Literature DB >> 35864252

Prospective, multi-site study of patient outcomes after implementation of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system for sepsis.

Roy Adams1,2, Katharine E Henry2,3, Anirudh Sridharan4, Hossein Soleimani5, Andong Zhan2,3, Nishi Rawat6, Lauren Johnson7, David N Hager8, Sara E Cosgrove8, Andrew Markowski9, Eili Y Klein10, Edward S Chen8, Mustapha O Saheed10, Maureen Henley7, Sheila Miranda11, Katrina Houston7, Robert C Linton4, Anushree R Ahluwalia7, Albert W Wu12,13,14,15,16, Suchi Saria17,18,19,20,21.   

Abstract

Early recognition and treatment of sepsis are linked to improved patient outcomes. Machine learning-based early warning systems may reduce the time to recognition, but few systems have undergone clinical evaluation. In this prospective, multi-site cohort study, we examined the association between patient outcomes and provider interaction with a deployed sepsis alert system called the Targeted Real-time Early Warning System (TREWS). During the study, 590,736 patients were monitored by TREWS across five hospitals. We focused our analysis on 6,877 patients with sepsis who were identified by the alert before initiation of antibiotic therapy. Adjusting for patient presentation and severity, patients in this group whose alert was confirmed by a provider within 3 h of the alert had a reduced in-hospital mortality rate (3.3%, confidence interval (CI) 1.7, 5.1%, adjusted absolute reduction, and 18.7%, CI 9.4, 27.0%, adjusted relative reduction), organ failure and length of stay compared with patients whose alert was not confirmed by a provider within 3 h. Improvements in mortality rate (4.5%, CI 0.8, 8.3%, adjusted absolute reduction) and organ failure were larger among those patients who were additionally flagged as high risk. Our findings indicate that early warning systems have the potential to identify sepsis patients early and improve patient outcomes and that sepsis patients who would benefit the most from early treatment can be identified and prioritized at the time of the alert.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35864252     DOI: 10.1038/s41591-022-01894-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   87.241


  31 in total

1.  Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock.

Authors:  Anand Kumar; Daniel Roberts; Kenneth E Wood; Bruce Light; Joseph E Parrillo; Satendra Sharma; Robert Suppes; Daniel Feinstein; Sergio Zanotti; Leo Taiberg; David Gurka; Aseem Kumar; Mary Cheang
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Why have clinical trials in sepsis failed?

Authors:  John C Marshall
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 11.951

3.  The Timing of Early Antibiotics and Hospital Mortality in Sepsis.

Authors:  Vincent X Liu; Vikram Fielding-Singh; John D Greene; Jennifer M Baker; Theodore J Iwashyna; Jay Bhattacharya; Gabriel J Escobar
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 21.405

4.  ED Door-to-Antibiotic Time and Long-term Mortality in Sepsis.

Authors:  Ithan D Peltan; Samuel M Brown; Joseph R Bledsoe; Jeffrey Sorensen; Matthew H Samore; Todd L Allen; Catherine L Hough
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program.

Authors:  Ricard Ferrer; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Gary Phillips; Tiffany M Osborn; Sean Townsend; R Phillip Dellinger; Antonio Artigas; Christa Schorr; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  The severe sepsis bundles as processes of care: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Diane J Chamberlain; Eileen M Willis; Andrew B Bersten
Journal:  Aust Crit Care       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 7.  The enigma of sepsis.

Authors:  Niels C Riedemann; Ren-Feng Guo; Peter A Ward
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 14.808

8.  A Machine Learning Algorithm to Predict Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Development, Implementation, and Impact on Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Heather M Giannini; Jennifer C Ginestra; Corey Chivers; Michael Draugelis; Asaf Hanish; William D Schweickert; Barry D Fuchs; Laurie Meadows; Michael Lynch; Patrick J Donnelly; Kimberly Pavan; Neil O Fishman; C William Hanson; Craig A Umscheid
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Effect of performance improvement programs on compliance with sepsis bundles and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  Elisa Damiani; Abele Donati; Giulia Serafini; Laura Rinaldi; Erica Adrario; Paolo Pelaia; Stefano Busani; Massimo Girardis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Prevalence, Underlying Causes, and Preventability of Sepsis-Associated Mortality in US Acute Care Hospitals.

Authors:  Chanu Rhee; Travis M Jones; Yasir Hamad; Anupam Pande; Jack Varon; Cara O'Brien; Deverick J Anderson; David K Warren; Raymund B Dantes; Lauren Epstein; Michael Klompas
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2019-02-01
View more
  2 in total

1.  Human-machine teaming is key to AI adoption: clinicians' experiences with a deployed machine learning system.

Authors:  Bilge Mutlu; Suchi Saria; Katharine E Henry; Rachel Kornfield; Anirudh Sridharan; Robert C Linton; Catherine Groh; Tony Wang; Albert Wu
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-07-21

2.  A sepsis early warning system is associated with improved patient outcomes.

Authors:  Jason N Kennedy; Kristina E Rudd
Journal:  Cell Rep Med       Date:  2022-09-20
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.