Hilde Berner Hammer1,2, Silvia Rollefstad3, Anne Grete Semb3, Gro Jensen4, Lars Fridtjof Karoliussen5, L Terslev6, Espen A Haavardsholm5,2, Tore K Kvien5,2, Till Uhlig5,2. 1. Dept of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway hbham@online.no. 2. Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway. 3. Peventive Cardio-Rheuma clinic, Division of Rheumatology and Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 4. Clinical chemical laboratory, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 5. Dept of Rheumatology, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway. 6. Center for Rheumatology and Spine Diseases, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark.
Monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition in gout may be detected and quantified by use of established ultrasound scores of double contour, tophi and aggregates. Calprotectin is a major granulocyte protein being a sensitive marker of inflammation.The present findings of associations between MSU crystal deposition, calprotectin levels and carotid pathologies may suggest that crystal deposition contributes to subclinical inflammation with subsequent vascular implications.Elimination of MSU crystal deposits by prolonged use of urate lowering therapy in patients with gout may reduce subclinical inflammation and the development of vascular pathology as well as gout flares and tophi.
Introduction
Gout is caused by deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in joints and/or extra-articular tissues and gout has increased in incidence the last decades.1 Evidence describes associations between gout and cardiovascular disease.2–4 High urate levels and presence of subcutaneous tophi have both been associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients with gout, and it was suggested that total body urate load could be a plausible pathophysiological link between gout and cardiovascular disease.5 The volume of crystal deposition measured with dual-energy CT (DECT) has been found to be a biomarker for the risk of developing new cardiometabolic diseases.6 Ultrasound of the carotids detected atheroma plaques in about half of the gout patients7 and silent deposition of MSU crystals in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia have been associated with more severe coronary calcification, suggesting more severe cardiovascular disease.8Calprotectin (S100A8/A9, MRP8/MRP14) is a major granulocyte and monocyte protein released during cell activation and turnover, and is a sensitive marker of inflammation.9 Calprotectin was released by MSU crystal-stimulated neutrophils10 and calprotectin levels were elevated in the synovium, tophi and serum of patients with gout and correlated with disease activity.11 Increased levels of calprotectin have been suggested to be a link between chronic inflammation and the risk of cardiovascular disease in gout patients.12 This is supported by studies where the calprotectin level was identified as a biomarker for prediction of mortality in patients with heart failure and associated with systemic inflammation in stable coronary atherosclerosis.13DECT and ultrasound are both included in the classification criteria for gout.14 Ultrasound detects crystal deposition in patients with gout, and the OMERACT ultrasound group has defined the following typical gout lesions caused by crystal deposition; double contour (DC), tophi and aggregates,15 and a scoring system has been developed.16MSU crystal deposition can be assessed by ultrasound, MSU crystals may induce release of calprotectin and raised levels of calprotectin may be associated with cardiovascular disease. Thus, the aim of this study was to explore the relationship between a comprehensive ultrasound examination of MSU crystal deposition, inflammatory markers including calprotectin and carotid artery pathologies.
Methods
We used baseline data from the Norwegian gout study (NOR-Gout), a prospective observational study of patients with crystal-proven intercritical gout with increased serum urate (SUA) levels (>360 µmol/L) to undertake a cross-sectional analysis.17 18 Patient representatives with gout participated in the project planning.
Ultrasound and DECT assessment of crystal depositions
As described previously,17 all patients had an extensive ultrasound assessment (GE Logic E9 machine) to assess the elementary lesions of deposition (DC, tophi and aggregates) with bilateral assessment of joints (radiocarpal, MCP 2, MTP 1) cartilage (distal femur (maximal flexed knee) and talus) and tendons (insertion of triceps and quadriceps, proximal/distal patellar and Achilles) scored according to the OMERACT scoring system.16 A sum score was made for each lesion as well as for all three lesions together. In addition, patients were explored for the presence of a large tophus (either clinically visible or the largest tophus (length ≥2 mm) detected by ultrasound) in the regions of elbow, hand, knee, ankle or foot.17 Ankles and feet were examined bilaterally by DECT and scored as described previously.19
Laboratory examinations
Plasma calprotectin was assessed by ELISA (Calpro, normal levels <910 µg/L). Kidney function tests and C reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were assessed as a routine at our hospital laboratory (normal levels; CRP ≤4 mg/L and ESR ≤12 men/≤17 women).
Assessments of the carotid artery
Bilateral B‐mode ultrasound examinations20 were performed to assess the carotid intima–media thickness (cIMT) (increased thickness defined as >0.9 mm). Atherosclerotic plaques were identified as protrusions of ≥1.5 mm or ≥2 times the adjacent IMT.
Statistics
Correlations were performed by use of Spearman’s rank and differences between groups examined by Mann-Whitney test. Linear regression explored each of the crystal deposition parameters separately as independent variable and each of the laboratory markers or carotid assessments separately as dependent variable, all with adjustments for sex, age and disease duration.
Results
From the NOR-Gout study, 202 patients with baseline calprotectin and ultrasound assessments were included (95.5% men, mean (SD) age 56.5 (13.8) years, disease duration 7.9 (7.7) years). The mean (SD) body mass index (BMI) was 28.8 (4.6), 43.4% had never smoked, 44.5% had smoked previously and 9.8% smoked ≤10 cigarettes per day. Calprotectin levels had no significant correlation with BMI or smoking.
Imaging results
The mean (SD) sum sore of DC was 4.4 (3.5), tophi 6.6 (6.6), aggregates 9.3 (5.6). A large tophus was detected in 50 patients (24.8%) (mean (SD) length 18 (22) mm).17 DECT was performed in 179 patients (88.6%) with mean (SD) sum score of 4.6 (6.3) (range 0–24).
Laboratory results
Mean (SD) of calprotectin was 801 (525) µg/L, CRP 7 (14) mg/L, ESR 14 (14) mm/hour, SUA 499 (77) μmol/L, creatinine 96 (19) μmol/L and estimated glomerular filtration rate 78 (19) mL/min/1.73 m2.
Carotid artery examinations
A total of 122 (60.4%) of the patients had assessments of cIMT and for presence of carotid artery plaques. Of these patients, 22 (18.0%) had increased cIMT and 67 (54.9%) had carotid artery plaque. cIMT at right or left side and sum both sides were substantially associated with age (correlation coefficient (r)=0.52–0.63, p<0.001), presence of plaque was higher with age (p<0.001), but carotid pathologies (cIMT and plaques) were not associated with sex or gout disease duration.
Correlations between crystal deposition, laboratory and carotid examinations
Table 1 shows the correlations between the ultrasound scores of crystal deposition and the inflammatory markers, showing highest correlations with calprotectin (table 1). In addition, DECT was correlated with calprotectin (r=0.15, p=0.039), but not with CRP or ESR.
Table 1
Spearman’s rank correlations at baseline of 202 patients with gout
Spearman’s rank correlations at baseline of 202 patients with gout*P<0.001.†P<0.05.CRP, C reactive protein; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; S-urate, serum urate.The cIMT was correlated with sum score aggregates; right cIMT: r=0.18 (p=0.045), left cIMT: r=0.21 (p=0.019) and sum bilateral cIMT: r=0.22 (p=0.013). However, there were no significant correlations between cIMT and sum scores of DC, tophi or DECT.
Associations between presence of inflammation/carotid artery pathologies and crystal load
Twenty-seven per cent of the patients had elevated calprotectin levels and they had the highest sum scores of each of, and sum of, the three elementary lesions (p≤0.001) (figure 1), as well as the highest DECT scores (p=0.044). Thirty-four per cent of patients had elevated CRP levels and they had the highest sum scores for tophi and aggregates as well as sum scores for all three elementary lesions (p≤0.03). Thirty-seven per cent of patients had elevated ESR and they had higher levels of sum scores for tophi as well as sum scores for all the three elementary lesions (p≤0.02). However, patients with elevated CRP or ESR did not have higher DECT scores.
Figure 1
With elevated calprotectin levels had significantly higher crystal load (p<0.001) than patients with normal calprotectin levels.
With elevated calprotectin levels had significantly higher crystal load (p<0.001) than patients with normal calprotectin levels.Eighteen per cent of patients with pathological cIMT (at one or both sides) and the 54.9% of patients with presence of carotid plaque had higher levels of aggregate sum score (p=0.003 and p=0.037, respectively).
Associations between presence of tophus and inflammation/carotid artery pathologies
Patients with a large tophus had higher levels of calprotectin (p=0.03), presence of carotid plaque (p=0.049) and higher sum scores for each of the three ultrasound elementary lesions (p<0.001). However, CRP, ESR or cIMT showed no differences between patients with or without a large tophus.
Regression analyses between crystal deposition and laboratory/carotid artery examinations
In the linear regression analyses, calprotectin and ESR were both associated with each elementary lesion sum score and with the three elementary lesions sum score (p<0.001) and calprotectin was associated with DECT (p=0.003). CRP was associated with sum scores for DC and tophi as well as the sum score for all three elementary lesions (p≤0.02). However, neither CRP nor ESR was associated with DECT. In addition, neither cIMT nor presence of plaque was associated with sum score for any of the ultrasound lesions separately or together nor DECT score.
Discussion
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first large study examining intercritical gout patients with assessments of MSU crystal deposits by both ultrasound and DECT to explore associations with inflammation and carotid pathology. We found calprotectin levels to be associated with the crystal deposits assessed by both ultrasound and DECT. In addition, both cIMT and carotid plaques were associated with aggregates of MSU crystals detected by ultrasound. Thus, this study suggests that MSU crystal deposition is associated with inflammation and carotid pathology in gout patients.Metabolic syndrome is associated with inflammation. However, calprotectin was presently not correlated with BMI. The associations between inflammatory markers, especially calprotectin levels, and crystal depositions were robust and observed for all forms of depositions. Calprotectin reflects the degree of leucocyte activation, and even if there may be several causes for increased levels, the present findings may indicate that MSU crystal depositions initiate a local inflammation causing release of calprotectin.We found cIMT to be associated with ultrasound aggregates, but not to DC or tophi. Aggregates may be the form of deposition that is generated first in gout and is the slowest to disappear during urate lowering treatment.17 In addition, presence of large tophus was associated with presence of carotid plaque, which may reflect a long-time deposition of crystals being associated with the gradual development of carotid plaques.Strengths of this study are the high number of patients assessed by comprehensive assessments of MSU crystal deposition as well as sensitive examinations for inflammatory markers and carotid pathology. Limitations includes the one centre design, no control group and that not all patients had carotid and DECT assessments as well as a cross-sectional design that prevents evaluation of causalities.As conclusion, in gout patients studied during an intercritical period, higher loads of MSU crystal deposition as assessed by ultrasound and DECT were associated with increased levels of inflammatory markers as well as cIMT and presence of atherosclerotic plaques in the carotid arteries. These findings may have several explanations. However, they may indicate that MSU crystal depositions could contribute to subclinical inflammation with subsequent vascular implications. This study has a cross-sectional design, and future longitudinal and targeted studies are needed to confirm a causal relationship.
Authors: Sian Yik Lim; Na Lu; Amar Oza; Mark Fisher; Sharan K Rai; Mariano E Menendez; Hyon K Choi Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Hilde Berner Hammer; Lars Karoliussen; Lene Terslev; Espen A Haavardsholm; Tore K Kvien; Till Uhlig Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2020-07-15 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: Lene Terslev; Marwin Gutierrez; Robin Christensen; Peter V Balint; George A Bruyn; Andrea Delle Sedie; Emilio Filippucci; Jesus Garrido; Hilde B Hammer; Annamaria Iagnocco; David Kane; Gurjit S Kaeley; Helen Keen; Peter Mandl; Esperanza Naredo; Carlos Pineda; Bernd Schicke; Ralf Thiele; Maria Antonietta D'Agostino; Wolfgang A Schmidt Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2015-10-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Anne G Semb; Silvia Rollefstad; Sella A Provan; Tore K Kvien; Einar Stranden; Inge C Olsen; Jonny Hisdal Journal: J Rheumatol Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 4.666
Authors: Laura B E Kienhorst; Ellen van Lochem; Wietske Kievit; Nicola Dalbeth; Marilyn E Merriman; Amanda Phipps-Green; Arnoud Loof; Waander van Heerde; Sita Vermeulen; Lisa K Stamp; Elly van Koolwijk; Jacqueline de Graaf; Dirk Holzinger; Johannes Roth; Hein J E M Janssens; Tony R Merriman; Jasper C A Broen; Matthijs Janssen; Timothy R D J Radstake Journal: Arthritis Rheumatol Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 10.995
Authors: Tuhina Neogi; Tim L Th A Jansen; Nicola Dalbeth; Jaap Fransen; H Ralph Schumacher; Dianne Berendsen; Melanie Brown; Hyon Choi; N Lawrence Edwards; Hein J E M Janssens; Frédéric Lioté; Raymond P Naden; George Nuki; Alexis Ogdie; Fernando Perez-Ruiz; Kenneth Saag; Jasvinder A Singh; John S Sundy; Anne-Kathrin Tausche; Janitzia Vaquez-Mellado; Steven A Yarows; William J Taylor Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: L E Clarson; P Chandratre; S L Hider; J Belcher; C Heneghan; E Roddy; C D Mallen Journal: Eur J Prev Cardiol Date: 2013-11-26 Impact factor: 7.804