| Literature DB >> 35860247 |
Xiao Lin1, Aixin Song1, Junfeng Lu1, Sujun Zheng1, Zhongjie Hu1, Lina Ma1, Zhenhuan Cao2, Hong Li2, Yanhong Zheng1, Shan Ren1, Xinyue Chen1.
Abstract
Background: Studies about the retreatment and predictors for patients with hepatitis B recurrence after functional cure are rare. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of retreatment, outcome, and potential predictors of recurrence in patients with recurrence after functional cure.Entities:
Keywords: HBV; hepatitis B core antibody; hepatitis B surface antibody; high clearance rate; outcome; recurrence; retreatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35860247 PMCID: PMC9289245 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.879835
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Basic information of the 32 patients at the time of recurrence.
| Patient | Gender | Age (years) | Recurrence time‡ (weeks) | HBsAg£ (IU/ml) | anti-HBs£ (IU/L) | HBeAg£ (COI) | HBV DNA£ (IU/ml) | ALT£ (U/L) | S-region variant | Drug resistance detection |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1♦/★ | Female | 31 | 47 | 0.287 | <2 | 0.120 | <20 | 12.5 | / | / |
| 2♦/★ | Female | 24 | 208 | 1.680 | 7.66 | 0.100 | <20 | 11.7 | / | / |
| 3♦/★ | Female | 56 | 52 | 0.052 | 20.36 | 0.112 | <20 | 22.1 | / | / |
| 4♦/★ | Male | 39 | 134 | 0.089 | <2 | 0.105 | <20 | 26.2 | / | / |
| 5♦ | Female | 20 | 147 | 1.750 | 185.40 | 0.102 | <20 | 7.8 | / | / |
| 6♦ | Male | 27 | 52 | 0.413 | 23.24 | 0.076 | <20 | 37.8 | / | / |
| 7♦ | Male | 36 | 48 | 0.621 | 836.40 | 0.112 | <20 | 19.4 | / | / |
| 8♦ | Male | 45 | 60 | 0.055 | <2 | 0.111 | <20 | 20.0 | / | / |
| 9♦ | Female | 42 | 25 | 0.166 | 24.99 | 0.104 | <20 | 20.1 | / | / |
| 10♦ | Female | 43 | 154 | 0.197 | 39.56 | 0.507 | <20 | 11.2 | / | / |
| 11♦ | Female | 34 | 46 | 2.000 | <2 | 0.099 | <20 | 10.4 | / | / |
| 12♦ | Female | 30 | 20 | 0.082 | 23.25 | 0.086 | <20 | 9.0 | / | / |
| 13♦ | Male | 49 | 48 | 1.200 | 38.41 | 0.128 | <20 | 25.3 | / | / |
| 14♦ | Female | 44 | 48 | 2.770 | 767.20 | 0.116 | <20 | 8.9 | / | / |
| 15♦ | Female | 31 | 60 | 0.073 | 32.89 | 0.131 | <20 | 7.0 | / | / |
| 16♦ | Female | 32 | 21 | 1.540 | 517.90 | 0.139 | <20 | 12.3 | / | / |
| 17♦ | Male | 49 | 28 | 0.301 | 205.90 | 0.103 | <20 | 16.0 | / | / |
| 18♦ | Male | 34 | 18 | 0.052 | 36.94 | 0.091 | <20 | 24.7 | / | / |
| 19★ | Female | 26 | 39 | 184.800 | <2 | 0.112 | 1.66E+2 - 2.56E+3 | 4.8 | Negative | Negative |
| 20★ | Male | 35 | 21 | 168.000 | >1,000 | 0.157 | 6.21E+2 - 1.70E+8 | 27.7 | sI126T | Negative |
| 21★ | Male | 33 | 188 | 2.460 | <2 | 0.099 | 3.45E+1 | 28.4 | / | / |
| 22★ | Male | 55 | 34 | 12,602.000 | 785.50 | 1,703.000 | 3.02E+7 | 243.2 | Negative | rtL180M, rtM204V, |
| 23★ | Male | 28 | 43 | 2.440 | 211.80 | 0.076 | 7.02E+3 | 31.5 | sI126T, | Negative |
| 24★ | Male | 26 | 73 | 0.437 | 3.50 | 0.108 | 2.02E+1 | 16.8 | / | / |
| 25★ | Male | 26 | 48 | 0.21 | <2 | 0.121 | 1.30E+1 | 10.0 | / | / |
| 26□ | Male | 51 | 99 | <0.05 | 530.80 | 0.164 | 4.28E+1 | 20.4 | / | / |
| 27□/★ | Male | 38 | 43 | <0.05 | 489.00 | 0.120 | 4.94E+1-2.09E+5 | 35.8 | Negative | Negative |
| 28□ | Male | 54 | 208 | <0.05 | 59.44 | 0.095 | 2.14E+1 | 21.5 | / | / |
| 29□ | Male | 44 | 34 | <0.05 | 88.10 | 0.180 | 1.71E+3 | 15.0 | sD144A | Negative |
| 30□ | Female | 62 | 156 | <0.05 | <2 | 0.107 | 2.47E+1 | 35.0 | / | / |
| 31□ | Male | 46 | 52 | <0.05 | >1,000 | 0.113 | 2.12E+1 | 27.4 | / | / |
| 32□ | Male | 52 | 375 | <0.05 | 7.93 | 0.207 | 2.60E+1 | 35.0 | / | / |
ALT, alanine aminotransferase. Type of recurrence: ♦type I; ★type II; □type III; ♦/★ type I at the time of recurrence and then converted to type II; □/★ type III at the time of recurrence and then converted to type II; ‡ weeks from the date of treatment cessation to the recurrence; £ viral quantities and ALT at recurrence; “/” represents not tested.
Therapeutic method and outcomes of 15 patients who were treated immediately after recurrence.
| Patient | Follow-up time(weeks)§ | Therapy | Functional cure(weeks) | Consolidation therapy(weeks) | Therapy duration(weeks) | Follow-up after treatment cessation(weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12♦ | 52 | Peg-IFN | 12 | 24 | 36 | 16 |
| 13♦ | 532 | Peg-IFN | 12 | 12 | 24 | 508 |
| 14♦ | 221 | Peg-IFN | 32 | 12 | 44 | 177 |
| 15♦ | 62 | Peg-IFN | 12 | 14 | 26 | 36 |
| 16♦ | 288 | ETV+Peg-IFN | 32 | 26 | 58 | 230 |
| 17♦ | 168 | ETV+ Peg-IFN & | 36 | 36 | 72 | 22 |
| 18♦ | 329 | ETV | – | – | 329 | / |
| 21★ | 224 | ETV+Peg-IFN | 12 | 24 | 36 | 188 |
| 22★ | 208 | ETV+TDF+Peg-IFN & | – | – | 60 | / |
| 23★ | 370 | ETV | - | - | 370 | / |
| 24★ | 284 | TDF | – | – | 284 | / |
| 25★ | 66 | ETV+Peg-IFN | 42 | 12 | 54 | 12 |
| 28□ | 444 | TDF+ Peg-IFN | 16 | 32 | 48 | 396 |
| 29□ | 392 | TDF | - | - | 392 | / |
| 32□ | 52 | TDF+Peg-IFN | 28 | 12 | 40 | 12 |
Peg-IFN, pegylated interferon; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; ETV, entecavir. §weeks from the date of recurrence to the last follow-up; &NA treatment was administered first, then combined with Peg-IFN treatment; “/” represents the patient was still under treatment at the last follow-up.
Figure 1Sankey diagram of the 8 cases of recurrence. (A) Follow-up retreatment of 17 relapsed patients selected for dynamic observation initially. (B) Follow-up retreatment of 8 relapsed patients with hepatitis B serological changes. I, II, and III in the figure represent the type of recurrence, and the Arabic numerals represent the number of cases.
Therapeutic method and outcomes of 5 patients who were under dynamic observation initially, followed by treatment.
| Patient | Follow-up time(weeks)§ | Therapy | Functional cure(weeks) | Consolidation therapy(weeks) | Therapy duration(weeks) | Follow-up after treatment cessation(weeks) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3♦/★ | 357 | ETV+Peg-IFN | 12 | 24 | 36 | 144 |
| 4♦/★ | 296 | ETV | - | - | 166 | / |
| 6♦ | 402 | Peg-IFN | 60 | 24 | 84 | 114 |
| 20★ | 227 | TDF+Peg-IFN & | - | - | 92 | / |
| 27□/★ | 258 | TDF+Peg-IFN | 32 | 20 | 52 | 141 |
Peg-IFN, pegylated interferon; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; ETV, entecavir. §weeks from the date of recurrence to the last follow-up; &NA treatment was administered first, then combined with Peg-IFN treatment; “/”represents the patient was still under treatment at the last follow-up.
Figure 2Anti-HBs (A) and anti-HBc (B) levels at different time points between recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
Figure 3AUROC of recurrence predictors. (A) AUROC of anti-HBc at drug withdrawal and combining predictors; (B) AUROC of anti-HBs at drug withdrawal.