Benjamin A Black1, Michael Manga2, Lujendra Ojha1, Marc-Antoine Longpré3,4, Suniti Karunatillake5, Lisa Hlinka3,4. 1. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Rutgers University Piscataway NJ USA. 2. Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences University of California, Berkeley Berkeley CA USA. 3. School of Earth and Environmental Sciences Queens College, City University of New York Queens NY USA. 4. Earth and Environmental Sciences The Graduate Center, City University of New York New York NY USA. 5. Department of Geology and Geophysics Louisiana State University Baton Rouge LA USA.
Abstract
Water inventories in Martian magmas are poorly constrained. Meteorite-based estimates range widely, from 102 to >104 ppm H2O, and are likely variably influenced by degassing. Orbital measurements of H primarily reflect water cycled and stored in the regolith. Like water, Th behaves incompatibly during mantle melting, but unlike water Th is not prone to degassing and is relatively immobile during aqueous alteration at low temperature. We employ Th as a proxy for original, mantle-derived H2O in Martian magmas. We use regional maps of Th from Mars Odyssey to assess variations in magmatic water across major volcanic provinces and through time. We infer that Hesperian and Amazonian magmas had ∼100-3,000 ppm H2O, in the lower range of previous estimates. The implied cumulative outgassing since the Hesperian, equivalent to a global H2O layer ∼1-40 m deep, agrees with Mars' present-day surface and near-surface water inventory and estimates of sequestration and loss rates.
Water inventories in Martian magmas are poorly constrained. Meteorite-based estimates range widely, from 102 to >104 ppm H2O, and are likely variably influenced by degassing. Orbital measurements of H primarily reflect water cycled and stored in the regolith. Like water, Th behaves incompatibly during mantle melting, but unlike water Th is not prone to degassing and is relatively immobile during aqueous alteration at low temperature. We employ Th as a proxy for original, mantle-derived H2O in Martian magmas. We use regional maps of Th from Mars Odyssey to assess variations in magmatic water across major volcanic provinces and through time. We infer that Hesperian and Amazonian magmas had ∼100-3,000 ppm H2O, in the lower range of previous estimates. The implied cumulative outgassing since the Hesperian, equivalent to a global H2O layer ∼1-40 m deep, agrees with Mars' present-day surface and near-surface water inventory and estimates of sequestration and loss rates.
The concentration of water in Martian magmas is critical to their petrologic evolution (Balta & McSween, 2013; Filiberto & Treiman, 2009; McSween et al., 2001), eruptibility (Black & Manga, 2016), and explosivity (Moitra et al., 2021). Magmatic water has also strongly influenced the evolution of the Martian hydrosphere (Grott et al., 2011; McSween & Harvey, 1993), with water inventory in the zone of exchange between the Martian crust and atmosphere controlled by the balance between volcanism, mineral sequestration, and loss to space (e.g., Carr & Head, 2015; Scheller et al., 2021). Water outgassing from magmas is thought to be the underlying source for surface water inventories ultimately involved in formation of Martian rivers, lakes or proposed Martian oceans (Clifford & Parker, 2001; Perron et al., 2007). Existing constraints on magmatic water inventories from experimental petrology and meteorites span more than an order of magnitude, from <1,000 to 20,000 ppm (0.1–2 wt.%) H2O (e.g., Filiberto et al., 2016; Filiberto & Treiman, 2009; McCubbin et al., 2010, 2016; McSween et al., 2001). This range in magma H2O contents corresponds to a range in expected outgassing of global equivalent water depths of ∼101–102 m (McSween & Harvey, 1993). Assuming 10,000 ppm (1 wt.%) H2O in Martian magmas, Carr and Head (2015) back‐calculated from present‐day surface and near‐surface water inventories to estimate cumulative Hesperian to Amazonian outgassing of ∼8 m global equivalent water, with the majority of the present‐day water surface and near‐surface water inventory carried over from the Noachian.Médard and Grove (2006) suggested that Noachian magmas might have been water‐rich, with progressive dewatering of the mantle through subsequent volcanic degassing. Unlike on Earth, the absence of plate tectonics on Mars prevents rehydration of the mantle. Evolving melting conditions through time (Baratoux et al., 2011) could modify the initial volatile budgets of Martian magmas, raising the possibility of secular shifts in magmatic volatiles that could link mantle geodynamics to changes in surface environments on long timescales.Testing these ideas requires an improved understanding of the history of igneous H2O on Mars. However, constraints on water from Martian meteorites mostly span a limited Amazonian age range, with a few exceptions such as NWA7533 (Humayun et al., 2013) and ALH84001 (Nyquist et al., 2001). Meteorites also represent isolated samples of specific locations, for example, in Tharsis (Lagain et al., 2021), that may not sample regional chemical variations around Mars (Filiberto, 2017; Filiberto et al., 2016). Moreover, degassing during magma ascent and eruption obscures original, mantle‐derived volatile concentrations (McSween & Harvey, 1993).The Gamma Ray Spectrometer (GRS) on the Mars Odyssey spacecraft provides regional‐scale distributions of major and trace elements including Si, Cl, K, Fe, H, and Th (Boynton et al., 2007) spanning Martian equatorial to mid‐latitudes (±50°). These spectrally derived chemical maps are laterally coarse at ∼102 km scale resolution, and are sensitive to decimeter‐scale depths (Baratoux et al., 2011; Boynton et al., 2007; Feldman et al., 2002; Taylor et al., 2010), revealing strong, regionally consistent distinctions in measured chemical compositions across Mars. GRS measurements of H yield near‐surface water inventories (Boynton et al., 2007; Feldman et al., 2002; Hood et al., 2019), which reflect the shallow cycling of water in the regolith rather than original igneous distributions.Here, we explore the use of the incompatible element Th as a proxy for the original, undegassed H2O concentrations imparted to Martian magmas during mantle melting, which we refer to as the primary magmatic H2O. Trace element proxies for volatiles in magmas are increasingly applied on Earth to constrain volatile concentrations prior to degassing, on the assumption that proxies can be selected for partitioning behavior during melting and crystallization that resembles specific volatile elements, with the crucial difference that they are impervious to degassing (Rosenthal et al., 2015; Saal et al., 2002). Based on similar bulk partition coefficients during melting of Earth's mantle, Th, Nb, and Ba have been used as proxies for CO2 (Rosenthal et al., 2015; Saal et al., 2002), Ce has been used as a proxy for H2O (e.g., Dixon et al., 2002), and K and Nd have been proposed as rough proxies for Cl and F respectively (Workman et al., 2006). While initial work focused on mid‐ocean ridge basalts, trace element proxies have also been applied to constrain volatiles prior to degassing from ocean island basalts (Workman et al., 2006) and flood basalts (Hernandez Nava et al., 2021). Direct measurements of trace elements such as Nb, Ba, and Ce are largely unavailable for Mars. However, Th represents a possible substitute for Ce as a proxy for H2O in Martian magmas. Data from Earth demonstrate that while the correlation between H2O and Ce in mid‐ocean ridge basalts is somewhat cleaner, Th also tracks H2O, and the fit improves after correction for slight differences in the bulk partition coefficients of Th and H2O (Figure S1 in Supporting Information S1). Use of Th as a proxy for H2O offers a useful comparison with constraints from meteorites and rovers because Th is not impacted by degassing, GRS data offer a large‐scale perspective on Th (Figure 1; Th is one of the best resolved elements in GRS data), and Th is relatively immobile during low‐temperature aqueous alteration (Taylor, Stopar, et al., 2006) implying its distribution likely reflects initial igneous compositions.
Figure 1
Th concentrations within individual Martian volcanic provinces. Th data (from Baratoux et al., 2011) shown as colored disks overlain on Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter topography data (Smith et al., 2001).
Th concentrations within individual Martian volcanic provinces. Th data (from Baratoux et al., 2011) shown as colored disks overlain on Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter topography data (Smith et al., 2001).
Mineralogy of the Martian Mantle, Partition Coefficients, and Mantle H2O/Th
To assess the suitability of Th as a proxy for the behavior of H2O during melting of the Martian mantle, we combine experimental partitioning data with models for Mars’ mantle mineralogy. A trace element's bulk partition coefficient (D) describes its equilibrium distribution between the solid and melt (Rollinson & Pease, 2021). The bulk partition coefficient depends on a given trace element’s partition coefficients for specific minerals (D
n) and the proportions of those minerals in the rock undergoing melting (X
n):We compile estimates of mineral‐melt partition coefficients for H2O and Th in Table S1 in Supporting Information S1. Models of the mineralogy of the Martian mantle (Table S1 in Supporting Information S1) have been developed based on equilibrium phase assemblages determined experimentally (Bertka & Fei, 1997) or with thermodynamic algorithms such as MELTS (Ghiorso & Sack, 1995; Sanloup et al., 1999) for assumed bulk mantle compositions (e.g., Taylor, 2013; Wänke & Dreibus, 1994). The mineralogy of the Martian mantle may have evolved through time, as melt extraction depletes clinopyroxene and aluminous phases. In addition to bulk composition and mineralogy, elemental partitioning can depend on oxygen fugacity and individual mineral chemistry (e.g., Dalou et al., 2012; Mysen, 2006). Future experimental data constraining Th and H2O partitioning under Mars‐relevant conditions would further strengthen the approach described here.The bulk partition coefficients calculated from mantle mineralogy models range from 0.007 to 0.01 for H2O and 0.001–0.003 for Th; both H2O and Th are thus highly incompatible, but Th is slightly more so. These slight differences in bulk partition coefficients result in a fractionation during melting that diminishes with increasing melt fraction (Figure 2, Figure S1 in Supporting Information S1). For very small (<3%) degrees of melting, large fractionations in H2O/Th can result. However, typical melt fractions for Martian magmas are thought to be significantly higher (e.g., 4%–15% from Baratoux et al., 2011; see Table S2 in Supporting Information S1). For this typical range in melt fractions, differences in H2O and Th bulk partition coefficients result in uncertainties of ∼5%–20% assuming modal batch melting (Figure 2). We can correct for this fractionation using estimates of degree of melting from Baratoux et al. (2011), who consider two methods: estimation of degree of melting from GRS Th concentrations and the batch melting equation, with assumed mantle Th = 0.056 ppm; and estimation of degree of melting from thermodynamic modeling of melt FeO and SiO2 compared with GRS observations. The batch modal melting equation relates liquid concentrations for element i, C
L,i, to mantle concentrations, C
0,i, for a given bulk partition coefficient D and degree of melting F:
Figure 2
The reliability of Th as a proxy for initial water depends on melt fraction and mantle mineralogy. As melt fraction increases, differences in bulk distribution coefficient between Th and H2O become less significant. Melt fraction estimates shown are from Baratoux et al. (2011). Depending on assumed mantle mineralogy, for ∼4% melting, the errors in calculated melt H2O introduced due to differences in distribution coefficient are ∼10–20%. BF97: Bertka and Fei (1997), S99: Wänke and Dreibus (1994) and H + EH chondrite models from Sanloup et al. (1999). Mantle H2O/Th = 1,720 is an average of mantle H2O estimates (i.e., ∼96 ppm H2O) and 0.056 ppm mantle Th.
The reliability of Th as a proxy for initial water depends on melt fraction and mantle mineralogy. As melt fraction increases, differences in bulk distribution coefficient between Th and H2O become less significant. Melt fraction estimates shown are from Baratoux et al. (2011). Depending on assumed mantle mineralogy, for ∼4% melting, the errors in calculated melt H2O introduced due to differences in distribution coefficient are ∼10–20%. BF97: Bertka and Fei (1997), S99: Wänke and Dreibus (1994) and H + EH chondrite models from Sanloup et al. (1999). Mantle H2O/Th = 1,720 is an average of mantle H2O estimates (i.e., ∼96 ppm H2O) and 0.056 ppm mantle Th.Equation 2 can be re‐arranged to calculate F with GRS Th representing Th in the magma, :Baratoux et al. (2011) found strong agreement between F calculated in this manner and estimates of F from FeO and SiO2 for Hesperian volcanic provinces. However, a mismatch for some Amazonian volcanic regions including Olympus Mons, Arsia Mons, and Alba Patera suggests the source mantle for these magmas may have been slightly depleted in Th. For these provinces, Baratoux et al. (2011) estimated melt fraction using GRS FeO and SiO2. We provide estimates of F calculated using Equation 3, and as estimated by Baratoux et al. (2011) in Table S2. For the purposes of subsequent calculations, we adopt values of F from Baratoux et al. (2011). From Equation 2 for melt H2O and Th, the H2O/Th ratio in primary, mantle‐derived melts isMantle H2O/Th ( in Equation 4) represents a major source of uncertainty for inferring absolute abundance (rather than relative variations) in primary H2O from measured Th concentrations. Constraints on mantle H2O/Th are summarized in Figure 3. Médard and Grove (2006) estimated ∼3.5 wt.% H2O in bulk accreted material and envisioned intense hydrous outgassing during accretion. They estimated maximum structurally bound water storage capacity in Mars' mantle of 0.4 wt% H2O, placing an upper limit on post‐accretion mantle water. Constraints on mantle H2O/Th from igneous clasts within NWA 7034, which contains >4 Ga zircons (Costa et al., 2020), could be critical to constraining the potential evolution of mantle H2O/Th around this time. Balta and McSween (2013) proposed that Hesperian and Amazonian magmas had generally higher Th and lower H2O relative to Noachian magmas due to progressive degassing of the mantle. Thermal evolution models have estimated a wide range for the total water lost from the mantle, but generally agree that <5%–15% of the initial water content of the Martian mantle has degassed in the past ∼3.5 Ga (Fraeman & Korenaga, 2010; Hauck & Phillips, 2002; Morschhauser et al., 2011; Sandu & Kiefer, 2012). These results imply that mantle H2O/Th ratios are unlikely to have changed dramatically after an initial phase of accretion‐related degassing, that mantle H2O/Th has been relatively constant since ∼3.5 Ga, and that H2O should be proportional to Th based on similar partitioning during mantle melting.
Figure 3
Constraints on mantle H2O/Th through time and from different lines of evidence. (a) Progressive mantle outgassing and Th depletion due to crust extraction in the first 0.5–1 Gyr (Grott et al., 2011) could cause changes in H2O/Th, though similar partitioning during melting is expected to limit such changes. Modest (<5%–10%) H2O outgassing after ∼3.5 Ga (Hauck & Phillips, 2002) further suggests stabilization of post‐Noachian mantle H2O/Th. (b) Comparison of Martian meteorite H2O and Th data with estimated mantle H2O/Th ratios. Bulk compositions are from Lodders (1998). H2O data were collected after first heating above 300°C. (c) Enlargement of outlined corner of panel b showing melt inclusion data and selected estimates of mantle H2O. H2O data from Yamato 980459 are from olivine‐hosted melt inclusions after correction for crystallization (Usui et al., 2012), and bulk Th data for Yamato 980459 are from Shirai and Ebihara (2004). Other mantle H2O estimates are from Usui et al. (2012), McCubbin et al. (2010, 2012, 2016), Hallis et al. (2012), and Taylor (2013).
Constraints on mantle H2O/Th through time and from different lines of evidence. (a) Progressive mantle outgassing and Th depletion due to crust extraction in the first 0.5–1 Gyr (Grott et al., 2011) could cause changes in H2O/Th, though similar partitioning during melting is expected to limit such changes. Modest (<5%–10%) H2O outgassing after ∼3.5 Ga (Hauck & Phillips, 2002) further suggests stabilization of post‐Noachian mantle H2O/Th. (b) Comparison of Martian meteorite H2O and Th data with estimated mantle H2O/Th ratios. Bulk compositions are from Lodders (1998). H2O data were collected after first heating above 300°C. (c) Enlargement of outlined corner of panel b showing melt inclusion data and selected estimates of mantle H2O. H2O data from Yamato 980459 are from olivine‐hosted melt inclusions after correction for crystallization (Usui et al., 2012), and bulk Th data for Yamato 980459 are from Shirai and Ebihara (2004). Other mantle H2O estimates are from Usui et al. (2012), McCubbin et al. (2010, 2012, 2016), Hallis et al. (2012), and Taylor (2013).Estimates of mantle H2O from Amazonian‐age SNC meteorites span a large range, from 14 to 250 ppm (McCubbin et al., 2010, 2012, 2016; Gross et al., 2013; Taylor, 2013; Usui et al., 2012) or perhaps higher (Dudley et al., 2022). For comparison, the mantle source of mid‐ocean ridge basalts on Earth contains ∼200 ppm H2O (Le Voyer et al., 2019). The assumptions necessary to backtrack from estimates of magmatic water from meteorites to mantle source H2O make it challenging to assess how much of the range in estimates of Martian mantle H2O results from mantle heterogeneity versus methodological uncertainties. For example, estimates of magmatic H2O based on H2O concentrations in apatite (Gross et al., 2013; McCubbin et al., 2012, 2016) or amphibole (McCubbin et al., 2010) depend on knowledge of mineral‐melt partition coefficients for H2O. Estimated magmatic H2O is then corrected to account for crystallization to obtain parental magmatic H2O (e.g., McCubbin et al., 2012 assume 75%–90% crystallization to reach apatite saturation), and finally a range in melt fraction is assumed to infer mantle source H2O. Despite uncertainties, meteorite data have been interpreted as evidence for heterogeneities in mantle chemistry. For example, the compilation of McCubbin et al. (2016) includes a depleted shergottite source mantle with 14–23 ppm H2O, an enriched shergottite source mantle with 36–72 ppm H2O, and a chassignite source mantle with 140–250 ppm H2O. Recent work has postulated the enriched shergottite source contains as much as 300–1,000 ppm H2O (Dudley et al., 2022).For consistency with melt fraction calculations by Baratoux et al. (2011), we assume mantle Th of 0.056 ppm (Dreibus & Wanke, 1985). Taylor (2013) estimated Th = 0.058 for bulk silicate Mars, which would imply lower mantle Th due to incompatible enrichment of the crust. While mantle heterogeneity (discussed above), melting calculations (Baratoux et al., 2011), and repeated melt extraction from the mantle through geologic time (e.g., Ramsey et al., 2021) imply a range in mantle Th, we expect the H2O/Th ratio to be relatively constant through time and across mantle domains due to similar partitioning of H2O and Th during melting.For a range in source mantle H2O from 14 to 250 ppm, Martian mantle Th = 0.056 ppm implies mantle H2O/Th = 250–4,500 during the Hesperian and Amazonian (Figure 3c). We assume this range of H2O/Th for subsequent calculations, while noting that a slightly lower average mantle Th = 0.043 ppm (accounting for estimates of crust mass and mantle mass, see Supporting Information S1), would imply slightly higher H2O/Th = 325–5,800. Undegassed glassy melt inclusions from the depleted shergottite Yamato 980459 contain 146–251 ppm H2O (Usui et al., 2012). Correction for crystallization implies parental magmas with 75–116 ppm H2O, yielding H2O/Th ratios overlapping with the upper range of H2O/Th considered here (Figure 3c). Whole rock H2O/Th ratios of SNC meteorites (Lodders, 1998) also mostly overlap with H2O/Th = 250–4,500 (Figure 3b), but must be interpreted with caution because the relationship between bulk H2O and igneous H2O is highly uncertain. We therefore choose not to expand the range of H2O/Th we consider to encompass outliers such as ALH84001, Chassigny, and Lafayette.
Do GRS Data Track Regional Bedrock Chemistry?
GRS measurements (including the Th concentrations we use as a proxy for H2O) represent the column‐averaged chemistry of the uppermost decimeters of the Martian regolith. Therefore, whether such measurements reflect the chemistry of global‐scale dust redistribution versus local geochemistry represents an important question for efforts to use GRS data to infer igneous compositions (Viviano et al., 2019). Following previous studies, we interpret these data as representative of regional geochemistry based on several lines of evidence. GRS compositions do not fall along a mixing line with estimates of global dust composition (Baratoux et al., 2011). Unlike on Earth where plate tectonics and biologically mediated pedogenesis can accentuate compositional stratification, Mars’ uppermost surface may have undergone extensive homogenization via impact gardening (Taylor, Boynton, et al., 2006). Newsom et al. (2007) focused on GRS data from heavily mantled and less mantled regions based on thermal inertia, albedo, and orbital imagery, and found statistically significant compositional distinctness even among heavily mantled regions such as Arabia, Tharsis, and Acidalia, indicating that these regolith measurements likely reflect variations in underlying bedrock composition. Many of the volcanic regions by Baratoux et al. (2011) considered here, especially those in the southern highlands, show Dust Cover Index values corresponding to only micron‐scale dust cover as mapped by Ruff and Christensen (2002).If regional variations in GRS data reflect processes such as aeolian sorting of fine particles (Viviano et al., 2019) rather than underlying bedrock compositions, then these variations are not meaningful for understanding the evolution of igneous processes. Even in this scenario, mean regolith Th averaged across the full ±50° latitudinal extent of GRS data still constrains the Th concentration in Hesperian and Amazonian crust and by extension the average primary H2O of Hesperian and Amazonian magmas (Taylor, Boynton, et al., 2006).
Constraints on Primary H2O
For mantle H2O/Th = 250–4,500, after correcting for slight differences in H2O and Th partitioning during melting using Equations 3 and 4, the observed range in Th concentrations reported by Baratoux et al. (2011) for Martian volcanic provinces yields estimated primary magmatic H2O of ∼100–3000 ppm (Figure 4). This range falls at the low end of estimates of magmatic H2O (McSween et al., 2001), but is consistent with recent experimental data (Filiberto & Treiman, 2009), with measurements of H2O in meteorite apatite and amphibole suggesting ∼0.2 wt.% H2O (McCubbin et al., 2010), and with estimates from sulfur degassing calculations of 0.2–0.4 wt.% H2O (Gaillard et al., 2013). To some extent agreement with meteorite data is not surprising, because we rely on constraints on mantle H2O/Th derived from meteorites. However, meteorites represent isolated data points; the broader GRS dataset supports relatively low primary H2O for most of the magmas that built Martian volcanic provinces.
Figure 4
Magmatic H2O through time from Th data. Variation in inferred primary H2O in Martian magmas across major volcanic provinces (see Table S2 in Supporting Information S1) for a range in end‐member H2O/Th ratios (dual left axes), after correction for degree of melting as estimated by Baratoux et al. (2011) (Table S2, Equation 4). H2O estimates from Th data from Baratoux et al. (2011) are shown as circles, with additional estimates from Th data from Elysium sub‐provinces (Susko et al., 2017) shown as triangles. Ages and references are given Table S2 in Supporting Information S1. Error bars represent propagated uncertainties from GRS Th data and partition coefficients (see in Supporting Information S1), but do not include uncertainties in H2O/Th ratio.
Magmatic H2O through time from Th data. Variation in inferred primary H2O in Martian magmas across major volcanic provinces (see Table S2 in Supporting Information S1) for a range in end‐member H2O/Th ratios (dual left axes), after correction for degree of melting as estimated by Baratoux et al. (2011) (Table S2, Equation 4). H2O estimates from Th data from Baratoux et al. (2011) are shown as circles, with additional estimates from Th data from Elysium sub‐provinces (Susko et al., 2017) shown as triangles. Ages and references are given Table S2 in Supporting Information S1. Error bars represent propagated uncertainties from GRS Th data and partition coefficients (see in Supporting Information S1), but do not include uncertainties in H2O/Th ratio.GRS data (Figure 4) show substantial variability in Th and implied primary H2O in the Noachian and Hesperian, progressing to less variability and generally higher Th and higher primary H2O in the Amazonian. Several factors could contribute to this progression, including secular evolution of bulk mantle H2O and Th, variations in melting conditions such as changing melt fraction, and heterogeneity in mantle H2O and Th. We assess each of these factors to interpret data shown in Figure 4.A range of models have been proposed for the thermal and chemical evolution of the Martian mantle (Fraeman & Korenaga, 2010; Hauck & Phillips, 2002; Morschhauser et al., 2011; Sandu & Kiefer, 2012). However, many of these models agree that mantle evolution was most dramatic in the pre‐Noachian and Noachian. For example, Ogawa (2021) proposed a four‐stage evolution of the Martian mantle, with a phase of water‐rich plume magmatism subsiding into the final stage of thermally driven mantle convection by ∼3.5 Ga. Modest magma generation and extraction since the Noachian suggests that H2O/Th may have remained relatively stable over the past 3.5 Ga. Assuming that GRS data are representative of the same young phases of volcanism in a region that yield the surface ages computed by crater counting (Robbins et al., 2011; Williams et al., 2009), GRS data then provide insights into the evolution of primary H2O in Martian magmas. Even if H2O/Th has changed since 3.5 Ga due to repeated melting and mantle degassing, relative differences among volcanic regions of approximately the same age would still be expected to reflect differences in primary H2O. For example, Alba Patera magmas would be expected to have ∼25% more primary H2O than Tyrrhena Patera magmas (Figure 4).Hesperian lithospheric thickening (Baratoux et al., 2011), in particular in regions with relatively thin lithosphere in the Noachian, would lead to more uniformly low melt fractions, providing one potential explanation for a progression from variable Th and H2O to higher Th and H2O.Geochemical heterogeneity in the mantle—as documented in meteorites (e.g., Barnes et al., 2020; Moriwaki et al., 2020) and discussed above—could also contribute to variations in magmatic Th and H2O. The Elysium volcanic province, for which three sub‐provinces have been mapped by Susko et al. (2017), provides an opportunity to investigate the temporal evolution in Th and implied H2O from a plausibly similar mantle source. Th and H2O concentrations from Elysium (Figure 4) progressively decline for the younger Central and SE Elysium sub‐provinces. This temporal evolution contrasts with that of the larger dataset of volcanic provinces from Baratoux et al. (2011). Higher degrees of melting driven by a more vigorous plume or local decreases in lithospheric thickness could explain this pattern within the Elysium province. Alternatively, post‐emplacement processes may have modified regional GRS chemistry of the composite volcanic provinces analyzed by Baratoux et al. (2011) more strongly than in the Elysium sub‐provinces, where mapped geology and chemical provinces align (Susko et al., 2017). Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, the Elysium data suggest that within individual regions the evolution of magmatic Th and H2O can encompass far more complexity than is revealed by relatively coarse GRS chemical compositions.The Martian crust is likely enriched in both Th and H2O relative to the mantle, including structurally bound H2O in hydrous mineral phases (Scheller et al., 2021; Wernicke & Jakosky, 2021). Magmatic assimilation or thermal metamorphism of hydrous crustal minerals would increase the flux of H2O to surface environments.
Conclusions and Implications for Outgassing and Eruptive Style
We develop and apply Th as a proxy for primary H2O concentrations in Martian magmas, and infer typical magmatic water concentrations of 100–3,000 ppm H2O (Figure 4), with the large range due to uncertainties in mantle H2O/Th. Similar incompatibility of H2O and Th suggests that it is conceivable H2O/Th ratios are relatively constant across enriched and depleted domains in the Martian mantle. As future data (e.g., from meteorites) further constrain mantle H2O/Th, the Th proxy will provide increasingly accurate estimates of primary H2O.We identify an apparent overall decrease in the range of magmatic H2O from the Noachian to the Amazonian. We recognize possible explanations for this pattern including mantle heterogeneity and conductive thickening of lithospheric thinspots leading to more consistently low degrees of mantle melting. However, we note that Elysium sub‐provinces and higher‐resolution orbital and rover data demonstrate that when more detailed data are available from individual locations, they can reveal a substantially more complex geochemical evolution.Crustal production rates from 3.5 Ga to the present have been estimated at <10−1–100 km3/year (Greeley & Schneid, 1991; Morschhauser et al., 2011) with cumulative crustal production of ∼570 million km3 since the Hesperian (Greeley & Schneid, 1991, assuming an intrusive‐to‐extrusive ratio of 8.5:1). For magmatic water concentrations in the range of 100–3000 ppm H2O, 100% degassing would deliver 1–40 m of global‐equivalent water in the Hesperian and Amazonian (see Supporting Information for details and assumptions). This estimate overlaps with 4–8 m global‐equivalent water outgassing in the Hesperian and Amazonian (for 1,000–10,000 ppm H2O) as estimated by Carr and Head (2015).Water and chlorine have each been invoked to explain the mineralogy and crystallization temperatures of Martian meteorites (Dann et al., 2001; Filiberto & Treiman, 2009; McSween et al., 2001; Nekvasil et al., 2007). An upper limit on typical primary H2O concentrations of ∼3,000 ppm from our work agrees with the argument, motivated by experimental data and chlorine‐rich apatite and amphibole compositions (Filiberto & Treiman, 2009), that chlorine may play an important role in the petrologic evolution of Martian magmas.Magmatic water concentrations influence whether magmas erupt (Black & Manga, 2016) and the style of eruption (Moitra et al., 2021). Black and Manga (2016) suggested limited concentrations of water and CO2 in Martian magmas (<15,000 ppm H2O + CO2) could render them less likely to erupt. In conjunction with low CO2 concentrations in Martian magmas (Stanley et al., 2011), limited (<3,000 ppm, or 0.3 wt.%) water could thus help to explain relatively high inferred intrusive‐to‐extrusive ratios on Mars (Black & Manga, 2016). Moitra et al. (2021) describe young (0.05–1 Ma) pyroclastic volcanism in the Cerberus Fossae region, and attribute explosivity to either magmatic or external water. If water concentrations in Martian basalts are typically low, this would favor phreatomagmatic interactions with external water (such as in subsurface icy materials) as a driver of explosive activity.Supporting Information S1Click here for additional data file.
Authors: M Humayun; A Nemchin; B Zanda; R H Hewins; M Grange; A Kennedy; J-P Lorand; C Göpel; C Fieni; S Pont; D Deldicque Journal: Nature Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: P Lognonné; W B Banerdt; D Giardini; W T Pike; U Christensen; P Laudet; S de Raucourt; P Zweifel; S Calcutt; M Bierwirth; K J Hurst; F Ijpelaan; J W Umland; R Llorca-Cejudo; S A Larson; R F Garcia; S Kedar; B Knapmeyer-Endrun; D Mimoun; A Mocquet; M P Panning; R C Weber; A Sylvestre-Baron; G Pont; N Verdier; L Kerjean; L J Facto; V Gharakanian; J E Feldman; T L Hoffman; D B Klein; K Klein; N P Onufer; J Paredes-Garcia; M P Petkov; J R Willis; S E Smrekar; M Drilleau; T Gabsi; T Nebut; O Robert; S Tillier; C Moreau; M Parise; G Aveni; S Ben Charef; Y Bennour; T Camus; P A Dandonneau; C Desfoux; B Lecomte; O Pot; P Revuz; D Mance; J tenPierick; N E Bowles; C Charalambous; A K Delahunty; J Hurley; R Irshad; Huafeng Liu; A G Mukherjee; I M Standley; A E Stott; J Temple; T Warren; M Eberhardt; A Kramer; W Kühne; E-P Miettinen; M Monecke; C Aicardi; M André; J Baroukh; A Borrien; A Bouisset; P Boutte; K Brethomé; C Brysbaert; T Carlier; M Deleuze; J M Desmarres; D Dilhan; C Doucet; D Faye; N Faye-Refalo; R Gonzalez; C Imbert; C Larigauderie; E Locatelli; L Luno; J-R Meyer; F Mialhe; J M Mouret; M Nonon; Y Pahn; A Paillet; P Pasquier; G Perez; R Perez; L Perrin; B Pouilloux; A Rosak; I Savin de Larclause; J Sicre; M Sodki; N Toulemont; B Vella; C Yana; F Alibay; O M Avalos; M A Balzer; P Bhandari; E Blanco; B D Bone; J C Bousman; P Bruneau; F J Calef; R J Calvet; S A D'Agostino; G de Los Santos; R G Deen; R W Denise; J Ervin; N W Ferraro; H E Gengl; F Grinblat; D Hernandez; M Hetzel; M E Johnson; L Khachikyan; J Y Lin; S M Madzunkov; S L Marshall; I G Mikellides; E A Miller; W Raff; J E Singer; C M Sunday; J F Villalvazo; M C Wallace; D Banfield; J A Rodriguez-Manfredi; C T Russell; A Trebi-Ollennu; J N Maki; E Beucler; M Böse; C Bonjour; J L Berenguer; S Ceylan; J Clinton; V Conejero; I Daubar; V Dehant; P Delage; F Euchner; I Estève; L Fayon; L Ferraioli; C L Johnson; J Gagnepain-Beyneix; M Golombek; A Khan; T Kawamura; B Kenda; P Labrot; N Murdoch; C Pardo; C Perrin; L Pou; A Sauron; D Savoie; S Stähler; E Stutzmann; N A Teanby; J Tromp; M van Driel; M Wieczorek; R Widmer-Schnidrig; J Wookey Journal: Space Sci Rev Date: 2019-01-28 Impact factor: 8.017
Authors: Jessica J Barnes; Francis M McCubbin; Alison R Santos; James M D Day; Jeremy W Boyce; Susanne P Schwenzer; Ulrich Ott; Ian A Franchi; Scott Messenger; Mahesh Anand; Carl B Agee Journal: Nat Geosci Date: 2020-03-30 Impact factor: 16.908
Authors: Benjamin A Black; Michael Manga; Lujendra Ojha; Marc-Antoine Longpré; Suniti Karunatillake; Lisa Hlinka Journal: Geophys Res Lett Date: 2022-06-08 Impact factor: 5.576