Weicheng Luo1, Keisuke Inomura2, Han Zhang3, Ya-Wei Luo1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science and College of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Xiamen Universitygrid.12955.3a, Xiamen, China. 2. Graduate School of Oceanography, University of Rhode Island, Narragansett, Rhode Island, USA. 3. Marine Genomics and Biotechnology Program, Institute of Marine Science and Technology, Shandong University, Qingdao, China.
Abstract
The dominant marine filamentous N2 fixer, Trichodesmium, conducts photosynthesis and N2 fixation during the daytime. Because N2 fixation is sensitive to O2, some previous studies suggested that spatial segregation of N2 fixation and photosynthesis is essential in Trichodesmium. However, this hypothesis conflicts with some observations where all the cells contain both photosystems and the N2-fixing enzyme nitrogenase. Here, we construct a systematic model simulating Trichodesmium metabolism, showing that the hypothetical spatial segregation is probably useless in increasing the Trichodesmium growth and N2 fixation, unless substances can efficiently transfer among cells with low loss to the environment. The model suggests that Trichodesmium accumulates fixed carbon in the morning and uses that in respiratory protection to reduce intracellular O2 during the mid-daytime, when photosynthesis is downregulated, allowing the occurrence of N2 fixation. A cell membrane barrier against O2 and alternative non-O2 evolving electron transfer also contribute to maintaining low intracellular O2. Our study provides a mechanism enabling N2 fixation despite the presence of photosynthesis across Trichodesmium. IMPORTANCE The filamentous Trichodesmium is a globally prominent marine nitrogen fixer. A long-standing paradox is that the nitrogen-fixing enzyme nitrogenase is sensitive to oxygen, but Trichodesmium conducts both nitrogen fixation and oxygen-evolving photosynthesis during the daytime. Previous studies using immunoassays reported that nitrogenase was limited in some specialized Trichodesmium cells (termed diazocytes), suggesting the necessity of spatial segregation of nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis. However, attempts using other methods failed to find diazocytes in Trichodesmium, causing controversy on the existence of the spatial segregation. Here, our physiological model shows that Trichodesmium can maintain low intracellular O2 in mid-daytime and achieve feasible nitrogen fixation and growth rates even without the spatial segregation, while the hypothetical spatial segregation might not be useful if substantial loss of substances to the environment occurs when they transfer among the Trichodesmium cells. Our study then suggests a possible mechanism by which Trichodesmium can survive without the spatial segregation.
The dominant marine filamentous N2 fixer, Trichodesmium, conducts photosynthesis and N2 fixation during the daytime. Because N2 fixation is sensitive to O2, some previous studies suggested that spatial segregation of N2 fixation and photosynthesis is essential in Trichodesmium. However, this hypothesis conflicts with some observations where all the cells contain both photosystems and the N2-fixing enzyme nitrogenase. Here, we construct a systematic model simulating Trichodesmium metabolism, showing that the hypothetical spatial segregation is probably useless in increasing the Trichodesmium growth and N2 fixation, unless substances can efficiently transfer among cells with low loss to the environment. The model suggests that Trichodesmium accumulates fixed carbon in the morning and uses that in respiratory protection to reduce intracellular O2 during the mid-daytime, when photosynthesis is downregulated, allowing the occurrence of N2 fixation. A cell membrane barrier against O2 and alternative non-O2 evolving electron transfer also contribute to maintaining low intracellular O2. Our study provides a mechanism enabling N2 fixation despite the presence of photosynthesis across Trichodesmium. IMPORTANCE The filamentous Trichodesmium is a globally prominent marine nitrogen fixer. A long-standing paradox is that the nitrogen-fixing enzyme nitrogenase is sensitive to oxygen, but Trichodesmium conducts both nitrogen fixation and oxygen-evolving photosynthesis during the daytime. Previous studies using immunoassays reported that nitrogenase was limited in some specialized Trichodesmium cells (termed diazocytes), suggesting the necessity of spatial segregation of nitrogen fixation and photosynthesis. However, attempts using other methods failed to find diazocytes in Trichodesmium, causing controversy on the existence of the spatial segregation. Here, our physiological model shows that Trichodesmium can maintain low intracellular O2 in mid-daytime and achieve feasible nitrogen fixation and growth rates even without the spatial segregation, while the hypothetical spatial segregation might not be useful if substantial loss of substances to the environment occurs when they transfer among the Trichodesmium cells. Our study then suggests a possible mechanism by which Trichodesmium can survive without the spatial segregation.
Trichodesmium sp. is a dominant contributor to marine microbial N2 fixation (1–3), an essential process in marine ecology and biogeochemistry. N2 fixation by Trichodesmium has been thought to be paradoxical, since it fixes N2 and conducts O2 evolving photosynthesis during the daytime (1), although nitrogenase, the enzyme catalyzing N2 fixation, is highly sensitive to O2 (4). One widely discussed hypothesis is that Trichodesmium may temporally segregate the two conflicting processes (5–10). Photosynthesis of Trichodesmium often peaks in the morning, while N2 fixation mainly occurs at noon or in the afternoon, when the intracellular O2 is low due to concurrent low photosynthesis and probably high respiration (5, 8, 9, 11, 12). This phenomenon of asynchrony in the peak timing of photosynthesis and N2 fixation is commonly referred to as temporal segregation of the two processes, although the two processes are not completely separated in time (5). The temporal segregation, however, is not always obvious in Trichodesmium (13–15), for unclear reasons.In addition, it has been hypothesized that Trichodesmium segregates these two competing processes spatially (5, 7, 9, 10, 16). Trichodesmium exists as filamentous trichomes consisting of dozens to hundreds of cells (1), in which N2 fixation may be allocated in specialized cell segments (termed diazocytes) (15) and thus be spatially segregated from photosynthesis (5, 9). The spatial segregation, if it exists, requires the transfer of substances among Trichodesmium cells, while it is unclear how it occurs (6). As supporting evidence, some studies have revealed that nitrogenase is only distributed in diazocytes (5, 17–19). However, contradictory results have also been reported in which nitrogenase is randomly distributed in some, or even all, Trichodesmium cells (20–22). 13C and 15N isotope measurements via nanometer-scale secondary ion mass spectrometry (NanoSIMS) also indicate that N2 fixation of Trichodesmium might not be limited to specialized diazocytes (6). These results lead to controversy in the existence of spatial segregation between N2 fixation and photosynthesis in Trichodesmium.Multiple mechanisms have been found or proposed to be involved in the O2 regulation of Trichodesmium. The reduced permeability of the Trichodesmium plasma membrane to O2 can slow into-cell O2 diffusion, which is possible considering that the membrane of Gram-negative Trichodesmium is surrounded by a cell envelope with multiple layers (23). A recent study also proposed that hopanoid lipid, a component of Trichodesmium’s membrane, may reduce the O2 permeability (24).Another mechanism for O2 regulation is respiratory protection (RP). RP is active aerobic respiration of carbohydrates by diazotrophs to lower intracellular O2 to protect nitrogenase, while the produced energy is lost as heat to the environment (5, 7, 25, 26). High RP might reduce the plastoquinone pool and send negative feedback to photosystem II (PSII), further lowering intracellular O2 production in Trichodesmium (5).Alternative electron transfer (AET), one of the photosynthetic electron transfer (PET) pathways, might also contribute to maintaining low intracellular O2 (8, 26). Electrons produced from PSII via the decomposition of H2O transfer to ferredoxin (Fd) and terminally return to H2O by, e.g., the Mehler reaction, forming (pseudo)cyclic electron flows around photosystem I (PSI) and resulting in zero net O2 production (27, 28). AET produces intracellular energy (ATP) but not the reducing agent NADPH (29). In marine diazotrophs, AET can be a complement to linear PET (LPET), in which ATP and NADPH are produced at a molar ratio (1.3:1) that is substantially lower than that (3:1) required by N2 fixation (27, 28, 30–32). AET can therefore benefit N2 fixation by providing ATP to energetically expensive N2 fixation while not generating O2 (8, 26, 33, 34).Recently, the segregation of Trichodesmium N2 fixation and photosynthesis has been studied using a physiological cell model (7). The model consists of coarse-grained metabolic fluxes resolving key metabolisms, such as N2 fixation, respiration, and biomass synthesis, suggesting that combined mechanisms are essential in regulating intracellular O2, including RP, low permeability of cell membranes, and temporal and spatial segregations of N2 fixation and photosynthesis. However, the model predefined the temporal segregation of N2 fixation and photosynthesis and thus did not test the possibility of Trichodesmium’s survival without spatial segregation. Exploring such a possibility is critical in reconciling conflicting observations in which nitrogenase is found in a small group of cells (5, 17–19) or all the cells (20–22).In the present study, we constructed a systematic physiological model of a single trichome of Trichodesmium, tracking the fluxes of carbon, nitrogen, O2, NADPH, and ATP through different intracellular pools and processes. An optimization method was applied to seek a model parameter set that maximizes the growth rate, which allows the model to self-organize its diurnal patterns of various physiological processes. Model experiments were conducted to quantitatively evaluate the importance and necessity of different strategies, including the temporal and spatial segregations of N2 fixation and photosynthesis, for regulating the intracellular O2 of Trichodesmium trichomes and accomplishing feasible N2 fixation. The results show that the hypothetical spatial segregation can be useful but is not mandatory.
RESULTS
General model framework.
The model (Fig. 1) estimates the growth of Trichodesmium trichome by simulating 12-h diurnal cycles of major intracellular processes involved in synthesizing organic carbon and fixing N2. The production and the consequent allocation of intracellular ATP and/or NADPH partly determine the rates of these processes. The rate of N2 fixation is also impacted by the temporal evolution of the intracellular O2 level. The modeled O2 inhibition on N2 fixation rate uses a Michaelis-Menten equation (35), in which the half-saturation coefficient (= 10−2 mol O2 m−3) is determined by fitting a modeled gross fixed C-to-N ratio of 49:1 with the observed value of 47:1 from an experiment with Trichodesmium (6) (see further discussion and sensitivity tests of in the Discussion, below). The assimilated organic carbon and nitrogen accumulated at the end of the diurnal cycle are used to calculate a daily integrated growth rate. The spatial segregation of N2 fixation and photosynthesis into segments of model trichome is also tested. Here, we briefly introduce our model framework, while more details are described in Materials and Methods.
FIG 1
Schematic diagram of our Trichodesmium trichome model. N2 fixation and photosynthesis are not spatially segregated (a) or are spatially segregated (b). The model simulates the amount of biomass synthesized over a diel cycle and calculates a growth rate (G). In the model with spatial segregation (b), N2 is fixed in diazocytes that consist of a fraction (f) of total cells, PET and carbon fixation occur in the remaining photosynthetic cells, and fixed carbohydrate produced in photosynthetic cells and fixed N produced in diazocytes are instantaneously transferred among the cells. For a clearer plot, arrows representing the production of ATP (by AET and LPET) and NADPH (by LPET), the consumption of NADPH (by both carbon and N2 fixations [dashed frames]), and the transfer of ATP and NADPH from photosynthetic cells to diazocytes are omitted. ATP produced by RP is wasted and not counted. Refer to the text for detailed descriptions. Dark orange frame, cell membrane; oval blobs, biochemical pools; rectangles, metabolic processes; solid arrows, mass or energy fluxes; dashed arrows, inhibition effects of RP on PET (gray) or of O2 on N2 fixation (blue). CCM, CO2-concentrating mechanism; CF, carbon fixation; NF, N2 fixation; RP, respiratory protection; CH2O, carbohydrates; CS, carbon skeleton; N, fixed nitrogen; MT, maintenance; BIO, biosynthesis.
Schematic diagram of our Trichodesmium trichome model. N2 fixation and photosynthesis are not spatially segregated (a) or are spatially segregated (b). The model simulates the amount of biomass synthesized over a diel cycle and calculates a growth rate (G). In the model with spatial segregation (b), N2 is fixed in diazocytes that consist of a fraction (f) of total cells, PET and carbon fixation occur in the remaining photosynthetic cells, and fixed carbohydrate produced in photosynthetic cells and fixed N produced in diazocytes are instantaneously transferred among the cells. For a clearer plot, arrows representing the production of ATP (by AET and LPET) and NADPH (by LPET), the consumption of NADPH (by both carbon and N2 fixations [dashed frames]), and the transfer of ATP and NADPH from photosynthetic cells to diazocytes are omitted. ATP produced by RP is wasted and not counted. Refer to the text for detailed descriptions. Dark orange frame, cell membrane; oval blobs, biochemical pools; rectangles, metabolic processes; solid arrows, mass or energy fluxes; dashed arrows, inhibition effects of RP on PET (gray) or of O2 on N2 fixation (blue). CCM, CO2-concentrating mechanism; CF, carbon fixation; NF, N2 fixation; RP, respiratory protection; CH2O, carbohydrates; CS, carbon skeleton; N, fixed nitrogen; MT, maintenance; BIO, biosynthesis.We first introduce our model case in which photosynthesis and N2 fixation are not spatially segregated (Fig. 1a). The model runs with diurnal variable light, which drives PET pathways, including LPET and AET. LPET produces O2, ATP, and NADPH, while AET only produces ATP (28). The ratio of LPET and AET is dynamically adjusted to fulfill the relative requirements of ATP and NADPH by all the processes. The sole N source of the model, N2 fixation, consumes ATP and NADPH (31, 32). CO2 and HCO3− are taken up (ATP is needed in HCO3− uptake) (36) and then fixed to carbohydrates by consuming ATP and NADPH. Some carbohydrates are further synthesized to form carbon skeletons (37). ATP is also needed for cell maintenance (38). Our model prioritizes using ATP and NADPH for N2 fixation over other processes, but N2 fixation can only proceed under low intracellular O2 levels (4).The model implements RP by actively respiring carbohydrates to reduce the intracellular O2 while wasting the produced ATP (5, 7, 25, 26). RP, as discussed above, inhibits PET (5) and consequently slows O2 production. This intracellular production and consumption of O2, as well as the cross-cell exchange of O2, generate a dynamic level of intracellular O2 and largely regulate the sometimes-observed diurnal patterns of N2 fixation. Note that ATP and NADPH in the model are solely produced by LPET and AET during the daytime (39) and are instantaneously used (i.e., not stored). At the end of the daytime, the model calculates the amount of accumulated fixed carbon that needs to be respired to produce ATP, which subsequently supports maximal biosynthesis from the remaining fixed carbon and nitrogen.The model case with spatially segregated photosynthesis and N2 fixation is constructed by modifying the model without the spatial segregation, to separate the trichome into N2-fixing (diazocytes) and photosynthetic cells (Fig. 1b). N2 fixation is confined in diazocytes, which are set to make up 15% of total cells (2, 16), while LPET, AET, and carbon fixation only occur in the remaining photosynthetic cells. All the materials except O2 are assumed to instantaneously and 100% efficiently transfer between diazocytes and photosynthetic cells and distribute evenly along the trichome (6), which is a best-case assumption for the growth of Trichodesmium with spatial segregation. Further evaluation and model experiments about this assumption are discussed later. Intracellular O2 in diazocytes and in photosynthetic cells is simulated separately. A mixed layer of O2 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material) is considered to form around the surface of the whole trichome, and the O2 exchange among the mixed layer, the diazocytes and the photosynthetic cells, is calculated separately, following a scheme from Staal et al. (40).Schematic diagram of O2 diffusion modified from Staal et al. (15) under the spatial segregation. The peach space is the cytoplasm, the dark orange part is the cell membrane, the dark red part is the mixed layer, and the white part inside the dashed circle is the boundary layer. R is the radius of the cytoplasm, L is the thickness of the cell membrane, L is the thickness of the mixed layer, and L is the thickness of the boundary layer. Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.07 MB.
Growth rate and daily integrated carbon and N2 fixation rates.
By optimizing model parameters, the model in which Trichodesmium trichome is not spatially segregated to diazocytes and photosynthetic cells achieves a maximal growth rate of 0.25 day−1 (Table 1). The modeled growth rate falls within the general observed levels of Trichodesmium (0.1 to 0.4 day−1) (13, 41–45). The modeled daily integrated fixed N (0.05 mol N per mol C per day) is coupled with the growth rate, using the Redfield ratio (46).
TABLE 1
Modeled growth and daily integrated carbon and N2 fixation rates
Model case
Growth rate (days−1)
Carbon fixation rate (mol C [mol C]−1 day−1)
N2 fixation rate (mol N [mol C]−1 day−1)
Without spatial segregation
0.25
2.24
0.05
With spatial segregation
0.51
2.21
0.11
Modeled growth and daily integrated carbon and N2 fixation ratesAfter incorporating the spatial segregation into the model, it reaches a much higher rate of 0.51 day−1, which is mainly attributed to the elevated daily integrated N2 fixation rate (Table 1). However, the daily integrated carbon (carbohydrate) fixation rate is nearly the same in the two model cases (Table 1), indicating that much more fixed carbon is respired or wasted in the model without spatial segregation. The high growth and N2 fixation rates in the model without spatial segregation will be discussed later.Nevertheless, Trichodesmium that does not spatially segregate photosynthesis and N2 fixation can still grow mainly, because it fixes a large amount of carbon in the early period and then uses that carbon in RP during the mid-day, resulting in more O2 consumption than is produced by photosynthesis and creating a low-O2 window for N2 fixation (further details are provided in the Discussion section, below).
Temporal segregation of carbon and N2 fixations.
The simulated carbon and N2 fixations segregate temporally in both models with and without spatial segregation (Fig. 2a and b). These optimized results represent the patterns via which the model can reach the maximal growth rate and tentatively support the necessity of the temporal segregation between photosynthesis and N2 fixation in Trichodesmium, more of which will be discussed later. The carbon fixation rate increases to its daily peak in the first 2 h, gradually decreases to approximately half of its maximum until noon, remains nearly constant (Fig. 2a) or increases to a second peak (Fig. 2b) for another 4 h, and then reduces to 0 at the end of the light period. N2 fixation mainly occurs in the middle light period, when the carbon fixation rate is downregulated and a window of low intracellular O2 emerges (Fig. 2c and d). Compared to the model without spatial segregation, the model spatially segregating photosynthesis and N2 fixation has a wider low-O2 window in diazocytes and a longer period of N2 fixation (Fig. 2).
FIG 2
Simulated rates of C and N2 fixations and O2 concentrations. The model runs both without (a and c) and with (b and d) a spatial segregation between carbon and N2 fixation. The thin black dashed lines in panels c and d represent the ambient far-field O2 concentrations set by the model.
Simulated rates of C and N2 fixations and O2 concentrations. The model runs both without (a and c) and with (b and d) a spatial segregation between carbon and N2 fixation. The thin black dashed lines in panels c and d represent the ambient far-field O2 concentrations set by the model.Our model generates a diurnal pattern of N2 fixation with a single peak, which is consistent with most previous studies of single trichomes of Trichodesmium (5, 6, 8, 13, 39, 41, 44, 47). N2 fixation in our model peaks during the later light period, which was observed in some of above studies (6, 13, 41, 47), although the exact peaking time of N2 fixation varied substantially, probably due to different culture and physiological conditions.
Dynamic changes of O2 fluxes.
We first compared the intracellular O2 budgets in the model without spatial segregation to those in the photosynthetic cells of the model with spatial segregation (Fig. 3a and b). In the early morning (0 to 4 h), a large amount of O2 was quickly produced from photosynthesis, which is consistent with an observation that the gross O2 evolution of Trichodesmium was high in the late morning or midday (48). The produced O2 then either diffuses to the ambient environment or is respired in both cases. After that period, when O2 production is moderate and N2 fixation increases rapidly, the RP dominates the removal of intracellular O2 in both cases. The low intracellular O2 in turn leads to a physical influx of O2 in the model without spatial segregation (Fig. 3a). Without N2 fixation, the photosynthetic cells of the model with spatial segregation, however, allow a lower RP than that without spatial segregation, and meanwhile an intracellular O2 concentration always higher than the extracellular level causes a continuous outflux of O2 (Figs. 2d and 3b). For the diazocytes of the model with spatial segregation, no O2 is produced inside, and there is only a relatively small influx of O2 due to the small area of the interface (7); consequently, a low RP is enough to create a low-O2 window in these cells (Figs. 2d and 3c).
FIG 3
Modeled intracellular O2 fluxes. (a to c) Photosynthesis and N2 fixation are either not spatially segregated (a) or spatially segregated to photosynthetic cells (b) and diazocytes (c). (d) Daily integrated O2 fluxes in models with and without spatial segregation, with the results for the photosynthetic cells and diazocytes in the model with spatial segregation also shown. Positive and negative values represent gain and loss of intracellular O2, respectively. O2 fluxes in the photosynthetic cells and diazocytes (b to d) are normalized to their own respective biomass.
Modeled intracellular O2 fluxes. (a to c) Photosynthesis and N2 fixation are either not spatially segregated (a) or spatially segregated to photosynthetic cells (b) and diazocytes (c). (d) Daily integrated O2 fluxes in models with and without spatial segregation, with the results for the photosynthetic cells and diazocytes in the model with spatial segregation also shown. Positive and negative values represent gain and loss of intracellular O2, respectively. O2 fluxes in the photosynthetic cells and diazocytes (b to d) are normalized to their own respective biomass.In terms of the daily integrated O2 budget, both the O2 consumed by RP and its ratio to photosynthetic O2 production in the model without spatial segregation are higher than those with spatial segregation (Fig. 3d). This is mainly because of the lowered RP requirement in both diazocytes and photosynthetic cells of the model without spatial segregation. Furthermore, with a higher intracellular O2, the photosynthetic cells in the model with spatial segregation can diffuse a much larger amount of O2 than that without spatial segregation (Figs. 2c and d and Fig. 3d).
Carbon, ATP, and NADPH allocation.
Mainly owing to the much higher fraction of gross fixed carbon consumed by RP, much less (13%) fixed carbon is synthesized to biomass in the model without spatial segregation than that with spatial segregation (30%) (Fig. 4a). To supply ATP for biosynthesis at night, more fixed carbon is respired in the model with spatial segregation than that without spatial segregation because of the higher growth in the former (Table 1 and Fig. 4a). Compared to the model without spatial segregation, ATP production is higher in the model with spatial segregation, mainly because it is inhibited less by lower RP, with slightly more ATP produced by LEPT than by AET in both cases (Fig. 4c). Hence, the model with spatial segregation is capable of supporting higher energy consumption than that without spatial segregation (Fig. 4d). In both cases, most ATP (81% and 71% in models without and with spatial segregation, respectively) is consumed by carbon fixation, while much less ATP (4% and 8% in models without and with spatial segregation, respectively) is allocated to N2 fixation (Fig. 4d). The fraction of NADPH allocated to carbon fixation is even higher (97% and 93% in models without and with spatial segregation, respectively), with the remaining <10% of NADPH used by N2 fixation, reflecting that carbon fixation requires a higher ratio of NADPH:ATP than N2 fixation (Fig. 4b).
FIG 4
Modeled daily integrated carbon, NADPH, and ATP fluxes. Gross fixed carbon (a) and NADPH (b) allocation and ATP production (c) and allocation (d) were integrated over a diel cycle in both models, without and with spatial segregation. Note that the ordinary respiration of fixed carbon is calculated at the end of the daytime for the amount of ATP needed to synthesize biomass during the night (see text for details).
Modeled daily integrated carbon, NADPH, and ATP fluxes. Gross fixed carbon (a) and NADPH (b) allocation and ATP production (c) and allocation (d) were integrated over a diel cycle in both models, without and with spatial segregation. Note that the ordinary respiration of fixed carbon is calculated at the end of the daytime for the amount of ATP needed to synthesize biomass during the night (see text for details).
DISCUSSION
Formation of the temporal segregation.
Without representing the spatial segregation between photosynthesis and N2 fixation in Trichodesmium, our model generates rhythms of carbon and N2 fixations (Fig. 2) that are basically consistent with sometimes-observed rhythms (6). The modeled rhythms can be divided into four stages (Fig. 5).
FIG 5
Schematic diagram illustrating the temporal segregation between C and N2 fixations in the model without spatial segregation. The modeled rhythms can be divided into four stages (I to IV). Black solid line, rate of carbon fixation; red solid line, rate of N2 fixation; blue dashed line, intracellular O2.
Schematic diagram illustrating the temporal segregation between C and N2 fixations in the model without spatial segregation. The modeled rhythms can be divided into four stages (I to IV). Black solid line, rate of carbon fixation; red solid line, rate of N2 fixation; blue dashed line, intracellular O2.In the first stage (hours 0 to 2), carbon is quickly fixed and accumulates, while N2 is barely fixed due to high intracellular O2 (see Fig. S2 in the supplemental material), resulting in an increasing ratio of particulate organic C to N, a phenomenon also found in culture experiments (49).Simulated concentrations of carbohydrates (black solid line), carbon skeletons (black dashed line), and fixed N (red solid line) during the light period (0 to 12 h) in the model without spatial segregation. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.1 MB.In the second stage (hours 2 to 4), the accumulation of carbon skeletons (see Fig. S2) increases the cellular demand for N2 fixation, which in turn triggers RP (Fig. 3a). The elevated RP not only consumes more O2 but also partly inhibits PET and O2 production (Fig. 3a). These two effects, together with the diffusion of O2 out of the cells, quickly reduce intracellular O2 to a level lower than that in the environment (Fig. 2c).In the third stage (hours 4 to 10.5), the majority of N2 is fixed. To maintain a low intracellular O2 for N2 fixation (Fig. 2c), the RP is at its highest level (Fig. 3a) to consume not only all the O2 that is photosynthetically produced at a moderate level (Fig. 2a) but also the O2 influx from the environment. This consequently results in a net consumption of organic carbon (see Fig. S2). The results are consistent with the net O2 consumption observed around a period of active N2 fixation in a cultured Trichodesmium experiment (48). Therefore, adequate carbon must be fixed and stored in the first two stages before substantial N2 fixation occurs, which is a reason for the necessity of the temporal segregation between carbon and N2 fixations.In the last stage (hours 10.5 to 12), the accumulation of fixed N (see Fig. S2) and downregulated PET because of weakened light (Fig. 3a) causes a decrease in N2 fixation and in turn slows down RP (Fig. 3a). There is still a small amount of carbon fixed in this last stage (Fig. 2a).Additional model experiments without the spatial segregation (see Text S1 and Fig. S3) show that the degree of temporal segregation between photosynthesis and N2 fixation largely determines daily integrated O2 production and RP and the ratio of net carbon to N2 fixations. The model reaches a maximal growth rate at an intermediate level of the temporal segregation.Full model description. Download Text S1, PDF file, 0.2 MB.Results of model experiments without spatial segregation under different maximal synthesis rates of carbon skeletons (). (a) Comparison between the optimized case and two nonoptimized examples of the model without spatial segregation. The slow, optimal, and fast carbon skeleton (CS) syntheses are controlled by using 50%, 100%, and 200% of the optimized values of the model parameter of maximal synthesis rate of carbon skeleton (). Thin dashed lines represent the peak time of carbon fixation (black) or N2 fixation (red). (b) Simulated daily integrated rate of respiratory protection, peak time of carbon and N2 fixations, daily integrated rate of O2 production, and C-based and N-based specific growth rates. ranges from 20% to 200% of the optimized value. Blue angles show the optimized model results without spatial segregation. The realized specific growth rate (dashed line) is the smaller of the C-based and N-based specific growth rates. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 1.9 MB.In summary, efficient carbon and N2 fixations with dynamic regulation of intracellular O2 and the requirement of sufficient accumulation of organic carbon before the period of high N2 fixation are the two main reasons for the modeled temporal segregation between photosynthesis and N2 fixation of Trichodesmium. Our model provides a scenario in which, even without spatially segregating N2 fixation and photosynthesis, Trichodesmium can still grow at a moderate rate with the concurrence of the two processes.Meanwhile, our model always produces the temporal segregation between N2 fixation and photosynthesis, although some previous studies observed no temporal segregation in single trichomes of Trichodesmium (13, 14). The mechanism for how Trichodesmium grows without temporal segregation is certainly worthy of further investigations.
Evaluation of the impacts from spatial segregation.
Meanwhile, the spatial segregation of photosynthesis and N2 fixation in different cells can increase the modeled maximum growth rate by 104% (Table 1); this is mainly caused by the expanded low-O2 window and the elevated N2 fixation in diazocytes (Fig. 2) and the lowered consumption of fixed carbon in RP (Figs. 3 and 4a). This result, however, was obtained by assuming all the synthesized materials (except O2) can freely and efficiently transfer between diazocytes and photosynthetic cells in the model. Although direct transfer of substances among cells has been suggested for some terrestrial filamentous N2-fixing cyanobacteria, such as the channels found to connect cells in Anabaena (50, 51), such channels or other similar mechanisms have not been discovered for Trichodesmium. If the substances produced in certain cells of Trichodesmium have to be otherwise released to extracellular environment before they can be retaken by other Trichodesmium cells, the loss of the transferred substances to the environment would be unavoidable. By setting a lost fraction of the intercellularly transferred materials in the model with spatial segregation (see Materials and Methods), the growth rate decreases substantially, mainly caused by the loss of fixed N, and becomes even lower than that in the model without spatial segregation when the lost fraction is higher than 50% (see Fig. S4). A loss fraction lower than this level can be difficult to reach, considering the ocean environment is dynamic and other microorganisms inhabiting areas near Trichodesmium can also take up these substances. Our model experiments then suggest that the benefit that Trichodesmium can obtain from the spatial segregation is likely overwhelmed by the loss of substances during their transfer among cells.Experiments on loss of intercellularly transferred materials in the model with spatial segregation. Relative change of gross C and N2 fixation rates, net N assimilation rate, and specific growth rate in the model with spatial segregation to those in the model without spatial segregation. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.1 MB.
Intracellular O2 management.
Trichodesmium also adopts another suite of combined intracellular O2 management mechanisms to protect nitrogenase. Considering the analyses above, we limit our discussion in this section only to the model results without spatial segregation.Our model results suggest that proper low cell permeability to O2 is important to maintain the low-O2 window for N2 fixation, which is consistent with the conclusions of other studies (7, 48). The multilayer cell envelope of Trichodesmium makes the O2 diffusivity across the cell membrane thousands of times lower than that in water (7, 48, 52). Our model experiment estimates an O2 diffusivity of 10−4 of that in water (Fig. 6), a value comparable to that in another study (7). When ε is lower (10−5), the O2 produced in the early morning cannot quickly diffuse out of the cell, resulting in extremely high intracellular O2 concentrations (about 60 times higher than the far-field ambient O2 concentration) (Fig. 6c). Although not represented in our model, this high intracellular O2 can cause strong oxidative stress (48). When ε is higher (10−3), the modeled cell needs to consume much more carbon in RP, so that the modeled gross fixed C-to-N ratio was substantially increased and the modeled growth rate was greatly decreased, unless the O2 inhibition on N2 fixation was weak (i.e., high ) (Fig. 6a and b).
FIG 6
Model sensitivity tests for two model parameters related to intracellular O2 regulation. (a to c) The half-saturation coefficients of O2 inhibition on N2 fixation () and the relative cross-membrane O2 diffusivity to that in water (ε) were tested in the model without spatial segregation, showing a simulated ratio of gross C-to-N fixations (a), growth rates (b), and intracellular maximal O2 concentration (c). Note that values in the black circles represent the model results simulated using default values for and ε (see text). (d and e) Optimized model results without spatial segregation using a low (10−3 mol O2 m−3) and a high (10−1 mol O2 m−3), respectively. For comparison, several key results of the standard model without spatial segregation using a default (1 × 10−2 mol O2 m−3) (i.e., Fig. 2), including the maximal carbon fixation rate (black cross), the maximal N2 fixation rate (red cross), and the minimal intracellular O2 concentration (blue cross), are marked at their corresponding occurring times in panels d and e. The thin black dashed lines in panels d and e represent the ambient far-field O2 concentrations predefined by the model.
Model sensitivity tests for two model parameters related to intracellular O2 regulation. (a to c) The half-saturation coefficients of O2 inhibition on N2 fixation () and the relative cross-membrane O2 diffusivity to that in water (ε) were tested in the model without spatial segregation, showing a simulated ratio of gross C-to-N fixations (a), growth rates (b), and intracellular maximal O2 concentration (c). Note that values in the black circles represent the model results simulated using default values for and ε (see text). (d and e) Optimized model results without spatial segregation using a low (10−3 mol O2 m−3) and a high (10−1 mol O2 m−3), respectively. For comparison, several key results of the standard model without spatial segregation using a default (1 × 10−2 mol O2 m−3) (i.e., Fig. 2), including the maximal carbon fixation rate (black cross), the maximal N2 fixation rate (red cross), and the minimal intracellular O2 concentration (blue cross), are marked at their corresponding occurring times in panels d and e. The thin black dashed lines in panels d and e represent the ambient far-field O2 concentrations predefined by the model.The half-saturation coefficient for the O2 inhibition () (equation 3), unknown but probably substantially lower than a typical ambient O2 concentration (0.213 mol O2 m−3 at 34 practical salinity units (PSU) and 25°C), is estimated at 10−2 mol O2 m−3. This value of , together with an ε of 10−4, results in a ratio of modeled gross C-to-N fixations of 49:1 (Fig. 6), which fits well to an observed value of 47:1 from an experiment of Trichodesmium (6). By setting a stronger O2 inhibition on N2 fixation, i.e., a lower of 10−3 mol O2 m−3 (see Fig. S5), more carbon is consumed in RP, resulting in a slightly higher ratio of modeled gross fixed C to N (55:1) and a slightly lower growth rate (Fig. 6a and b), while the pattern of the temporal segregation is basically unchanged (Fig. 6d). When the O2 inhibition on N2 fixation is weaker, by setting a higher of 10−1 mol O2 m−3, the model reached a much higher growth rate (0.53 day−1) with a lower gross fixed C-to-N ratio (23:1) (Fig. 6a and b). However, in this case, the modeled intracellular O2 is higher than the ambient O2, even when the N2 fixation rates are high (Fig. 6e), contradictory to our intention of this model and the common understandings that Trichodesmium needs to substantially reduce intracellular O2 to allow N2 fixation. The results of this experiment show that the modeled degree of temporal separation depends on the parameter , which sets the strength of the O2 inhibition on N2 fixation. The model can resolve a much less pronounced temporal separation (Fig. 6e) than that in the standard model (Fig. 2a) when the O2 inhibition is set to be weaker, while the modeled growth rate of Trichodesmium is still comparable to other reported observations (41, 53).Model experiments of O2 inhibition effect on N2 fixation. The percentage of reduced N2 fixation rate from its maximal rate under different intracellular O2 concentrations and model parameter using the Michaelis-Menten equation. Download FIG S5, PDF file, 0.1 MB.Upon further consideration of other reported observations showing that the gross C:N fixation ratio mainly ranges between 30 and 50 (5, 6, 13, 47), our model sensitivity tests narrowed ε and estimates to considerably smaller ranges of ≈10−4.5 to 10−4 and 10−2 to 10−1.5 mol O2 m−3, respectively, in which the modeled ratios of gross C and N fixations, growth rates, and intracellular levels are likely acceptable (Fig. 6).Our model also reveals the importance of RP in regulating the intracellular O2 of Trichodesmium, in which active RP not only directly consumes O2 but also downregulates PET and thus photosynthetic O2 production (5). Further model experiments without RP showed that the much higher intracellular O2 levels inhibit N2 fixation nearly entirely (see Fig. S6). The active role of RP can also be supported by the observed strong positive correlation between the expression of nitrogenase and cytochrome oxidase (the enzyme of respiration) in Trichodesmium (25). The RP of Trichodesmium is an extra-high indirect cost of N2 fixation (36) and is a carbon biomass efficiency trade-off strategy commonly adopted by other marine diazotrophs (54–56).Simulated rates of carbon and N2 fixations and O2 concentrations in the model experiment with no respiratory protection. Spatial segregation is not considered here. The thin black dashed line represents the ambient far-field O2 concentration set by the model. Download FIG S6, PDF file, 0.1 MB.AET can be another important mechanism in N2-fixing Trichodesmium. As already discussed, AET partly satisfies the higher ATP demand by N2 fixation. The fraction of PET electrons passing AET is substantially higher in Trichodesmium (48% ± 15%) than in nondiazotrophic cyanobacteria, such as Synechococcus (25%) (26, 57). Even the fraction of AET in Trichodesmium decreases when it grows with nitrate instead of N2 (8). Our modeled fraction of AET is 39% on a daily basis and has a daily rhythm similar to that of N2 fixation (see Fig. S7b), a phenomenon also found by Milligan et al. (8). Another important role of AET in Trichodesmium is to scavenge O2 produced in PSII (27, 28) and to thus protect nitrogenase (58, 59). In our model, AET scavenges 39% of O2 produced in PSII, at rates comparable to those of a previous observation (26). Turning off AET in the model, the increased photosynthetic O2 production (by 56%) elevates RP by 11% and reduces the growth rate by 62%.Theoretical and simulated fractions of PET electrons passing AET (fAET). (a) Evaluation of the ATP:NADPH ratio and fAET under different ratios of instantaneous N2 to carbon fixation rate. For the relation between the required ATP:NADPH supply ratio and the ratio of instantaneous N2 to carbon fixation rate, NADPH is required for both N2 and carbon fixation, and ATP is calculated as the total requirement by energy-consuming processes during the daytime, including CCM, carbon fixation, N2 fixation, and maintenance. For the relation between fAET and ATP: NADPH, = 56.7% and = 31.6% are the required values of fAET for PET to produce ATP and NADPH at the ratios (3:1 and 1.9:1) required by N2 and C fixations, respectively. fAET can also be calculated based on the ratio of instantaneous N2 to carbon fixation rate. (b) Simulated fAET (black dashed line) and N2 fixation rates (red solid line) during the light period in the model without spatial segregation. Download FIG S7, PDF file, 0.7 MB.There are other possible strategies that Trichodesmium may use to manage intracellular O2, but they are not considered in our model. For instance, diazotrophs may dynamically adjust their membrane permeability to O2 by redistributing hopanoid lipids in the membranes to cope with instantaneous requirements (24). The high abundance of Trichodesmium found on sinking particles implies that remineralization of particulate organic carbon may create a low-O2 microenvironment for Trichodesmium (60). The constitution of Trichodesmium colonies may also protect N2 fixation from into-cell O2 diffusion by forming O2-depleted microzones inside the colonies (61). High respiration rates of the heterotrophic bacteria attached to Trichodesmium colonies (62) might also help to create a hypoxic microenvironment. However, recent studies found that no anoxia formed inside the colonies during the light period (63, 64). Nevertheless, N2 fixation of Trichodesmium colonies is often reported to be lower than that of free trichomes (48, 65, 66). How colony formation helps Trichodesmium manage O2 and impacts its N2 fixation, as well as its evolutionary reason, requires further research.
Conclusions.
In this study, we constructed a physiological model of Trichodesmium to explore its conflict in O2-evolving photosynthesis and O2-inhibiting N2 fixation. Our study shows that N2 fixation of Trichodesmium is feasible without spatial separation from photosynthesis, consistent with observations in which it occurs in photosynthetic cells. Our model also suggests that the spatial segregation overall may not benefit Trichodesmium if substances lose during their transfer across cells. The model provides a mechanistic understanding behind the occurrence of N2 fixation despite the presence of photosynthesis across the trichome. Proper low cell permeability to O2, respiratory protection, and alternative electron transfer are key processes of Trichodesmium in its intracellular management to create the low-O2 window for N2 fixation. Given the diurnal changes of physiological activities simulated (e.g., photosynthetic electron transfer, carbon and nitrogen fixations), our model may be adapted in future studies to provide a further mechanistic insight regarding Trichodesmium, for example, into how limiting light intensity and other limiting nutrients such as iron can mediate the ATP and NAPDH production and other processes and then regulate diurnal patterns of growth and N2 fixation. Our model may also be used to advance our understanding of physiological processes in Trichodesmium colonies in their dynamic microenvironments by incorporating them into a proper physical framework.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In the following, we briefly describe schemes of the model without spatial segregation. The full model description, parameter values, and variables of both models without and with spatial segregation can be found in Text S1 and Tables S1 and S2 in the supplemental material.Fixed model parameters. Download Table S1, PDF file, 0.1 MB.Model variables. Download Table S2, PDF file, 0.1 MB.
Photosynthetic pathways.
A 12-h daylight cycle is set using a sine function (67) and drives a light-dependent PET rate (, in moles electrons per mole C per second), which is further inhibited by RP as already discussed:
where VRP (in moles C per mole C per second) is the RP rate described later and β [in (moles C)−1 (moles C · seconds)] is a parameter for the inhibition strength.The modeled PET is divided into LPET and AET at variable fractions. For each electron through LPET, 0.65 ATP, 0.5 NADPH, and 0.25 O2 are produced, while each electron through AET generates 0.65 ATP but no net NADPH or O2 (27). Note that this ATP production rate by AET is based on a pathway in which electrons cycle through the Mehler reaction (27), which appears to be the dominant AET pathway in Trichodesmium (8), although other AET pathways can have different ATP production rates (27).N2 fixation and C fixation require different ratios of ATP to NADPH (3:1 and 1.9:1, respectively; see below). At each time step, after calculating the N2 fixation rate, the model dynamically adjusts the fraction of AET in PET (fAET), and consequently the ratio of produced ATP to NADPH, to fulfill the requirements of the N2 fixation rate and maximize the C fixation (see Text S1 and Fig. S7a). Therefore, our model assumes a fully efficient adjustment of fractioning of PET into LPET and AET.
N2 fixation.
The N2 fixation, including N2 assimilation to NH4+ and NH4+ assimilation to glutamate, in the model consumes 9 ATP and 3 NADPH per fixed N atom (31, 32).A possible reason that N2 fixation of Trichodesmium primarily occurs during the light period is that NADPH required by N2 fixation may be completely provided by PET instead of respiring carbohydrates (39). Therefore, the maximal potential that N2 fixation can reach [, in moles N per (moles C per second)] in our model is when NADPH and ATP produced by PET are fully allocated to N2 fixation:
where = 56.7% is the required value of fAET for PET to produce ATP and NADPH at the ratio (3:1) required by N2 fixation, = 0.5 mol NADPH (mol electrons)−1 is the NADPH production quota of LPET, and = 3 mol NADPH (mol N)−1 is that required by N2 fixation.N2 fixation in the model also depends on the carbon skeleton (CS; in moles C per mole C), fixed N (in moles N per mole C), and intracellular O2 (in moles O2 per cubic meter):
where (in moles C per mole C) is the half-saturating coefficient of the carbon skeleton for N2 fixation. We assume that Trichodesmium tends to downregulate N2 fixation when the fixed N is approaching maximal N storage (Nmax, in moles N per mole C) (7). The model’s O2 inhibition on N2 fixation rate uses a Michaelis-Menten equation (35), in which the value of the half-saturation coefficient () for the inhibition has not been reported in the literature. Model experiments were then conducted to find and pair a value with another parameter, ε, as described below.
Carbon fixation.
Each inorganic carbon (Ci, including CO2 and HCO3−) is fixed into carbohydrates using 2 NADPH and 3 ATP, based on the stoichiometry of the Calvin-Benson cycle (30). Additional energy of 0.8 ATP per fixed C is used by assuming 50% Ci leakage, 80% Ci from HCO3–, and a transport cost of 0.5 ATP per HCO3– (68, 69). As mentioned above, the rate of carbon fixation is determined with fAET after the N2 fixation rate is calculated.The carbon skeleton CS value in the model is produced from carbohydrates without energy consumption or carbon loss (37). The production rate of the carbon skeleton (VCS, in moles C per mole C per second) is stimulated by the concentration of carbohydrates (CH2O, in moles C per mole C), as shown using a Michaelis-Menten equation (35) and is inhibited by its own accumulation (7):
where (in moles C per mole C per second) is the maximal production rate of the carbon skeleton, (in moles C per mole C) is the half-saturation constant of carbohydrates for carbon skeleton production, and CSmax (in moles C per mole C) is the maximal CS storage.
Respiratory protection.
To create a low-O2 environment for N2 fixation, high intracellular O2 stimulates RP. The rate of RP is also stimulated by the potential of N2 fixation, which is in turn elevated by light and CS and is limited by fixed N (7, 56). We then parameterized the rate of RP (in moles C per mole C per second), as follows:
where (in moles C per mole C per second) is the maximal RP rate and α (per micromole per square meter per second) is the initial slope of the photosynthesis versus light curve.
O2 diffusion.
The O2 diffusion rate between the cell cytoplasm and ambient environment (TO, in moles O2 per cubic meter per second) is simulated using a scheme from Staal et al. (40):
where is the ambient far-field O2 concentration set to a saturating concentration (0.213 mol O2 m−3) under typical ocean conditions of 34-PSU salinity and 25°C (70), dO (in square meters per second) is the O2 diffusion coefficient in seawater, L (in meters) and V (in cubic meters) are the length and volume of the trichome (simplified to cylindrical geometry), respectively, ε is the ratio of the O2 diffusion coefficient of the cell membrane to the dO and is estimated to be 10−4 by model experiments (described below), R (in meters) is the radius of the cytoplasm, L (in meters) is the thickness of the cell membrane, and L = 1,024 · (R + L) is the thickness of the boundary layer (64).
Integration of state variables during the daytime.
The temporal change rates of state variables of carbohydrates, carbon skeleton, fixed N, and intracellular O2 are represented in ordinary differential equations (ODEs), including all the fluxes described above. Note that NADPH and ATP are not stored but are fully consumed at each time step. Because all the rates described above have been normalized to carbon biomass, either volume, initial biomass, or the biomass concentration of Trichodesmium trichome does not need to be included in the model. An exception is for the ODE of intracellular O2 (in moles per cubic meter), in which the cellular carbon biomass concentration (QC, which is 18,333 mol C m−3) (71) is used to convert carbon-normalized biological fluxes of O2:
where is the biological production and consumption of O2 (by RP) in moles of O2 per mole C per second). These ODEs are integrated over the light period by using the MATLAB ode15s integrator (72).
Biosynthesis and growth rate.
Trichodesmium might store fixed C and N during the daytime and assimilate them into biomass, mainly during the dark period (6). Therefore, for simplification, the model calculates the amount of biomass (Bio, in moles C per moles C) that can be synthesized using the carbohydrates, carbon skeletons, and fixed N at the end of the light period. Bio is the smaller of N-based (BioN) and C-based biomass (BioC), with BioN being calculated by dividing fixed N by the molar ratio N:C (0.159) (46). BioC is calculated from the carbohydrates and carbon skeleton, considering the mass and energy balance. The energy needed for biosynthesis is derived from the respiration of carbohydrates ():
where (= 2 mol ATP per mol C) is the ATP requirement rate for biosynthesis (7), γMT (= 10%) represents additional energy used in maintenance, referring to all cellular processes (e.g., nutrient uptake and DNA protection) that are incalculable but require energy (38), and (= 5 mol ATP per mol C) is the ATP production rate from respiring carbohydrates (73). Then, the nonrespired carbohydrates and all carbon skeletons can be directly used to synthesize biomass:BioC and are the two unknown variables in equations 8 and 9 and thus can be solved. Noting that all the rates have been normalized to carbon biomass, Bio is therefore the relative increase in biomass over 1 day. The growth rate (G) is then the natural log of (1 + Bio) divided by 1 day.
Optimization of model parameters.
Our optimality-based model assumes Trichodesmium can regulate its intracellular processes to maximize its growth (74). In the model without spatial segregation, several important parameters, whose values are largely unknown from the literature, were optimized in large bounded ranges by using the MATLAB global optimizer MultiStart (Table 2). These optimized parameters include those related to carbon skeleton production ( and ), N2 fixation (), and RP (). Other parameters (see Table S1 in the supplemental material) are fixed because they are either elemental or are energy stoichiometries of metabolic activities largely constrained by known biochemical reactions, morphological parameters of Trichodesmium, and boundary conditions (e.g., light intensity and ambient O2 concentration), or they are derived from model experiments ( and ε). To fairly compare results, for the model with spatial segregation we used the same parameter values as those for the model without spatial segregation, except for , which was reoptimized to a lower value in the model with spatial segregation (Table 2), reflecting that RP was less demanded.
TABLE 2
Optimized model parameters
Symbol
Units
Description
Initial range
Value after optimization
kCSNF
mol C (mol C)−1
Half-saturating coefficient of carbon skeleton for N2 fixation
[0, 1]a
0.06
vCSmax
mol C (mol C)−1 s−1
Maximal production rate of carbon skeleton
[0, 5.0 × 10−4]b
3.7 × 10−6
kCH2OCS
mol C (mol C)−1
Half-saturating coefficient of carbohydrate for carbon skeleton production
The upper bounds are the maximal potential of organic carbon that can be fixed over the diurnal cycle.
The upper bounds are the maximal potential of the O2 production rate in photosystem II.
Optimized model parametersThe upper bounds are the maximal potential of organic carbon that can be fixed over the diurnal cycle.The upper bounds are the maximal potential of the O2 production rate in photosystem II.
Model experiments with the spatial segregation considering a cost for material transfer.
For the model with spatial segregation, given that N2 fixation is segregated from photosynthesis and is confined in diazocytes, the potential cost for the intercellular materials transfer was considered, including the loss of ATP, NADPH, and carbohydrate transferred into diazocytes and the loss of fixed N transfer into photosynthetic cells. To quantitively evaluate the effect of transfer cost on N2 fixation and growth rates, for simplicity we set the same loss fraction of transferred materials, ranging from 0% to 80%.
Model availability.
All data generated or analyzed in this study are included in this article and its supplemental material. The code of the model in this study is available on Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6774659).
Authors: Hanna Farnelid; Kendra Turk-Kubo; Helle Ploug; Justin E Ossolinski; James R Collins; Benjamin A S Van Mooy; Jonathan P Zehr Journal: ISME J Date: 2018-08-16 Impact factor: 10.302
Authors: Ya-Wei Luo; Dalin Shi; Sven A Kranz; Brian M Hopkinson; Haizheng Hong; Rong Shen; Futing Zhang Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2019-04-03 Impact factor: 14.919