Literature DB >> 35870019

Prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in the circulating tumor DNA testing.

Yoshihiro Yamamoto1, Keita Fukuyama1, Masashi Kanai2, Tomohiro Kondo1,3, Masahiro Yoshioka1,3, Tadayuki Kou1, Pham Nguyen Quy1, Reiko Kimura-Tsuchiya1, Takahiro Yamada3,4, Shigemi Matsumoto1, Shinji Kosugi3,4, Manabu Muto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Somatic and germline variants are not distinguishable by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing without analyzing non-tumor samples. Although confirmatory germline testing is clinically relevant, the criteria for selecting presumed germline variants have not been established in ctDNA testing. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the prevalence of pathogenic germline variants in clinical ctDNA testing through their variant allele fractions (VAFs).
METHODS: A total of consecutive 106 patients with advanced solid tumors who underwent ctDNA testing (Guardant360®) between January 2018 and March 2020 were eligible for this study. To verify the origin of pathogenic variants reported in ctDNA testing, germline sequencing was performed using peripheral blood DNA samples archived in the Clinical Bioresource Center in Kyoto University Hospital (Kyoto, Japan) under clinical research settings.
RESULTS: Among 223 pathogenic variants reported in ctDNA testing, the median VAF was 0.9% (0.02-81.8%), and 88 variants with ≥ 1% VAFs were analyzed in germline sequencing. Among 25 variants with ≥ 30% VAFs, seven were found in peripheral blood DNA (BRCA2: n = 6, JAK2: n = 1). In contrast, among the 63 variants with VAFs ranging from 1 to < 30%, only one variant was found in peripheral blood DNA (TP53: n = 1). Eventually, this variant with 15.6% VAF was defined to be an acquired variant, because its allelic distribution did not completely link to those of neighboring germline polymorphisms.
CONCLUSION: Our current study demonstrated that VAFs values are helpful for selecting presumed germline variants in clinical ctDNA testing.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Circulating tumor DNA testing; Confirmatory germline sequencing; Presumed germline pathogenic variants; Variant allele fractions

Year:  2022        PMID: 35870019     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02220-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.850


  26 in total

1.  Early Detection of Molecular Residual Disease in Localized Lung Cancer by Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling.

Authors:  Aadel A Chaudhuri; Jacob J Chabon; Alexander F Lovejoy; Aaron M Newman; Henning Stehr; Tej D Azad; Michael S Khodadoust; Mohammad Shahrokh Esfahani; Chih Long Liu; Li Zhou; Florian Scherer; David M Kurtz; Carmen Say; Justin N Carter; David J Merriott; Jonathan C Dudley; Michael S Binkley; Leslie Modlin; Sukhmani K Padda; Michael F Gensheimer; Robert B West; Joseph B Shrager; Joel W Neal; Heather A Wakelee; Billy W Loo; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2017-09-24       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  Validation of a Plasma-Based Comprehensive Cancer Genotyping Assay Utilizing Orthogonal Tissue- and Plasma-Based Methodologies.

Authors:  Justin I Odegaard; John J Vincent; Stefanie Mortimer; James V Vowles; Bryan C Ulrich; Kimberly C Banks; Stephen R Fairclough; Oliver A Zill; Marcin Sikora; Reza Mokhtari; Diana Abdueva; Rebecca J Nagy; Christine E Lee; Lesli A Kiedrowski; Cloud P Paweletz; Helmy Eltoukhy; Richard B Lanman; Darya I Chudova; AmirAli Talasaz
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.

Authors:  Sarah S Kalia; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Wendy K Chung; Christine Eng; James P Evans; Gail E Herman; Sophia B Hufnagel; Teri E Klein; Bruce R Korf; Kent D McKelvey; Kelly E Ormond; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael Watson; Christa L Martin; David T Miller
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 8.822

4.  ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  David T Miller; Kristy Lee; Wendy K Chung; Adam S Gordon; Gail E Herman; Teri E Klein; Douglas R Stewart; Laura M Amendola; Kathy Adelman; Sherri J Bale; Michael H Gollob; Steven M Harrison; Ray E Hershberger; Kent McKelvey; C Sue Richards; Christopher N Vlangos; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Analytical and Clinical Validation of a Digital Sequencing Panel for Quantitative, Highly Accurate Evaluation of Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA.

Authors:  Richard B Lanman; Stefanie A Mortimer; Oliver A Zill; Dragan Sebisanovic; Rene Lopez; Sibel Blau; Eric A Collisson; Stephen G Divers; Dave S B Hoon; E Scott Kopetz; Jeeyun Lee; Petros G Nikolinakos; Arthur M Baca; Bahram G Kermani; Helmy Eltoukhy; AmirAli Talasaz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Spectrum of driver mutations and clinical impact of circulating tumor DNA analysis in non-small cell lung cancer: Analysis of over 8000 cases.

Authors:  Philip C Mack; Kimberly C Banks; Carin R Espenschied; Rebekah A Burich; Oliver A Zill; Christine E Lee; Jonathan W Riess; Stefanie A Mortimer; AmirAli Talasaz; Richard B Lanman; David R Gandara
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Clinical relevance of circulating tumor DNA assessed through deep sequencing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Hiroki Osumi; Eiji Shinozaki; Yoshinori Takeda; Takeru Wakatsuki; Takashi Ichimura; Akio Saiura; Kensei Yamaguchi; Shunji Takahashi; Tetsuo Noda; Hitoshi Zembutsu
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.452

8.  ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.

Authors:  Robert C Green; Jonathan S Berg; Wayne W Grody; Sarah S Kalia; Bruce R Korf; Christa L Martin; Amy L McGuire; Robert L Nussbaum; Julianne M O'Daniel; Kelly E Ormond; Heidi L Rehm; Michael S Watson; Marc S Williams; Leslie G Biesecker
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  An ultrasensitive method for quantitating circulating tumor DNA with broad patient coverage.

Authors:  Aaron M Newman; Scott V Bratman; Jacqueline To; Jacob F Wynne; Neville C W Eclov; Leslie A Modlin; Chih Long Liu; Joel W Neal; Heather A Wakelee; Robert E Merritt; Joseph B Shrager; Billy W Loo; Ash A Alizadeh; Maximilian Diehn
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2014-04-06       Impact factor: 53.440

10.  Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group.

Authors:  D Mandelker; M Donoghue; S Talukdar; C Bandlamudi; P Srinivasan; M Vivek; S Jezdic; H Hanson; K Snape; A Kulkarni; L Hawkes; J-Y Douillard; S E Wallace; E Rial-Sebbag; F Meric-Bersntam; A George; D Chubb; C Loveday; M Ladanyi; M F Berger; B S Taylor; C Turnbull
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 51.769

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.