| Literature DB >> 35875537 |
Zivile Kondrotaite1, Laura C Valk1, Francesca Petriglieri1, Caitlin Singleton1, Marta Nierychlo1, Morten K D Dueholm1, Per H Nielsen1.
Abstract
The Saprospiraceae family within the phylum Bacteroidota is commonly present and highly abundant in wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) worldwide, but little is known about its role. In this study, we used MiDAS 4 global survey with samples from 30 countries to analyze the abundance and distribution of members of Saprospiraceae. Phylogenomics were used to delineate five new genera from a set of 31 high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from Danish WWTPs. Newly designed probes for fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed rod-shaped morphologies for all genera analyzed, including OLB8, present mostly inside the activated sludge flocs. The genomes revealed potential metabolic capabilities for the degradation of polysaccharides, proteins, and other complex molecules; partial denitrification; and storage of intracellular polymers (glycogen, polyphosphate, and polyhydroxyalkanoates). FISH in combination with Raman microspectroscopy confirmed the presence of intracellular glycogen in Candidatus Brachybacter, Candidatus Parvibacillus calidus (both from the former genus OLB8), and Candidatus Opimibacter, and the presence of polyhydroxyalkanoates in Candidatus Defluviibacterium haderslevense and Candidatus Vicinibacter. These results provide the first overview of the most abundant novel Saprospiraceae genera present in WWTPs across the world and their potential involvement in nutrient removal and the degradation of macromolecules.Entities:
Keywords: activated sludge; FISH–Raman; MiDAS; OLB8; Saprospiraceae; high-quality MAGs; wastewater
Year: 2022 PMID: 35875537 PMCID: PMC9304909 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.917553
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Figure 1Global average relative read abundance in 929 activated sludge samples: (A) 10 most abundant families within Bacteroidota and (B) 10 most abundant genera within Saprospiraceae.
Figure 2Occurrence of different Saprospiraceae species across the world in relation to (A) different climate zone groupings (tropical/megathermal climate, 29 plants; dry (desert and semi-arid) climate, 48 plants; temperate/mesothermal climate, 368 plants; continental/microthermal climate, 24 plants; polar climate, 2 plants) (Kruskal–Wallis for all species p < 0.05; Supplementary Table S3); (B) global average relative read abundance of highly abundant species of Saprospiraceae in different temperature ranges analyzed in process tanks [very low (1–10.0°C, 43 plants), low (10.1–15.0°C, 96 plants), moderate (15.1–20.0°C, 112 plants), high (20.1–25°C, 73 plants), very high (25.1–30.0°C, 48 plants), extremely high (30.1–38.0°C, 32 plants)] (Kruskal–Wallis for all species p < 0.05; Supplementary Table S3); (C) process type (C−113 plants; C, N, 48 plants; C, N, DN, 208 plants, C, N, DN, P, 111 plants), (C, carbon removal; N, nitrification; DN, denitrification; P, biological P removal), (Kruskal–Wallis for all species p < 0.05; Supplementary Table S3) and (D) In WWTPs with different fractions of industrial wastewater (0%, 169 plants; 0–10%, 105 plants; 11–30%, 67 plants; 31–50%, 41 plants; 51–99%, 20 plants; 100%, 40 plants) (Kruskal–Wallis for all species p < 0.05; Supplementary Table S3).
Figure 3Maximum-likelihood (PhyML) phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA genes of the Saprospiraceae including full-length sequences from MiDAS 4 (black) and MAG (blue). Colors indicate the coverage of FISH probes designed in this study. Bootstrap values from 1000 re-samplings are indicated for branches with >70% (gray circles) and >90% (black circles) support. The scale bar represents substitutions per nucleotide base.
Figure 4Maximum likelihood genome tree created from the concatenated alignment of 120 single-copy marker gene proteins trimmed to 5,000 amino acids using the GTDB-Tk v1.5.0. Branches with bootstraps support >70% are indicated by black dots. Species representatives are in bold. The genera Lewinella, Haliscomenobacter, and Saprospira were used as the outgroup.
Figure 5Basic functional potential of the Ca. Vicinibacter, Ca. Defluviibacterium haderslevense, Ca. Opimibacter, Ca. Brachybacter algidus, and Ca. Parvibacillus calidus. The number in colored boxes represents gene copy number. The gene list follows the progression in the text. For the full list of gene names and associated KO numbers, see Supplementary data 3. The genomes are ordered as in the genome tree in Figure 4, with their genome completeness and contamination indicated within the parentheses. Species representatives are in bold.
Summary table of morphology and presence of intracellular storage polymers detected by FISH and FISH–Raman microspectroscopy in the Saprospiraceae species of interest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OLB8-445 | 0.4–0.6 ×1–2 | – | + | – | |
| OLB8-445 | 0.4–0.5 ×1.3–2 | – | + | – | |
| G17-398 | 0.4–0.6 × 1.1–1.9 | – | + | – | |
| G65-705 | 0.4–0.5 × 2–3.2 | + | – | – | |
| G65-705 | 0.5–0.6 × 1.5–2.5 | + | – | – |
Figure 6Multicolor FISH micrograph of Ca. Vicinibacter (yellow, G65-705) attached to Ca. Accumulibacter aalborgensis (red, Acc470 ref for that probe) and some to Chloroflexi filaments (blue, CFXmix ref for that probe). All other bacteria are gray. Scale bar is 20 μm.