| Literature DB >> 35862742 |
Jacob McPherson1, Chenlin Hu1, Khurshida Begum1, Weiqun Wang1, Chris Lancaster1, Anne J Gonzales-Luna1, Caroline Loveall1, Michael H Silverman2, M Jahangir Alam1, Kevin W Garey1.
Abstract
Reduction of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) recurrence is an essential endpoint for CDI-directed antibiotic development that is often not evaluated until Phase III trials. The purpose of this project was to use a functional and metagenomic approach to predict the potential anti-CDI recurrence effect of ibezapolstat, a DNA polymerase IIIC inhibitor, in clinical development for CDI. As part of the Phase I ibezapolstat clinical study, stool samples were collected from 22 healthy volunteers, who were given either ibezapolstat or vancomycin. Stool samples were evaluated for microbiome changes and bile acid concentrations. Ibezapolstat 450 mg and vancomycin, but not ibezapolstat 300 mg, showed statistically significant changes in alpha diversity over time compared to that of a placebo. Beta diversity changes confirmed that microbiota were significantly different between study groups. Vancomycin had a more wide-ranging effect on the microbiome, characterized by an increased proportion of Gammaproteobacteria. Ibezapolstat demonstrated an increased proportion of Actinobacteria, including the Bifidobacteriaceae family. Using a linear regression analysis, vancomycin was associated with significant increases in primary bile acids as well as primary:secondary bile acid ratios. An overabundance of Enterobacteriaceae was most highly correlated with primary bile acid concentrations (r = 0.63; P < 0.0001). Using Phase I healthy volunteer samples, beneficial changes suggestive of a lower risk of CDI recurrence were associated with ibezapolstat compared to vancomycin. This novel omics approach may allow for better and earlier prediction of anti-CDI recurrence effects for antibiotics in the clinical development pipeline.Entities:
Keywords: Clostridioides difficile; bile acids; clinical trial; human subjects; metagenomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35862742 PMCID: PMC9380534 DOI: 10.1128/aac.02244-21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother ISSN: 0066-4804 Impact factor: 5.938
FIG 1Subject specific changes in alpha diversity (A) and phylum-level proportions (B) during the study time period. Each box represents 1 patient given a 10-day course of the study drug or a placebo over a 13-day study period.
Comparison of (A) daily alpha diversity and (B) bile acid changes during therapy for ibezapolstat versus oral vancomycin
| Analysis | Ibezapolstat 300 mg (*) | Ibezapolstat 450 mg (*) | Vancomycin 125 mg (*) |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. Alpha diversity analysis | |||
| Shannon | −0.12 ± 0.12 (0.31) | −0.45 ± 0.12 (0.0001) | −0.36 ± 0.11 (0.0014) |
| Simpson's | −0.013 ± 0.023 (0.59) | −0.072 ± 0.022 (0.0019) | −0.070 ± 0.023 (0.0020) |
| Pielous | −0.0040 ± 0.024 (0.87) | −0.051 ± 0.024 (0.031) | −0.073 ± 0.024 (0.0016) |
| B. Bile acid analysis | |||
| 1° bile acids, μg/L | −3.7 ± 172 (0.98) | 307 ± 161 (0.061) | 963 ± 146 (<0.001) |
| 2° bile acids, μg/L | −913 ± 675 (0.18) | −971 ± 629 (0.13) | −1,266 ± 570 (0.030) |
| 1°:2° bile acid ratio | −1.3 ± 4.1 (0.75) | 6.2 ± 3.8 (0.11) | 19 ± 3.5 (<0.0001) |
Numbers represent average change ± standard deviation over the study time period. A negative (−) number represents decreased (A) diversity or (B) bile acid concentration. 1°: primary; 2°: secondary; *, P value versus placebo, controlling for patient age, weight, and sex.
FIG 2Summary estimates of alpha diversity over time by treatment group, measured by Shannon’s Entropy (A) or Simpson’s Index (B) and beta diversity measured at baseline (C) or after at least 5 days of therapy (D).
FIG 3Effects of vancomycin (A) and ibezapolstat (B) on the relative abundance of taxa at baseline versus end of therapy. Significantly higher relative abundance taxa at end of therapy are represented in red, while significantly lower relative abundance taxa at end of therapy are represented in green.
Proportional changes in taxa in healthy subjects given vancomycin or one of two doses of ibezapolstat
| Vancomycin 125 mg | Ibezapolstat 300 mg | Ibezapolstat 450 mg | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Taxa (bold indicates phylum) | Proportional change (mean ± SE) |
| Proportional change (mean ± SE) |
| Proportional change (mean ± SE) |
|
|
| −0.11 ± 0.05 | 0.032 | 0.31 ± 0.053 | <0.0001 | 0.31 ± 0.054 | <0.0001 |
| c_Actinobacteria | −0.074 ± 0.051 | 0.14 | 0.27 ± 0.052 | <0.0001 | 0.29 ± 0.053 | <0.0001 |
| c_Actinobacteria o_Bifidobacteriales f_Bifidobacteriaceae | −0.078 ± 0.051 | 0.1293 | 0.27 ± 0.053 | <0.0001 | 0.29 ± 0.053 | <0.0001 |
| c_Actinobacteria o_Bifidobacteriales | −0.080 ± 0.051 | 0.1201 | 0.27 ± 0.053 | <0.0001 | 0.29 ± 0.053 | <0.0001 |
| c_Coriobacteriia | −0.038 ± 0.015 | 0.0145 | 0.036 ± 0.016 | 0.0221 | 0.024 ± 00.16 | 0.1431 |
| c_Coriobacteriia o_Coriobacteriales | −0.031 ± 0.015 | 0.0375 | 0.035 ± 0.016 | 0.0264 | 0.026 ± 0.016 | 0.1013 |
| c_Coriobacteriia o_Coriobacteriales f_Coriobacteriaceae | −0.032 ± 0.015 | 0.0338 | 0.034 ± 0.016 | 0.0298 | 0.025 ± 0.016 | 0.1122 |
|
| −0.034 ± 0.024 | 0.16 | −0.0055 ± 0.025 | 0.83 | −0.013 ± 0.025 | 0.61 |
|
| −0.14 ± 0.058 | 0.014 | −0.47 ± 0.060 | <0.0001 | −0.50 ± 0.06 | <0.0001 |
| c_Clostridia | −0.50 ± 0.052 | <0.0001 | −0.49 ± 0.054 | <0.0001 | −0.52 ± 0.054 | <0.0001 |
| c_Clostridia o_Clostridiales | −0.50 ± 0.052 | <0.0001 | −0.49 ± 0.054 | <0.0001 | −0.52 ± 0.054 | <0.0001 |
| c_Clostridia o_Clostridiales f_Lachnospiraceae | −0.24 ± 0.024 | <0.0001 | −0.22 ± 0.025 | <0.0001 | −0.26 ± 0.025 | <0.0001 |
| c_Clostridia o_Clostridiales f_Ruminococcaceae | −0.25 ± 0.033 | <0.0001 | −0.27 ± 0.034 | <0.0001 | −0.25 ± 0.035 | <0.0001 |
| c_Bacilli | 0.30 ± 0.043 | <0.0001 | 0.016 ± 0.044 | 0.72 | 0.017 ± 0.045 | 0.39 |
| c_Bacilli o_Lactobacillales | 0.30 ± 0.043 | <0.0001 | 0.016 ± 0.044 | 0.7117 | 0.017 ± 0.045 | 0.6972 |
| c_Bacilli o_Lactobacillales f_Lactobacillaceae | 0.28 ± 0.041 | <0.0001 | 0.024 ± 0.042 | 0.5755 | 0.015 ± 0.043 | 0.7307 |
|
| 0.036 ± 0.015 | 0.0165 | 0.0011 ± 0.015 | 0.9414 | 0.00046 ± 0.015 | 0.9762 |
|
| 0.23 ± 0.045 | <0.0001 | 0.12 ± 0.0.5 | 0.0094 | 0.09 ± 0.0.5 | 0.053 |
| c_Gammaproteobacteria | 0.21 ± 0.045 | <0.0001 | 0.12 ± 0.046 | 0.0094 | 0.092 ± 0.046 | 0.0478 |
| c_Gammaproteobacteria o_Enterobacterales | 0.17 ± 0.042 | <0.0001 | 0.11 ± 0.043 | 0.0099 | 0.094 ± 0.044 | 0.0336 |
| c_Gammaproteobacteria o_Enterobacterales f_Enterobacteriaceae | 0.17 ± 0.041 | <0.0001 | 0.11 ± 0.042 | 0.0082 | 0.087 ± 0.043 | 0.043 |
c: class; o: order; f: family. Dark gray shading indicates at least a 10% increase in relative proportion compared to baseline, and light gray shading represents a 10% decrease in relative proportion compared to baseline (only variables with a P < 0.005 significance colored).
FIG 4Summary of the changes of primary (A) and secondary (B), as well as the ratio of primary:secondary bile acids (C) over time. Values represent mean ± standard error.
Correlation of microbiota with bile acids
| Family | Primary bile acids |
| Secondary bile acids |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacteroidaceae | −0.20096 | 0.103 | −0.10486 | 0.3984 |
| Bifidobacteriaceae | −0.07082 | 0.569 | −0.03019 | 0.8084 |
| Coriobacteriaceae | −0.23574 | 0.0548 | −0.02838 | 0.8197 |
|
|
|
| −0.16676 | 0.1774 |
| Erysipelotrichaceae | −0.12744 | 0.3041 | −0.03216 | 0.7962 |
| Fusobacteriaceae | −0.0662 | 0.5946 | −0.04921 | 0.6925 |
| Lachnospiraceae | −0.33184 | 0.0061 | 0.01017 | 0.9349 |
| Lactobacillaceae | 0.26868 | 0.0279 | −0.09527 | 0.4432 |
| Methanobacteriaceae | 0.00194 | 0.9876 | −0.01041 | 0.9333 |
| Pseudomonadaceae | 0.27146 | 0.0263 | 0.37721 | 0.006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boldface entries indicate analyses that were statistically significant.
FIG 5BaiCD gene cluster prevalence and abundance by therapy assignment.