| Literature DB >> 30944323 |
Ya-Wei Luo1, Dalin Shi2, Sven A Kranz3, Brian M Hopkinson4, Haizheng Hong5, Rong Shen5, Futing Zhang5.
Abstract
The response of the prominent marine dinitrogen (N2)-fixing cyanobacteriaEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30944323 PMCID: PMC6447586 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-09554-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Fig. 1Trichodesmium cellular model structure. The intracellular Fe (red) and produced energy (purple) are allocated to different cellular processes. The dashed circles and ellipses pointed by OA indicate processes that are influenced by ocean acidification. The two flows with question mark represent unknown parameters to be optimized to maximize Trichodesmium growth
Treatments and results of Trichodesmium manipulation experiments
| FeT (nM) | Fe′ (pM) | Specific growth rate (d−1) | N2 fixation [mol N (mol C)−1 d−1] | POC:PON | Intracellular Fe Quota [μmol Fe (mol C)−1] | Nitrogenase IUE [mol N (mol Fe)−1 d−1] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total ( | Nitrogen-ase | Photo-systems | Mainten-ance | Metabolism | Storage | ||||||
| 10.5 | 32.0 | 0.31 ± 0.01 | 0.056 ± 0.003 | 5.6 | 27.9 | 16.1 ± 1.9 | 6.1 ± 0.6 |
| 24.8 | 3.1 | 3470 |
| 50.5 | 155 | 0.39 ± 0.01 | 88.6 | ||||||||
| 150 | 461 | 0.49 ± 0.01 | 198 | ||||||||
| 250 | 767 | 0.53 ± 0.02 | 287 | ||||||||
| 300 | 920 | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.109 ± 0.002 | 5.1 | 328 | 37.8 ± 4.5 | 13.0 ± 0.2 |
| 55.5 | 272.8 | 2880 |
| 32.5 | 39.5 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 0.032 ± 0.001 | 5.9 | 32.5 | 27.0 ± 5.1 | 3.7 ± 0.6 | 1.86 | 32.5 | 0 | 1200 |
| 125 | 153 | 0.30 ± 0.01 | 87.8 | ||||||||
| 380 | 463 | 0.43 ± 0.04 | 198 | ||||||||
| 765 | 931 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.095 ± 0.014 | 5.1 | 331 | 43.6 ± 3.4 | 16.7 ± 0.8 |
| 64.3 | 266.7 | 2180 |
Errors denote 1 s.d. (n = 3)
FeT concentration of total dissolved Fe in medium, Fe′ concentration of dissolved inorganic Fe in medium
Fig. 2Illumination of model schemes. a Fe storage model scheme and b nitrogenase Fe-determined N2 fixation rate model scheme compared with the experimental data under ambient (blue) and acidified (red) conditions. c Energy production model scheme (black line) and the estimates (colored bars) of energy allocation to different cellular processes in the culture experiments under ambient (Amb.) and acidified (OA) conditions. For experimental data, error bars represent the s.d. of biological replicates (n = 3)
Energy consumption rates of Trichodesmium cellular processes under ambient condition
| ATP hydrolysis | NADPH oxidation | Energy consumption ratea | References | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C fixation | 3 per C | 2 per C | 590 kJ (mol C)−1 | Raven et al.[ |
| CCM | 1.92 per Cb | 96 kJ (mol C)−1 | ||
| N fixation include: | 9 per N | 3 per N | 1,110 kJ (mol N)−1 | |
| = 198 kJ (mol C)−1 c | ||||
| N2 assimilation to NH4+ | 8 per N | 2 per N | Flores and Herrero[ | |
| NH4+ assimilation to glutamate | 1 per N | 1 per N | Flores et al.[ | |
| Maintenance and other processes | 100 kJ (mol C)−1 | ~10% of total energy consumption | ||
| Total | 984 kJ (mol C)−1 |
aEnergy consumption rate was estimated based on the free energy of 50 kJ (mol ATP hydrolysis)−1 and of 220 kJ (mol NADPH oxidation)−1 [31]
bAssuming 80% HCO3− use and 50% CO2 leakage[9], and a transport cost of 1.2 ATP per HCO3– [30]
cUsing C:N = 5.6 to convert energy consumption of N fixation to C unit
Fig. 3Cellular model simulation results. a Specific growth rate, b N2 fixation rate, c amount of Fe allocated to nitrogenase, and d amount of Fe allocated to photosystems under ambient (blue), and acidified (red) conditions, compared to the observations. e Growth rate and f the relative change of growth rate compared to that under pH 8.02 over ranges of seawater pH and intracellular Fe levels. For experimental data, error bars represent the s.d. of biological replicates (n = 3)
Fig. 4Comparison of modeled individual impact of ocean acidification (OA) on Trichodesmium. The pH changes from 8.02 to 7.82 and pCO2 changes accordingly in the simulations. a Relative changes of growth rate when the model enables each of the OA impacts. Also shown the relative changes of nitrogenase Fe, photosystems Fe, and energy production when the model enables b anti-stress energy or c the reduced nitrogenase efficiency as the only OA impact
Fig. 5The projected Trichodesmium N2 fixation potential. a Results [mmol N (mol C)−1 d−1] in 1990s and b relative change from 1990s to 2090s
Model variables and parameters
| Symbol | Unit | Description | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
|
| μmol Fe (mol C)−1 | Total intracellular Fe quota | |
| pH | pH value in medium | ||
| μatm | Partial pressure of medium dissolved CO2 | ||
|
| |||
|
| Fraction of metabolic Fe allocated to photosystems | ||
|
| Fraction of produced energy allocated to C fixation | ||
|
| |||
|
| Medium pH value under baseline condition | 8.02 | |
|
| μatm | Medium | 400 |
|
| μmol Fe (mol C)−1 | Critical | 24.4 |
| OAST | Coefficient representing the strength of OA impact on Fe storage threshold | 0.71 | |
|
| Portion of luxury Fe uptake | 90% | |
|
| kJ (mol C)−1 d−1 | Maximum cellular energy production rate | 2060 |
|
| μmol Fe (mol C)−1 | Half-saturating coefficient for energy production | 35 |
| ecCF | kJ (mol C)−1 | Energy consumption rate of carbon fixation | 590 |
|
| Contribution of HCO3− to total inorganic carbon uptake under baseline condition | 80% | |
|
| Percentage of total inorganic carbon uptake leaked as CO2 | 50% | |
| OAlk | Coefficient representing relative reduction of CO2 leakage with increasing medium CO2 | 0.1 | |
| ecCCM | kJ (mol C)−1 | Energy consumption rate of HCO3− transportation | 60 |
| ecAtS | kJ (mol C)−1 | Coefficient representing energy consumption rate for anti-stress | 780 |
| ecMT | kJ (mol C)−1 | Energy consumption rate of maintenance | 90 |
| ecNF | kJ (mol N)−1 | Energy consumption rate of N2 fixation | 1 110 |
| IUEMT | mol C (μmol Fe)−1 d−1 | Fe use efficiency in maintenance | 0.12 |
|
| μmol Fe (mol C)−1 | Reference nitrogenase Fe used in representing impact of pH on nitrogenase efficiency | 25 |
| NFmax | mol N (mol C)−1 d−1 | Maximum N2 fixation rate | 0.37 |
|
| μmol Fe (mol C)−1 | Half-saturating coefficient for N2 fixation | 91 |
|
| mol C (mol N)−1 | Carbon to nitrogen ratio of | 5.6 |