| Literature DB >> 35863820 |
Elena Bruni1,2, Matteo Maria Cimino3, Matteo Donadon3,4, Roberta Carriero5, Sara Terzoli1,6, Rocco Piazza7, Sarina Ravens8, Immo Prinz8,9, Valentina Cazzetta1,2, Paolo Marzano1,2, Paolo Kunderfranco5, Clelia Peano10, Cristiana Soldani11, Barbara Franceschini11, Federico Simone Colombo12, Cecilia Garlanda6,13, Alberto Mantovani6,13,14, Guido Torzilli3,6, Joanna Mikulak1,2, Domenico Mavilio15,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: More than 50% of all patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) develop liver metastases (CLM), a clinical condition characterized by poor prognosis and lack of reliable prognostic markers. Vδ1 cells are a subset of tissue-resident gamma delta (γδ) T lymphocytes endowed with a broad array of antitumor functions and showing a natural high tropism for the liver. However, little is known about their impact in the clinical outcomes of CLM.Entities:
Keywords: T-lymphocytes; immunity, cellular; immunologic surveillance; liver neoplasms; lymphocytes, tumor-infiltrating
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35863820 PMCID: PMC9310256 DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2022-004579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Immunother Cancer ISSN: 2051-1426 Impact factor: 12.469
Cohort characterization of patients with CLM
| Feature | Variable | Patients with CLM (total no=93) |
| Age (mean±SD) | 64 (±11) | |
| Sex, n (%) | Male | 51 (54.8) |
| Female | 42 (45.2) | |
| K-RAS status, n (%) | Wild type | 38 (40.9) |
| Mutated | 38 (40.9) | |
| n/a | 17 (19.2) | |
| Liver metastases (n) (median=4; range: 1–30) | ||
| Disease-free interval, n (%) | Synchronous | 65 (69.9) |
| Metachronous | 28 (30.1) | |
| Liver localization of metastases, n (%) | Unilobar | 41 (44.0) |
| Bilobar | 52 (56.0) | |
| T status of the primitive lesion, n (%) | T1-2 | 13 (14.0) |
| T3-4 | 74 (80.0) | |
| n/a | 6 (6.0) | |
| N status of the primitive lesion, n (%) | N+ | 65 (70.0) |
| N0 | 22 (23.7) | |
| n/a | 6 (6.3) | |
| Type of surgery, n (%) | Major hepatectomy | 9 (9.7) |
| Limited resection | 84 (90.3) | |
| na-CHT, n (%) (courses median=8; range: 1–34) | Total | 72 (77.4) |
| Monotherapy (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI/XELOX) | 14 (19.4) | |
| Combination therapy with anti-VEGF (bevacizumab or aflibercept) | 38 (52.8) | |
| Combination therapy with anti-EGFR (cetuximab or panitumumab) | 20 (27.8) | |
| Without na-CHT, n (%) | 21 (22.6) | |
| Immunotherapies, n (%) | 0 (0.0) | |
| Recurrence, n (%) | Total | 61 (65.6) |
| Only liver | 32 (52.5) | |
| Only lung | 7 (11.5) | |
| Liver and lung | 11 (18.0) | |
| Others | 11 (18.0) | |
| Positive status of HBV/HCV infections, n (%) | 0 (0.0) |
Patients with CLM were stratified according to age, sex and major clinical manifestations. Synchronous or metachronous CLM status is considered to be those detected within or after 12 months after diagnosis of the primitive lesion, respectively. Liver localization. Unilobar localization: nodules are located in one hemiliver (right or left hemiliver). Bilobar localization: lesions are located both on the right and on the left hemiliver. T status: the size of the tumor and any spread of cancer into nearby tissue. T1: the cancer has grown through the inner lining of the bowel, or into the muscle wall, but no further. T2: the tumor has grown into the muscularis propria, a deeper, thick layer of muscle that contracts to force along the contents of the intestines. T3: the tumor has grown into the outer lining of the bowel wall but has not grown through it. T4: the tumor has grown into the outermost layers of the colon or rectum and through the visceral peritoneum (T4a) but has not reached nearby organs. N status: N+ patients with diffusion of the adenocarcinoma to any lymph nodes at any levels. N0: no infiltration of the lymph nodes. Type of surgery: major hepatectomies are defined according to the Brisbane Classification.
CLM, colon liver metastatic cancer; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; FOLFIRI, 5-fluorouracil/irinotecan; FOLFOX, 5-fluorouracil/oxaliplatin; HBV/HCV, hepatitis B/C virus; K-RAS, Kirsten rat sarcoma virus; n/a, missing data; na-CHT, neoadjuvant conventional/biological chemotherapies; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; XELOX, capecitabine/oxaliplatin.
Figure 1Cellular characterization and clinical impact of intrahepatic gamma delta (γδ) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colon liver metastatic cancer (CLM). (A) Representative immunohistochemistry (IHC) images showing CD3+ (upper panels) and γδ T cell receptor (TCR)+ (lower panels) T cells within peritumoral tissue (PT) and metastatic tumor (MT) from one CLM liver section (out of 10) at 10× (left panel) and 20× (right panel) magnified views. Arrows indicate γδ TCR+ cells in lower panels. (B) Statistical graph from IHC data showing the mean frequency (%) of γδ TCR+ TILs among CD3+ T cells in PT and MT areas (n=10). (C) Statistical graph from multiparametric flow cytometry data showing the mean (±SEM) frequency (%) of matched Vδ1 and Vδ2 T cells among CD3+ T cells in PT (n=82). (D) Pie charts of multiparametric flow cytometry data showing the mean distribution (%) of naïve T (TNAIVE), T central memory (TCM), T effector memory (TEM) and terminally differentiated (TEMRA) Vδ1 (upper chart) and Vδ2 (lower chart) T cells within PT (n=62). (E) Heatmaps of multiparametric flow cytometry data showing the expression of several surface markers between matched Vδ1 (left panel) and Vδ2 (right panel) TILs from PT (n=62). Group of markers which statistically differ between Vδ1 and Vδ2 TILs are annotated under the heatmap as ‘≥****’ and indicates the range of significant p values; ‘ns’ indicates a group of markers not statistically significant. (F) Kaplan-Meier curve of postsurgical overall survival (OS; %) of patients with CLM based on the number of liver metastases (MT, cut-off ≥4; n=60). (G) Spearman’s rank correlation between the frequency (%) of liver PT CD69+ Vδ1 T cells and the number of surgically removed liver metastasis (n=60). (H) Kaplan-Meier curves showing postsurgical OS (%) of patients with CLM based on the median frequencies (%) of CD69+CD27− (cut-off ≤2%; left panel) and CD69+CD28− liver Vδ1 T cells in PT (cut-off ≤5%; right panel) (n=63) Statistically significant p values are represented with the following number of asterisks (*): *p ≤ 0.05; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 2Single cell RNA-sequencing of gamma delta (γδ) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colon liver metastatic cancer (CLM). (A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) projection of γδ T cells from peritumor (PT) (n=1333) and distal tumor-free (DT) (n=424) compartments of CLM from three patients underwent surgical liver resection. UMAP graph identifies eight specific clusters (left panel) and their distribution among DT (orange cells) and PT (light blue cells) compartments of CLM (right panel). (B) Heatmap showing the average of T cell receptor (TCR) δ chain expression within the eight γδ T cell clusters identified by UMAP analysis. The expression values are zero-centered and scaled for each gene. (C) Pie charts showing the relative enrichment of Vδ1, Vδ2 and Vδ3 T cells (%) among DT (left panel) and PT (right panel) compartments of CLMs. (D) Bar plot graph showing the distribution (%) of γδ T cell clusters among DT and PT compartments of CLM within the eight clusters identified from UMAP analysis. The proportion of γδ T cells for each cluster across the DT and PT compartments were calculated as ratio between number of cells in each cluster and total number of cells in DT and PT, respectively. (E) Violin plot graph showing the expression of TRGV genes among the seven γδ T cell clusters grouped according to their Vδ1, Vδ2 and Vδ3 T cell origin. (F) Violin plot graphs of selected genes among all γδ T cell clusters grouped according to their Vδ1, Vδ2 and Vδ3 T cell origin. Each graph shows genes associated with cell differentiation status, transcription factors, tissue-affinity, cytotoxicity, inhibitory and activating molecules.
Figure 3Differentially expressed genes among gamma delta (γδ) tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) clusters in colon liver metastatic cancer (CLM). Heatmap showing the values of 238 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) (adjusted p<0.05) coming from pairwise comparison between cluster 0 (c0) against each identified γδ T cluster. Expression values are zero-centered and scaled for each gene.
Figure 4Functional annotations of gamma delta (γδ) tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in colon liver metastatic cancer (CLM). (A) Statistical dot plot graph showing the biological processes (BO) obtained by Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis calculated for total Vδ1, Vδ2, Vδ3 TILs and for the clusters c3 of Vδ1, c5 of Vδ2 and c6 of Vδ3 TIL subsets. GO enrichment analyses are performed by using differentially expressed genes (DEGs) with adjusted p≤0.05 and log-foldchange >0. Only enriched GO terms with adjusted p≤0.05 and more than five genes are reported. (B) Statistical bar plot graph showing interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and X-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (XCL2) cytokine modular score calculated for each γδ T cell clusters. (C) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) density plot graphs showing IFN-γ, TNF and XCL2 gene density distribution among γδ TIL cell clusters. (D) Scatter dot plot distribution with Pearson’s correlation between TRDV1 and Vδ1-Cy-SI expression in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) cohorts of patients with CRC calculated by Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2). (E) Kaplan-Meier curve showing postoperative disease-free survival (%) ranking in TCGA cohorts of low-frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-L) and microsatellite stability (MSS) patients with CLM stratified by the low (blue curve) or high (red curve) Vδ1-Cy-SI expression (HR 0.5; median high cut-off 50%–50%; n=110). (F) Kaplan-Meier curve (left panel) showing the OS (%) in TCGA cohorts of MSI-L and MSS patients with CLM stratified by the low (blue curve) or high (red curve) Vδ1-Cy-SI ranking (HR 0.5; median 50%–50% high cut-off; n=110). Forest plots (right panel) showing HR with 95% CI, p value (p) and number (n) of patients obtained for different high Vδ1-Cy-SI cut-off values in TCGA cohorts of MSI-L and MSS patients with CRC (n=110). Dashed line at HR=1 indicates the numerical distance from no survival benefit. The cox proportional HR of the Vδ1-Cy-SI high and low-expression cohort was calculated by GEPIA2, while 95% CI was calculated as ‘exp [ln(HR)±z×SE], with SE’.51 Statistically significant p values are represented with the following number of asterisks (*): *p ≤ 0.05; ***p ≤ 0.001; ****p ≤ 0.0001; ns, not statistically significant.
Figure 5Single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) integrated analysis comparing the distribution of circulating and tumor-infiltrating gamma delta (γδ) T cells and transcriptional profiles of Vδ3 T cells from patients with colon liver metastatic cancer (CLM). (A) Uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) graph showing the γδ T clusters from cells purified from matched peritumoral (PT) and peripheral blood (PB) samples of three patients with CLM undergoing surgical resection of tumors. (B) Heatmap showing the average of T cell receptor (TCR) δ chain expression along the six identified γδ T cell clusters showed in panel A. (C) UMAP graph (left panel) and bar plot graph (right panel) showing the distribution (%) of the γδ T cell clusters within PT (gray) and PB (red) anatomic compartments. (D) UMAP density plot graphs showing CD27 and CX3CR1 gene density distribution among γδ T cell clusters. (E) Heatmap showing the top 30 differently expressed genes (DEGs) (adjusted p<0.05) between PB and PT Vδ3 T cells in patients with CLM (left panel). Representative UMAP graph showing the distinct molecular signatures of PB and PT Vδ3 T cells (right panel).
Figure 6Single cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) integrated analysis comparing the transcriptional profiles of circulating and tumor infiltrating Vδ1 and Vδ2 T cells from patients with colon liver metastatic cancer (CLM). (A) Heatmap showing the top 30 differently expressed genes (DEGs) (adjusted p<0.05) between peripheral blood (PB) and peritumoral (PT) Vδ2 T cells from patients with CLM (left panel). Representative uniform manifold approximation and projection (UMAP) graph showing the distinct molecular signatures of PT-enriched type 3, PB CD27high and CD27low Vδ2 T cells (right panel). (B) Bar plot graph showing the distribution (%) of type 3, CD27high and CD27low Vδ2 T cells in PB (red) and PT (gray) anatomic compartments from patients with CLM. (C) Heatmap showing the top 30 DEGs (adjusted p<0.05) between PT and PB Vδ1 T cells from patients with CLM (left panel). Representative UMAP graph showing the distinct molecular signatures of the PT and PB CD69 and CD69 Vδ1 T cells subsets in patients with CLM (right panel). (D) Bar plot graph showing the distribution (%) of the CD69 and CD69 Vδ1 T cells in PB (red) and PT (gray) anatomic compartments from patients with CLM.
Figure 7Identification of intrahepatic Vδ1 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) egressing tumor and re-circulating in peripheral blood (PB) of patients with colon liver metastatic cancer (CLM). (A) Statistical bar graph showing the mean (±SEM) frequency (%) of PB Vδ1 T cells among CD3+ T lymphocytes in health donors (HDs) (n=66) and patients with CLM (n=75). (B) Pie charts showing the mean frequency distribution (%) of PB naïve T (TNAIVE), T central memory (TCM), T effector memory (TEM) and terminally differentiated (TEMRA) Vδ1 T cells in HDs (n=33) and in patients with CLM (n=50) (upper panel) either in the absence (n=13) (lower left) or in the presence (n=38) (lower right) of neoadjuvant conventional/biological chemotherapies (na-CHT) (lower panel). (C) Heatmaps of multiparametric flow cytometry data showing the expression of several surface markers between PB Vδ1 T cells isolated from patients with CLM (left) and HDs (n=49) (right). Group of markers which statistically differ between two groups are annotated under the heatmap as ‘‘≥** and indicates the range of significant p values; ‘ns’ indicates a group of markers not statistically significant. (D) Statistical bar graph showing the mean (±SEM) frequency (%) of PB CD69+ TEMRA Vδ1 cell subset in HDs (n=22) and patients with CLM (n=45). (E) Pearson’s correlation of flow cytometry percentages (%) between matched PB CD69+ TEMRA and PT CD69+ TEMRA Vδ1 TILs (n=45). (F) Statistical bar graph showing the mean (±SEM) frequency (%) of PB CD69+ TEMRA Vδ1 cells from patients with CLM either in the absence (n=11) or in the presence (n=45) of na-CHT. (G) Heatmap of flow cytometry data showing Spearman’s rank between the mean of different cell markers expression (%) in PB Vδ1 T cells from patients with CLM (n=49). (H) Overlap analysis of T cell receptor (TCR) repertoires from FACS-sorted PB CD69+ and CD69− and liver PT Vδ1 T cells in patients with CLM (n=5). Shared top 20 TRG clones of one representative patient with CLM are represented as colored bands between columns (left panel) and included in the summary statistic (right plot). (I) Kaplan-Meier curve showing postoperative OS (%) of patients with CLM stratified on the basis of the median frequency (%) of the PB CD69+CD28− Vδ1 T cells in patients with CLM (cut-off ≤10%; n=53). Statistically significant p values are represented with the following number of asterisks (*): *p ≤ 0.05; **p ≤ 0.01; ***p ≤ 0.001; ns, not statistically significant.