Literature DB >> 35873904

Tunnel Restoration: A Minimally Invasive Dentistry Practice.

Mohammed Zahedul Islam Nizami1, Conson Yeung1, Iris Xiaoxue Yin1, Amy Wai Yee Wong1, Chun Hung Chu1, Ollie Yiru Yu1.   

Abstract

With advances in technology, dentists nowadays manage dental caries with the philosophy of minimally invasive dentistry. Dental restoration is now performed most conservatively with minimal destruction of tooth structure when operative dentistry is indicated. Some operative dentists suggested using tunnel restoration for treating proximal caries as a conservative alternative to the conventional box preparation. The main advantage of tunnel restoration over the conventional box or slot preparation includes being more conservative and increasing tooth integrity and strength by preserving the marginal ridge. However, tunnel restoration is technique sensitive and requires advanced operative skills. Tunnel restoration can be an option to restore proximal caries if the dentist selects the proper case and pays attention to the details of the restorative procedures. With the dentist's advanced training, advanced light-emitting diode handpieces, magnifying loupes, precise digital imaging and new generation restorative materials, good results can be obtained in selected cases. This study reviews the literature on tunnel restoration and provides updated techniques and clinical data that can be used in tunnel restoration to oversee its limitations and the perspective on restorative treatment.
© 2022 Nizami et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  minimally invasive; proximal caries; restorative dentistry; tunnel preparation; tunnel restoration

Year:  2022        PMID: 35873904      PMCID: PMC9296866          DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S372165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cosmet Investig Dent        ISSN: 1179-1357


  65 in total

1.  Performance of tunnel restorations at 3-6 years.

Authors:  S Nicolaisen; F R von der Fehr; N Lunder; I Thomsen
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  A 3-year clinical evaluation of Cerana prefabricated ceramic inlays.

Authors:  Per Odman
Journal:  Int J Prosthodont       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.681

3.  Analysis of factors affecting failure of glass cermet tunnel restorations in a multi-center study.

Authors:  C E Pilebro; J W van Dijken
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.

Authors:  D Markovic; T Peric
Journal:  Aust Dent J       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.291

5.  Marginal ridge strength in Class II tunnel restorations.

Authors:  D J Fasbinder; R D Davis; J O Burgess
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.522

6.  Accuracy of radiographic detection of residual caries in connection with tunnel restorations.

Authors:  A Wenzel; H Hintze; P Hörsted-Bindslev
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  Glass ionomer-silver cermet bonded composite resin Class II tunnel restorations.

Authors:  T P Croll
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 1.677

8.  Current concepts in successful posterior class II direct composites.

Authors:  R I Maitland
Journal:  Dent Econ       Date:  1993-06

9.  Estimation of clinical axial extension of Class II caries lesions with ultraspeed and digital radiographs: an in-vivo study.

Authors:  Mohammed Bin-Shuwaish; Joseph B Dennison; Peter Yaman; Gisele Neiva
Journal:  Oper Dent       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.440

10.  An Evaluation on Deep Caries Removal Method and Management Performed by Undergraduate Dental Students: A Malaysia Experience.

Authors:  Nurin Izyani Othman; Hanan Umaira Ismail; Norazlina Mohammad; Norzalina Ghazali; Muhammad Syafiq Alauddin
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2020-12-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.