Literature DB >> 35864173

The Microbiomes in Lichen and Moss Biocrust Contribute Differently to Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles in Arid Ecosystems.

Chang Tian1,2,3, Jingwen Pang1, Chongfeng Bu4,5, Shufang Wu6, Hao Bai7, Yahong Li1, Qi Guo1, Kadambot H M Siddique8.   

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are distributed in arid and semiarid regions across the globe. Microorganisms are an essential component in biocrusts. They add and accelerate critical biochemical processes. However, little is known about the functional genes and metabolic processes of microbiomes in lichen and moss biocrust. This study used shotgun metagenomic sequencing to compare the microbiomes of lichen-dominated and moss-dominated biocrust and reveal the microbial genes and metabolic pathways involved in carbon and nitrogen cycling. The results showed that Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria were more abundant in moss biocrust than lichen biocrust, while Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were more abundant in lichen biocrust than moss biocrust. The relative abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes and enzymes associated with carbon and nitrogen metabolism differed significantly between microbiomes of the two biocrust types. However, in the microbial communities of both biocrust types, respiration pathways dominated over carbon fixation pathways. The genes encoding carbon monoxide dehydrogenase were more abundant than those encoding ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo) involved in carbon fixation. Similarly, metabolic N-pathway diversity was dominated by nitrogen reduction, followed by denitrification, with nitrogen fixation the lowest proportion. Gene diversity involved in N cycling differed between the microbiomes of the two biocrust types. Assimilatory nitrate reduction genes had higher relative abundance in lichen biocrust, whereas dissimilatory nitrate reduction genes had higher relative abundance in moss biocrust. As dissolved organic carbon and soil organic carbon are considered the main drivers of the community structure in the microbiome of biocrust, these results indicate that biocrust type has a pivotal role in microbial diversity and related biogeochemical cycling.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biocrust; Carbon cycle; Metabolic pathways; Microbiome; Nitrogen cycle; Shotgun metagenomic sequencing

Year:  2022        PMID: 35864173     DOI: 10.1007/s00248-022-02077-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microb Ecol        ISSN: 0095-3628            Impact factor:   4.192


  29 in total

Review 1.  The evolution and future of Earth's nitrogen cycle.

Authors:  Donald E Canfield; Alexander N Glazer; Paul G Falkowski
Journal:  Science       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4.

Authors:  Daniel H Huson; Suparna Mitra; Hans-Joachim Ruscheweyh; Nico Weber; Stephan C Schuster
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-06-20       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Assessing level of development and successional stages in biological soil crusts with biological indicators.

Authors:  Shubin Lan; Li Wu; Delu Zhang; Chunxiang Hu
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  Response and resilience of soil biocrust bacterial communities to chronic physical disturbance in arid shrublands.

Authors:  Cheryl R Kuske; Chris M Yeager; Shannon Johnson; Lawrence O Ticknor; Jayne Belnap
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control.

Authors:  Fredrik H Karlsson; Valentina Tremaroli; Intawat Nookaew; Göran Bergström; Carl Johan Behre; Björn Fagerberg; Jens Nielsen; Fredrik Bäckhed
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome.

Authors:  Junhua Li; Huijue Jia; Xianghang Cai; Huanzi Zhong; Qiang Feng; Shinichi Sunagawa; Manimozhiyan Arumugam; Jens Roat Kultima; Edi Prifti; Trine Nielsen; Agnieszka Sierakowska Juncker; Chaysavanh Manichanh; Bing Chen; Wenwei Zhang; Florence Levenez; Juan Wang; Xun Xu; Liang Xiao; Suisha Liang; Dongya Zhang; Zhaoxi Zhang; Weineng Chen; Hailong Zhao; Jumana Yousuf Al-Aama; Sherif Edris; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Torben Hansen; Henrik Bjørn Nielsen; Søren Brunak; Karsten Kristiansen; Francisco Guarner; Oluf Pedersen; Joel Doré; S Dusko Ehrlich; Peer Bork; Jun Wang
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 54.908

7.  High rates of denitrification and nitrous oxide emission in arid biological soil crusts from the Sultanate of Oman.

Authors:  Raeid M M Abed; Phyllis Lam; Dirk de Beer; Peter Stief
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 10.302

8.  MicrobiomeAnalyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data.

Authors:  Achal Dhariwal; Jasmine Chong; Salam Habib; Irah L King; Luis B Agellon; Jianguo Xia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Microbiome Helper: a Custom and Streamlined Workflow for Microbiome Research.

Authors:  André M Comeau; Gavin M Douglas; Morgan G I Langille
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.496

10.  SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler.

Authors:  Ruibang Luo; Binghang Liu; Yinlong Xie; Zhenyu Li; Weihua Huang; Jianying Yuan; Guangzhu He; Yanxiang Chen; Qi Pan; Yunjie Liu; Jingbo Tang; Gengxiong Wu; Hao Zhang; Yujian Shi; Yong Liu; Chang Yu; Bo Wang; Yao Lu; Changlei Han; David W Cheung; Siu-Ming Yiu; Shaoliang Peng; Zhu Xiaoqian; Guangming Liu; Xiangke Liao; Yingrui Li; Huanming Yang; Jian Wang; Tak-Wah Lam; Jun Wang
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 6.524

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.