Isabelle Michaud-Létourneau1,2,3, Marion Gayard1, Julie Lauzière1,2, Micheline Beaudry1, Laura Rosa Pascual1, Isabelle Chartier1,4, Juliette Herzhaft-LeRoy1, Sylvie Chiasson1, Bénédicte Fontaine-Bisson1,5,6, Catherine Pound7, Isabelle Gaboury2. 1. Mouvement allaitement du Québec, Québec, Canada. 2. Département de médecine de famille et de médecine d'urgence, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada. 3. Département de médecine sociale et préventive, École de santé publique, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada. 4. Faculté des sciences infirmières, Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada. 5. School of Nutrition Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 6. Institut du savoir Montfort, Hôpital Montfort, Ontario, Canada. 7. Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Objectives: A majority of women and families wish that their babies be breastfed. However, too many still receive insufficient or inappropriate initial care from health professionals (HPs) who have limited breastfeeding (BF) competencies. We investigated barriers and potential solutions to improve the undergraduate training programs for various HPs. Methods: Focus groups were carried out in three universities in Quebec and one in Ontario (Canada), with 30 faculty and program directors from medicine, midwifery, nursing, nutrition, and pharmacy. Discussions were subjected to thematic content analysis, before being validated in a strategic planning workshop with 48 participants from the same disciplines, plus dentistry and chiropractic. Findings: Substantive improvements of undergraduate training programs for BF could be obtained by addressing challenges related to the insufficient, or lack of, (i) interactions among various HPs, (ii) opportunities for practical learning, (iii) specific standards to guide course content, (iv) real-life experience with counselling, and (v) understanding of the influence of attitudes on professional practice. Several potential solutions were proposed and validated. The re-interpretation of the results in light of various literature led to an emerging framework that takes a systems perspective for enhancing the education of HPs on BF. Conclusions: To improve the education of HPs so as to enable them to provide relevant support for future mothers, mothers and their families, solutions need to be carried out to address challenges in the health system, the education system as well as regarding the curricular change process.
Objectives: A majority of women and families wish that their babies be breastfed. However, too many still receive insufficient or inappropriate initial care from health professionals (HPs) who have limited breastfeeding (BF) competencies. We investigated barriers and potential solutions to improve the undergraduate training programs for various HPs. Methods: Focus groups were carried out in three universities in Quebec and one in Ontario (Canada), with 30 faculty and program directors from medicine, midwifery, nursing, nutrition, and pharmacy. Discussions were subjected to thematic content analysis, before being validated in a strategic planning workshop with 48 participants from the same disciplines, plus dentistry and chiropractic. Findings: Substantive improvements of undergraduate training programs for BF could be obtained by addressing challenges related to the insufficient, or lack of, (i) interactions among various HPs, (ii) opportunities for practical learning, (iii) specific standards to guide course content, (iv) real-life experience with counselling, and (v) understanding of the influence of attitudes on professional practice. Several potential solutions were proposed and validated. The re-interpretation of the results in light of various literature led to an emerging framework that takes a systems perspective for enhancing the education of HPs on BF. Conclusions: To improve the education of HPs so as to enable them to provide relevant support for future mothers, mothers and their families, solutions need to be carried out to address challenges in the health system, the education system as well as regarding the curricular change process.
Authors: Julio Frenk; Lincoln Chen; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Jordan Cohen; Nigel Crisp; Timothy Evans; Harvey Fineberg; Patricia Garcia; Yang Ke; Patrick Kelley; Barry Kistnasamy; Afaf Meleis; David Naylor; Ariel Pablos-Mendez; Srinath Reddy; Susan Scrimshaw; Jaime Sepulveda; David Serwadda; Huda Zurayk Journal: Lancet Date: 2010-11-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Cesar G Victora; Rajiv Bahl; Aluísio J D Barros; Giovanny V A França; Susan Horton; Julia Krasevec; Simon Murch; Mari Jeeva Sankar; Neff Walker; Nigel C Rollins Journal: Lancet Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Lori Feldman-Winter; Lauren Barone; Barry Milcarek; Krystal Hunter; Joan Meek; Jane Morton; Tara Williams; Audrey Naylor; Ruth A Lawrence Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-07-05 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Staci R Eisenberg; Megan H Bair-Merritt; Eve R Colson; Timothy C Heeren; Nicole L Geller; Michael J Corwin Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 7.124