| Literature DB >> 27087928 |
Claire Papot1, Kévin Cascella2, Jean-Yves Toullec2, Didier Jollivet2.
Abstract
The Arctic and the Antarctic Peninsula are currently experiencing some of the most rapid rates of ocean warming on the planet. This raises the question of how the initial adaptation to extreme cold temperatures was put in place and whether or not directional selection has led to the loss of genetic variation at key adaptive systems, and thus polar species' (re)adaptability to higher temperatures. In the Southern Ocean, krill represents the most abundant fauna and is a critical member at the base of the Antarctic food web. To better understand the role of selection in shaping current patterns of polymorphisms, we examined genetic diversity of the cox-1 and hsp70 genes by comparing two closely related species of Euphausiid that differ in ecology. Results on mtcox-1 agreed with previous studies, indicating high and similar effective population sizes. However, a coalescent-based approach on hsp70 genes highlighted the role of positive selection and past demographic changes in their recent evolution. Firstly, some form of balancing selection was acting on the inducible isoform C, which reflected the maintenance of an ancestral adaptive polymorphism in both species. Secondly, E. crystallorophias seems to have lost most of its hsp70 diversity because of a population crash and/or directional selection to cold. Nonsynonymous diversities were always greater in E. superba, suggesting that it might have evolved under more heterogeneous conditions. This can be linked to species' ecology with E. superba living in more variable pelagic conditions, while E. crystallorophias is strictly associated with continental shelves and sea ice.Entities:
Keywords: Balancing selection; duplication; heat‐shock proteins; krill; sweep; thermal adaptation
Year: 2016 PMID: 27087928 PMCID: PMC4775515 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Distribution of E. superba and E. crystallorophias along the Antarctic coastline together with their sampling location at the Antarctic French base Dumont d'Urville (distribution maps were redrawn and modified after Fischer and Hureau 1987, the red to blue color gradient of the Dumont d'Urville map correspond to bathymetry from 500 m (Adelie Bank) to about 4000 m (the abyssal plain)).
Species‐specific primer sequences used to amplify alleles of the first half of both of the 3 cytosolic hsp70‐encoded genes and the mitochondrial cox‐1 gene
| Locus | Species | Direction | 5′ Primer 3′ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paralog A |
| Forward | CCATCATATGTTGCCTTCACTG |
| Paralog A |
| Reverse | AGTTTCAATACCCATAGAGAGAGG |
| Paralog A |
| Forward | CCATCATATGTTGCCTTCACAG |
| Paralog A |
| Reverse | AGTTTCAATACCCATAGAAAGAGG |
| Paralog B | Both | Forward | TGCAAATGACCAGGGTAACC |
| Paralog B | Both | Reverse | GCCTCCAACCAAGACGAT |
| Paralog C | Both | Forward | CCAAGATGTCTGCTCCAGT |
| Paralog C |
| Reverse | CTTGTGAAGATGAGGATAGGGT |
| Paralog C |
| Reverse | CTTGTGACGATGAGGATAGGGT |
|
|
| Forward | AGAATGAGGTATTCAAGTTACGG |
|
|
| Reverse | GATATTGGCACACTATACTTCAT |
|
|
| Forward | AGAATGAGGTATTTAAATTACGA |
|
|
| Reverse | GATATTGGTACATTATACTTTAT |
| Puc19 | BS1F | Forward | AGGGGGATGTGCTGCAAGGCG |
| Puc19 | BS1R | Reverse | CTTCCGGCTCGTATGTTGTGTG |
| Sequencing | SP6 | Forward | CATTTAGGTGACACTATAG |
| Sequencing | T7 | Reverse | GTAATACGACTCACTATA |
Genetic diversities and associated Tajima's D statistic for each Hsp70 paralog and the mtCox‐1 gene in both species (Euc: Euphausia crystallorophias; Eus: Euphausia superba)
| Locus | Species | Number of alleles | Length (bp) | S |
|
| Hd ± SD | Tajima's D |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paralog A |
| 26 | 892 | 2 | 0.0006 ± 0.0004 | 0.0002 ± 0.0001 | 0.15 ± 0.093 | −1.51 |
| Paralog A |
| 26 | 892 | 16 | 0.0047 ± 0.0012 | 0.0033 ± 0.0005 | 0.92 ± 0.037 | −1.04 |
| Paralog B |
| 18 | 891 | 4 | 0.0013 ± 0.0076 | 0.0007 ± 0.0002 | 0.56 ± 0.130 | −1.35 |
| Paralog B |
| 24 | 891 | 58 | 0.0180 ± 0.0060 | 0.0220 ± 0.0010 | 0.98 ± 0.024 | 0.85 |
| Paralog C |
| 26 | 850 | 40 | 0.0120 ± 0.0043 | 0.0110 ± 0.0009 | 0.99 ± 0.016 | −0.38 |
| Paralog C |
| 22 | 850 | 53 | 0.0170 ± 0.0060 | 0.0120 ± 0.0010 | 1.00 ± 0.015 | −1.12 |
|
|
| 20 | 558 | 22 | 0.0110 ± 0.0043 | 0.0078 ± 0.0006 | 0.98 ± 0.024 | −1.38 |
|
|
| 23 | 558 | 22 | 0.0110 ± 0.0041 | 0.0096 ± 0.0007 | 0.99 ± 0.016 | −0.53 |
None of the D values were found to be significantly different from zero.
Figure 2Coalescence tree of (A) cox‐1, (B) hsp70 paralog A, (C) paralog B, (D) paralog C computed with the MEGA 5.0 software using the Minimum Evolution procedure (Kumar et al. 1994). Only the optimal trees for which the sum of branch length is minimal are shown. Trees are drawn to scale, with branch lengths in the same units as those of the evolutionary distances used to infer the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary distances were computed using the p‐distance method and were in the units of the number of base differences per site. The ME tree was searched using the Close‐Neighbor‐Interchange (CNI) algorithm at a search level of 0. Each color materializes allelic lineages for both species: in paralog B, green color corresponds to the Gly insertion, and the red one to the Gly deletion, in paralog C, the dark (R) and light blue (I) colors correspond to the two R vs I allelic lineages in E. crystallorophias whereas the red (K) and green (M) colors represent the two K vs M allelic lineages in E. superba. The first two letters (EC or ES) in the sequence label represent the species name and are followed by the individual number and the allele number (All1 or All2).
Figure 3Global genetic diversity (black and gray lines) and species divergence (red lines) along the gene for (A) hsp70 paralog A. Black arrows indicate the position of nonsynonymous mutations, respectively, IV, DN, SE, TS (B) hsp70 paralog B. The thin black arrows indicate the position of nonsynonymous mutations between the two Eus allelic lineages (respectively, TS, KN, VI, DS, LI, NT, TA, NT, LF, FL, IV, RK, ED). The bold black arrow indicates the Gly deletion and (C) hsp70 paralog C. The thin black arrows indicate the position of the nonsynonymous mutations in the Euc species (respectively, KN, RS, DK, SC, EV). The thin gray arrow indicates the position of the nonsynonymous mutation KM in the Eus species. The bold black arrow indicates the position of the polymorphic hydrophobic/charged site found in the two distinct allelic lineages of the two krill species and, red arrows, the position of nonsynonymous mutations responsible for the divergence of species (respectively, QE and TI). K(species) correspond to the divergence between species and K(paralog) the divergence between allelic lineages within a species for a given paralog.
Figure 4Distributions of the observed pairwise site differences at the cox‐1 gene (mismatch curves in red line) and the expected values under both the model of growing/declining population (gray dot) and the model of population constant size (black dash) for E. crystallorophias (A) and E. superba (B) together with their associated Tau and R2 statistics.
Likelihood ratio tests (LRT) performed by the Sweep_Bott software between coalescent models of bottleneck, selective sweeps, or constant population size for each species. 4p, 6p, and 12p represent the number of parameters within each model, namely the four monolocus theta values in M1, the theta values plus the bottleneck strength (S) and the time elapsed since the bottleneck (T) in M2, and the same theta values plus the sweep strength (Si) and the time elapsed since the sweep (Ti) for each locus in M3
| Species | Model | Multilocus | Single locus | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LnL | Paralog A | Paralog B | Paralog C |
| ||
|
| M1: Neutral (4p) | −145.55 | −21.46 | −39.35 | −30.92 | −53.81 |
| M2: Bottleneck (6p) | −138.86 | (0.45, 0.97) | ||||
| M3: Selective‐sweep (12p) | −132.15 | −16.97 | −38.75 | −27.1 | −49.33 | |
| (0.27, 1.23) | (1.31, 2.88) | (0.28, 1.63) | (0.47, 0.52) | |||
| LTR | M2/M1 | 13.5 | ||||
| M3/M1 | 26.8 | |||||
| M3/M2 | 13.4 | |||||
|
| M1: Neutral (4p) | −84.03 | −2.88 | −5.53 | −40.51 | −35.1 |
| M2: Bottleneck (6p) | −4.94 | (0.07, 2.1) | ||||
| M3: Selective‐sweep (12p) | −43.55 | −0.80 | −3.35 | −39.39 | −0.00 | |
| (0.1, 3.87) | (0.15, 1.49) | (1.00, 0.82) | (0.06, 0.95) | |||
| LTR | M2/M1 | 158.2 | ||||
| M3/M1 | 80.9 | |||||
| M3/M2 | 77.2 | |||||
Values in brackets (T, S) correspond to MLE of the time since and the strength of either the bottleneck or the sweep in units of 2N generations, respectively.
Level of significance of the LRT is as follows: *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.001.
Selective coefficients (k) obtained using the MLHKA test for both species when testing the following model: neutral, one, two, or three locus under positive selection. Maximum‐likelihood scores (LnL) are provided in brackets when significant with reference scores of −29.45 (Euc) and −28.88 (Eus) for the neutral model
| Species | One‐locus test | Two and three locus under selection (2‐L&3‐L) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| 2‐L (PA&PB) | 2‐L (PA&PC) | 2‐L(PB&PC) | 3‐L | |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 0.07 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.057 | 0.12 | – | 0.095 |
|
| 1 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 0.25 | 1 | – | 0.35 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 4.17 | 1 | 1 | 3.17 | – | 2.70 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 2.17 | 1 | 1 | – | 1 |
|
| ||||||||
|
| 0.4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.53 | 0.44 | 1 | 0.80 |
|
| 1 | 2.96 | 1 | 1 | 2.98 | 1 | 4.45 | 4.49 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 2.04 | 1 | 1 | 1.76 | 3.44 | 3.23 |
|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0.45 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Levels of significance associated with the selective model (M1) when compared to the null model (M0) using a LRT.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, and ***P < 0.01.
Summary of physiological resistance of the Antarctic and Ice krill species to thermal shocks (adapted from Cascella et al. 2015): CTmax and temperature affecting swimming behavior represent the thermal limit at which 50% of the tested individuals have died or have fallen onto the bottom, respectively, following a regular increase of temperature of 0.1°C per minute from an initial temperature of −1°C
| Species | Habitat | Depth (m) | Maximum in situ temperature (°C) | CTmax (°C) | Temperature affecting the swimming behavior (°C) | Hsp70 gene expression during thermal shock |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Offshore waters | 0–3000 | 4–5 | 15.8 | 8–9 | No overexpression at 3 and 6°C for 3 to 6 h |
|
| Shelf waters | 0–500 | 0–1 | 14.7 | 1–2 | Overexpression after 3 h at 6°C |