Salvatore Moschetto1, Margherita Bolognesi1, Federico Prescimone1, Marco Brucale1, Alessio Mezzi2, Luca Ortolani3, Maria Caporali4, Pasqualantonio Pingue5, Manuel Serrano-Ruiz4, Dario Pisignano5,6, Maurizio Peruzzini4, Luana Persano5, Stefano Toffanin1. 1. Istituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati (ISMN)-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy. 2. Istituto per lo Studio dei Materiali Nanostrutturati (ISMN)-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), P.O. Box 10, Monterotondo Scalo, I-00016 Rome, Italy. 3. Istituto per la microelettronica e microsistemi (IMM)-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via P. Gobetti 101, 40129 Bologna, Italy. 4. Istituto di Chimica dei Composti Organometallici (ICCOM)-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Via Madonna del Piano 10, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Florence, Italy. 5. Laboratorio NEST, Scuola Normale Superiore and Istituto Nanoscienze-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Piazza San Silvestro 12, I-56127 Pisa, Italy. 6. Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Pisa, Largo B. Pontecorvo 3, I-56127 Pisa, Italy.
Abstract
Bidimensional (2D) materials are nowadays being developed as outstanding candidates for electronic and optoelectronic components and devices. Targeted applications include sensing, energy conversion, and storage. Phosphorene is one of the most promising systems in this context, but its high reactivity under atmospheric conditions and its small-area/lab-scale deposition techniques have hampered the introduction of this material in real-world applications so far. However, phosphorene oxides in the form of low-dimensional structures (2D PO x ) should behave as an electroresponsive material according to recent theoretical studies. In the present work, we introduce electrospraying for the deposition of stoichiometric and large-area 2D PO x nanoflakes starting from a suspension of liquid-phase-exfoliated phosphorene. We obtained 2D PO x nanostructures with a mean surface area two orders of magnitude larger than phosphorene structures obtained with standard mechanical and liquid exfoliation techniques. X-ray spectroscopy and high-resolution electron microscopy confirmed the P2O5-like crystallographic structure of the electrosprayed flakes. Finally, we experimentally demonstrated for the first time the electromechanical responsivity of the 2D P2O5 nanoflakes, through piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM). This work sheds light on the possible implementation of phosphorus oxide-based 2D nanomaterials in the value chain of fabrication and engineering of devices, which might be easily scaled up for energy-harvesting/conversion applications.
Bidimensional (2D) materials are nowadays being developed as outstanding candidates for electronic and optoelectronic components and devices. Targeted applications include sensing, energy conversion, and storage. Phosphorene is one of the most promising systems in this context, but its high reactivity under atmospheric conditions and its small-area/lab-scale deposition techniques have hampered the introduction of this material in real-world applications so far. However, phosphorene oxides in the form of low-dimensional structures (2D PO x ) should behave as an electroresponsive material according to recent theoretical studies. In the present work, we introduce electrospraying for the deposition of stoichiometric and large-area 2D PO x nanoflakes starting from a suspension of liquid-phase-exfoliated phosphorene. We obtained 2D PO x nanostructures with a mean surface area two orders of magnitude larger than phosphorene structures obtained with standard mechanical and liquid exfoliation techniques. X-ray spectroscopy and high-resolution electron microscopy confirmed the P2O5-like crystallographic structure of the electrosprayed flakes. Finally, we experimentally demonstrated for the first time the electromechanical responsivity of the 2D P2O5 nanoflakes, through piezoresponse force microscopy (PFM). This work sheds light on the possible implementation of phosphorus oxide-based 2D nanomaterials in the value chain of fabrication and engineering of devices, which might be easily scaled up for energy-harvesting/conversion applications.
In
the last decade, the scientific community has focused its attention
to bidimensional (2D) nanomaterials, considering this class of systems
as highly effective and versatile building blocks for the development
of new-generation electronic/optoelectronic devices.[1,2] Graphene is surely the most studied within 2D materials, but there
has been an increasing interest also in the research on new 2D systems,
especially semiconducting ones such as transition-metal dichalcogenides
(TMDCs) and 2D xenes, i.e., silicene, phosphorene, and borophene.[3] Phosphorene (or 2D bP) is an atomically thin
2D material that can be obtained from the exfoliation of layered bulk
black phosphorus (bP). It shows a lot of interesting properties, such
as a direct band gap dependent on the number of atomic layers (0.3–2
eV),[4] high charge mobility (103 cm2/V s),[5] and high photoluminescence
quantum yield.[6]The high reactivity
of phosphorene when exposed to air[7] is
surely one of the most difficult challenges
to face to easily use this nanomaterial for large-scale applications.[8] To protect the material from oxygen, different
approaches have been developed, including the direct blending of the
phosphorene flakes into a polymeric matrix,[9,10] or
the deposition of a protective/passivating layer,[11,12] as shown in our previous works.[13,14] However, the
burial of phosphorene into matrices or under protective layers lengthens
and complicates process protocol regardless of the desired technological
application, from electronic and optoelectronic devices to energy
storage and conversion, to chemical sensing.Otherwise, one
could take advantage of the nontrivial properties
of low-dimensional phosphorene oxides, or 2D PO. 2D PO have recently attracted
the community for their potential application in electronic, optoelectronic,
and energy-harvesting fields, in general.Ab initio calculations
have revealed that the electronic structure
of 2D PO is strongly dependent on the
oxygen concentration, showing a band gap ranging from 4 to 10 eV and
an exciton binding energy (Eb) ranging
from 1.4 to 3.0 eV, when passing from a low to a high oxygen content
(from P4O2 to P4O10).[15] Consequently, both optical and optoelectronic
properties in these materials strongly depend on the content/coverage
of oxygen. Besides the electronic structure, another recent theoretical
study reports that the loss of the mirror symmetry in 2D PO nanostructures, compared to pristine phosphorene,
leads to a reduction of the phonon lifetime and consequently to great
reduction of thermal conductivity. These characteristics make 2D PO nanostructures promising candidates for low-dimensional
thermoelectric devices.[16] In addition,
thanks again to its noncentrosymmetric structure, recent theoretical
calculations[17,18] predicted that 2D PO should show piezoelectric properties. Piezoelectricity,
which is the ability to reversibly convert mechanical energy into
electrical energy, is a property shared between many materials with
a noncentrosymmetric crystalline structure, such as many metal oxides[19] and metal dichalcogenides.[20,21] Also, 2D materials such as transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDCs)
or 2D xenes exhibit enhanced piezoelectric properties[19] with respect to bulk piezoelectric materials. Thus, piezoelectric
2D materials are ideal candidates for applications such as nanosensors,[22,23] actuators,[24,25] and energy harvesters,[26−29] which can operate without an external power supply for sensing,
data processing, and data transmission, as highly desired for the
Internet-of-Things (IoT).Here, we introduce an electrospraying
technique as an innovative
and effective method for the deposition of large-area 2D PO nanostructures, which exhibit electromechanical
response. The electrospray process, which is based on the application
of an electric voltage bias (i.e., tens of kilovolt) between a liquid
solution and a collector, has been recently introduced as a scalable
method for the deposition of large-area electrodes for applications
in solar cells[30] and supercapacitors.[31] Once the applied electric field overcomes the
surface tension of an element of fluid formed at the termination of
an electrified extruder, in fact, charged droplets are formed and
sprayed, namely, accelerating toward the collector. Here, the electrospray
process was applied to a dispersion of phosphorene (2D bP) flakes
in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), leading to the formation of crystalline
2D PO structures, with an aspect ratio
as high as 10 000 (thickness vs lateral dimensions). X-ray
photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), energy-dispersive X-ray analysis
(EDX), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) are used to analyze
the composition and the crystalline structure of the deposited 2D
nanomaterial. Morphological and mechanical studies are carried out
by optical microscopy and atomic force microscopy (AFM). In addition,
for the first time, the electroresponsive properties of the deposited
2D nanomaterial are experimentally demonstrated through piezoresponse
force microscopy (PFM), showing that the material responds to external
electric fields by displaying both vertical and torsional displacements.The electroresponsive features of the studied 2D PO nanostructures make them particularly attractive
for energy-harvesting/conversion applications.
Experimental
Section
bP Synthesis
bP was synthesized according to the method
published by Lange, as previously reported by our group.[13,14] Red phosphorus is used as P-source, and Au, Sn, and SnI4 are used as mineralizing agents and catalysts. The mixture is heated
in an evacuated quartz vial at temperature T = 650
°C for 3 days[32,33] and then cooled very slowly at
room temperature.
Liquid-Phase Exfoliation
Liquid-phase
exfoliation of
bP has been extensively studied during the last years. Solvents such
as dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) and dimethylformamide (DMF), which both
show a high dielectric constant and high surface tension, have been
largely used.[34] Molecular dynamics simulations
have shown that the cohesion energy between the solvent molecules
and the bP layers is of great importance, explaining why DMSO, which
has a strong affinity with phosphorene, ensures great stability of
the dispersion.[35]In this work, to
a suspension of bP microcrystals (5.0 mg) in 5.0 mL of DMSO, deoxygenated
distilled water (3–5 μL) was added and the mixture was
sonicated for 5 days in the dark keeping the bath temperature at T = 19 °C. The obtained 2D bP suspension was either
used as it is or after centrifugation for 1 h at 4000 rpm and after
collection of the supernatant fraction, for the deposition through
electrospray.
Mechanical Exfoliation
Mechanically
exfoliated 2D bP
was produced as a reference sample. A bulk bP crystal was mechanically
exfoliated in a controlled atmosphere with the scotch tape method
(35 times folding). 2D bP flakes obtained in this way were then transferred
onto cleaned silicon substrates.
Deposition of 2D PO by Electrospraying
Electrospraying
has been recently applied also for the deposition
of a variety of large-area 2D materials, including graphene 2D and
three-dimensional (3D) structures[31] and
GO.Here, the whole process was conducted in air and in the
absence of heating. The 2D bP suspension obtained from the liquid-phase
exfoliation whose concentration is 1 mg/mL (see the description above)
was pumped through a syringe into a stainless steel nozzle (inner
diameter, 200 μm) at a speed 0.5–1.0 mL/h, by applying
a voltage of 11–20 kV between the nozzle and a metal support
at a distance of 15 cm (where the deposition occurs).
Deposition
of the Suspension onto Silicon Substrate Previously
Coated with 40 nm of Gold
To estimate the total amount of
phosphorene oxide obtained by a single electrospray deposition of
the 2D bP suspension, we might take into account (i) a reduction of
about 25% of the starting concentration (1 mg/mL) of the suspension
after centrifugation at 5000 rpm[36] and
(ii) that in a single deposition process of 5 min, the solution used
is 0.083 mL. In this scenario, an amount of 0.06 mg of phosphorene
oxide is obtained by a single deposition process, which corresponds
to a deposition rate of 0.73 mg/h.
X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
(XPS)
XPS analysis
was carried out using an ESCALAB 250 Xi, equipped with a monochromatic
X-ray source (Al Kα = 148.6 eV) and 6 Channeltron as the detection
system. All samples were fixed to a steel sample holder by a metallic
clip. The spectra were recorded at 50 eV pass energy at a pressure
in the analysis chamber of about 10–10 mbar. The
BE scale was calibrated positioning the adventitious carbon contribution
at BE = 285.0 eV. All data were collected and processed using the
Avantage v5.9 software. A signal from a localized spot of 50 μm2 of lateral size has been used to analyze a homogeneous area
of the selected sample.
AFM
Topographic AFM of 2D bP and
PO flakes were performed in PeakForce
Tapping mode using Bruker
SNL-A probes with a nominal spring constant of 0.35 N/m (Bruker) on
a Bruker Multimode 8 microscope equipped with a Nanoscope V controller
and a type JV piezoelectric scanner. Force/distance curves were recorded
using the same setup at a maximum applied load of 10 nN. The deflection
sensitivity of each probe was determined on a silicon oxide surface,
and its spring constant was measured with the thermal noise method.
All AFM measurements were performed in an atmospheric hood under a
gentle flow of either dry nitrogen or air (∼50% humidity) to,
respectively, inhibit or promote oxidation. Raw images were processed
with Gwyddion[37] v2.53. Force/distance curves
were analyzed with Hooke[38] rev213.
PFM Studies
PFM measurements were performed on PO flakes
electrosprayed onto silicon substrates, previously coated with 40
nm of gold. A Bruker Dimension Icon system equipped with a Nanoscope
V controller was employed as the SPM system. Measurements were carried
out in peak force mode, using a platinum–iridium-coated tip
with a nominal radius of 20 nm and an elastic constant of 2.8 N/m.
Transmission Electron Microscopy
Transmission electron
microscopy (TEM) was carried out using a Thermo Fischer Tecnai F20
microscope, operated at a 120 kV accelerating voltage to reduce beam
damage during observations. Samples from liquid-phase exfoliation
were prepared by simple drop-casting of the solutions over a conventional
holey-carbon TEM grid and immediately loaded in the microscope to
prevent long-term air exposure. Samples of electrosprayed 2D PO were prepared by securing a conventional copper
TEM grid, covered with a holey-carbon film, over a highly conductive
silicon substrate using a drop of conductive silver paint. The electrospraying
deposition procedure as described above was performed and the grid
is later released from the substrate and loaded inside the microscope
for characterization.
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and EDX
Scanning
electron microscopy (SEM) was performed with an FEI Nova NanoSEM 450
system, equipped with an energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) detector and
operating at acceleration voltages of 5–10 kV (Scheme ).
Scheme 1
Schematic Illustration of the Deposition of 2D PO Flakes Using the Electrospraying Technique,
Starting from
Liquid-Phase-Exfoliated bP
Results and Discussion
Morphological Characterization
Given
the affinity of
bP to oxygen, by performing the whole electrospraying process in air,
we aimed at depositing a material containing oxidized forms of bP.
As the first characterization of the deposited material, we used optical
microscopy to analyze the size distribution and the aspect ratio,
together with the possible presence of solvent impurities. Optical
images of flakes deposited by electrospray were compared with 2D bP
samples prepared through liquid-phase exfoliation and oxygen-free
mechanical exfoliation of bP. Optical microscopy highlights that the
largest elongated solid structures are generally observed closer to
big drops of solvent (Figure a). In particular, the observed structures have sharp edges
and lateral dimensions that range from tens to hundreds of μm2, with a very low and homogeneous optical contrast, thus indicating
a crystalline 2D nature of the material deposited. It is worth noticing
that, unlike previous reports on MXene electrosprayed flaxes,[39] where crumpled 3D morphologies of the flakes
are reported, here, the use of a high-boiling-point solvent (DMSO,
boiling point: 189 °C) could enable a more gentle deposition
of the flakes onto the collector, thus avoiding the fragmentation
and wrinkling processes, which might be associated with a fast evaporation
of the solvent during the time of flight.
Figure 1
Typical optical micrographs
of samples of: (a) 2D structures deposited
by electrospraying and (b) relative surface area distribution; (c)
2D bP flakes obtained from the mechanical exfoliation of bP and (d)
relative surface area distribution; (e) 2D bP obtained by drop-casting
a suspension of liquid-phase-exfoliated bP and (f) relative surface
area distribution. Scale bar: 100 μm.
Typical optical micrographs
of samples of: (a) 2D structures deposited
by electrospraying and (b) relative surface area distribution; (c)
2D bP flakes obtained from the mechanical exfoliation of bP and (d)
relative surface area distribution; (e) 2D bP obtained by drop-casting
a suspension of liquid-phase-exfoliated bP and (f) relative surface
area distribution. Scale bar: 100 μm.On the contrary, the optical images of mechanically exfoliated
bP (Figure c) or liquid-phase-exfoliated
bP (Figure e) indicate
that much smaller crystalline flakes are obtained with these two techniques.
Moreover, mechanical and liquid-phase exfoliation produces crystalline
flakes with a wide distribution of lateral sizes and thicknesses (evaluated
through optical contrast[13]).[40] For a quantitative comparison, the mean surface
areas of the 2D flakes deposited by electrospraying, mechanical exfoliation,
and liquid-phase exfoliation were calculated, resulting in 480, 26.3,
and 0.2 μm2, respectively (Figure b,d,f). These values clearly highlight the
effectiveness of the proposed method for the deposition of large-area
2D structures.The morphology of the 2D structures obtained
by electrospraying
was further analyzed through AFM. In many regions of each substrate,
single-layer 2D structures are found (Figure a). The surface of these structures is atomically
flat (full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of peak height is <1 nm)
and extends over a micrometric area. It should be noted that the uniform
thickness of these flakes is fundamental in view of their application
in electronics because the electronic properties are strongly thickness-dependent.
In addition, the morphology of the single-layer structures is highly
stable and remains unchanged after overnight exposure to air, as observed
from the AFM image taken on the same surface of the same 2D flake
(Figure S1 in the Supporting Information).
This is in striking contrast to that typically found for mechanically
exfoliated 2D bP, since the first oxidation features are already observed
within 1 h after air exposure.[13]
Figure 2
AFM height
image of (a) a single-layer flake and (b) a multilayered
flake, obtained through electrospray. (c) Height distribution of the
multilayered flake as extracted from image (b). Scale bar: (a) 30
μm; (b) 5 μm. Vertical scales: (a) −10–20
nm; (b) −5–55 nm.
AFM height
image of (a) a single-layer flake and (b) a multilayered
flake, obtained through electrospray. (c) Height distribution of the
multilayered flake as extracted from image (b). Scale bar: (a) 30
μm; (b) 5 μm. Vertical scales: (a) −10–20
nm; (b) −5–55 nm.By contrast, the thermal stability of electrosprayed PO flakes in inert atmosphere is lower compared
to mechanically exfoliated 2D bP. The optical images before and after
annealing at 400 °C for 15 min (Figure S2) show the total removal of PO flakes
from SiO2 substrate due to the thermal treatment. Instead,
annealing at 200 °C, for the same time (15 min) resulted in only
a partial removal of PO flakes. We can
assume that PO flakes are stable at temperatures
lower than 200 °C (Figure S3). It
is likely that annealing at temperatures higher than 200 °C leads
to the complete removal of the PO flakes
due to their weak adhesion onto the SiO2 substrate, which
may be further weakened or inhibited by the presence of residual solvent
from the electrospray process.On the contrary, 2D bP flakes
obtained by mechanical exfoliation
and transferred onto SiO2 substrates are thermally stable
up to 600 °C. XPS spectra of 2D bP flakes onto SiO2 (Figure S4, Table S1) show indeed that
the energy of the P 2p signal related to phosphorous remains unaltered
before and after the annealing process, revealing the high thermal
stability of nonoxidized 2D bP. We can conclude that more favorable
interactions probably occur between mechanically exfoliated 2D bP
flakes and SiO2, compared to electrosprayed PO flakes onto SiO2.2D multilayered
structures can be also found (Figure b). The height distribution
graph obtained from the AFM images of the 2D multilayered structure
reveals that the layers are equally separated by an average distance
of about 4.3 ± 0.3 nm (Figure c). This indicates that the electrosprayed 2D material
obtained is layered, like 2D bP, but it has a different crystalline
structure and composition, since its interlayer distance is different
from that in pristine 2D bP (5.28 Å)[41] and also different from that expected from 2D bP intercalated with
solvent molecules (i.e., 5.4 Å).[42]Moreover, the repeated AFM scans on the same area of the same
flake
(Figure a) highlighted
a larger fragility of the electrosprayed material with respect to
the mechanical exfoliated 2D bP. For instance, after 15 min of scanning
(Figure b), the AFM
image reveals a hole in the center of the flake, which widens during
further scans (Figure c). The majority of force curves recorded on intact regions of single-layer
electrosprayed flakes show a sharp breakthrough event of a 4.5 nm
thick layer at around 1–3 nN applied force (Figure d). In contrast, single- or
few-layer pristine 2D bP flakes remain unperturbed over 270 min under
the same AFM scanning conditions and do not show layer breakthrough
events when subjected to forces up to ∼5 nN (see Figure d, blue line). The higher brittleness
of the oxidized material seems to further confirm the presence of
a material with chemical composition and crystalline habit that are
different from 2D bP. In detail, this mechanical behavior is predicted
by theoretical calculations recently reported in the literature for
phosphorene oxides.[43]
Figure 3
Mechanical response of
single electrosprayed flake as observed
via AFM. (a–c) Mechanical failures induced by repeatedly scanning
the same 1 × 1 μm2 area (dashed white lines)
at 1 nN applied force in PeakForce mode (512 × 512 lines, 0.5
Hz scan rate). After each successive scan, the flake was then imaged
at approximately 250 pN applied force at a lower magnification to
appreciate potentially induced damages. Failures are apparent after
51 min of total scanning at higher forces (c). (d) Representative
nanoindentation force/separation curves performed on electrosprayed
flake (red) or a mechanically exfoliated 2D bP flake (blue). The red
trace shows a clear breakthrough event with first contact occurring
at 4.7 nm and failure at 3.9 nm. The vast majority (96%) of force
curves performed on electrosprayed flakes showed one or more breakthrough
events of this type, whereas no sudden mechanical failure “steps”
were observed on mechanically exfoliated 2D bP flakes subjected to
the same compressive stresses. Scale bar: 250 nm.
Mechanical response of
single electrosprayed flake as observed
via AFM. (a–c) Mechanical failures induced by repeatedly scanning
the same 1 × 1 μm2 area (dashed white lines)
at 1 nN applied force in PeakForce mode (512 × 512 lines, 0.5
Hz scan rate). After each successive scan, the flake was then imaged
at approximately 250 pN applied force at a lower magnification to
appreciate potentially induced damages. Failures are apparent after
51 min of total scanning at higher forces (c). (d) Representative
nanoindentation force/separation curves performed on electrosprayed
flake (red) or a mechanically exfoliated 2D bP flake (blue). The red
trace shows a clear breakthrough event with first contact occurring
at 4.7 nm and failure at 3.9 nm. The vast majority (96%) of force
curves performed on electrosprayed flakes showed one or more breakthrough
events of this type, whereas no sudden mechanical failure “steps”
were observed on mechanically exfoliated 2D bP flakes subjected to
the same compressive stresses. Scale bar: 250 nm.
Compositional, Chemical, and Structural Characterization
To verify the composition of the deposited material, we performed
the chemical characterization of the surface of the samples. Due to
the heterogeneity of the electrosprayed samples (also related to the
presence of solvent droplets onto the substrate and to the subsequent
solvent evaporation pattern), XPS, EDX, and TEM analyses were performed
only on selected areas of the substrate, where the 2D structures were
observed by optical microscopy.XPS measurements of electrosprayed
samples were compared to those of mechanically exfoliated 2D bP as
the reference. In particular, the oxidation state of the phosphorus
atoms in the two samples was investigated.Figure shows the
P 2p spectra of both samples. P 2p peak is characterized by the typical
doublet due to the spin–orbit splitting P 2p3/2–P
2p1/2, separated by Δ(BE) = 1.3 eV. This signal is
generally found in the range of binding energy (BE) = 129.0–135.0
eV, depending on the bond in which P is involved. To avoid the plasmon
loss of Si 2p that for Si(0) lies in the proximity of the P 2p signal,
electrospray and mechanical exfoliations were performed on silicon
substrates covered with a thermally grown layer of SiO2. The mechanically exfoliated 2D bP sample was characterized by a
P 2p3/2 peak positioned at BE = 130.0 eV, which is characteristic
for P–P bond.[44] The good quality
of 2D bP was also testified by the absence of oxides contribution,
generally positioned at higher BE.[45] In
the case of the electrosprayed sample, the P 2p3/2 peak
was positioned at BE = 134.1 eV, which is typical for P at a higher
oxidation state (+5), in the configuration of P2O5. The absence of a peak positioned at BE = 130.0 eV highlights that
none (or a negligible part) of the P atoms in electrosprayed sample
are in the 0 oxidation state, such as in BP. These results highlight
and confirm that the proposed electrospray deposition is a good method
to produce an oxidized phosphorus-based material (2D PO).
Figure 4
XPS spectra of P 2p acquired on mechanically exfoliated
2D bP and
electrosprayed samples.
XPS spectra of P 2p acquired on mechanically exfoliated
2D bP and
electrosprayed samples.Other than P signals,
the XPS quantitative analysis revealed also
the presence of other elements, such as C, O, N, and Si (Table S2). The Si 2p signal was assigned to the
substrate because the information depth of the XPS is higher than
the thickness of 2D PO. The C 1s signal
was characterized by two components positioned at BE = 285.0 eV (14.8
atom %) and 286.6 eV (1.6 atom %), assigned to aliphatic carbon and
C–O bond, respectively. As regards the O 1s signal, there was
a strong contribution of SiO2 at 533.1 eV (52.1 atom %),
while the contribution of P–O and C–O was found at BE
= 531.2 eV (3.6 atom %). Finally, the presence of N was detected,
where N 1s signal was positioned at BE = 402.4 eV, assigned to residual
NO groups from the sample preparation.The local analysis through
SEM microscopy and EDX spectroscopy
confirmed that the signal from oxidized species identified by XPS
can be attributed to the electrosprayed material.Figure a shows
the SEM image of the sample prepared through electrospraying, and Figure b shows the corresponding
elemental analysis map extrapolated from EDX measures on the same
area. The darker areas of the SEM image correspond to phosphorus-rich
areas, while on the substrate, only Si and O signals are registered.
The EDX spectrum (Figure c) registered at the point X of Figure a is characterized by P, Si, and S peaks
arising, respectively, from (i) the 2D PO structure observed, (ii) the substrate, and (iii) the residual DMSO
solvent in proximity of the 2D structure.
Figure 5
(a) SEM image of 2D PO flakes. (b,
c) Phosphorus (red), silicon (green), and oxygen (cyan) EDX maps recorded
from the 2D PO flakes shown in (a). (d)
EDX spectrum taken at the point indicated with X in (a). Scale bar:
30 μm.
(a) SEM image of 2D PO flakes. (b,
c) Phosphorus (red), silicon (green), and oxygen (cyan) EDX maps recorded
from the 2D PO flakes shown in (a). (d)
EDX spectrum taken at the point indicated with X in (a). Scale bar:
30 μm.While the composition of the electrosprayed
structures was confirmed
through XPS and EDX analyses, TEM was performed to investigate their
crystalline features.Figure a shows
a PO aggregate over the amorphous carbon
film of the TEM grid, with a rather regular circular shape, probably
originating from a nanodroplet of the spray procedure. It should be
revealed that the size and shape of the PO flakes deposited through electrospraying are largely dependent on
the substrate, explaining why PO flakes
analyzed by TEM have smaller lateral dimensions and different shapes
with respect to the flakes deposited over Si or Si/SO2 substrates
and analyzed through XPS, AFM, and PFM. The area highlighted in the
white rectangle is further magnified in the high-resolution electron
microscopy (HREM) image in Figure b, where lattice fringes are visible. The fast Fourier
transform (FFT) of the image is shown in the inset: the marked spots
correspond to periodicities of 0.34, 0.30, and 0.28 nm. While the
exact crystal orientation was impossible to be determined, the periodicities
shown here are compatible with the crystal structure of P2O5 found in the literature,[46] namely, (120) 0.335 nm, (211) 0.305 nm, and (220) 0.283 nm, consistent
with the composition found by XPS analysis.
Figure 6
TEM characterization
of electrosprayed 2D PO material. (a)
TEM image of crystal aggregate over the amorphous
carbon film of the TEM grid. (b) HREM image of the area highlighted
by the white rectangle in (a), showing lattice fringes of the deposited
material; (inset) FFT of the HREM image showing reflections corresponding
to planes spaced by 0.34, 0.30, and 0.28 nm, compatible with the P2O5 crystal structure.
TEM characterization
of electrosprayed 2D PO material. (a)
TEM image of crystal aggregate over the amorphous
carbon film of the TEM grid. (b) HREM image of the area highlighted
by the white rectangle in (a), showing lattice fringes of the deposited
material; (inset) FFT of the HREM image showing reflections corresponding
to planes spaced by 0.34, 0.30, and 0.28 nm, compatible with the P2O5 crystal structure.TEM analysis of 2D bP obtained by liquid-phase exfoliation of bulk
bP exhibits largely different results from the electrosprayed samples. Figure a shows the HREM
image of the edge of a bP nanosheet, and Figure b displays the corresponding FFT, where reflections
compatible with bP crystal structure are highlighted. The flake is
oriented with the (112) direction aligned with the viewing direction,
showing (1̅10), (021̅), and (111̅) reflections in
the FFT. When the flake edge folds over itself, (002) lattice fringes,
spaced by 0.525 nm, are visible in the HREM image, as shown in Figure c, and the number
of stacked layers can be determined by counting the number of fringes
visible in the image (six layers, in the case of the shown image).
Figure 7
TEM characterization
of liquid-phase-exfoliated bP. (a) High-resolution
TEM (HRTEM) image of a black phosphorous flake edge. (b) FFT of the
image, showing black phosphorous (1̅10), (021̅), and (111̅)
reflections. (c) Details of the flake folded edge, showing (002) lattice
fringes.
TEM characterization
of liquid-phase-exfoliated bP. (a) High-resolution
TEM (HRTEM) image of a black phosphorous flake edge. (b) FFT of the
image, showing black phosphorous (1̅10), (021̅), and (111̅)
reflections. (c) Details of the flake folded edge, showing (002) lattice
fringes.
Electromechanical Responsivity
Piezoresponse force
microscopy (PFM) probes the surface mechanical deformations of a material
in response to an external voltage applied between an AFM tip and
a bottom electrode (usually a conductive substrate underneath the
investigated sample). This might unveil the electromechanical functionality
of the material at the nanometer and micrometer scales. The applied
voltage is Vext = Vdc + Vac × cos(ωt), where Vdc is an optional
dc offset and Vac is the amplitude of
the alternated voltage with angular frequency ω. In electromechanically
active materials, the surface can deform mechanically in response
to the external electric field. By the use of a position-sensitive
detector for the cantilevered probe, the PFM technique can track both
out-of-plane and in-plane components of the material response at the
modulated frequency by lock-in detection, which is generally useful
for systems with an arbitrary polarization direction. Electromechanically
active materials exhibit a nonzero amplitude PFM signal when an external
field is applied. Figure a shows a typical AFM image of electrosprayed 2D P2O5 flakes. The corresponding out-of-plane amplitude images,
when no bias is applied to the tip-sample system and upon the application
of 5 V, are reported in Figure b,c.
Figure 8
AFM topographic image and the corresponding PFM image
at bias voltages
0 V (b) and 5 V (c). Scale bar: 3 μm. Vertical scales: (a) −12–20
nm; (b, c) −17–30 pm.
AFM topographic image and the corresponding PFM image
at bias voltages
0 V (b) and 5 V (c). Scale bar: 3 μm. Vertical scales: (a) −12–20
nm; (b, c) −17–30 pm.Micrographs clearly indicate that 2D P2O5 flakes
are sensitive to the applied external field and generate
a strain response of the order of tens of picometers. A more in-depth
investigation of the electromechanical response of one of the flakes
in Figure a is reported
in the Supporting Information (Figure S5b,c with out-of-plane and in-plane amplitude signals recorded at Vdc = 0, Vac = 5
V, and a frequency of 30 kHz). Out-of-plane and in-plane signals,
both as amplitude and phase signals, have a similar spatial distribution
that well matches the topography, thus indicating the presence of
both vertical and torsional displacements (related to domains sensitive
to shear forces), which can be correlated to domain patterns oriented
at certain angles with respect to the sample plane. The phase image
in Figure S5d indicates an out-of-phase
response (i.e., flakes appear dark), corresponding to dipoles oriented
toward the bottom electrode. Out-of-plane dipoles are sensitive to
the direction of the applied field and exhibit a 180° phase shift
(i.e., flakes appear bright) when the external bias is inverted (i.e.,
the positive bias is applied to the sample and the tip is grounded)
as reported in Figure S5e. Note that the
amplitude of the out-of-plane signal, some picometers per V (4–5
pm/V), is comparable to the theoretical values reported in the literature
for phosphorene oxides.[17] Moreover, the
out-of-plane amplitude intensity increases with the thickness of P2O5 flakes (Figure ).
Figure 9
Maximum out-of-plane amplitude intensity vs flake thickness
(black
dots). The line is a guide to the eye. Inset: Typical out-of-plane
amplitude profile.
Maximum out-of-plane amplitude intensity vs flake thickness
(black
dots). The line is a guide to the eye. Inset: Typical out-of-plane
amplitude profile.This behavior is in
agreement with previous reports on flakes of
2D materials such as sulfides and selenides[47,48] and can be ascribed to a nonuniform distribution of the electric
field in the tip-sample system, especially for materials with low
electrical permittivity.[49,50] The presence and amplitude
of the out-of-plane piezoresponse signals and their increment versus
thickness, allow us to include electrosprayed 2D P2O5 in the class of electromechanical responsive materials. Envisaged
applications, for which electrosprayed 2D P2O5 might establish new design rules, include hybrid nanoelectronics/nanogenerator
platforms, optomechanical devices, and sensing architectures based
on shear or strained components.
Conclusions
In
summary, we demonstrated that the electrospraying technique
is a useful tool to effectively deposit an air-stable, phosphorus
oxide-based nanomaterial in the 2D form, specifically as 2D P2O5 nanoflakes as confirmed by the XPS, SEM-EDX,
and HRTEM analyses. AFM confirmed that the electrosprayed, large-area
P2O5 nanostructures have an atomically flat
surface, a thickness in the nanometer range (single-layered structures),
and a periodicity between layers of about 4.3 ± 0.3 nm (few-layer
structures), confirming the extremely high surface-to-volume ratio
and 2D nature of such P2O5 structures. AFM also
confirmed the higher stability in air and higher mechanical fragility
of the 2D P2O5 nanoflakes with respect to 2D
bP. Notably, the lateral size of the electrosprayed 2D P2O5 flakes (hundreds of μm2) is much larger
than the average lateral size of 2D bP flakes obtained with standard
techniques such as mechanical and liquid-phase exfoliation of bP (tens
of μm2). Other than the larger lateral size and the
improved stability, the electrosprayed 2D P2O5 flakes showed a clear electromechanical responsivity. PFM was indeed
performed onto the electrosprayed 2D P2O5 flakes
to demonstrate their electromechanical response, confirming theoretical
predictions from the literature on 2D oxidized phosphorus nanostructures.
The electrosprayed 2D P2O5 flakes show in fact
both in-plane signal (tenths of picometers per volt) and out-of-plane
signal (some picometers per volt) when subjected to an external electric
field.Overall, the approach herein proposed to deposit a large-area,
electromechanical responsive 2D P2O5 allows
us to overcome the process scalability issues and enables the real
applicability of phosphorus-based 2D nanomaterials for sensing and
various classes of energy-harvesting devices.
Authors: Joohoon Kang; Spencer A Wells; Joshua D Wood; Jae-Hyeok Lee; Xiaolong Liu; Christopher R Ryder; Jian Zhu; Jeffrey R Guest; Chad A Husko; Mark C Hersam Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-04-18 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Wei Luo; Dmitry Y Zemlyanov; Cory A Milligan; Yuchen Du; Lingming Yang; Yanqing Wu; Peide D Ye Journal: Nanotechnology Date: 2016-09-23 Impact factor: 3.874
Authors: Juan Manuel Ramírez-de-Arellano; Ali Fransuani Jiménez-González; Mónica Canales; Luis Fernando Magaña Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 6.208