Kathleen Shangraw1, Charles F Murchison2, Elizabeth Silbermann1, Rebecca I Spain3. 1. Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA (KS, ES, RIS). 2. Department of Biostatistics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA (CFM). 3. Department of Neurology, Veterans Affairs Portland Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA (RIS).
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Vascular comorbidity (VC) is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) disease progression and visual dysfunction. The longitudinal effect of VC in people with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) is unclear. This study explored the impact of VC on standard clinical, MRI, and visual outcomes in people with SPMS enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: Data were extracted from a 2-year randomized controlled trial (N = 51) testing the supplement lipoic acid in people with SPMS who underwent annual Expanded Disability Status Scales, Timed 25-Foot Walk tests, MRIs, visual acuity testing, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses per optical coherence tomography (OCT). Post hoc linear mixed-effects regression analysis compared baseline and annualized outcomes between participants without VC (VC-) and with 1 or more VCs (VC+) (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, diabetes, peripheral or cardiovascular disease, tobacco use). RESULTS: The VC- (n = 19) and VC+ (n = 28) participants were similar in age, sex, and MS disease duration and had comparable MS disability, mobility, and brain atrophy at baseline and throughout the 2-year parent study. The VC+ participants had worse baseline visual acuity than those in the VC- group by 0.13 logMAR (P = .041). No significant differences were detected in RNFL or GCIPL baseline thickness or atrophy between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In an SPMS cohort, VC had an inconsistent effect on standard clinical, MRI, and exploratory OCT outcomes, suggesting that the effect of VC may not be evident in smaller cohort studies. Using a more refined definition of VC in future, adequately powered investigations may help effectively elucidate and account for the interaction between vascular risk burden and MS disability.
BACKGROUND: Vascular comorbidity (VC) is associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) disease progression and visual dysfunction. The longitudinal effect of VC in people with secondary progressive MS (SPMS) is unclear. This study explored the impact of VC on standard clinical, MRI, and visual outcomes in people with SPMS enrolled in a clinical trial. METHODS: Data were extracted from a 2-year randomized controlled trial (N = 51) testing the supplement lipoic acid in people with SPMS who underwent annual Expanded Disability Status Scales, Timed 25-Foot Walk tests, MRIs, visual acuity testing, and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and ganglion cell/inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) thicknesses per optical coherence tomography (OCT). Post hoc linear mixed-effects regression analysis compared baseline and annualized outcomes between participants without VC (VC-) and with 1 or more VCs (VC+) (hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, diabetes, peripheral or cardiovascular disease, tobacco use). RESULTS: The VC- (n = 19) and VC+ (n = 28) participants were similar in age, sex, and MS disease duration and had comparable MS disability, mobility, and brain atrophy at baseline and throughout the 2-year parent study. The VC+ participants had worse baseline visual acuity than those in the VC- group by 0.13 logMAR (P = .041). No significant differences were detected in RNFL or GCIPL baseline thickness or atrophy between groups. CONCLUSIONS: In an SPMS cohort, VC had an inconsistent effect on standard clinical, MRI, and exploratory OCT outcomes, suggesting that the effect of VC may not be evident in smaller cohort studies. Using a more refined definition of VC in future, adequately powered investigations may help effectively elucidate and account for the interaction between vascular risk burden and MS disability.
Authors: Axel Petzold; Laura J Balcer; Peter A Calabresi; Fiona Costello; Teresa C Frohman; Elliot M Frohman; Elena H Martinez-Lapiscina; Ari J Green; Randy Kardon; Olivier Outteryck; Friedemann Paul; Sven Schippling; Patrik Vermersch; Pablo Villoslada; Lisanne J Balk Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-09-12 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Jennifer B Fisher; Dina A Jacobs; Clyde E Markowitz; Steven L Galetta; Nicholas J Volpe; M Ligia Nano-Schiavi; Monika L Baier; Elliot M Frohman; Heather Winslow; Teresa C Frohman; Peter A Calabresi; Maureen G Maguire; Gary R Cutter; Laura J Balcer Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-01-10 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Alexander Pichler; Michael Khalil; Christian Langkammer; Daniela Pinter; Stefan Ropele; Siegrid Fuchs; Gerhard Bachmaier; Christian Enzinger; Franz Fazekas Journal: Mult Scler Date: 2017-10-13 Impact factor: 6.312
Authors: Chris H Polman; Stephen C Reingold; Gilles Edan; Massimo Filippi; Hans-Peter Hartung; Ludwig Kappos; Fred D Lublin; Luanne M Metz; Henry F McFarland; Paul W O'Connor; Magnhild Sandberg-Wollheim; Alan J Thompson; Brian G Weinshenker; Jerry S Wolinsky Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 10.422