| Literature DB >> 35859702 |
Gerrit Müller1, Janine Börker2, Appy Sluijs1, Jack J Middelburg1.
Abstract
We investigate if the commonly neglected riverine detrital carbonate fluxes might reconciliate several chemical mass balances of the global ocean. Particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) concentrations in riverine suspended sediments, that is, carbon contained by these detrital carbonate minerals, were quantified at the basin and global scale. Our approach is based on globally representative data sets of riverine suspended sediment composition, catchment properties, and a two-step regression procedure. The present-day global riverine PIC flux is estimated at 3.1 ± 0.3 Tmol C/y (13% of total inorganic carbon export and 4% of total carbon export) with a flux-weighted mean concentration of 0.26 ± 0.03 wt%. The flux prior to damming was 4.1 ± 0.5 Tmol C/y. PIC fluxes are concentrated in limestone-rich, rather dry and mountainous catchments of large rivers near Arabia, South East Asia, and Europe with 2.2 Tmol C/y (67.6%) discharged between 15°N and 45°N. Greenlandic and Antarctic meltwater discharge and ice-rafting additionally contribute 0.8 ± 0.3 Tmol C/y. This amount of detrital carbonate minerals annually discharged into the ocean implies a significant contribution of calcium (∼4.75 Tmol Ca/y) and alkalinity fluxes (∼10 Tmol (eq)/y) to marine mass balances and moderate inputs of strontium (∼5 Gmol Sr/y) based on undisturbed riverine and cryospheric inputs and a dolomite/calcite ratio of 0.1. Magnesium fluxes (∼0.25 Tmol Mg/y), mostly hosted by less-soluble dolomite, are rather negligible. These unaccounted fluxes help in elucidating respective marine mass balances and potentially alter conclusions based on these budgets.Entities:
Keywords: alkalinity; biogeochemical cycling; calcium; detrital carbonate; particulate inorganic carbon; river sediment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35859702 PMCID: PMC9285522 DOI: 10.1029/2021GB007231
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Global Biogeochem Cycles ISSN: 0886-6236 Impact factor: 6.500
Predictor Variable Selection to Model PIC Concentrations
| Topography and vegetation | Underground and humans | Climate and hydrology |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | Potential source carbonate (rock, sediment, and soil) | Precipitation |
| Upstream catchment area | Soil organic carbon content | Temperature |
| Forestation | Human factor (log (hdi + gdp + nli + pop)) | Extent of water bodies (rivers, lakes, and reservoirs) |
| Bare areas (rock, desert, tundra, and open shrub land) |
Note. Variables are taken from HydroBasins (Linke et al., 2019), except for the potential source carbonate, which was calculated from global soil, sediment, and lithological maps (Batjes, 2012; Börker et al., 2018; Hartmann & Moosdorf, 2012). All variables represent the upstream average of a specific HydroBasins subbasin at Pfafstetter level 7. hdi, human development index; gdp, gross domestic product; nli, night light index; pop, population count.
Figure 1Results (upper) and performance (lower) of the Monte Carlo (MC)‐refined regression procedure. Histograms (upper left panel) show the distribution of natural and anthropogenically disturbed global Particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) fluxes in Tmol C/y (times 0.012011 yields Pg/y). The upper‐right panel assesses the performance of the quantitative prediction via SR (1:1 line = perfect prediction). The lower panels evidence the performance of an exemplary qualitative model (left: negative classifications (= No PIC present, correct predictions are <0.1 wt%); right: positive classifications (= PIC present, correct predictions are >0.1 wt%). N is the number of accepted MC simulations and RMSE is the root mean squared error.
Comparison of the Herein Presented Results and Literature‐Based Estimates of Global Average PIC Concentration (cPIC, Flux‐Weighted Mean, Median, and Mixture of Median and Mean, Respectively), Suspended Sediment Discharge (fTSS, Global Sum), and PIC Flux (fPIC, Global Sum)
| Variable (unit) | cPIC (wt%) | cPIC (wt%) | cPIC (wt%) | fTSS river (Gt/y) | fPIC river, prehuman (Tmol C/y) | fPIC river, present day (Tmol C/y) | fPIC river, actual (Tmol C/y) | fPIC atmosphere (Tmol C/y) | fPIC cryosphere (Tmol C/y) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value |
| 0.42 | 0.7 | 16 |
|
| 10.4 |
|
|
| Range |
| 0.1–0.7 | 0.4–1 | 12–20 |
|
| 4.0–16.7 |
|
|
| Reference | This study (fwm,model) | This study (med, obs.) | Literature (1–4) | Literature (5–8) | This study (model) | This study (model) | Literature (1–10) | Literature (11,12) | Literature (13–15) |
Note. References: 1: Meybeck (1982), 2: Viers et al. (2009), 3: Savenko (2007), 4: Bayon et al. (2015), 5: Beusen et al. (2005), 6: Milliman and Farnsworth (2011), 7: Syvitski and Kettner (2011), 8: Cohen et al. (2014), 9: Middelburg et al. (2020) based on Canfield, (1997) and Beusen et al. (2005), 10: Meybeck (1993), 11: Journet et al. (2014), 12: Jickells et al. (2005), 13: Overeem et al. (2017), 14: Raiswell et al. (2008), 15: Wadham et al. (2013). med, median; fwm, flux‐weighted mean; obs, observations; wo, without. "Literature" indicates values and ranges that were calculated from published values ("first‐order" estimates, Supporting Information S1, gray columns). "This study" refers to values we derived in this contribution (2 Methods and Procedures, Supporting Information S1). Bold numbers indicate the values suggested for further use. Conversion from Tmol C/y to Pg/y by a factor 0.012011.
Figure 2Map of the model results. Point data along the coast are the result of this study (mean of 794 accepted Monte Carlo simulations). Size scales with the magnitude of the Particulate inorganic carbon ((PIC) flux (Tmol C/y) based on prehuman sediment discharge and color is related to PIC concentration (wt %). For comparison, blue colors indicate natural annual mean water discharge (m3/s) (Linke et al., 2019). Conversion of fluxes to Pg/y by a factor 0.012011.
Figure 3Relative importance of the different variables to our model results as assessed by the coefficient of determination (R2) between the variable in question and the median result of 794 high‐quality Monte Carlo simulations. The correlation coefficient gives the direction of influence (orange: negative, blue: positive). Individual values are indicated above the bars. OC: Organic Carbon. Variables as in Table 1.
Figure 4Relationship of river Particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) and source PIC. Source PIC (12% of SC) includes sediment and soil contributions but is dominated by rocks. In‐stream dissolution and contributions of weathered material decrease river PIC, while rock erosion has a pronounced positive effect by contributing source rock. Transport efficiency and in‐stream precipitation can further enhance PIC concentrations at the river mouth. The unit of Source PIC (%) is wt% PIC in the given percentage of carbonate within the upstream outcrop area.
Summary of the Riverine Carbon Export (in Tmol C/y)
| DIC | PIC | DOC | POC | TC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern global river export (Tmol C/y) | 31.5 | 3.1 | 19.1 | 17.4 | 71.1 |
| Percentage of TC | 44.3 | 4.4 | 26.9 | 24.5 | 100 |
| Range (Tmol C/y) | 26.6–36.3 | 2.8–3.4 | 14.2–30.0 | 14.2–20.0 | 57.8–89.7 |
| Human disturbance (%) | +13.5* | −24S | −13D | −13D | −2 |
| Range (%) | +9.8 – +17.1 | −5.6 – −39.0 | −12.8– −13.2 | −12.8 – −13.2 | −4 to + 0.7 |
| Source | Literature | This study | Literature | Literature | This study and Literature. |
Note. DIC: (Amiotte Suchet et al. (2003); Gaillardet et al. (1999); Hartmann et al. (2014); Li et al. (2017); Ludwig et al. (1996, 1998); Meybeck (1982), DOC: (Aitkenhead and McDowell (2000); Dai et al. (2012); Harrison et al. (2005); Li et al. (2019); Ludwig et al. (1996, 1998), POC: Beusen et al. (2005); Galy et al. (2015); Li et al. (2017); Ludwig et al. (1996, 1998); Meybeck (1982), Superscripts: S: By changes in sediment flux only, D: By damming only (Maavara et al., 2017; This study); *: By climate change and land‐use change for carbonate weathering only (Zeng et al., 2019). Human disturbance of TC is the bulk effect as indicated for DIC, PIC, DOC, and POC. “Literature” indicates averages and ranges taken from the abovementioned studies (gray columns). TC represents the sum of our PIC estimate and DIC, DOC, and POC estimates from literature. Conversion to Pg/y by a factor 0.012011.
Figure 5Illustration of the modern ocean calcium budget and how it may be complemented by the inclusion of the riverine PCa flux. The fate of PCa (particulate Ca) in the ocean is, however, uncertain (details in the main text). Fluxes are given in Tmol Ca/y. CaCO3 burial fluxes are from Middelburg et al. (2020), Milliman (1993), and O’Mara and Dunne (2019). River‐sorbed Ca is from Müller et al. (2021a), Müller et al. (2021b), DCa (dissolved Calcium) and groundwater inputs are from Mayfield et al. (2021), and the hydrothermal flux and marine carbonate diagenesis (3–4 Tmol Ca/yr) are from DePaolo (2004). The silicate diagenesis flux of Ca is assumed to fill the residual imbalance of ∼2 Tmol Ca/yr.
Figure 6Analysis of distribution of relative residuals (fractional deviation from observations) among the most important predictors in the model.