaning that a higher percentage of the cell-surface tags get ligated to the fluorophore. The principle, demonstrated here, that larger tags can, in some cases, lead to better labeling, if they have faster rates of bio-orthogonal reaction and if the right balance of water-solubility versus hydrophobicity is achieved, may apply much more generally in metabolic labeling of all kinds of biomolecules.
  43 in total

Review 1.  Genetic defects in the human glycome.

Authors:  Hudson H Freeze
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2006-06-06       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 2.  Protein glycosylation in cancer.

Authors:  Sean R Stowell; Tongzhong Ju; Richard D Cummings
Journal:  Annu Rev Pathol       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 23.472

Review 3.  Cu-free click cycloaddition reactions in chemical biology.

Authors:  John C Jewett; Carolyn R Bertozzi
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 54.564

4.  Copper-free click chemistry for dynamic in vivo imaging.

Authors:  Jeremy M Baskin; Jennifer A Prescher; Scott T Laughlin; Nicholas J Agard; Pamela V Chang; Isaac A Miller; Anderson Lo; Julian A Codelli; Carolyn R Bertozzi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-10-17       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Improved cyclopropene reporters for probing protein glycosylation.

Authors:  David M Patterson; Krysten A Jones; Jennifer A Prescher
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2014-03-12

Review 6.  Metabolic oligosaccharide engineering as a tool for glycobiology.

Authors:  Danielle H Dube; Carolyn R Bertozzi
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  Expanding the scope of cyclopropene reporters for the detection of metabolically engineered glycoproteins by Diels-Alder reactions.

Authors:  Anne-Katrin Späte; Verena F Schart; Julia Häfner; Andrea Niederwieser; Thomas U Mayer; Valentin Wittmann
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2014-09-22       Impact factor: 2.883

8.  Cyclopropene derivatives of aminosugars for metabolic glycoengineering.

Authors:  Jessica Hassenrück; Valentin Wittmann
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 2.883

9.  Metabolic Glycoengineering with Azide- and Alkene-Modified Hexosamines: Quantification of Sialic Acid Levels.

Authors:  Jeremias E G A Dold; Valentin Wittmann
Journal:  Chembiochem       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 3.164

10.  Imaging cell surface glycosylation in vivo using "double click" chemistry.

Authors:  André A Neves; Henning Stöckmann; Yelena A Wainman; Joe C-H Kuo; Sarah Fawcett; Finian J Leeper; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  2013-05-16       Impact factor: 4.774

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.