Methylcyclopropene (Cyoc)-tagged tetra-acetylated monosaccharides, and in particular mannosamine derivatives, are promising tools for medical imaging of cancer using metabolic oligosaccharide engineering and the extremely fast inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder bioorthogonal reaction. However, the in vivo potential of these monosaccharide derivatives has yet to be fully explored due to their low aqueous solubility. To address this issue, we sought to vary the extent of acetylation of Cyoc-tagged monosaccharides and probe its effect on the extent of glycan labeling in various cancer cell lines. We demonstrate that, in the case of AcxManNCyoc, tri- and diacetylated derivatives generated significantly enhanced cell labeling compared to the tetra-acetylated monosaccharide. In contrast, for the more readily soluble azide-tagged sugars, a decrease in acetylation led to decreased glycan labeling. Ac3ManNCyoc gave better labeling than the azido-tagged Ac4ManNAz and has significant potential for in vitro and in vivo imaging of glycosylated cancer biomarkers.
Methylcyclopropene (Cyoc)-tagged tetra-acetylated monosaccharides, and in particular mannosamine derivatives, are promising tools for medical imaging of cancer using metabolic oligosaccharide engineering and the extremely fast inverse electron-demand Diels-Alder bioorthogonal reaction. However, the in vivo potential of these monosaccharide derivatives has yet to be fully explored due to their low aqueous solubility. To address this issue, we sought to vary the extent of acetylation of Cyoc-tagged monosaccharides and probe its effect on the extent of glycan labeling in various cancer cell lines. We demonstrate that, in the case of AcxManNCyoc, tri- and diacetylated derivatives generated significantly enhanced cell labeling compared to the tetra-acetylated monosaccharide. In contrast, for the more readily soluble azide-tagged sugars, a decrease in acetylation led to decreased glycan labeling. Ac3ManNCyoc gave better labeling than the azido-tagged Ac4ManNAz and has significant potential for in vitro and in vivo imaging of glycosylated cancer biomarkers.
Abnormal glycosylation has been associated
with a variety of diseases,
including cancer,[1,2] highlighting the vital role glycans
play in many cellular interactions. This aberrant glycosylation is
involved in tumor proliferation and progression, angiogenesis, invasion,
metastasis, and immunomodulation.[3,4] Altered cancer
cell-surface glycoproteins are a target for molecular imaging and
targeted therapeutics.[5−7]Abnormal glycosylation is often the result
of changes in the monosaccharide
composition of the glycans. These include increased N-glycan branching via GlcNAc,[8] an increase
in mucin-type glycans initiated by GalNAc,[6,9] and
increased sialylation (synthesized intracellularly from ManNAc).[10−12] Consequently, these glycan signatures offer potential diagnostic
and therapeutic targets for exploiting the aberrant glycan structures
displayed by tumor cells.Metabolic oligosaccharide engineering
(MOE) has been widely used
as a technique for labeling glycans in several tissue types.[13] A variety of bioorthogonal reactions have been
exploited to achieve this, including Staudinger ligations,[14] inverse electron-demand Diels–Alder (IED-DA)
reactions,[15] and azide-alkyne cycloadditions.[16] For metabolic labeling, the nature of the chemical
reporter on the monosaccharide is key. Large motifs are often not
tolerated by glycosyltransferase enzymes in the biosynthetic pathways
of glycan production; small chemical reporters such as azide[14] and isonitrile[17] groups
are generally thought to be preferred.IED-DA reactions can
show very fast kinetics for bioorthogonal
ligation reactions and can be orthogonal to the widely used strain-promoted
alkyne-azide cycloaddition (SPAAC) reactions, allowing both reactions
to be used concurrently in dual-labeling studies.[18−20] While many
motifs such as trans-cyclooctenes show very rapid
IED-DA kinetics with tetrazines,[15] their
use in metabolic labeling is limited due to their relatively large
size, which limits their incorporation. However, the smaller cyclopropene
motif is better tolerated by glycosyltransferases for glycan incorporation[21] and is hence an exciting novel tool for MOE,
along with its fast reaction partner, tetrazine (Tz).Unsubstituted
cycloprop-2-ene-1-carbonyl (Cp) derivatives are generally
unstable. Despite this, Ac4ManNCp[22]1 (Figure ) and other Cp-labeled sugars[23] have been used for MOE. Methyl cyclopropenes[21,24] (Cyc) such as ManNCyc (2) are more stable and thus
suitable for MOE[25] but reaction speeds
with tetrazines are ca. threefold slower than unmethylated analogues.[18] However, both ManNCp (1) and ManNCyc
(2) groups have a carbonyl group directly attached to
the cyclopropene, and this electron-withdrawing group slows down the
IED-DA reaction with tetrazines by more than 50-fold relative to carbamate-linked
cyclopropene (Cyoc) groups, as in 3.[26] The enhanced kinetics of the carbamate compensate for the
reduced incorporation of 3 relative to 1 and 2.[23] ManNCyoc 3 was shown to react with a tetrazine with a rate constant
of 0.99 M–1 s–1 at 20 °C.[18] Ac4ManNCyoc has, for example, been
used to metabolically label a human leukemic T-lymphocyte line (Jurkat)
and its incorporation into cell-surface glycans was imaged with either
a Tz-biotin/avidin combination or a directly linked Tz-fluorophore,[26] targeting the increased levels of sialylation
observed in cancer cell lines.
Figure 1
Different cyclopropene derivatives of
mannosamine (ManN) that have
been reported.
Different cyclopropene derivatives of
mannosamine (ManN) that have
been reported.Tetra-acetylated monosaccharides are generally
used for MOE to
aid cell permeability, as the unacetylated monosaccharides are too
polar for passive diffusion through the plasma membrane (Figure ). After cell uptake,
the acetylated monosaccharides are deacetylated by nonspecific esterases
in the cytosol.[27] Despite demonstrations
of in vitro ligation reactions, in vivo applications of cyclopropene-tagged sugars have been limited, to
our knowledge, to a single report[22] using 1 with detection of the label performed ex vivo. This may be a consequence of the poor aqueous solubility of Ac4ManNCyoc, even in the presence of a cosolvent (e.g. 10% DMSO).
In contrast, tetraacetylated azido-tagged sugars have been widely
used for in vivo applications.[28−30] We believe
this difference is due to the better solubility of the azido-tagged
sugars relative to their cyclopropene counterparts, which is related
to their reduced c log P (Figure ).
Figure 2
Striking a
balance between aqueous solubility and cell permeability
by varying the degree of acetylation of Cyoc- and azido-tagged monosaccharides.
The c log P values
of AcManNCyoc and AcManNAz are shown as examples.[31]
Striking a
balance between aqueous solubility and cell permeability
by varying the degree of acetylation of Cyoc- and azido-tagged monosaccharides.
The c log P values
of AcManNCyoc and AcManNAz are shown as examples.[31]Here, we investigate whether partially acetylated
Cyoc-tagged sugars
are more effective for MOE than the peracetylated versions. We show
that the di- and triacetylated ManNCyoc derivatives are not only more
soluble in aqueous media than Ac4ManNCyoc but also better
incorporated into cell-surface glycans in vitro and,
therefore, more suitable for use in MOE experiments.
Results and Discussion
Synthesis of Monosaccharides
Unacetylated cyclopropene-tagged
mannosamine (ManNCyoc), galactosamine (GalNCyoc), and glucosamine
(GlcNCyoc) derivatives were prepared using previously reported methods.[26] The tetraacetylated derivatives were synthesized
by reacting the unacetylated tagged sugars with excess pyridine and
acetic anhydride, as described previously.[26] The same approach was used for azido-tagged ManNAz, GalNAz, and
GlcNAz.[32]While methods exist to
synthesize many different selectively acetylated sugar derivatives,[33] the standard procedures largely use acidic conditions
(for acetal hydrolysis), hydrogenation (for removal of benzyl groups),
and/or oxidative conditions (e.g., for removal of p-methoxybenzyl groups or activation of an anomeric leaving group).
Unfortunately, the Cyoc group does not tolerate any of these conditions[22,23] and even decomposes upon heating to 80 °C. We were, therefore,
very limited in the types of reactions we could use. To synthesize
mono- and diacetylated Cyoc-tagged derivatives, the unacetylated sugars
were dissolved in pyridine and the corresponding stoichiometric amount
of acetic anhydride added (Figure ). This approach, however, did not yield a single level
of acetylation but instead a range of different degrees of acetylation
as well as different regioisomers, resulting in a complex mixture
of products, as detected by NMR and LCMS. However, the more polar
products could be partially separated by multiple rounds of normal
phase chromatography. This separated the mono- and diacetylated sugars
for both the azide and cyclopropene series with good control over
the level of acetylation but no control over the position of acetylation.
Figure 3
Synthesis
of mono- and diacetylated monosaccharides. Acetylation
of the ManN derivatives is shown as an example.
Synthesis
of mono- and diacetylated monosaccharides. Acetylation
of the ManN derivatives is shown as an example.For the triacetylated derivatives, we used instead
selective deacetylation
of the corresponding tetraacetylated monosaccharide. Numerous reagents
have been used to achieve selective deacetylation including hydrazine
hydrate,[34] ammonium carbonate,[35] and zinc acetate.[36] We found that addition of 7 M ammonia in methanol to the tetra-acetylated
sugar dissolved in THF, as described by Fiandor et al.,[37] resulted in selective conversion to the triacetylated
sugar in 2 h and was compatible with both the azide and cyclopropene
tags (Figure ). We
confirmed by NMR that it is the anomeric position that is deacetylated
(Figure S2.1). This method was used to
synthesize pure triacetylated analogues of each tagged sugar in this
study, with excellent regioselectivity and anomeric control (α-selective),
as described in the initial report of this method.[37]
Figure 4
Selective synthesis of triacetylated monosaccharides via anomeric
deacetylation. Deacetylation of the Ac4ManN derivatives
is shown as an example.
Selective synthesis of triacetylated monosaccharides via anomeric
deacetylation. Deacetylation of the Ac4ManN derivatives
is shown as an example.In summary, we synthesized mono- and diacetylated
azido and Cyoc-tagged
ManN, GalN, and GlcN with no control over the position of acetylation
but good control of the level of acetylation. Tri-acetylated sugars,
on the other hand, were synthesized as pure compounds, with respect
to the position and level of acetylation and stereochemistry at the
anomeric position (further discussed in Section 2.1 of the Supporting Information). In contrast, previous studies
with tetra-acetylated Cyoc-tagged sugars have all used a mixture of
anomers.
In Vitro Labeling
Next, we investigated
the effect of the degree of acetylation of these tagged sugars on
metabolic labeling in colorectal adenocarcinoma cells (COLO205). COLO205
cells were incubated with 125 μM of each of the differently
acetylated Cyoc-tagged sugars: Ac, Ac2, Ac3,
and Ac4. Cyoc-tagged sugars were detected using a Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 dye[38] and azido-tagged
sugars using a TMDIBO-Lys-AlexaFluor647 dye (Figure ).[39]
Figure 5
In
vitro labeling strategy. The figure was created
with BioRender.com.
In
vitro labeling strategy. The figure was created
with BioRender.com.A direct bioorthogonal reaction was used for labeling
rather than
using a biotinylated probe followed by detection using a fluorescently
tagged streptavidin. While the two-step approach should lead to a
reduced background signal and hence an increased signal-to-background
ratio (SBR),[40] it would be less applicable in vivo. Whereas, by using a fluorescently labeled tetrazine,
this same system could then be directly translated to an experiment in vivo, using a single bioorthogonal reaction.The
insolubility of the tetraacetylated cyclopropene sugars was
immediately apparent, with visible turbidity occurring upon addition
of a solution Ac4ManNCyoc in DMSO to the culture medium.
For the less acetylated sugars, this was not observed. Figure shows a flow cytometric analysis
of metabolic labeling with AcManNCyoc,
as a function of the degree of acetylation of the sugar (Ac1–Ac4) in COLO205 cells. The median fluorescence
intensity (MFI) was (17.4 ± 0.4)- and (16.6 ± 0.8)-fold
higher than the control (PBS) for the di- and triacetylated compounds,
respectively. In contrast, Ac4ManNCyoc-treated cells showed
a much-reduced signal intensity, which can be explained by the poor
aqueous solubility of this peracetylated monosaccharide. Ac1ManNCyoc also showed decreased signal intensity, presumably due to
its reduced cell-membrane permeability. Ac3ManNCyoc and
Ac2ManNCyoc are therefore better candidates for imaging
of tumor hypersialylation than the widely used tetraacetylated derivative.
These results contrast with earlier work,[41] which showed that for ManNAc (without any bio-orthogonal tag) increased
sialic acid production was observed with more hydrophobic hydroxyl
protecting groups than acetyl.
Figure 6
Glycan labeling with AcManNCyoc. COLO205
cells were incubated in the presence or absence (control) of the indicated
AcManNCyoc sugar at 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24
h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647
(5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37
°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity
(MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs)
relative to the control (PBS) are shown above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using
an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001,
**P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).
Glycan labeling with AcManNCyoc. COLO205
cells were incubated in the presence or absence (control) of the indicated
AcManNCyoc sugar at 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24
h. They were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647
(5 μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37
°C and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity
(MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs)
relative to the control (PBS) are shown above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using
an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001,
**P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).The same methodology was used with the AcGalNCyoc and AcGlcNCyoc derivatives
(Figure ). However,
the same effect was not observed for these monosaccharides. Instead,
tetra- and triacetylated derivatives produced moderate SBRs of (1.6
± 0.1) and (1.6 ± 0.2) for Ac4GalNCyoc and Ac3GalNCyoc, respectively, and (1.6 ± 0.1) and (1.4 ±
0.2) for Ac4GlcNCyoc and Ac3GlcNCyoc, respectively,
whereas lower acetylation levels resulted in no significant sugar
incorporation. Therefore, in this case, it is not solubility that
limits the incorporation of the monosaccharide into the cell surface
glycans but the inherently low labeling efficiency with these sugars.
The significantly lower labeling with Ac4GalNCyoc and Ac4GlcNCyoc than with Ac4ManNCyoc has been observed
previously in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK293T).[23,42] Poor labeling with other tagged GalN and GlcN analogues (relative
to their ManN counterparts) has also been reported previously.[43,44] Monosaccharides can be interconverted intracellularly to some extent
by epimerases and so it is possible that some AcGlcNCyoc is eventually expressed on the cell surface as
sialic acid residues.[45]
Figure 7
Glycan labeling with
AcGalNCyoc and
AcGlcNCyoc. COLO205 cells were incubated
in the presence or absence of the indicated sugar (A) GalNCyoc and
(B) GlcNCyoc 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with
dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green
cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow
cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ±
SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS)
are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical
analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with
Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001,***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).
Glycan labeling with
AcGalNCyoc and
AcGlcNCyoc. COLO205 cells were incubated
in the presence or absence of the indicated sugar (A) GalNCyoc and
(B) GlcNCyoc 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They were then incubated with
dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) + Sytox green
cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow
cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ±
SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS)
are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical
analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with
Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001,***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).Tetra-acetylated azido-tagged sugars have been
widely used for
MOE both in vitro and in vivo,[28−30] but it has not been shown that tetra-acetylation is the optimum
level of acetylation. When the variably acetylated azido-tagged sugars
were tested on COLO205 cells, the tetra-acetylated derivatives showed
the best labeling efficiency (Figure ). Reduced incorporation of AcGalNAz and AcGlcNAz relative to AcManNAz was again observed as previously demonstrated
for the cyclopropene-tagged sugars (Figures and 7).
Figure 8
Glycan labeling
with azide-tagged sugars. COLO205 cells were incubated
in the presence or absence of the appropriate sugar, (A) ManNAz, (B)
GalNAz, and (C) GlcNAz 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4), for 24 h. They were then incubated
with dyes TMDIBO-Lys-AlexaFluor647 (30 μM) + Sytox green cell
death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background
ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed
using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001,
**P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).
Glycan labeling
with azide-tagged sugars. COLO205 cells were incubated
in the presence or absence of the appropriate sugar, (A) ManNAz, (B)
GalNAz, and (C) GlcNAz 125 μM (Ac1, Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4), for 24 h. They were then incubated
with dyes TMDIBO-Lys-AlexaFluor647 (30 μM) + Sytox green cell
death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Median fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background
ratios (SBRs) relative to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical analysis was performed
using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤ 0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001,
**P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).We believe that the difference between the ManNCyoc
derivatives
(where the di- and triacetylated sugars were better incorporated)
and the ManNAz derivatives (where the tetra-acetylated sugar is the
best incorporated) is due to the greater inherent solubility of Ac4ManNAz. This is supported by its much lower c log P value relative to Ac4ManNCyoc (Figure ). Therefore, the solubility of Ac4ManNAz does not limit
its incorporation and lower levels of acetylation reduce the labeling,
presumably due to reduced cell permeability. There is, in fact, evidence
in the literature that the permeability of Ac4ManNAz is
less than ideal as the tetrabutanoylated Bu4ManNAz is better
incorporated.[46] However, Bu4ManNAz may be too nonpolar as 1,3,4-Bu3ManNAz is incorporated
better still.[7,46]Recent reports[47,48] of nonenzymic S-glyco modification of proteins
by anomerically deacetylated monosaccharides
are not thought to explain the increase in labeling with Ac3ManNCyoc and Ac2ManNCyoc (relative to Ac4ManNCyoc).
If the labeling increase was due to S-glyco modification,
the same effect would have been expected in other di- and triacetylated
sugars (e.g., GalNCyoc and GlcNCyoc) since GalN and GlcN derivatives
can also be substrates for S-glyco modification.
All three azido-tagged sugars have been shown to participate in this
modification,[47,48] and in this study, none of the
lower degrees of acetylation of the azido sugars showed enhanced labeling.
Since only Ac3ManNCyoc and Ac2ManNCyoc show
increased labeling relative to the tetraacetylated derivative, this
nonenzymatic reaction is unlikely to be responsible for the enhanced
labeling.Next, we determined whether the enhanced cell labeling
we had observed
with partially acetylated AcManNCyoc
in COLO205 cells was replicated in other tumor cell lines. MDA-MB-231,
an invasive triple-negative epithelial human breast cancer cell line,
and PANC-1, a pancreatic carcinoma cell line, were selected. For both
cell lines, the extent of labeling was significantly increased at
all levels of acetylation compared to COLO205 cells (Figure ). The increase in labeling
with the tri- and diacetylated ManNCyoc derivatives compared to the
tetra-acetylated derivative was further evidence that solubility can
become a limiting factor when the tagged sugars show high levels of
incorporation
Figure 9
Glycan labeling of other cell lines with AcManNCyoc. (A) MDA-MB-321 and (B) PANC-1 cells were
incubated
in the presence or absence (control) of the appropriate AcManNCyoc sugar 125 μM (Ac1,
Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They
were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5
μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C
and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI)
is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative
to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical
replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤
0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).
Glycan labeling of other cell lines with AcManNCyoc. (A) MDA-MB-321 and (B) PANC-1 cells were
incubated
in the presence or absence (control) of the appropriate AcManNCyoc sugar 125 μM (Ac1,
Ac2, Ac3, or Ac4) for 24 h. They
were then incubated with dyes Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5
μM) + Sytox green cell death stain (50 nM) for 1 h at 37 °C
and analyzed by flow cytometry. Median fluorescence intensity (MFI)
is shown as mean ± SD. Signal-to-background ratios (SBRs) relative
to the control (PBS) are above each bar; n = 3 technical
replicates. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired t test with Welch correction (****P ≤
0.0001, ***P ≤ 0.001, **P ≤ 0.01, *P ≤ 0.05).Epifluorescence microscopy confirmed these findings.
MDA-MB-231
cells were incubated with either Ac2ManNCyoc, Ac3ManNCyoc, Ac4ManNCyoc (125 μM for 24 h at 37 °C),
or vehicle (PBS). Visualization of the cells after incubation with
Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (and DAPI) showed strong labeling
of the sugar-treated cells (Figure ). Vehicle-treated cells showed very little nonspecific
labeling, confirming that Ac3ManNCyoc is a promising tool
for imaging tumor hypersialylation. No significant effect on cell
viability with Ac3ManNCyoc addition was seen at 125 μM
(Figure S1.3).
Figure 10
Epifluorescence microscopy
of labeled MDA-MB-231 cell glycans.
Cells were cultured with or without AcManNCyoc (125 μM) for 24 h and then incubated with Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) and DAPI (100 nM) nuclear stain
for 15 min at 37 °C. Red: AlexaFluor647, blue: DAPI. Scale bar:
50 μm.
Epifluorescence microscopy
of labeled MDA-MB-231 cell glycans.
Cells were cultured with or without AcManNCyoc (125 μM) for 24 h and then incubated with Tz-PEG11-AlexaFluor647 (5 μM) and DAPI (100 nM) nuclear stain
for 15 min at 37 °C. Red: AlexaFluor647, blue: DAPI. Scale bar:
50 μm.
Conclusions
Ac3ManNCyoc and Ac2ManNCyoc are novel candidates
for probing tumor hypersialylation using metabolic labeling and subsequent
imaging. They represent the optimal compromise between sugar solubility
and membrane permeability. Ac3ManNCyoc is the preferred
choice, as it is the more easily synthesized of the two compounds
and is a single compound.It is notable that Ac3ManNCyoc
yielded a threefold greater
signal-to-background ratio than Ac4ManNAz and could, therefore,
be considered the monosaccharide of choice for sialic acid imaging.
We believe that this improvement in labeling is probably due to the
faster IED-DA reaction of the Cyoc group[23] (ca. 1 M–1 s–1) compared with
the SPAAC reaction of the azide[49] (ca.
0.1 M–1 s–1), meaning that a higher
percentage of the cell-surface tags get ligated to the fluorophore.
The principle, demonstrated here, that larger tags can, in some cases,
lead to better labeling, if they have faster rates of bio-orthogonal
reaction and if the right balance of water-solubility versus hydrophobicity
is achieved, may apply much more generally in metabolic labeling of
all kinds of biomolecules.
Authors: Jeremy M Baskin; Jennifer A Prescher; Scott T Laughlin; Nicholas J Agard; Pamela V Chang; Isaac A Miller; Anderson Lo; Julian A Codelli; Carolyn R Bertozzi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Anne-Katrin Späte; Verena F Schart; Julia Häfner; Andrea Niederwieser; Thomas U Mayer; Valentin Wittmann Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 2.883
Authors: André A Neves; Henning Stöckmann; Yelena A Wainman; Joe C-H Kuo; Sarah Fawcett; Finian J Leeper; Kevin M Brindle Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 4.774