| Literature DB >> 35866786 |
Aleksandra Z Stojanovic Gavrilovic1,2, Jelena M Cekovic1, Aida Z Parandilovic1, Aleksandar B Nikolov1, Predrag S Sazdanovic1,3, Aleksandra M Velickovic4,5, Marija V Andjelkovic4,5, Marija P Sorak1,6.
Abstract
The quality of an oocyte is influenced by its microenvironment, which includes cumulus cells and follicular fluid, as well as cells of the immune system and their products. The ovarian interleukins, which are secreted by the granulosa cells and other immune cells within the ovaries and follicles, regulate various functions between the cells. IL-6 is a cytokine that is present in the follicular fluid and may affect the quality of oocytes. There are some inconsistencies in the literature regarding the concentration of interleukin 6 in the follicular fluid. The main objective of this study was to examine whether the concentration of interleukin 6 in the follicular fluid affects the outcome of IVF. This study involved 83 patients who underwent IVF. Follicular fluid was used as the biological material for the analysis. Examination of the obtained follicular fluid and collection of oocytes under a stereomicroscope was performed in the embryological laboratory. The concentration of IL-6 in the follicular fluid was analyzed. IVF and ICSI methods were used as the fertilization methods. Pregnancy was confirmed by the positive serum β-hCG level. The software package SPSS 20 was used for statistical data processing. Analysis of the follicular fluid samples showed a correlation between the concentration of IL-6 in the follicular fluid and the outcome of IVF. The concentration of IL-6 in the follicular fluid was higher in patients with confirmed pregnancy (9.55 ± 7.47 ng/ml). Based on our results, we conclude that the concentration of IL-6 affects the outcome of IVF. If the range of IL-6 concentration is between 3,67 ng/ml and 10 ng/ml, we can expect good IVF outcome with vital pregnancy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35866786 PMCID: PMC9302246 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.817
Oocyte maturity, embryo quality on the third day after fertilization and blastocyst.
| Oocyte maturity | |
|---|---|
| GV cells (the oocyte at the stage of a germinal vesicle) | The presence of the germinal vesicle in the ooplasm and the absence of a polar body, such oocyte is diploid in prophase I |
| MI oocytes (the oocytes in metaphase I) | The absence of vesicles in the ooplasm and the absence of the first polar body, such oocyte is also diploid |
| M II oocytes (the oocyte in metaphase II) | The absence of vesicles in the ooplasm, the presence of the first polar body, such oocyte is haploid and the only one that can undergo fertilization |
| Embryo quality 3 day after fertilization | |
| Class A | Excellent, without or with 1–10% fragmentation, perfect symmetry |
| Class B | Medium, with 11–25% of fragmentation, moderate asymmetry |
| Class C | Poor, > 25% of fragmentation, expressed asymmetry |
| Blasocyst quality | |
| According to the appearance of ICM | A A large number of closely grouped cells |
| B A large number of cells that are not closely grouped | |
| C Very few cells | |
| According to the appearance of the trophectoderm | A Many cells form a cohesive epithelium |
| B A small number of cells that form a loose epithelium | |
| C A very small number of cells | |
GV = germina vesicle, ICM = inner cell mass.
Demographic characteristics of patients.
| Parameter | Mean | Mediana | SD | Minimum | Maximum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 36.94 | 37 | 4.54 | 27 | 46 | ||
|
| 27.2 | 27 | 1.92 | 23 | 31 | |
| 2.32 | 1.91 | 2.17 | 0.10 | 10.36 | ||
|
| 7.71 | 7 | 4.77 | 1 | 20 | |
|
| 4.72 | 4.00 | 3.03 | 1 | 15 | |
| IVF | 10.80 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| ICSI | 65.10 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| IVF/ ICSI | 24.10 | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
|
| 3.93 | 3 | 2.55 | 0 | 12 | |
| 56.6 | NA | NA | NA | NA | ||
| 6.58 | 4.90 | 6.56 | 1.00 | 44.00 | ||
AMH = antimullerian hormone, BMI = body mass index, FF = folicular fluid, ICSI = Intracytoplasmic sperm injection, IVF = in vitro fertilization, NA = not available, SD = standard deviation.
Comparison between clinical characteristics and age.
|
| Group A (n = 31)≤35 years | Group B (n = 52)>35 years | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 26.68 ± 1.78 | 27.63 ± 1.92 |
| |
| 3.59 ± 2.75 | 1.55 ± 1.24 |
| ||
|
| 9.81 ± 4.61 | 6.46 ± 4.54 |
| |
|
| 6.03 ± 2.89 | 3.94 ± 2.87 |
| |
| IVF | 19.4 | 5.8 | 0.125 | |
| ICSI | 54.8 | 71.2 | ||
| IVF/ ICSI | 25.8 | 23.1 | ||
|
| 4.77 ± 2.33 | 3.42 ± 2.56 |
| |
| 7.63 ± 6.46 | 5.95 ± 6.16 |
| ||
| Nonpregnancy | 25.8 | 53.8 |
| |
| Pregnancy | 74.2 | 46.2 | ||
The values are given as mean ± standard deviation. Statistically significant P values are given in bold.
AMH: antiMullerian hormone; BMI: Body mass index; FF: Follicular fluid concentrations; Group A: ≤35 years; Group B: >35 years; IVF = in vitro fertilization; ICSI: intracytoplasmic sperm injection; IL-6: Interleukin 6.
P value estimated by Mann–Whitney U test.
P value estimated by Pearson’s Chi-square test.
Figure 1.Comparison between clinical characteristics and years.
Comparison between nonpregnancy and pregnancy groups for clinical characteristics.
|
| Group A (n = 36)No pregnancy | Group B (n = 47)confirmed pregnancies | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 38.14 ± 4.72 | 36.02 ± 4.20 |
| ||
|
| 27.58 ± 1.87 | 27.04 ± 1.92 | 0.206 | |
| 1.78 ± 2.09 | 2.74 ± 2.16 |
| ||
|
| 5.44 ± 3.54 | 9.45 ± 4.88 |
| |
|
| 3.14 ± 2.03 | 5.94 ± 3.14 |
| |
| IVF | 11.1 | 88.9 | 0.113 | |
| ICSI | 46.6 | 53.7 | ||
| IVF/ ICSI | 50 | 50 | ||
|
| 2.69 ± 1.98 | 4.87 ± 2.87 |
| |
| 2.70 ± 0.59 | 9.55 ± 7.47 |
| ||
The values are given as mean ± standard deviation. Statistically significant P values are given in bold.
AMH = antiMullerian hormone, BMI = body mass index, FF = follicular fluid concentrations, Group A = cycles that did not result in pregnancy, Group B = cycles that resulted in pregnancy, IVF = in vitro fertilization, ICSI = intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
P value estimated by Independent Sample T test.
P value estimated by Mann–Whitney U test.
P value estimated by Pearson chi-square test.
Figure 2.Comparison between nonpregnancy and pregnancy groups for clinical characteristics.
Figure 3.Comparison between years and clinical pregnancy.
Correlations of the clinical characteristics and the concentrations of FF IL-6 (ng/mL).
|
| r/rho | |
|---|---|---|
| –0.211 | 0.050 | |
|
| –0.259 | 0.018 |
| 0.289 | 0.008 | |
|
| 0.348 | 0.001 |
|
| 0.419 | 0.000 |
|
| 0.422 | 0.000 |
|
| 0.843 | 0.000 |
Statistically significant P values are given in bold.
AMH = antiMüllerian hormone, BMI = body mass index, FF = follicular fluid concentrations, IL-6 = Interleukin 6, rho = Spearman correlation coefficient.
ROC analysis (IL-6 from follicular fluid as predictors of IVF outcome).
| Surface area |
| 95% confidence interval | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||
| 0.991 |
| 0.972 | 1000 | |
Statistically significant P values are given in bold.
IL-6 = Interleukin 6.
Figure 4.ROC analysis for IL-6 values in follicular fluid as a potential marker of a positive outcome of the IVF process.