| Literature DB >> 35870175 |
Dazhi Huang1,2, Yixin Niu1, Weiwei Zhang1, Xiaoyong Li1, Ning Lin1, Zhen Yang1, Li Qin1,3, Qing Su1, Hui Ran1, Hongmei Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Thyroid nodule prevalence is increasing lately, especially in diabetes, but the mechanism of which is not clear. In this study, we investigated if osteoprotegerin (OPG) is involved in the pathogenesis of thyroid nodules in diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: diabetes; osteoprotegerin; thyroid nodule
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35870175 PMCID: PMC9459264 DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24615
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Lab Anal ISSN: 0887-8013 Impact factor: 3.124
Clinical and laboratory characteristics according to diabetes status
| Characteristics | All | Diabetes | Non‐diabetes |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 7568 | 1883 | 5685 |
| Age (year) | 56.27 ± 7.70 | 58.93 ± 6.97 | 55.39 ± 7.73 |
| Sex (Male/Female) | 2411/5157 | 734/1149 | 1677/4008 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.71 ± 5.31 | 25.53 ± 3.50 | 24.44 ± 5.77 |
| Thyroid nodule ( | 3667 | 1015 | 2652 |
| SBP (mm Hg) | 130.27 ± 20.30 | 136.83 ± 20.07 | 128.11 ± 19.91 |
| DBP (mm Hg) | 80.32 ± 10.55 | 81.75 ± 10.36 | 79.85 ± 10.57 |
| FBG (mmol/l) | 6.30 ± 1.69 | 8.10 ± 2.52 | 5.71 ± 0.52 |
| HbA1C (%) | 6.00 ± 1.01 | 6.95 ± 1.55 | 5.68 ± 0.41 |
| HOMA‐IR | 1.79 (1.28, 2.64) | 2.72 (1.79, 3.88) | 1.64 (1.22, 2.31) |
| HDL‐C (mmol/L) | 1.24 ± 0.32 | 1.21 ± 0.31 | 1.25 ± 0.32 |
| LDL‐C (mmol/L) | 2.62 ± 0.77 | 2.70 ± 0.81 | 2.60 ± 0.75 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.68 ± 1.02 | 4.84 ± 1.07 | 4.63 ± 1.01 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.36 (0.97, 2.01) | 1.65 (1.14, 2.45) | 1.29 (0.93, 1.87) |
Note: Data are means ± SD or median (interquartile range).
Logistic regression analysis showing variables independently associated with thyroid nodules
| Independent variables |
| Exp ( | 95% CI |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HbA1c | 0.147 | 1.158 | (1.106, 1.213) | <0.001 |
| Age | 0.041 | 1.042 | (1.036, 1.049) | <0.001 |
| BMI | 0.035 | 1.035 | (1.020, 1.051) | <0.001 |
| Sex | 0.523 | 1.687 | (1.521, 1.871) | <0.001 |
Note: The variables entered in the analysis also included SBP, DBP, TC, HDL‐C, LDL‐C, and TG which were all excluded from the model.
FIGURE 1Serum OPG levels were up‐regulated significantly in diabetic patients compared with non‐diabetic patients. (A) Prevalence of thyroid nodules in diabetic patients and non‐diabetic patients. (B) Serum OPG levels in diabetic patients and non‐diabetic patients were analyzed by ELISA. *p < 0.01
FIGURE 2Insulin resistance promotes cell proliferation of the thyroid. (A) Body weight of rats fed with HFHFD and ND. (B) IPGTT of HFHFD‐fed and ND‐fed rats. (C) ITT of HFHFD‐fed and ND‐fed rats. (D) Representative H&E images of thyroid tissue of HFHFD rats and ND rats. H&E, hematoxylin and eosin. Scale bar = 100 μm. *p < 0.01
FIGURE 3Insulin resistance was assessed after HFHFD feeding. (A) FINS of HFHFD‐fed and ND‐fed rats. (B) IPGTT of HFHFD‐fed and ND‐fed rats. *p < 0.01
FIGURE 4Osteoprotegerin is highly expressed in the thyroid tissue of HFHFD‐fed rats. (A) OPG mRNA level in rat thyroid tissues in the two groups analyzed by Q‐PCR. (B and C) OPG protein level in rat thyroid tissues in the two groups was determined by Western blot. *p < 0.01